ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the results of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measurements using automatic auditory response telemetry (AutoART) with those obtained by ART in adults. The study also aimed to evaluate the predictive value of intraoperative ART and AutoART ECAPs for speech intelligibility (SI) and hearing success (HS), and to determine if cochlear nerve (CN) cross-sectional area (CSA) obtained preoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans could predict ART and AutoART ECAPs and SI and HS outcome. METHODS: The study analyzed and correlated ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds at electrodes E2, E6, and E10, as well as averaged ECAP thresholds over electrodes E1-E12, using data from 32 implants. Correlations were also examined for ART and AutoART ECAP slopes. In addition, averaged ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds and slopes over all 12 electrodes for each participant were correlated with CN CSA measured from MRI sequences. SI of the monosyllabic Freiburg Speech Test at 65 dB sound pressure level was examined along with averaged ART and AutoART thresholds and slopes over all 12 electrodes. A parallel analysis was performed for HS, derived from the difference between baseline and 6-month SI. Finally, correlations between CN CSA and SI, as well as CN CSA and HS were examined. RESULTS: The results of the study showed a significant positive correlation between ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds and as well as slopes for E2, E6, E10 and averaged thresholds and slopes of E1-E12. However, no significant correlation was observed between ART and AutoART averaged ECAP thresholds and slopes and either SI and HS or CN CSA. Furthermore, no significant correlation was found between CN CSA and SI and HS. CONCLUSION: While AutoART is a reliable and safe program for measuring ECAPs in adults, the study found no preoperative prognostic information on intraoperative ECAP results using parameters extracted from current MRI sequences or pre-/intraoperative information on subsequent hearing outcome using ECAP and CN CSA.

Significance of endolymphatic sac surgery with and/or without simultaneous cochlea implant surgery in respect of vertigo control and speech perception in patients with Menière's disease.

PURPOSE: The focus on treating patients with Menière's Disease (MD) lies on the reduction of vertigo attacks and the preservation of sensory function. Endolympathic hydrops is considered as an epiphenomenon in MD, which can potentially be altered by endolymphatic sac surgery (ESS). Purpose of the study was to investigate the influences on vertigo control through manipulation of the perilymphatic system with or without ESS. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of 86 consecutive patients with MD according to current diagnostic criteria after endolymphatic sac surgery alone (ESSalone; n = 45), cochlear implantation (CI) alone (CIalone; n = 12), and ESS with CI (ESS + CI; n = 29), treated at a tertiary referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: vertigo control, speech perception pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Gender, side, and preoperative treatment were similar in all groups. Age was younger in the ESSalone-group with 56.2 ± 13.0 years (CIalone = 64.2 ± 11.4 years; ESS + CI = 63.1 ± 9.7 years). Definitive MD was present in all the CIalone, in 79.3% of the ESS + CI and in 59.6% of the ESSalone-patients. Likewise, vertigo control rate was 100% in the CIalone, 89.7% in the ESS + CI and 66.0% in the ESSalone-group. CONCLUSIONS: Vertigo control was improved in all three groups, however, superior in groups treated with CI, potentially contributed by the manipulation of both the endo- and perilymphatic systems. A more systematic characterization of the patients with larger case numbers and documentation of follow up data would be needed to evaluate a clinical effect more properly.

Comparison of speech perception in bimodal cochlear implant patients with respect to the cochlear coverage.

BACKGROUND: The hearing success of patients with bimodal fitting, utilizing both a cochlear implant (CI) and a hearing aid (HA), varies considerably: While some patients benefit from bimodal CI and HA, others do not. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study aimed to investigate speech perception in bimodally fitted patients and compare it with the cochlear coverage (CC). METHODS: The CC was calculated with the OTOPLAN software, measuring the cochlear duct length on temporal bone CT scans of 39 patients retrospectively. The patients were categorized into two groups: CC ≤ 65% (CC500) and CC > 65% (CC600). Monaural speech intelligibility for monosyllables at a sound pressure level (SPL) of 65 dB in a free-field setting was assessed before and after CI at various time points. The two groups, one with preoperative HA and one with postoperative CI, were compared. Additionally, speech intelligibility was correlated with CC in the entire cohort before CI and at the last available follow-up (last observation time, LOT). RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant difference in speech intelligibility between CC500 and CC600 patients, with both groups demonstrating a consistent improvement after implantation. While CC600 patients tended to exhibit earlier improvement in speech intelligibility, CC500 patients showed a slower initial improvement within the first 3 months but demonstrated a steeper learning curve thereafter. At LOT, the two patient groups converged, with no significant differences in expected speech intelligibility. There was no significant relationship between unimodal/unilateral free-field speech intelligibility and CC. Interestingly, patients with a CC of 70-75% achieved the highest speech intelligibility. CONCLUSION: Despite of the lack of a significant correlation between CC and speech perception, patients appeared to reach their maximum in unimodal/unilateral speech perception primarily at a coverage level of 70-75%. Nevertheless, further investigation is warranted, as CC500 was associated with shorter cochlear duct length, and different types of electrodes were used in both groups.

Vestibular and audiometric results after endolymphatic mastoid shunt surgery in patients with Menière's disease.

PURPOSE: Treatment of Menière's Disease (MD) comprises an array of both non-destructive and destructive treatment options. In patients who are therapy-refractory to non-destructive medical treatment, endolymphatic mastoid shunt surgery (EMSS) is both recommended and debated controversially. The aim of this study was to investigate safety in terms of hearing, vestibular function, complication rate, and efficacy with regards to vertigo control of EMSS in patients with MD according to the current diagnostic criteria of 2015. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 47 consecutive patients with definite or probable MD with description of demographic parameters, pre- and postoperative MD treatment, pre- and postoperative audiometric (pure tone audiometry) and vestibular (caloric testing) results. The parameters were compared between patients with and without postoperative vertigo control. RESULTS: 31/47 patients (66.0%) had improved vertigo control postoperatively. Postoperative hearing and vestibular preservation were predominantly stable. No significant differences between patients with improved vertigo control and patients with no change or worse vertigo episodes were found. In the treatment refractory group, 4 patients required a revision EMSS and 6 a destructive MD treatment (5 gentamicin intratympanically, 1 labyrinthectomy). No peri- or postsurgical complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: EMSS was found to be beneficial in two thirds of the patients with definite or probable Morbus Menière and a safe procedure regarding hearing and vestibular preservation with no postoperative complications. Therefore, EMSS should be considered before inducing destructive treatment options, such as intratympanic gentamicin application or labyrinthectomy.

Randomized, placebo-controlled study on efficacy, safety and tolerability of drug-induced defibrinogenation for sudden sensorineural hearing loss: the lessons learned.

PURPOSE: Disturbance of cochlear microcirculation is discussed as final common pathway of various inner ear diseases. Hyperfibrinogenemia causing increased plasma viscosity is a possible factor for a critical reduction of cochlear blood flow that might lead to sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL). The aim was to determine the efficacy and safety of drug-induced defibrinogenation by ancrod for SSHL. METHODS: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel group, phase II (proof-of-concept) study (planned enrollment: 99 patients). Patients received an infusion of ancrod or placebo (day 1) followed by subcutaneous administrations (day 2, 4, 6). Primary outcome was the change in pure tone audiogram air conduction average until day 8. RESULTS: The study was terminated early due to slow recruiting (31 enrolled patients: 22 ancrod, 9 placebo). A significant improvement of hearing loss was registered in both groups (ancrod: - 14.3 dB ± 20.4 dB, - 39.9% ± 50.4%; placebo: - 22.3 dB ± 13.7 dB, - 59.1% ± 38.0%). A statistically significant group-difference was not detected (p = 0.374). Placebo response of 33.3% complete and 85.7% at least partial recovery was observed. Plasma fibrinogen levels were reduced significantly by ancrod (baseline: 325.2 mg/dL, day 2: 107.2 mg/dL). Ancrod was tolerated well, no adverse drug reaction was of severe intensity, no serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Ancrod reduced fibrinogen levels that support its mechanism of action. The safety profile can be rated positively. Since the planned number of patients could not be enrolled, no efficacy conclusion can be drawn. The high rate of placebo response challenges clinical trials for SSHL and needs to be considered in future investigations. Trial registrations This study was registered in the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT-No. 2012-000066-37 at 2012-07-02.

Parameters for estimating the feasibility of implantation of a semi-implantable bone conduction device (SIBCD) in children and adolescents.

PURPOSE: In children and adolescents, preoperative planning for a semi-implantable bone conduction device (SIBCD) is crucial. The geometric changes of the new version of a common SIBCD should enable a higher rate of successful implantation due to its flatter actuator. Thus, this radioanatomic study compared the rate of successful implantation of both device versions at the traditional mastoidal localization and two alternative sites, retrosigmoidal, and parietal, and investigated parameters helping to estimate the feasibility. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 136 CT scans of 0 to 20-year-old patients, evaluation of demographic parameters, radioanatomy, and assessment of head diameter was conducted. The feasibility was investigated for certain age groups at three implantation sites. Prediction of feasible implantation by means of different parameters was calculated. RESULTS: A significant higher implantation rate was observed with the new device for all three sites and age groups. The age group of 6-8 years (n = 19) had most striking differences with a 58.1% rate of successful implantation with the new device without spacer (80% with spacer) at the mastoidal localization, whereas none with the old implant. Head diameter was identified as the most predictive parameter regarding all implantation sites (mastoidal: p = 0.030; retrosigmoidal: p = 0.006; parietal: p < 0.0001), age for the mastoidal (p < 0.0001) and retrosigmoidal (p < 0.0001), and gender for the parietal site (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The geometric changes of the actuator lead to a higher rate of successful implantation in all age-groups and all three localizations with reducing the requirement for spacers. Parameters age and head diameter might aid in estimating the rate of successful implantation in young patients and may be a novel tool to assist in the decision-making process for a SIBCD.

[Speech perception as a function of cochlear coverage-comparison in bimodally hearing cochlear implant patients. German version]. / Sprachverstehen in Abhängigkeit von der cochleären Abdeckung ­ Vergleich bei bimodal versorgten Cochleaimplantatpatienten.

BACKGROUND: Hearing success in bimodally hearing patients with a cochlear implant (CI) and a hearing aid (HA) exhibits different results: while some benefit from bimodal CI and HA, others do not. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate hearing success in terms of speech perception in bimodally fitted patients in relation to the cochlear coverage (CC) of the CI electrodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the OTOPLAN software (CAScination AG, Bern, Switzerland), CC was retrospectively measured from CT scans of the temporal bone of 39 patients, who were then categorized into two groups: CC ≤ 65% (CC500) and CC > 65% (CC600). Monaural speech intelligibility for monosyllables at a sound pressure level (SPL) of 65 dB in open field was assessed at various timepoints, preoperatively with HA and postoperatively with CI, and compared between the groups. In addition, speech intelligibility was correlated with CC in the entire cohort before surgery and during follow-up (FU). RESULTS: Overall, no significant differences in speech intelligibility were found between CC500 and CC600 patients at any of the FU timepoints. However, both CC500 and CC600 patients showed a steady improvement in speech intelligibility after implantation. While CC600 patients tended to show an earlier improvement in speech intelligibility, CC500 patients tended to show a slower improvement during the first 3 months and a steeper learning curve thereafter. The two patient groups converged during FU, with no significant differences in speech intelligibility. There was no significant relationship between unimodal/unilateral free-field speech intelligibility and CC. However, patients with a CC of 70-75% achieved maximum speech intelligibility. CONCLUSION: Despite a nonsignificant correlation between CC and speech discrimination, patients seem to reach their maximum in unimodal/unilateral speech understanding mainly at 70-75% coverage. However, there is room for further investigation, as CC500 was associated with a shorter cochlear duct length (CDL), and long and very long electrodes were used in both groups.

Variation of the cochlear anatomy and cochlea duct length: analysis with a new tablet-based software.

PURPOSE: In cochlear implantation, thorough preoperative planning together with measurement of the cochlear duct length (CDL) assists in choosing the correct electrode length. For measuring the CDL, different techniques have been introduced in the past century along with the then available technology. A tablet-based software offers an easy and intuitive way to visualize and analyze the anatomy of the temporal bone, its proportions and measure the CDL. Therefore, we investigated the calculation technique of the CDL via a tablet-based software on our own cohort retrospectively. METHODS: One hundred and eight preoperative computed tomography scans of the temporal bone (slice thickness < 0.7 mm) of already implanted FLEX28™ and FLEXSOFT™ patients were found eligible for analysis with the OTOPLAN software. Measurements were performed by two trained investigators independently. CDL, angular insertion depth (AID), and cochlear coverage were calculated and compared between groups of electrode types, sex, sides, and age. RESULTS: Mean CDL was 36.2 ± 1.8 mm with significant differences between sex (female: 35.8 ± 0.3 mm; male: 36.5 ± 0.2 mm; p = 0.037), but none concerning side or age. Differences in mean AID (FLEX28: 525.4 ± 46.4°; FLEXSOFT: 615.4 ± 47.6°), and cochlear coverage (FLEX28: 63.9 ± 5.6%; FLEXSOFT: 75.8 ± 4.3%) were significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A broad range of CDL was observed with significant larger values in male, but no significant differences concerning side or age. Almost every cochlea was measured longer than 31.0 mm. Preoperative assessment aids in prevention of complications (incomplete insertion, kinking, tipfoldover), attempt of atraumatic insertion, and addressing individual necessities (hearing preservation, cochlear malformation). The preferred AID of 720° (two turns of the cochlea) was never reached, opening the discussion for the requirement of longer CI-electrodes versus a debatable audiological benefit for the patient in his/her everyday life.

Functional results with active middle ear implant or semi-implantable bone conduction device in patients with comparable hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with conductive (CHL) or mixed hearing loss (MHL), hearing rehabilitation with an implantable hearing system, active middle ear implant (AMEI) or a semi-implantable bone-conduction device (SIBCD), is an option when conventional hearing aids are insufficient, or patients are unable to wear them. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 20 consecutive patients (24 implants) with a comparison of demographic characteristics and audiometric results (air-bone gap = ABG, effective hearing gain = EHG, functional hearing gain = FHG, Freiburg Monosyllabic Test in quiet, Oldenburg Sentence Test in noise = OLSA). STUDY SAMPLE: Patients, eligible for both devices, who received either AMEI or SIBCD due to CHL or MHL. RESULTS: Analysis showed no significant differences in post-operative functional hearing results between the group of AMEI vs. SIBCD (ABG-reduction: 31.6 ± 12.4 dB HL vs. 28.0 ± 11.8 dB HL; p = 0.702; EHG: -1.6 ± 7.7 dB HL vs. -1.2 ± 4.2 dB HL; p = 0.090; FHG: 33.4 ± 12.6 dB HL vs. 26.1 ± 11.7 dB HL; p = 0.192; Freiburg: 83.0 ± 15.6% vs. 83.6 ± 14.2%; Freiburg-improvement: 57.7 ± 26.8% vs. 68.2 ± 19.7%; p = 0.294; OLSA: -2.7 ± 3.0 SNR vs. -1.4 ± 3.6 SNR; OLSA-improvement: 2.6 ± 2.1 dB vs. 3.7 ± 2.8 dB; p = 0.323). Four patients had the AMEI explanted due to insufficient functioning and later received a SIBCD. CONCLUSIONS: Due to more challenging anatomical conditions, a surgical technique for the AMEI is more complex. However, functional results are comparable to the SIBCD. Therefore, proper patient counselling and cautious choice of the device are mandated before surgery.

Factors influencing outcomes in selective neck dissection in 661 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Selective neck dissection (SND) is the surgical treatment of choice in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) with suspected or manifest metastases in the cervical lymph nodes. For SND to be successful, treated lymph node levels should be selected according to anatomic considerations and the extent of the disease. Aim of this study was to identify neck dissection levels that had an impact on individual prognosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of SND as part of primary treatment of HNSCC. Overall survival (OS) and regional control rates (RCR) were calculated for all patients treated at one academic tertiary referral center. RESULTS: 661 patients with HNSCC were included, 644 underwent ipsilateral and 319 contralateral SND. Average follow-up was 78.9 ± 106.4 months. 67 (10.1%) patients eventually developed nodal recurrence. Tumor sites were oral cavity (135), oropharynx (179), hypopharynx (118) and larynx (229). Tumor categories pT1-pT4a, and all clinical and pathological nodal categories were included. Multivariate analysis indicated improved OS rates for patients undergoing SND in ipsilateral levels I and V as well as level III contralaterally. Analysis for tumor origin showed that SND in ipsilateral level I showed significantly improved OS in HNSCC of the oral cavity. CONCLUSION: The dissection of ipsilateral level I in oral cavity cancer was of particular relevance in our exploratory, retrospective analysis. To clarify the relevance for the determination of the extent of SND, this should be investigated prospectively in a more homogenous patient cohort.

Cancer stem cell markers in adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands - reliable prognostic markers?

PURPOSE: Adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands is of low incidence and a broad range of histopathological subtypes. Cancer stem cell markers (CSC) might serve as novel prognostic parameters. To date, only a few studies examined the expression of CSC in adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands with diverging results. To further investigate the reliability in terms of prognostic value, a histopathological analysis of CSCs on a cohort of patients with adenocarcinomas of the major salivary glands was performed. METHODS: Tumor samples of 40 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the major salivary gland treated with curative intend at one tertiary center were stained with the CSCs ALDH1, BMI-1, CD44, Nanog, and SOX2. Expression of these markers was correlated with clinicopathological parameters and survival estimates. RESULTS: Correlation of high expression of ALDH1 with higher grading (p < 0.001) and high expression of CD44 with the localization of the neoplasm (p = 0.05), larger tumor size (p = 0.006), positive pN-category (p = 0.023), and advanced UICC stage (p = 0.002) was found. Furthermore, high expression of SOX2 correlated with a negative perineural invasion (p = 0.02). No significant correlation of any investigated marker with survival estimates was observed. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study did not find a significant correlation of the investigated CSCs with survival estimates in adenocarcinoma of the major salivary glands. Recapitulating the results of our study in conjunction with data in the literature, the CSCs ALDH1, BMI-1, CD44, Nanog, and SOX2 do not seem to serve as reliable prognostic parameters in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands.

Prognostic impact of additional HPV diagnostics in 102 patients with p16-stratified advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: p16 overexpression was considered as surrogate marker to identify human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCCs). METHODS: 102 patients with advanced stage OPSCCs treated primarily by transoral lasermicrosurgery were included. Prognostic associations of p16- and HPV-status were analyzed separately and combined. RESULTS: In contrast to p16, the HPV-status resulted in no significant survival discrepancies (5-year overall survival (OS) HPV-positive 64.9%, HPV-negative 78.7%). Combining both markers, p16-positive (p16-positive/HPV-positive, p16-positive/HPV-negative) and p16-negative/HPV-negative groups demonstrated comparable high survival (OS 78.1% vs. 85.6% vs. 73.6%). Lowest survival was observed for patients with p16-negative/HPV-positive OPSCCs (OS 40.8%). Never smoking patients with p16-positive OPSCCs demonstrated the highest survival, whereas within former/current smokers with p16-positive and p16-negative disease it was comparable low (OS 90.0% vs. 63.0% vs. 57.4%). CONCLUSIONS: p16- and HPV-status should not be considered as equivalent markers for a better prognosis. Furthermore, they should not generally predominate patient associated factors like smoking.

[Assessment of German-Language Information on Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss in the Internet]. / Beurteilung von im Internet verfügbaren deutschsprachigen Patienteninformationen zum Hörsturz.

OBJECTIVES: As a result of digitalization, the internet embodies the essential information medium. Especially, patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) require profound education due to unclear scientific evidence. Thus, our study investigated a German-language internet search about SSNHL. DESIGN: The first 30 Google-search results with the term "Hörsturz" (SSNHL in German) were categorized, readability-statistic with different readability-scores (FRES: 0=complex, 100=easy; FKL; SMOG; GFI) calculated, and misinformation documented. A structured content-analysis was performed with the DISCERN-questionnaire (1=low, 5=high quality). Certification of the Health-On-The-Net-Foundation (HON) assessed the abidance of recommended standards. RESULTS: 18 websites (60.0%) accounted for digital media, 7 (23.3%) manufacturers of medical devices, 2 (6.7%) government institutions, and respectively 1 (3.3%) healthcare provider, support-group, and scientific article. Mean word count was 1307.0±840.2, last update 17.1±32.5 months ago, and FRES 36.1±13.9, with the most difficult text by the scientific article (13.7). Mean of DISCERN was 2.2±0.7 with worst rating of manufacturers of medical devices (1.6±0.5). 2 websites (6.7%) were HON-certified, and 14 (46.7%) contained misinformation. CONCLUSION: Internet-based patient-information should be assessed cautiously due to poor readability, potential conflict of interests, low quality, or wrong information. Hence, healthcare providers and professional associations are urged to provide high-quality patient-information in the internet.

Amyloidosis of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract: Management of a Rare Disease and Review of the Literature.

Amyloidosis in the upper aerodigestive tract is a very rare disease with mainly case reports documented so far. In the pathogenesis, amyloid protein fibers are deposited in organs and tissue. In the upper aerodigestive tract, mostly localized amyloidosis occurs with unspecific symptoms, e.g., dysphagia. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study with two study centers in Germany (tertiary referral hospitals), the University Hospital of Bonn and the University Hospital of Goettingen. For a period of the last 7 years, data were analyzed and patients were recruited consecutively. 14 cases were included to the study. The most common manifestation was in the larynx (n = 11); in one case each localized amyloidosis was found in the tongue, trachea and in the pharynx. Since the majority of our cases (n = 13; 92.6%) presented with unspecific symptoms, biopsy results confirmed the diagnosis of localized amyloidosis. Resection of the lesion was only performed in patients reporting of symptoms, in asymptomatic patients only a non-invasive biopsy was done. In two patients (14.2%), in addition to the focal lesion a systemic amyloidosis was found. Amyloidosis in the upper aerodigestive tract is a rare disease. Nonetheless, every otorhinolaryngologist should be aware of this disease. When detected it is a straight forward to treat illness. The appearance of a systemic amyloidosis needs to be ruled out; thus, there is a chance to develop a multiple myeloma. Given the slow progressive character of amyloidosis, a long-term follow-up up to 10 years is inevitable.

Quality of life in patients after reconstruction with the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) versus the radial free forearm flap (RFFF).

PURPOSE: Gold-standard for defect reconstruction in the head and neck region is the radial free forearm flap (RFFF). The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) gained popularity due to its versatility. Our objective was to compare functional advantages between both modalities. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 24 consecutive cases with advanced-stage squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx after cancer defect reconstruction with two modalities (12 SCAIF; 12 RFFF) was conducted. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30-questions (QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Head and Neck 35-questions (QLQ-H&N35). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 22.2 ± 9.5 months. Comparison of quality of life (QOL) showed significant differences only in speech and problems with the senses in favor of the SCAIF. CONCLUSION: Patients report satisfactory QOL results after oncologic surgery and reconstruction with preliminary no significant differences in most aspects comparing the two modalities. Therefore, the SCAIF appears as a viable alternative to the gold standard, the RFFF.

Oral Cancer Reconstruction Using the Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap: Comparison to Free Radial Forearm Flap.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the pedicled supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is a sufficient alternative to the fasciocutaneous radial forearm free flap (RFFF) for oral reconstruction in cancer surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study composed of all consecutive patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction after cancer surgery at their tertiary university hospital from 2013 to 2016. Demographics and peri- and postoperative information were recorded and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Of 83 patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction after cancer, 50 were identified as having stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx and underwent surgery and reconstruction with the SCAIF (n = 25) or the RFFF (n = 25). Total surgery time (411.0 vs 576.4 minutes; P < .001), flap elevation time (39.00 vs 93.78 minutes; P < .001), need for intensive care observation (32 vs 96%; P < .05), and rate of tracheotomy (64 vs 88%; P < .05) were significantly lower in the SCAIF group. There was no statistical difference in the postoperative complication rate or postoperative functional swallowing ability between the 2 groups. Total perioperative costs were significantly lower in patients who underwent reconstruction with the SCAIF (2,621.15 vs 4,453.77€; P < .01). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the SCAIF is a straightforward and reliable flap with shorter operative times and comparable outcomes compared with the RFFF.

Comparison of Two Measurement Paradigms to Determine Electrically Evoked Cochlear Nerve Responses and Their Correlation to Cochlear Nerve Cross-section in Infants and Young Children With Cochlear Implant.

INTRODUCTION: Electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) are used for intra-/postoperative monitoring with intracochlear stimulation of cochlear implants. ECAPs are recorded in MED-EL (Innsbruck, Austria) implants using auditory response telemetry (ART), which has been further developed with automatic threshold determination as AutoART. The success of an ECAP measurement also depends on the number of available spiral ganglion cells and the bipolar neurons of the cochlear nerve (CN). It is assumed that a higher population of spiral ganglion cell implies a larger CN cross-sectional area (CSA), which consequently affects ECAP measurements. METHODS: Intraoperative ECAP measurements from 19 implanted ears of children aged 8 to 18 months were retrospectively evaluated. A comparison and correlation of ART/AutoART ECAP thresholds/slopes at electrodes E2 (apical), E6 (medial), E10 (basal), and averaged E1 to E12 with CN CSA on magnetic resonance imaging was performed. RESULTS: A Pearson correlation of the ART/AutoART ECAP thresholds/slopes for E2/E6/E10 and the averaged electrodes E1 to E12 showed a significant correlation. The CN CSA did not correlate significantly with the averaged ART/AutoART ECAP thresholds/slopes across all 12 electrodes. SUMMARY: AutoART provides reliable measurements and is therefore a suitable alternative to ART. No significant influence of CN CSA on ECAP thresholds/slopes was observed. A predictive evaluation of the success of ECAP measurements based on CN CSA for a clinical setting cannot be made according to the present data.

Review of Interventions That Improve Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: A Cataloging of Strategies That Have Been Shown to Work (or Not).

TOPIC IMPORTANCE: Lung cancer screening (LCS) has the potential to decrease mortality from lung cancer by 20%. Yet, more than a decade since LCS was established as an evidence-based practice, < 20% of the eligible population in the United States has been screened. This review focuses on critically appraising interventions that have been designed to increase the initial uptake of LCS, including how they address known barriers to LCS and their effectiveness in overcoming these barriers. REVIEW FINDINGS: Studies were categorized based on the primary barriers that they addressed: (1) identifying eligible patients (including enhancing awareness through smoking history collection, outreach, and education), (2) shared decision-making-related interventions, and (3) patient navigation interventions. Four of the studies included multicomponent interventions, which often included patient navigation as one of the components. Overall, the effectiveness of the studies reviewed at improving LCS uptake generally was modest and was limited by the multilevel barriers that need to be overcome. Multicomponent interventions generally were more effective at improving LCS uptake, but most studies still had relatively low completion of screening. SUMMARY: Improving uptake of LCS requires learning from prior interventions to design multilevel interventions that address barriers to LCS at key steps and identifying which components of these interventions are effective and generalizable.

Sound Exposure Promotes Intratympanic Drug Delivery to the Inner Ear.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of sound exposure, with the resultant windows vibration on perilymphatic concentrations following intratympanic (IT) dexamethasone and gentamicin in an animal model. STUDY DESIGN: Animal model blinded study. SETTING: Animal facility of a tertiary medical center. METHODS: Bilateral IT dexamethasone or gentamicin was applied to 15 tested rats. Following injections, each rat was exposed for 3 minutes to free field 30 dB sound pressure level (SPL), 512 vHz noise, with 1 external auditory canal plugged (contralateral control). Following noise exposure, perilymph was obtained from both ears. Drug concentrations were measured using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometer. RESULTS: For dexamethasone, the average (±SD) perilymphatic steroidal concentration was 0.417 µg/mL (±0.549) in the control ears versus 0.487 µg/mL (±0.636) in the sound-exposed ears (P = .008). The average (±SD) gentamicin perilymphatic concentration was 8.628 µg/mL (±2.549) in the sound-exposed ears, compared to 4.930 µg/mL (±0.668) in the contralateral control (nonsound exposed) ears. Sound exposure promoted steroidal and gentamicin diffusion to the inner ear by an averaged (±SD) factor of 1.431 and 1.730 (±0.291 and 0.339), respectively. CONCLUSION: Low-intensity noise (30 dB SPL) was found to enhance dexamethasone phosphate and gentamicin diffusion to the inner ear (by an averaged factor of ∼1.4 and 1.7, respectively) in a murine model.

Low Dose Betahistine in Combination With Selegiline Increases Cochlear Blood Flow in Guinea Pigs.

OBJECTIVE: Betahistine is frequently used in the pharmacotherapy for Menière's Disease (MD). Little is known about its mode of action and prescribed dosages vary. While betahistine had an increasing effect on cochlear microcirculation in earlier studies, low dose betahistine of 0.01 mg/kg bw or less was not able to effect this. Selegiline inhibits monoaminooxidase B and therefore potentially the breakdown of betahistine. The goal of this study was to examine whether the addition of selegiline to low dose betahistine leads to increased cochlear blood flow. METHODS: Twelve Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs were anesthetized, the cochlea was exposed and a window opened to the stria vascularis. Blood plasma was visualized by injecting fluoresceinisothiocyanate-dextrane and vessel diameter and erythrocyte velocity were evaluated over 20 minutes. One group received low dose betahistine (0.01 mg/kg bw) and selegiline (1 mg/kg bw) i.v. while the other group received only selegiline (1 mg/kg bw) and saline (0.9% NaCl) as placebo i.v. RESULTS: Cochlear microcirculation increased significantly (P < .001) in guinea pigs treated with low dose betahistine combined with selegiline by up to 58.3 ± 38.7% above baseline over a period of up to 11 minutes. In one guinea pig, the increase was 104.6%. Treatment with Selegiline alone did not affect microcirculation significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose betahistine increased cochlear microcirculation significantly when combined with selegiline. This should be investigated in further studies regarding dose-effect relation in comparison to betahistine alone. Side effects, in particular regarding circulation, should be considered carefully in view of the clinical applicability of a combination therapy in patients with MD.