Randomized phase II study of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist CJ-11,974 in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of the neurokinin type 1 receptor antagonist CJ-11,974 for the control of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, phase II design with a group sequential stopping rule was used in this study. Sixty-one patients with cancer who were receiving cisplatin at a dose of at least 100 mg/m2 for the first time were enrolled. All patients received granisetron 10 microg/kg and dexamethasone 20 mg intravenously 30 minutes before they were given cisplatin. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 received CJ-11,974 100 mg, and group 2 received placebo orally 30 minutes before and 12 hours after cisplatin and then twice daily on days 2 through 5 after cisplatin. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who developed delayed emesis (emesis on the second to fifth days after cisplatin). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled in group 1, and 31 patients were enrolled in group 2. Fifty-eight patients were assessable for efficacy. Complete control of emesis (expressed as the percentage of patients who had no emesis) was as follows: day 1, 85.7% (group 1) and 66.7% (group 2) (P = .090); days 2 through 5, 67.8% (group 1) and 36.6% (group 2) (P = .0425, adjusted); days 1 through 5, 64.3% (group 1) and 30% (group 2) (P = .009). Patients in group 1 experienced significantly less nausea than patients in group 2 on day 1 (P = .024). Treatment was well tolerated in both groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude from this exploratory phase II trial that CJ-11,974 is superior to placebo in controlling cisplatin-induced delayed emesis and may provide additive benefit in acute emesis and nausea control when combined with a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. Additional larger trials are indicated to confirm the clinical value of CJ-11,974.

Rheumatoid arthritis treated with tenidap and piroxicam. Clinical associations with cytokine modulation by tenidap.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of tenidap and piroxicam on acute-phase protein and cytokine levels in the blood of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to explore their associations with clinical disease activity. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, crossover trial in 49 patients with active RA compared 6 weeks of treatment with tenidap (120 mg/day) versus 6 weeks of treatment with piroxicam (20 mg/day). RESULTS: Median values for C-reactive protein (CRP), Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum amyloid A (SAA) protein, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were significantly lower after tenidap treatment compared with piroxicam treatment, even in the presence of stable background treatment with prednisone, methotrexate, or prednisone plus methotrexate. The median within-patient treatment differences (after tenidap minus after piroxicam) in the CRP, ESR, SAA, and IL-6 values were -1.7 mg/dl, -10.0 mm/hour, -22.0 micrograms/ml, and -3.7 pg/ml, respectively, and represent -60.4%, -17.7%, -35.5%, and -26.1% of the respective baseline levels. IL-6 levels were positively correlated with CRP and SAA. Plasma IL-1 beta was generally below the level of detection. Tumor necrosis factor alpha levels were similar after tenidap and after piroxicam. Treatment differences for 4 of 7 clinical parameters favored tenidap, but did not reach statistical significance. IL-6, CRP, and ESR were significantly correlated with clinical treatment differences. Tenidap and piroxicam toleration were similar, although tenidap-treated patients exhibited a reversible increase in urinary protein excretion. CONCLUSION: Tenidap was differentiated from piroxicam by lower levels of acute-phase proteins, ESR, and IL-6 after tenidap treatment. These treatment differences were significantly correlated with clinical parameters.

Complex promoter and coding region beta 2-adrenergic receptor haplotypes alter receptor expression and predict in vivo responsiveness.

The human beta(2)-adrenergic receptor gene has multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), but the relevance of chromosomally phased SNPs (haplotypes) is not known. The phylogeny and the in vitro and in vivo consequences of variations in the 5' upstream and ORF were delineated in a multiethnic reference population and an asthmatic cohort. Thirteen SNPs were found organized into 12 haplotypes out of the theoretically possible 8,192 combinations. Deep divergence in the distribution of some haplotypes was noted in Caucasian, African-American, Asian, and Hispanic-Latino ethnic groups with >20-fold differences among the frequencies of the four major haplotypes. The relevance of the five most common beta(2)-adrenergic receptor haplotype pairs was determined in vivo by assessing the bronchodilator response to beta agonist in asthmatics. Mean responses by haplotype pair varied by >2-fold, and response was significantly related to the haplotype pair (P = 0.007) but not to individual SNPs. Expression vectors representing two of the haplotypes differing at eight of the SNP loci and associated with divergent in vivo responsiveness to agonist were used to transfect HEK293 cells. beta(2)-adrenergic receptor mRNA levels and receptor density in cells transfected with the haplotype associated with the greater physiologic response were approximately 50% greater than those transfected with the lower response haplotype. The results indicate that the unique interactions of multiple SNPs within a haplotype ultimately can affect biologic and therapeutic phenotype and that individual SNPs may have poor predictive power as pharmacogenetic loci.

Reduction of acute-phase proteins with tenidap sodium, a cytokine-modulating anti-rheumatic drug.

Four independent studies have investigated and compared the effects of tenidap sodium, naproxen and placebo on CRP in patients with active RA. One of these studies also investigated the effects of tenidap and naproxen on serum amyloid A (SAA) concentrations and ESR. The duration of the four studies ranged between 2 weeks and 24 weeks, and depending on the study, tenidap sodium was administered orally in doses of 40-120 mg/day and naproxen in doses of 1000 mg/day. In all four studies serum CRP concentrations in tenidap-treated patients had decreased significantly from baseline at the time of final assessment. The decrease in CRP concentration in tenidap-treated patients was observed as early as 1 week after initiation of therapy and was sustained for up to 6 months, the last assessment timepoint. CRP concentrations in naproxen-treated and placebo patients were essentially unchanged. The decreases from baseline observed in tenidap-treated patients were significantly greater than the changes observed in naproxen-treated or placebo patients. After 24 weeks of tenidap treatment the decrease in CRP was paralleled by significant decreases in SAA concentration and ESR. The finding that tenidap sodium rapidly, consistently and significantly lowered CRP serum concentrations differentiates tenidap sodium from the NSAID, naproxen. This could possibly have important therapeutic implications given that other long-term investigations have shown that reducing serum CRP and SAA concentrations correlates with a reduction in radiographically-assessed disease progression.