RESUMEN
Background: Knowing the questions and concerns that patients have regarding treatment options for lateral epicondylitis may allow for shared-decision making and potentially superior patient outcomes and satisfaction. In the present study, we aimed to further delineate patient preferences with treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Methods: An online, survey-based, descriptive study was conducted through Amazon Mechanical Turk. Survey participants were presented with a clinical scenario regarding lateral epicondylitis and asked four questions regarding treatment preferences for nonoperative treatment, whether they would consider platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection, and whether they would consider surgical intervention for recalcitrant symptoms. A Likert scale was used for responses. McNemar chi-square test was used for paired nominal data for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 238 survey responses were included. A majority (63%) of respondents elected to proceed with formal physical therapy. When given additional information regarding corticosteroid injections, 50.8% of respondents reported preferring physical therapy. There were no differences between groups for questions 1 and 2 (P = 0.90). Of the respondents, 75.2% were "likely" or "extremely likely" to consider PRP injection. When asked about surgical intervention, 74.8% of respondents were "likely" or "extremely likely" to proceed with continued symptoms. Conclusions: It is important to include patient preferences in treatment discussions of lateral epicondylitis. Survey respondents preferred formal physical therapy for initial treatment. A surprising majority of respondents were likely to consider a PRP injection. With prolonged symptoms, respondents were interested in discussions of surgical intervention and thus, it should continue to be offered to patients with recalcitrant symptoms.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Patient preferences and expectations following both nonsurgical and operative treatment of de Quervain's tenosynovitis are unclear. In this study, we aim to better delineate patient preferences for initial management of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. For patients considering surgical treatment, we hope to identify which factors of surgical care are most important for patients to receive counseling. Methods: An online crowdsourcing platform, Amazon Mechanical Turk, was used to recruit study participants. Study participants were then led through a clinical scenario pertaining to de Quervain's tenosynovitis. They were then asked a series of questions regarding initial treatment options, important factors to consider during surgery, and postoperative expectations. A Likert scale was used for responses. Descriptive statistics and one-way analysis of variance were used to assess survey responses. Results: In total, 199 survey responses were included, and 84% of respondents chose nonsurgical modalities for initial treatment of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. Survey items asking about the importance of cost, risks of surgery, expected recovery time, and expected pain level following surgery revealed that all factors were considered important to respondents. There were no differences between groups in the one-way analysis of variance. Conclusions: Providers should remain cognizant that patients presenting with de Quervain's tenosynovitis may favor initial nonsurgical management. The vast majority of respondents rated the importance of cost, risks of surgery, expected recovery time, and expected pain level as having some level of importance when considering surgical care. When discussing outcomes of surgery, respondents were nearly divided on what would be considered a successful outcome of surgery. This suggests that treating physicians may benefit from clarifying expected outcomes during surgical discussions. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostics IIb.