Continuous vs Intermittent ß-Lactam Antibiotic Infusions in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The BLING III Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Whether ß-lactam antibiotics administered by continuous compared with intermittent infusion reduces the risk of death in patients with sepsis is uncertain. Objective: To evaluate whether continuous vs intermittent infusion of a ß-lactam antibiotic (piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem) results in decreased all-cause mortality at 90 days in critically ill patients with sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants: An international, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted in 104 intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia, Belgium, France, Malaysia, New Zealand, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Recruitment occurred from March 26, 2018, to January 11, 2023, with follow-up completed on April 12, 2023. Participants were critically ill adults (≥18 years) treated with piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for sepsis. Intervention: Eligible patients were randomized to receive an equivalent 24-hour dose of a ß-lactam antibiotic by either continuous (n = 3498) or intermittent (n = 3533) infusion for a clinician-determined duration of treatment or until ICU discharge, whichever occurred first. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes were clinical cure up to 14 days after randomization; new acquisition, colonization, or infection with a multiresistant organism or Clostridioides difficile infection up to 14 days after randomization; ICU mortality; and in-hospital mortality. Results: Among 7202 randomized participants, 7031 (mean [SD] age, 59 [16] years; 2423 women [35%]) met consent requirements for inclusion in the primary analysis (97.6%). Within 90 days, 864 of 3474 patients (24.9%) assigned to receive continuous infusion had died compared with 939 of 3507 (26.8%) assigned intermittent infusion (absolute difference, -1.9% [95% CI, -4.9% to 1.1%]; odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.01]; P = .08). Clinical cure was higher in the continuous vs intermittent infusion group (1930/3467 [55.7%] and 1744/3491 [50.0%], respectively; absolute difference, 5.7% [95% CI, 2.4% to 9.1%]). Other secondary outcomes were not statistically different. Conclusions and Relevance: The observed difference in 90-day mortality between continuous vs intermittent infusions of ß-lactam antibiotics did not meet statistical significance in the primary analysis. However, the confidence interval around the effect estimate includes the possibility of both no important effect and a clinically important benefit in the use of continuous infusions in this group of patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03213990.

Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Population Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem in Neurocritical Care Patients: a Prospective Two-Center Study.

Morbidity and mortality related to ventriculitis in neurocritical care patients remain high. Antibiotic dose optimization may improve therapeutic outcomes. In this study, a population pharmacokinetic model of meropenem in infected critically ill patients was developed. We applied the final model to determine optimal meropenem dosing regimens required to achieve targeted cerebrospinal fluid exposures. Neurocritical care patients receiving meropenem and with a diagnosis of ventriculitis or extracranial infection were recruited from two centers to this study. Serial plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected and assayed. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics. We sought to determine optimized dosing regimens that achieved meropenem cerebrospinal fluid concentrations above pathogen MICs for 40% of the dosing interval, or a higher target ratio of meropenem cerebrospinal fluid trough concentrations to pathogen MIC of ≥1. In total, 53 plasma and 34 cerebrospinal fluid samples were obtained from eight patients. Meropenem pharmacokinetics were appropriately described using a three-compartment model with linear plasma clearance scaled for creatinine clearance and cerebrospinal fluid penetration scaled for patient age. Considerable interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was apparent, particularly in the cerebrospinal fluid. Percent coefficients of variation for meropenem clearance from plasma and cerebrospinal fluid were 41.7% and 89.6%, respectively; for meropenem, the volume of distribution in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid values were 63.4% and 58.3%, respectively. High doses (up to 8 to 10 g/day) improved attainment of meropenem cerebrospinal fluid target exposures, particularly for less susceptible organisms (MICs, ≥0.25 mg/L). Standard meropenem doses of 2 g every 8 h may not achieve effective concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid in all critically ill patients. Higher doses, or alternative dosing methods (e.g., loading dose followed by continuous infusion) may be required to optimize cerebrospinal fluid exposures. Doses of up to 8 to 10 g/day either as intermittent boluses or continuous infusion would be suitable for patients with augmented renal clearance; lower doses may be considered for patients with impaired renal function as empirical suggestions. Ongoing dosing should be tailored to the individual patient circumstances. Notably, the study population was small and dosing recommendations may not be generalizable to all critically ill patients.

Evaluation of low-volume plasma sampling for the analysis of meropenem in clinical samples.

Reducing the volume of blood sampled from neonatal or paediatric patients is important to facilitate research in a group that is under-represented in clinical studies. Not all patients have a cannula available for blood sampling, meaning there are real advantages in obtaining a blood microsample by skin prick. In this study, the results obtained from both capillary microsamples (CMS) and a microfluidic (MF)-CMS by skin prick are compared to conventional plasma sampled from an arterial catheter in a clinical bridging study. Six critically ill patients receiving meropenem were included with the incurred sample reanalysis test meeting the acceptance criteria for both CMS (n = 24 samples) and MF-CMS (n = 20 samples). Bland-Altman plots comparing MF-CMS to conventional arterial blood sampling revealed a difference of - 12.7 ± 22.1% (mean ± standard deviation (SD), and comparing CMS to conventional arterial blood sampling a difference of - 3.4 ± 17.0%. At - 12.7%, the bias between MF-CMS and conventional sampling is greater than the bias found with CMS, although within the limit of acceptability for analytical accuracy (that being ± 15%). Samples collected by skin prick and using CMS produced meropenem concentrations that were comparable to those obtained from conventional arterial catheter sampling. CMS samples were found to be stable when stored in the capillary tube for 24 h at 5 °C or for 4 h at room temperature.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Penetration of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients with an Indwelling External Ventricular Drain.

The aim of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane-tazobactam in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of infected critically ill patients. In a prospective observational study, critically ill patients (≥18 years) with an indwelling external ventricular drain received a single intravenous dose of 3.0 g ceftolozane-tazobactam. Serial plasma and CSF samples were collected for measurement of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam concentration by liquid chromatography. Unbound concentration-time data were modeled in R using Pmetrics. Dosing simulations were performed using the final model. A three-compartment model adequately described the data from 10 patients. For ceftolozane, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) area under the unbound concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (fAUC0-inf) in the CSF and plasma were 30 (19 to 128) h·mg/liter and 323 (183 to 414) h·mg/liter, respectively. For tazobactam, these values were 5.6 (2 to 24) h·mg/liter and 52 (36 to 80) h·mg/liter, respectively. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) CSF penetration ratios were 0.2 ± 0.2 and 0.2 ± 0.26 for ceftolozane and tazobactam, respectively. With the regimen of 3.0 g every 8 h, a probability of target attainment (PTA) of ≥0.9 for 40% fT>MIC in the CSF was possible only when MICs were ≤0.25 mg/liter. The CSF cumulative fractional response for Pseudomonas aeruginosa-susceptible MIC distribution was 73%. The tazobactam PTA for the minimal suggested exposure of 20% fT>1 mg/liter was 12%. The current maximal dose of ceftolozane-tazobactam (3.0 g every 8 h) does not provide adequate CSF exposure for treatment of Gram-negative meningitis or ventriculitis unless the MIC for the causative pathogen is very low (≤0.25 mg/liter).

What the forks? A longitudinal quality improvement study tracking cutlery numbers in a public teaching and research hospital staff tearoom.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the circulation lifespan of forks and teaspoons in an institutional tearoom. DESIGN: Longitudinal quality improvement study, based on prospective tracking of marked teaspoons and forks. SETTING: Staff tearoom in a public teaching and research hospital, Brisbane. PARTICIPANTS: Tearoom patrons blinded to the purposes of the study. INTERVENTION: Stainless steel forks and teaspoons (18 each) were marked with red spots and introduced alongside existing cutlery (81 items) in the tearoom. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Twice weekly count of marked forks and teaspoons for seven weeks; baseline and end of study count of all utensils on day 45. RESULTS: The loss of marked teaspoons (six of 18) was greater than that of forks (one of 18) by the conclusion of the study period (P = 0.038). The overall rate of utensil loss was 2.2 per 100 days for teaspoons and spoons, and -2.2 per 100 days for forks and knives. CONCLUSIONS: Teaspoon disappearance is a more substantial problem than fork migration in a multidisciplinary staff tearoom, and may reflect different kleptomaniacal or individual appropriation tendencies. If giving cutlery this Christmas, give teaspoons, not forks. The symbolism of fork rebirth or resurrection is appropriate for both Christmas and Easter, and forks are also mighty useful implements for eating cake!

A Population Pharmacokinetic Model-Guided Evaluation of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration.

The aim of this work was to describe optimized dosing regimens of ceftolozane-tazobactam for critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). We conducted a prospective observational pharmacokinetic study in adult critically ill patients with clinical indications for ceftolozane-tazobactam and CVVHDF. Unbound drug concentrations were measured from serial prefilter blood, postfilter blood, and ultrafiltrate samples by a chromatographic assay. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics. A four-compartment pharmacokinetic model adequately described the data from six patients. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) extraction ratios for ceftolozane and tazobactam were 0.76 ± 0.08 and 0.73 ± 0.1, respectively. The mean ± SD sieving coefficients were 0.94 ± 0.24 and 1.08 ± 0.30, respectively. Model-estimated CVVHDF clearance rates were 2.7 ± 0.8 and 3.0 ± 0.6 liters/h, respectively. Residual non-CVVHDF clearance rates were 0.6 ± 0.5 and 3.3 ± 0.9 liters/h, respectively. In the initial 24 h, doses as low as 0.75 g every 8 h enabled cumulative fractional response of ≥85% for empirical coverage against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, considering a 40% fT>MIC (percentage of time the free drug concentration was above the MIC) target. For 100% fT>MIC, doses of at least 1.5 g every 8 h were required. The median (interquartile range) steady-state trough ceftolozane concentrations for simulated regimens of 1.5 g and 3.0 g every 8 h were 28 (21 to 42) and 56 (42 to 84) mg/liter, respectively. The corresponding tazobactam concentrations were 6.1 (5.5 to 6.7) and 12.1 (11.0 to 13.4) mg/liter, respectively. We suggest a front-loaded regimen with a single 3.0-g loading dose followed by 0.75 g every 8 h for critically ill patients undergoing CVVHDF with study blood and dialysate flow rates.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Unbound Ceftolozane and Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients without Renal Dysfunction.

Evaluation of dosing regimens for critically ill patients requires pharmacokinetic data in this population. This prospective observational study aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam in critically ill patients without renal impairment and to assess the adequacy of recommended dosing regimens for treatment of systemic infections. Patients received 1.5 or 3.0 g ceftolozane-tazobactam according to clinician recommendation. Unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam plasma concentrations were assayed, and data were analyzed with Pmetrics with subsequent Monte Carlo simulations. A two-compartment model adequately described the data from twelve patients. Urinary creatinine clearance (CLCR) and body weight described between-patient variability in clearance and central volume of distribution (V), respectively. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) parameter estimates for unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam, respectively, were CL of 7.2 ± 3.2 and 25.4 ± 9.4 liters/h, V of 20.4 ± 3.7 and 32.4 ± 10 liters, rate constant for distribution of unbound ceftolozane or tazobactam from central to peripheral compartment (Kcp) of 0.46 ± 0.74 and 2.96 ± 8.6 h-1, and rate constant for distribution of unbound ceftolozane or tazobactam from peripheral to central compartment (Kpc) of 0.39 ± 0.37 and 26.5 ± 8.4 h-1 With dosing at 1.5 g and 3.0 g every 8 h (q8h), the fractional target attainment (FTA) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was ≥85% for directed therapy (MIC ≤ 4 mg/liter). However, for empirical coverage (MIC up to 64 mg/liter), the FTA was 84% with the 1.5-g q8h regimen when creatinine clearance is 180 ml/min/1.73 m2, whereas the 3.0-g q8h regimen consistently achieved an FTA of ≥85%. For a target of 40% of time the free drug concentration is above the MIC (40% fT>MIC), 3g q8h by intermittent infusion is suggested unless a highly susceptible pathogen is present, in which case 1.5-g dosing could be used. If a higher target of 100% fT>MIC is required, a 1.5-g loading dose plus a 4.5-g continuous infusion may be adequate.

Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound concentrations of intravenous posaconazole in adult critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: The population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound posaconazole following intravenous administration has not yet been described for the critically ill patient population. The aim of this work was, therefore, to describe the total and unbound population pharmacokinetics of intravenous posaconazole in critically ill patients and identify optimal dosing regimens. METHODS: This was a prospective observational population pharmacokinetic study in critically ill adult patients with presumed/confirmed invasive fungal infection. A single dose of 300 mg posaconazole was administered intravenously as an add-on to standard antifungal therapy, and serial plasma samples were collected over 48 h. Total and unbound posaconazole concentrations, measured by chromatographic method, were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and perform dosing simulations in R using Pmetrics. RESULTS: From eight patients, 93 pairs of total and unbound concentrations were measured. A two-compartment linear model with capacity-limited plasma protein binding best described the concentration-time data. Albumin and body mass index (BMI) were included as covariates in the final model. Mean (SD) parameter estimates for the volume of the central compartment (V) and the elimination rate constant were 72 (43) L and 42.1 (23.7) h-1, respectively. Dosing simulations showed that high BMI was associated with a reduced probability of achieving target total and unbound posaconazole concentrations. Low serum albumin concentration was associated with a reduced probability of attaining target total but not unbound posaconazole concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: An important clinical message of this study is that critically ill patients with increased BMI may require larger than approved loading doses of intravenous posaconazole when considering currently recommended dosing targets. Variability in plasma albumin concentration appears unlikely to affect dosing requirements when the assessment is based on unbound concentrations. Where available, therapeutic drug monitoring of unbound concentrations may be useful.

Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Posaconazole in Critically Ill Patients.

To date, there is no information on the intravenous (i.v.) posaconazole pharmacokinetics for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This prospective observational study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of i.v. posaconazole in critically ill patients. Patients with no history of allergy to triazole antifungals and requiring systemic antifungal therapy were enrolled if they were aged ≥18 years, central venous access was available, they were not pregnant, and they had not received prior posaconazole or drugs interacting with posaconazole. A single dose of 300 mg posaconazole was administered over 90 min. Total plasma concentrations were measured from serial plasma samples collected over 48 h, using a validated chromatographic method. The pharmacokinetic data set was analyzed by noncompartmental methods. Eight patients (7 male) were enrolled with the following characteristics: median age, 46 years (interquartile range [IQR], 40 to 51 years); median weight, 68 kg (IQR, 65 to 82 kg); and median albumin concentration, 20 g/liter (IQR, 18 to 24 g/liter). Median (IQR) pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were as follows: observed maximum concentration during sampling period (Cmax), 1,702 ng/ml (1,352 to 2,141 ng/ml); area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), 17,932 ng · h/ml (13,823 to 27,905 ng · h/ml); clearance (CL), 16.8 liters/h (11.1 to 21.7 liters/h); and volume of distribution (V), 529.1 liters (352.2 to 720.6 liters). The V and CL were greater than 2-fold and the AUC0-∞ was 39% of the values reported for heathy volunteers. The AUC0-∞ was only 52% of the steady-state AUC0-24 reported for hematology patients. The median of estimated average steady-state concentrations was 747 ng/ml (IQR, 576 to 1,163 ng/ml), which is within but close to the lower end of the previously recommended therapeutic range of 500 to 2,500 ng/ml. In conclusion, we observed different pharmacokinetics of i.v. posaconazole in this cohort of critically ill patients compared to those in healthy volunteers and hematology patients.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin in Nonobese, Obese, and Morbidly Obese Critically Ill Patients.

The treatment of infections in critically ill obese and morbidly obese patients is challenging because of the combined physiological changes that result from obesity and critical illness. The aim of this study was to describe the population pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in a cohort of critically ill patients, including obese and morbidly obese patients. Critically ill patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam were classified according to their body mass index (BMI) as nonobese, obese, and morbidly obese. Plasma samples were collected, and piperacillin concentrations were determined by a validated chromatographic method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics software. Thirty-seven critically ill patients (including 12 obese patients and 12 morbidly obese patients) were enrolled. The patients' mean ± standard deviation age, weight, and BMI were 50 ± 15 years, 104 ± 35 kg, and 38.0 ± 15.0 kg/m2, respectively. The concentration-time data were best described by a two-compartment linear model. The mean ± SD parameter estimates for the final covariate model were a clearance of 14.0 ± 7.1 liters/h, a volume of distribution of the central compartment of 49.0 ± 19.0 liters, an intercompartmental clearance from the central compartment to the peripheral compartment of 0.9 ± 0.6 liters · h-1, and an intercompartmental clearance from the peripheral compartment to the central compartment of 2.3 ± 2.8 liters · h-1 A higher measured creatinine clearance and shorter-duration infusions were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving therapeutic piperacillin exposures in patients in all BMI categories. Piperacillin pharmacokinetics are altered in the presence of obesity and critical illness. As with nonobese patients, prolonged infusions increase the likelihood of achieving therapeutic concentrations.

In Vivo Microdialysis To Determine Subcutaneous Interstitial Fluid Penetration and Pharmacokinetics of Fluconazole in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Sepsis.

The objective of the study was to describe the subcutaneous interstitial fluid (ISF) pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in critically ill patients with sepsis. This prospective observational study was conducted at two tertiary intensive care units in Australia. Serial fluconazole concentrations were measured over 24 h in plasma and subcutaneous ISF using microdialysis. The concentrations in plasma and microdialysate were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography system with electrospray mass spectrometer detector method. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. Twelve critically ill patients with sepsis were enrolled. The mean in vivo fluconazole recovery rates ± standard deviation (SD) for microdialysis were 51.4% ± 16.1% with a mean (±SD) fluconazole ISF penetration ratio of 0.52 ± 0.30 (coefficient of variation, 58%). The median free plasma area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) was significantly higher than the median ISF AUC0-24 (340.4 versus 141.1 mg · h/liter; P = 0.004). There was no statistical difference in median fluconazole ISF penetration between patients receiving and not receiving vasopressors (median, 0.28 versus 0.78; P = 0.106). Both minimum and the maximum concentrations of drug in serum (Cmax and Cmin) showed a significant correlation with the fluconazole plasma exposure (Cmax, R(2) = 0.86, P < 0.0001; Cmin, R(2) = 0.75, P < 0.001). Our data suggest that fluconazole was distributed variably, but incompletely, from plasma into subcutaneous interstitial fluid in this cohort of critically ill patients with sepsis. Given the variability of fluconazole interstitial fluid exposures and lack of clinically identifiable factors by which to recognize patients with reduced distribution/exposure, we suggest higher than standard doses to ensure that drug exposure is adequate at the site of infection.

Effect of Obesity on the Population Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients.

Severe pathophysiological changes in critical illness can lead to dramatically altered antimicrobial pharmacokinetics (PK). The additional effect of obesity on PK potentially increases the challenge for effective dosing. The aim of this prospective study was to describe the population PK of meropenem for a cohort of critically ill patients, including obese and morbidly obese patients. Critically ill patients prescribed meropenem were recruited into the following three body mass index (BMI) groups: nonobese (18.5 to 29.9 kg/m(2)), obese (30.0 to 39.9 kg/m(2)), and morbidly obese (≥40 kg/m(2)). Serial plasma samples were taken, and meropenem concentrations were determined using a validated chromatographic method. Population PK analysis and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were undertaken with Pmetrics. Nineteen critically ill patients with different BMI categories were enrolled. The patients' mean ± standard deviation (SD) age, weight, and BMI were 49 ± 15.9 years, 95 ± 22.0 kg, and 33 ± 7.0 kg/m(2), respectively. A two-compartment model described the data adequately. The mean ± SD parameter estimates for the final covariate model were as follows: clearance (CL), 15.5 ± 6.0 liters/h; volume of distribution in the central compartment (V1), 11.7 ± 5.8 liters; intercompartmental clearance from the central compartment to the peripheral compartment, 25.6 ± 35.1 liters h(-1); and intercompartmental clearance from the peripheral compartment to the central compartment, 8.32 ± 12.24 liters h(-1) Higher creatinine clearance (CLCR) was associated with a lower probability of target attainment, with BMI having little effect. Although obesity was found to be associated with an increased V1, dose adjustment based on CLCR appears to be more important than patient BMI.

Effect of Obesity on the Population Pharmacokinetics of Fluconazole in Critically Ill Patients.

Our objective was to describe the population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in a cohort of critically ill nonobese, obese, and morbidly obese patients. Critically ill patients prescribed fluconazole were recruited into three body mass index (BMI) cohorts, nonobese (18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2), obese (30.0 to 39.9 kg/m2), and morbidly obese (≥40 kg/m2). Serial fluconazole concentrations were determined using a validated chromatographic method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were undertaken with Pmetrics. Twenty-one critically ill patients (11 male) were enrolled, including obese (n = 6) and morbidly obese (n = 4) patients. The patients mean ± standard deviation (SD) age, weight, and BMI were 54 ± 15 years, 90 ± 24 kg, and 31 ± 9 kg/m2, respectively. A two-compartment linear model described the data adequately. The mean ± SD population pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were clearance (CL) of 0.95 ± 0.48 liter/h, volume of distribution of the central compartment (Vc) of 15.10 ± 11.78 liter, intercompartmental clearance from the central to peripheral compartment of 5.41 ± 2.28 liter/h, and intercompartmental clearance from the peripheral to central compartment of 2.92 ± 4.95 liter/h. A fluconazole dose of 200 mg daily was insufficient to achieve an area under the concentration-time curve for the free, unbound drug fraction/MIC ratio of 100 for pathogens with MICs of ≥2 mg/liter in patients with BMI of >30 kg/m2 A fluconazole loading dose of 12 mg/kg and maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg/day achieved pharmacodynamic targets for higher MICs. A weight-based loading dose of 12 mg/kg followed by a daily maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg, according to renal function, is required in critically ill patients for pathogens with a MIC of 2 mg/liter.

Glucocorticoid Sensitivity Is Highly Variable in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock and Is Associated With Disease Severity.

OBJECTIVES: To measure tissue glucocorticoid sensitivity in patients with septic shock and determine its relationship to standard measurements of adrenal function and of outcome. DESIGN: Prospective observational trial. SETTING: Teaching hospital ICU. SUBJECTS: Forty-one patients and 20 controls were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Glucocorticoid sensitivity was measured by in vitro suppression of cytokine production from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated leukocytes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in the relative suppression of cytokine production, although there was a greater range and variance in the patient data. Patients in the lowest quartile of glucocorticoid sensitivity had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (25 [24-28] vs 20 [14-23]; p = 0.02) and a trend toward higher mortality (30% vs 0%; p = 0.2) compared to those in the highest. The mRNA expression of the ß variant of the glucocorticoid receptor and the 11-ß hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 isozyme were significantly higher in patients compared to controls (8.6-fold, p = 0.002 and 10.1-fold, p = 0.0002, respectively). Changes in mRNA expression of these genes did not correlate with measurements of glucocorticoid sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with septic shock and controls do not differ in their median glucocorticoid sensitivity. However, patients exhibited a greater variability in glucocorticoid responsiveness and had evidence of association between increased sickness sensitivity and reduced glucocorticoid sensitivity. Sensitivity to glucocorticoids did not appear to be mediated by changes in the expression of the ß variant of the glucocorticoid receptor or the 11-ß hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 isozyme.

Is prolonged infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem in critically ill patients associated with improved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and patient outcomes? An observation from the Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care unit patients (DALI) cohort.

OBJECTIVES: We utilized the database of the Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care unit patients (DALI) study to statistically compare the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and clinical outcomes between prolonged-infusion and intermittent-bolus dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem in critically ill patients using inclusion criteria similar to those used in previous prospective studies. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicentre pharmacokinetic point-prevalence study (DALI), which recruited a large cohort of critically ill patients from 68 ICUs across 10 countries. RESULTS: Of the 211 patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem in the DALI study, 182 met inclusion criteria. Overall, 89.0% (162/182) of patients achieved the most conservative target of 50% fT>MIC (time over which unbound or free drug concentration remains above the MIC). Decreasing creatinine clearance and the use of prolonged infusion significantly increased the PTA for most pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. In the subgroup of patients who had respiratory infection, patients receiving ß-lactams via prolonged infusion demonstrated significantly better 30 day survival when compared with intermittent-bolus patients [86.2% (25/29) versus 56.7% (17/30); P = 0.012]. Additionally, in patients with a SOFA score of ≥9, administration by prolonged infusion compared with intermittent-bolus dosing demonstrated significantly better clinical cure [73.3% (11/15) versus 35.0% (7/20); P = 0.035] and survival rates [73.3% (11/15) versus 25.0% (5/20); P = 0.025]. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of this large dataset has provided additional data on the niche benefits of administration of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem by prolonged infusion in critically ill patients, particularly for patients with respiratory infections.

SaMpling Antibiotics in Renal Replacement Therapy (SMARRT): an observational pharmacokinetic study in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Optimal antibiotic dosing is key to maximising patient survival, and minimising the emergence of bacterial resistance. Evidence-based antibiotic dosing guidelines for critically ill patients receiving RRT are currently not available, as RRT techniques and settings vary greatly between ICUs and even individual patients. We aim to develop a robust, evidence-based antibiotic dosing guideline for critically ill patients receiving various forms of RRT. We further aim to observe whether therapeutic antibiotic concentrations are associated with reduced 28-day mortality. METHODS/DESIGN: We designed a multi-national, observational pharmacokinetic study in critically ill patients requiring RRT. The study antibiotics will be vancomycin, linezolid, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem. Pharmacokinetic sampling of each patient's blood, RRT effluent and urine will take place during two separate dosing intervals. In addition, a comprehensive data set, which includes the patients' demographic and clinical parameters, as well as modality, technique and settings of RRT, will be collected. Pharmacokinetic data will be analysed using a population pharmacokinetic approach to identify covariates associated with changes in pharmacokinetic parameters in critically ill patients with AKI who are undergoing RRT for the five commonly prescribed antibiotics. DISCUSSION: Using the comprehensive data set collected, the pharmacokinetic profile of the five antibiotics will be constructed, including identification of RRT and other factors indicative of the need for altered antibiotic dosing requirements. This will enable us to develop a dosing guideline for each individual antibiotic that is likely to be relevant to any critically ill patient with acute kidney injury receiving any of the included forms of RRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ( ACTRN12613000241730 ) registered 28 February 2013.

A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Continuous versus Intermittent ß-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis.

RATIONALE: Continuous infusion of ß-lactam antibiotics may improve outcomes because of time-dependent antibacterial activity compared with intermittent dosing. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of continuous versus intermittent infusion in patients with severe sepsis. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 25 intensive care units (ICUs). Participants commenced on piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, or meropenem were randomized to receive the prescribed antibiotic via continuous or 30-minute intermittent infusion for the remainder of the treatment course or until ICU discharge. The primary outcome was the number of alive ICU-free days at Day 28. Secondary outcomes were 90-day survival, clinical cure 14 days post antibiotic cessation, alive organ failure-free days at Day 14, and duration of bacteremia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We enrolled 432 eligible participants with a median age of 64 years and an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 20. There was no difference in ICU-free days: 18 days (interquartile range, 2-24) and 20 days (interquartile range, 3-24) in the continuous and intermittent groups (P = 0.38). There was no difference in 90-day survival: 74.3% (156 of 210) and 72.5% (158 of 218); hazard ratio, 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.31; P = 0.61). Clinical cure was 52.4% (111 of 212) and 49.5% (109 of 220); odds ratio, 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.63; P = 0.56). There was no difference in organ failure-free days (6 d; P = 0.27) and duration of bacteremia (0 d; P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with severe sepsis, there was no difference in outcomes between ß-lactam antibiotic administration by continuous and intermittent infusion. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number (ACT RN12612000138886).

Pharmacokinetic variability and exposures of fluconazole, anidulafungin, and caspofungin in intensive care unit patients: Data from multinational Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care unit (DALI) patients Study.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of fluconazole, anidulafungin, and caspofungin in critically ill patients and to compare with previously published data. We also sought to determine whether contemporary fluconazole doses achieved PK/pharmacodynamic (PD; PK/PD) targets in this cohort of intensive care unit patients. METHODS: The Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care unit patients (DALI) study was a prospective, multicenter point-prevalence PK study. Sixty-eight intensive care units across Europe participated. Inclusion criteria were met by critically ill patients administered fluconazole (n = 15), anidulafungin (n = 9), and caspofungin (n = 7). Three blood samples (peak, mid-dose, and trough) were collected for PK/PD analysis. PK analysis was performed by using a noncompartmental approach. RESULTS: The mean age, weight, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores of the included patients were 58 years, 84 kg, and 22, respectively. Fluconazole, caspofungin, and anidulafungin showed large interindividual variability in this study. In patients receiving fluconazole, 33% did not attain the PK/PD target, ratio of free drug area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours to minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC(0-24)/MIC) ≥100. The fluconazole dose, described in milligrams per kilogram, was found to be significantly associated with achievement of fAUC(0-24)/MIC ≥100 (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Considerable interindividual variability was observed for fluconazole, anidulafungin, and caspofungin. A large proportion of the patients (33%) receiving fluconazole did not attain the PK/PD target, which might be related to inadequate dosing. For anidulafungin and caspofungin, dose optimization also appears necessary to minimize variability.

DALI: defining antibiotic levels in intensive care unit patients: are current ß-lactam antibiotic doses sufficient for critically ill patients?

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality for critically ill patients with infections remains a global healthcare problem. We aimed to determine whether ß-lactam antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients achieves concentrations associated with maximal activity and whether antibiotic concentrations affect patient outcome. METHODS: This was a prospective, multinational pharmacokinetic point-prevalence study including 8 ß-lactam antibiotics. Two blood samples were taken from each patient during a single dosing interval. The primary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets were free antibiotic concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen at both 50% (50% f T>MIC) and 100% (100% f T>MIC) of the dosing interval. We used skewed logistic regression to describe the effect of antibiotic exposure on patient outcome. RESULTS: We included 384 patients (361 evaluable patients) across 68 hospitals. The median age was 61 (interquartile range [IQR], 48-73) years, the median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 18 (IQR, 14-24), and 65% of patients were male. Of the 248 patients treated for infection, 16% did not achieve 50% f T>MIC and these patients were 32% less likely to have a positive clinical outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; P = .009). Positive clinical outcome was associated with increasing 50% f T>MIC and 100% f T>MIC ratios (OR, 1.02 and 1.56, respectively; P < .03), with significant interaction with sickness severity status. CONCLUSIONS: Infected critically ill patients may have adverse outcomes as a result of inadeqaute antibiotic exposure; a paradigm change to more personalized antibiotic dosing may be necessary to improve outcomes for these most seriously ill patients.

Doripenem population pharmacokinetics and dosing requirements for critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration.

OBJECTIVES: Doripenem is a newer carbapenem with little data available to guide effective dosing during renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to determine the population pharmacokinetics of doripenem in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) for acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: This was an observational pharmacokinetic study in 12 infected critically ill adult patients with AKI undergoing CVVHDF and receiving 500 mg of doripenem intravenously every 8 h as a 60 min infusion. Serial blood samples were taken on 2 days of treatment and used for population pharmacokinetic analysis with S-ADAPT. RESULTS: The median (IQR) age was 62 (53-71) years, the median (IQR) weight was 77 (67-96) kg and the median (IQR) APACHE II score was 29 (19-32). The median blood, dialysate and replacement fluid rates were 200, 1000 and 1000 mL/h, respectively. A two-compartment linear model with doripenem clearance described by CVVHDF, renal or non-renal mechanisms was most appropriate. The mean value for total doripenem clearance was 4.46 L/h and volume of distribution was 38.0 L. Doripenem clearance by CVVHDF was significantly correlated with the replacement fluid flow rate and accounted for ∼30%-37% of total clearance. A dose of 500 mg intravenously every 8 h achieved favourable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics for all patients up to an MIC of 4 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first paper describing the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of doripenem in critically ill patients with AKI receiving CVVHDF. A dose of 500 mg intravenously every 8 h was appropriate for our CVVHDF settings for infections caused by susceptible bacteria.