Improvements in Pediatric Bone Loss Reconstruction With the Induced Membrane Technique.

BACKGROUND: The induced membrane technique is now widely used for pediatric diaphyseal bone loss due to various etiologies. Although consolidation rates remain satisfactory, complications, and healing delays may occur requiring additional procedures. We studied a series of induced membrane bone reconstructions in which the second stage included an embedded endomembranous non vascularized fibular shaft, in addition to iliac bone grafts. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results in terms of bone consolidation and complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative and multicentric study of 32 children with large bone loss treated with the induced membrane reconstruction technique. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the graft used during the second stage. The first group (G1) of 16 patients had a nonvascularized fibula embedded inside the membrane in addition with the corticocancellous grafts from the iliac crest. The second group (G2) of 16 patients underwent reconstruction using the original technique, with iliac crest graft only. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in terms of etiologies of bone loss and follow-up (mean: 44 mo for G1 and 49 mo for G2). Mean bone losses were 15.4 cm (range: 2 to 25; SD: 5.6) for G1 and 10.6 cm (range: 3 to 19; SD: 5.2) for G2. In the first group, all patients healed primarily, with a mean time of 5.9 months (range: 4 to 8; SD: 1.6). In the second group, 2 of 16 patients did not healed; for the others 14, healing mean time was 6.9 months (range: 3 to 12; SD: 2.7). The short-term and long-term complications rates were 38% to 19% for G1 and 50% to 31% for G2, respectively. Regarding the donor site, the fibulas reconstructed spontaneously with a mean time of 4.8 months (range: 3 to 6; SD: 1.2). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of a nonvascularized fibula during the second stage of the induced membrane technique appears to improve the consolidation rate in the pediatric population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Retrospective comparative study.

Pregabalin does not reduce postoperative pain after outpatient ACL surgery: A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: In France, prescribing pregabalin requires a secure prescription valid for 6 months since the decree of 12 February 2021, based on recommendations of the French Centre for Evaluation and Information on Pharmacodependence and Addiction vigilance (CEIP-A). This led to discontinuation of this treatment as a postoperative analgesic in the French ACL Study (FAST) cohort. We aimed to evaluate the impact of this change on early postoperative pain. HYPOTHESIS: Pregabalin is an important analgesic for reducing early postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair. METHODS: At our healthcare facility, 584 patients from the FAST cohort who underwent primary isolated ACL reconstruction were included: 292 patients operated before June 1, 2021 who received pregabalin postoperatively and 292 patients operated after June 1, 2021 who did not receive pregabalin. The patients were matched based on age, sex, preoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores. Pain was evaluated on a visual analog scale (VAS) on D0 in the evening, D0 at night, D1, D2 and D3. RESULTS: The patients who did not receive pregabalin had more severe pain at night on D0: 5.21 vs 5.68 (p=.048). There was no difference between groups in the postoperative pain at rest during the evening of D0 (p=.89), D1 (p=.33), D2 (p=.37) and D3 (p=.21). CONCLUSION: In the context of outpatient arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, pregabalin does not reduce early postoperative pain in a clinically significant manner. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; case-control study.

Thematic analysis of online discussion forums for soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As there is an increasing reliance on the internet for medical information, patients diagnosed with rare diseases have turned to online community forums to share information about their diagnoses. These forums help patients to gather and share information about their experience with disease. Additionally, these platforms enable patients to build unique connections based on their shared experiences. The objective of this study was to review shared posts in online community forums by individuals with soft tissue sarcomas to better understand commonly discussed themes. This information may improve the physicians' understanding of patients' concerns and feelings at the time of diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We entered "sarcoma discussion forum" in search engines to identify internet discussion boards. Four major discussion forums were analyzed, and posts written between January 1, 2017 through May 1, 2022 addressing soft tissue sarcomas present in the upper and lower extremities were collected. Each post was analyzed by the two investigators in three steps (open coding, axial coding, and selective coding). RESULTS: A total of 506 posts were included in the final analysis. We used twenty-seven axial codes and four selective codes. Emotional Aspects/Connecting with Others was the most common theme (77 % of posts) followed by Information Support: Treatment (38 % of posts), Information Support: Diagnosis (24 % of posts) and Information Support: Recovery (21 % of posts). CONCLUSIONS: The most prevalent theme was centered on emotional aspects of these patients' journeys, highlighting the importance of providing resources to address emotional support for patients with soft tissue sarcoma and their families. LEVEL IV: Qualitative research study.