Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 74: 526.e7-526.e12, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33836224

RESUMEN

CASE REPORT: Classical surgical options for renal artery aneurysm (RAA) are usually restricted to endovascular surgery or open repair, either using an in-situ or ex-situ approach. A 45-year-old woman presenting with a 20-mm complex RAA with hilum location, not suitable for endovascular repair renal was treated with a mini-invasive robotic approach. This approach allowed an in-situ reconstruction in a complete mini-invasive manner with the Da Vinci Xi robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). The robotic system was used for both surgical exposure and aneurysmectomy with patch closure. Clamping time was 38 minutes (warm ischemia), total operative time was 210 minutes. LIITERATURE REVIEW: A comprehensive literature review was performed concerning the studies reporting a robotic approach for RAA. Main outcomes of interest were surgical technique, total operative time, clamping time, blood loss and postoperative renal function. Seven studies were identified, reporting a total of 20 RAAs. Most of the RAA were treated by aneurysmoraphy (n=9). Median total operative time varied between 228 and 300 min (range: 155 - 360 minutes), median clamping time varied between 26 and 44 minutes (range: 10 - 82 minutes). Median blood loss was comprised between100 and 150 mL (range: 25 - 650 mL). No alteration of renal function in the early post-operative period was reported. CONCLUSION: RAA in-situ repair with a robotic approach is feasible and safe and should be considered as an alternative to open surgical repair when endovascular technique cannot be an option.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/cirugía , Arteria Renal/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Int Angiol ; 40(3): 222-228, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33660497

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Radiation-induced arteriopathy (RIA) is a rare complication but may become more common due to the increased use of radiotherapy and the prolonged survival of patients. There is still a lack of evidence concerning treatment options. The aim of this study is to review reported cases of lower-limb RIA in order to provide guidelines for management. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We reported 4 cases treated for lower limb RIA and performed a systematic literature review without time limitation in the Medline database using the MeSh tems "iliac artery/radiation effects" OR "femoral artery/radiation effects." Main outcomes of interest were radiation dose, time before symptoms, symptoms, involved vessels, treatment and outcome. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-five studies were included, reporting a total of 43 patients. Median time between irradiation and symptoms was 12 years (range: 9 days-49 years), with a median irradiation dose of 40Gy. Clinical presentation was claudication in 18 patients (52%), critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) in 4 patients (11%), acute limb ischemia (ALI) in 3 patients (9%) and hemorrhage in 6 patients (17%), the remaining 4 patients were asymptomatic (11%). Vessels involved were iliac arteries in 65% of the cases, femoropopliteal arteries in 28% of cases and concomitant supra and infrainguinal vessels in 7% of the cases. Claudication was mostly treated by open surgery (62%). Treatment of CLTI included primary amputation (50%), open surgery (25%) or endovascular surgery (25%). ALI was treated medically (33%), by open surgery (33%) or in situ thrombolysis (33%). Hemorrhagic cases or pulsatile masses were mostly treated by open surgery (66%). Follow-up was reported in 26 patients (67%), with mean follow-up of 12 months (range: 2 weeks - 5 years). During follow-up, 16% of these patients presented a recurrence of symptoms, and 8% required a reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be no evidence for open versus endovascular treatment, but close and long-term follow-up is needed in these patients due to the possible late presentation and recurrence of symptoms after treatment.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Amputación Quirúrgica , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/etiología , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/terapia , Recuperación del Miembro , Extremidad Inferior , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 61(5): 538-543, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32885928

RESUMEN

In the last decades, the main evolution in the field of vascular surgery was correlated to the development and introduction of vascular substitutes. Currently, two types of synthetic vascular substitutes have been widely adopted: polyethylene terephthalate and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Ideally, they should demonstrate a behavior as close as possible as that of human arteries in terms of mechanical and biological properties. However, no vascular substitute has been found to compare with the patency rates of gold-standard autologous conduits, and major drawbacks of current vascular substitutes remain both thrombogenicity and infectability.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Politetrafluoroetileno/química , Diseño de Prótesis , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Animales , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/fisiopatología , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/fisiopatología , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA