Prevalence and clinical characteristics of adult polymyositis and dermatomyositis; data from a large and unselected Norwegian cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The occurrence of polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) in the general population is largely unknown and unbiased data on clinical and laboratory features in PM/DM are missing. Here, we aim to identify and characterise every PM/DM patient living in southeast Norway (denominator population 2.64 million), 2003-2012. METHOD: Due to the structure of the Norwegian health system, all patients with PM/DM are followed at public hospitals. Hence, all public hospital databases in southeast Norway were screened for patients having ICD-10 codes compatible with myositis. Manual chart review was then performed to identify all cases meeting the Peter & Bohan and/or Targoff classification criteria for PM/DM. RESULTS: The ICD-10 search identified 3160 potential myositis patients, but only 208/3160 patients met the Peter & Bohan criteria and 230 the Targoff criteria (100 PM, 130 DM). With 56 deaths during the observation period, point prevalence of PM/DM was calculated to 8.7/100 000. Estimated annual incidences ranged from 6 to 10 /1 000 000, with peak incidences at 50-59 (DM) and 60-69 years (PM). Myositis specific antibodies (Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, signal recognition particle (SRP) and Mi-2) were present in 53% (109/204), while 137/163 (87%) had pathological muscle MRI. Frequent clinical features included myalgia (75%), arthritis (41%) dyspnoea (62%) and dysphagia (58%). Positive anti-Jo-1, present in 39% of DM and 22% of PM cases, was associated with dyspnoea, arthritis and mechanic hands. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the population prevalence of PM/DM in Caucasians is quite low, but underscores the complexity and severity of the disorders.

Can cancer patients assess the influence of pain on functions? A randomised, controlled study of the pain interference items in the Brief Pain Inventory.

BACKGROUND: The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is recommended as a pain measurement tool by the Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care. The BPI is designed to assess both pain severity and interference with functions caused by pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate if pain interference items are influenced by other factors than pain. METHODS: We asked adult cancer patients to complete the original and a revised BPI on two study days. In the original version of the BPI the patients were asked how, during the last 24 hours, pain has interfered with functions. In the revised BPI this question was changed to how, during the last 24 hours, these functions are affected in general. Heath related quality of life was assessed at both study days applying the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-eight of the 55 included patients completed both assessments. The BPI pain intensities scores and the health related quality of life scores were similar at the two study days. Except for mood this study observed no significant distinctions between the patients' BPI interference items scores in the original (pain influence on function) and the revised BPI (function in general). Seventeen patients reported higher influence from pain on functions than the total influence on function from all causes. CONCLUSION: We observed similar scores in the original BPI interference scores (pain influence on function) compared with the revised BPI interference scores (decreased function in general). This finding might imply that the BPI interference scale measures are partly responded to as more of a global interference measure.

The Norwegian Doloplus-2, a tool for behavioural pain assessment: translation and pilot-validation in nursing home patients with cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: Pain assessment is challenging in cognitively impaired (CI) patients due to inadequate self-report skills and observational ratings are an alternative. The Doloplus-2 is developed for pain assessment in the CI and rates somatic, psychomotor and psychosocial behaviours as indicators of pain. AIMS: To translate the Doloplus-2 into Norwegian, to test the Doloplus-2 with regard to criterion validity and to obtain the administrators' evaluation of the clinical performance of the Doloplus-2. METHODS: Nurses at three nursing homes, in collaboration with two research assistants, administered the Doloplus-2 to 59 patients with dementia. The results were compared against experienced clinicians' pain ratings. Regression analyses were performed to explore each different item's contribution to the total pain score. The administrators also completed a debriefing questionnaire. RESULTS: The instrument was translated according to international guidelines. Regression analyses demonstrate that the Doloplus-2 score accounts for 62% (R2) of the expert score and that the four most informative items could explain 68% of the expert score. Analyses of the different Doloplus-2 items indicate that facial expressions explain most and social life least of the expert's pain ratings. The administrators reported that Doloplus-2 was helpful and easy to administer, but questioned the validity of the psychosocial domain. CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian Doloplus-2 demonstrates satisfactory criterion validity and clinical value in this pilot study. However, the content of the instrument needs a general re-evaluation, especially with regard to the psychosocial items.