RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Empathy is a key competency and is essential for doctor-patient relationships. Studies have proven a continuous reduction of empathy in medical students during their study period. The use of SPs is positively evaluated for competency acquisition and real patient communication training has positive effects on empathy empowerment. Therefore, the present study focusses on the impact of simulated patient (SP) vs real patient (RP) communication training on empathetic behaviour in undergraduate medical students. METHODS: The prospective evaluation took place during a 210-minute skills lab unit on medical communication for 3rd year medical students. Study participants were allocated in advance to one of three groups: one group trained with an SP (SP-group) and was informed about the fact that it was an SP; another group trained with an SP but assumed to encounter an RP (incognito patient group (IP-group)); the last group trained with an RP and was correctly informed about it (real patient group (RP-group). Self-assessed empathy was measured by using Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) and Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), as these are the most commonly used instruments for assessing empathy. Study participants were evaluated on empathetic behaviour by their group-associated patient using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) scale. RESULTS: 146 students participated. There was no significant difference in self-assessed empathy between groups for JSPE and IRI. External assessment via CARE showed a statistically significant difference between SP-group and IP-group , as well as between SP-group and RP-group. There was no significant difference between IP-group and RP-group. This means that students training with real patients (or who believed them to be real) did receive significantly lower performance ratings on their empathy. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate a significant lower external empathy rating for students who had trained with a real patient or if they were in the belief of having encountered a real patient; this may be due to inhibitions and a lack of routine. Therefore, we recommend implementing SPs in the early study period with the gradual integration of RPs in the student's further course of study.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Empatía , Simulación de Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Competencia Clínica , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the context of the coronavirus pandemic, countless face-to-face events as well as medical trainings were cancelled or moved to online courses, which resulted in increased digitalization in many areas. In the context of medical education, videos provide tremendous benefit for visualizing skills before they are practised. METHODS: Based on a previous investigation of video material addressing epidural catheterization available on the YouTube platform, we aimed to investigate new content produced in the context of the pandemic. Thus, a video search was conducted in May 2022. RESULTS: We identified twelve new videos since the pandemic with a significant improvement in the new content in terms of procedural items (p = 0.03) compared to the prepandemic video content. Video content released in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic was more often created by private content creators and were significantly shorter in total runtime than those from university and medical societies (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The profound changes in the learning and teaching of health care education in relation to the pandemic are largely unclear. We reveal improved procedural quality of predominantly privately uploaded content despite a shortened runtime compared to the prepandemic period. This might indicate that technical and financial hurdles to producing instructional videos by discipline experts have decreased. In addition to the teaching difficulties caused by the pandemic, this change is likely to be due to validated manuals on how to create such content. The awareness that medical education needs to be improved has grown, so platforms offer specialized sublevels for high-quality medical videos.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Instrucción por Computador , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Educación en Salud , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients fearing dental interventions are at risk of delaying or skipping much-needed treatments. Empathic communication could lead to a higher rate of compliance from patients within this group. Empathy, the big five personality traits, and emotion management abilities are all known to influence the quality of communication between dentists and patients. This study was conducted to analyze whether there is a correlation between these factors in dentistry students. METHODS: Dentistry students in their 2nd and 4th year of study were asked to complete questionnaires assessing empathy, emotion management, and personality traits. Out of a total of 148 eligible participants, 53 students (34%) volunteered to participate. For empathy, the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (students' version; JSPE-S) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) were used. Personality traits were assessed using the Short Big Five Inventory (BFI-s), and the Situational Test of Emotional Management (STEM) to measure emotional management ability. RESULTS: Higher scores for emotion management were significantly correlated with the female gender (p ≤ 0.005) and with higher scores in openness (p ≤ 0.05). Students with higher scores in openness also achieved higher scores on the IRI subscales: Perspective taking (p ≤ 0.05), Fantasy (p ≤ 0.01), Empathic concern (p ≤ 0.05), and Personal distress (p ≤ 0.05). For JSPE-S, no correlation with emotion management and personality traits was found. CONCLUSION: Empathy and emotion management might not be significantly related in dentistry students. Regarding personality traits, students who scored higher on openness also indicated higher abilities in emotion management. These findings should be taken into consideration when planning communication courses for dentistry students, as it might be possible to independently train empathy and emotion management as part of emotional intelligence.
Asunto(s)
Empatía , Estudiantes de Medicina , Odontología , Inteligencia Emocional , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
For quite some time, the development and implementation of online teaching has been a controversial issue in surgical education for the degree in medicine. This has become more important with the progression of digitalisation and not least as a result of the current pandemic. It is becoming increasingly urgent to establish the opportunities and limits of online teaching, which has already proved successful under the current developmental pressure, and there are promising concepts. This article addresses the framework and the various online teaching formats in surgery, and illustrates the interplay between technical feasibility, practical experience, and didactic objectives.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Educación a Distancia , Humanos , Pandemias , EnseñanzaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The correct performance of a structured facial examination presents a fundamental clinical skill to detect facial pathologies. However, many students are not adequately prepared in this basic clinical skill. Many argue that the traditional 'See One, Do One' approach is not sufficient to fully master a clinical skill. 'Mental Training' has successfully been used to train psychomotor and technical skills in sports and other surgical fields, but its use in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is not described. We conducted a quasi-experimental to determine if 'Mental Training' was effective in teaching a structured facial examination. METHODS: Sixty-seven students were randomly assigned to a 'Mental Training' and 'See One, Do One' group. Both groups received standardized video instruction on how to perform a structured facial examination. The 'See One, Do One' group then received 60 min of guided physical practice while the 'Mental Training' group actively developed a detailed, stepwise sequence of the performance of a structured facial examination and visualized this sequence subvocally before practicing the skill. Student performance was measured shortly after (T1) and five to 10 weeks (T2) after the training by two blinded examiners (E1 and E2) using a validated checklist. RESULTS: Groups did not differ in gender, age or in experience. The 'Mental Training' group averaged significantly more points in T1 (pE1 = 0.00012; pE2 = 0.004; dE1 = 0.86; dE2 = 0.66) and T2 (pE1 = 0.04; pE2 = 0.008, dE1 = 0.37; dE2 = 0.64) than the 'See One, Do One' group. The intragroup comparison showed a significant (pE1 = 0.0002; pE2 = 0.06, dE1 = 1.07; dE2 = 0.50) increase in clinical examination skills in the 'See One, Do One' group, while the 'Mental Training' group maintained an already high level of clinical examination skills between T1 and T2. DISCUSSION: 'Mental Training' is an efficient tool to teach and maintain basic clinical skills. In this study 'Mental Training' was shown to be superior to the commonly used 'See One, Do One' approach in learning how to perform a structured facial examination and should therefore be considered more often to teach physical examination skills.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Examen Físico , Humanos , Aprendizaje , Proyectos de Investigación , EstudiantesRESUMEN
Epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EET) facilitate regeneration in different tissues, and their benefit in dermal wound healing has been proven under normal conditions. In this study, we investigated the effect of 11,12 EET on dermal wound healing in diabetes. We induced diabetes by i.p. injection of streptozotocin 2 weeks prior to wound creation on the dorsal side of the mouse ear. 11,12 EET was applied every second day on the wound, whereas the control groups received only solvent. Epithelialization was monitored every second day intravitally up to wound closure. Wounds were stained for VEGF, CD31, TGF-ß, TNF-α, SDF-1α, NF-κB, and Ki-67, and fibroblasts were counted after hematoxylin-eosin stain on days 3, 6, 9, and 16 after wounding. After induction of diabetes, wounds closed on day 13.00 ± 2.20 standard deviation (SD). Local 11,12 ETT application improved wound closure significantly to day 8.40 ± 1.39 SD. EET treatment enhanced VEGF and CD31 expression in wounds on day 3. It also seemed to raise TNF-α level on all days investigated as well as TGF-ß level on days 3 and 6. A decrease in NF-κB could be observed on days 9 and 16 after EET application. The latter findings were not significant. SDF-1α expression was not influenced by EET application, and Ki-67 was significantly less in the EET group on day 9 after EET application. The number of fibroblasts was significantly increased on day 9 after the 11,12 EET application. 11,12 EET improve deteriorated wound healing in diabetes by enhancing neoangiogenesis, especially in the early phase of wound healing. Furthermore, they contribute to the dissolution of the initial inflammatory reaction, allowing the crucial transition from the inflammatory to proliferative phase in wound healing.
Asunto(s)
Ácido 8,11,14-Eicosatrienoico/análogos & derivados , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/complicaciones , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos , Ácido 8,11,14-Eicosatrienoico/farmacología , Ácido 8,11,14-Eicosatrienoico/uso terapéutico , Animales , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Ratones , Neovascularización Fisiológica/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The admission of patients with minor injuries, such as contusions is a regular practice in acute care hospitals. The pathophysiological changes resulting from the accident are seldom the primary reason for hospitalization. The aim of this retrospective monocentric study was therefore to examine the etiology as well as the cost-causing factors and refinancing on admission. METHODS: Patients were identified due to a retrospective query in the hospital information system (HIS) according to the ICD-10 German modification codes at discharge. A total of 117 patients were enrolled over a period of 2 years. The classification was carried out according to the accident mechanism and the division into age groups. In addition, the cost calculation was based on department and clinic-specific daily rates. RESULTS: In terms of etiology low impact falls in the domestic environment were the most common cause (48.7%), followed by high-energy trauma (22.8%). Within the group with domestic falls, the mean age was 77.8 years. This group also showed the longest length of stay (LOS) with 5.2 days. As part of the calculated costs, the group of domestic falls showed the highest costs of 2596.24⯠with an average DRG cost revenue of 1464.51â¯. DISCUSSION: The evaluation of the clinic internal data confirmed the subjective perception that the majority of patients admitted with the diagnosis of contusions came from the age group >65 years. Admission is primarily based on the increasing comorbidities and to avert secondary diseases and the consequences of immobilization. It could also be shown that the resulting costs are relevant to health economics and that the treatment does not appear to cover the costs.
Asunto(s)
Contusiones , Hospitalización , Anciano , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Alta del Paciente , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The feedback given to students plays an important role in their efficiency related to learning practical skills. In the present study, diverse feedback modalities have been investigated. Our hypothesis is that individualized and unsupervised video feedback can produce a similar learning experience as performing practical skills in an oral and maxillofacial surgery setting with conventional direct expert feedback (control group). METHODS: This prospective, randomized, controlled, and blinded study compared direct expert feedback (DEF), individualized video feedback (IVF) and unsupervised video feedback (UVF). The participants were fourth-year dental students from University Goethe in Frankfurt. The students were assigned to one of the three feedback methods (n = 20 per group) using simple randomization. All participants watched an instruction video for an interdental ('Ernst') ligature and periphery venous catheterization. Next, the students were video recorded performing the tasks by themselves (pre-test). Following this, every student received feedback using one of the above-mentioned feedback modalities. The participants then performed the same task again while being video recorded (post-test) to measure the acquired competence. Six weeks later, the students participated in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to evaluate their long-term knowledge retention. All examiners were blinded regarding the students' instructional approach and their affiliation in terms of the learning group. RESULTS: For the interdental ligature, we found significant improvements in performance in each feedback modality group between the pre-test and post-test (p < 0.001). UVF had the strongest effect on performance time. The comparison between each group in the post-test showed no significant differences between the three groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that IVF and UVF can be considered an alternative or adjunct to conventional methods (i.e. DEF) when learning procedural skills in oral and maxillofacial surgery. However, DEF showed to be the most effective method of feedback and therefore preferable in teaching.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Cirugía Bucal , Competencia Clínica , Retroalimentación , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Técnicas de Sutura , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Teaching complex motor skills at a high level remains a challenge in medical education. Established methods often involve large amounts of teaching time and material. The implementation of standardized videos in those methods might help save resources. In this study, video-based versions of Peyton's '4-step Approach' and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' are compared. We hypothesized that the video-based '4-step Approach' would be more effective in learning procedural skills than the 'See One, Do One Approach'. METHODS: One-hundred-two naïve students were trained to perform a structured facial examination and a Bellocq's tamponade with either Halsted's (n = 57) or Peyton's (n = 45) method within a curricular course. Steps 1 (Halsted) and 1-3 (Peyton) were replaced by standardized teaching videos. The performance was measured directly (T1) and 8 weeks (T2) after the intervention by blinded examiners using structured checklists. An item-analysis was also carried out. RESULTS: At T1, performance scores significantly differed in favor of the video-based '4-step Approach' (p < 0.01) for both skills. No differences were found at T2 (p < 0.362). The item-analysis revealed that Peyton's method was significantly more effective in the complex subparts of both skills. CONCLUSIONS: The modified video-based version of Peyton's '4-step Approach' is the preferred method for teaching especially complex motor skills in a large curricular scale. Furthermore, an effective way to utilize Peyton's method in a group setting could be demonstrated. Further studies have to investigate the long-term learning retention of this method in a formative setting.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Destreza Motora , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/educación , Enseñanza , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Grabación en Video , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Introduction: Curriculum mapping shows concordances and differences between the intended and the taught curriculum. To our knowledge, no previous studies describe the effects that this mapping has on the curriculum. The aim of the present study is to map the content of a lecture series in surgery to the National Catalogue of Learning Objectives in Surgery and analyze the effects this mapping has on the content of the following lecture series. Methods: All lecturers in the lecture series were directly observed by a minimum of two reviewers and learning objectives and the level of competence were documented. After the lecture series, the results were visualized within the catalog of learning objectives and were sent to the lecturers. In the following lecture series, learning objectives were documented correspondingly. Results: In the first lecture series, 47% of the learning objectives were taught. After the mapping, the number of learning objectives that were taught increased to 59% (p < 0.001). The increase was found in all surgical disciplines and in all levels of competences without any changes in the average duration of the lectures. Conclusions: The presented method for mapping a curriculum effectively increased the number of taught learning objectives without requiring longer lecture durations.
Asunto(s)
Educación Basada en Competencias/estadística & datos numéricos , Curriculum/estadística & datos numéricos , Objetivos , Aprendizaje , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/educación , Competencia Clínica , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Computerized virtual patients (VP) have spread into many areas of healthcare delivery and medical education. They provide various advantages like flexibility in pace and space of learning, a high degree of teaching reproducibility and a cost effectiveness. However, the educational benefit of VP as an additive or also as an alternative to traditional teaching formats remains unclear. Moreover, there are no randomized-controlled studies that investigated the use of VP in a dental curriculum. Therefore, this study investigates VP as an alternative to lecturer-led small-group teaching in a curricular, randomized and controlled setting. METHODS: Randomized and controlled cohort study. Four VP cases were created according to previously published design principles and compared with lecturer-led small group teaching (SGT) within the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery clerkship for dental students at the Department for Cranio-, Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Clinical competence was measured prior (T0), directly (T1) and 6 weeks (T2) after the intervention using theoretical tests and a self-assessment questionnaire. Furthermore, VP design was evaluated using a validated toolkit. RESULTS: Fifty-seven students (VP = 32; SGT = 25) agreed to participate in the study. No competence differences were found at T0 (p = 0.56). The VP group outperformed (p < .0001) the SGT group at T1. At T2 there was no difference between both groups (p = 0.55). Both interventions led to a significant growth in self-assessed competence. The VP group felt better prepared to diagnose and treat real patients and regarded VP cases as a rewarding learning experience. CONCLUSIONS: VP cases are an effective alternative to lecture-led SGT in terms of learning efficacy in the short and long-term as well as self-assessed competence growth and student satisfaction. Furthermore, integrating VP cases within a curricular Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clerkship is feasible and leads to substantial growth of clinical competence in undergraduate dental students.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Estudiantes de Odontología , Cirugía Bucal/educación , Enseñanza , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Estudios de Cohortes , Educación en Odontología , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Practical skills are very important for medical doctors, but, for many practical skills, the optimal teaching form is not yet known. Surgical education and training can be compared to high performance sports, since complex movements and differentiated coordination have to be united perfectly in both disciplines. Thus, it would be useful to integrate into medical training methods that have been established and analysed in detail in sports sciences. The aim of the present study was to perform an analysis of the comparative effectiveness of mental training and the traditional "see one, do one" approach - with respect to both the acquired expertise, as well as the personnel and material costs. METHODS: Third year undergraduate medical students were randomised into two groups while participating in a practical skills training session: The control group was taught using the "see one, do one" approach, but the intervention group used mental training. As an example of a complex surgical skill, wound care was selected, as it consists of applying a local anaesthetic, the sterile covering and preparation of a wound, as well as performing a simple interrupted suture. The learning success was recorded at 3 measuring times: Directly after the training in an introductory OSCE (time point 1), two weeks after training using a free recall test (time point 2) as well as 5â-â14 weeks after training in an overall OSCE (time point 3). RESULTS: 123 students participated in the study. At the first time point, the students of the "mental training" group showed significantly better results in performing the sterile covering and wound preparation ("see one, do one" group 67.4% + 11.1; mental training group 71.6 + 10.6, p = 0.035). At other stations and at other time points there were no significant differences between the two groups. The cost analysis shows a potential saving of 4067.68 per semester due to the resource-saving handling of materials and personnel. CONCLUSION: Mental training represents a teaching method that can be used with good results in curricular teaching in the field of surgery, which goes hand in hand with a reduction in personnel and material costs.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Estudiantes de Medicina , Competencia Clínica , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Teaching training programs contribute to improving the quality of medical education. In a course of the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) concept of the Surgical Working Group for Teaching, teachers (TN) from different medical professions and career levels were taught together. AIM OF THE WORK: Assessments of teaching activities in everyday clinical practice of residents (AÄ), senior staff (OÄ) and nurses (KP), their perception of teaching obstacles and requirements to improve teaching. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prior to the beginning of the course, biographical data, previous teaching experiences, teaching obstacles as well as their notions to improve teaching in the daily clinical routine were requested. Upon completion, the participants were asked to rate the course. The answers to the closed and open questions were evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2017, six basic courses (TTT-A) were conducted at three locations. 97 participants participated in the surveys (AÄ n = 44, OÄ n = 19, KP n = 17). More than two-thirds declared previously acquired teaching knowledge. There were no significant differences between medical and nursing staff. While AÄ and KP primarily taught at the bedside, OÄ taught mainly in the context of lectures, electives and seminars. Only a small proportion of all occupational groups felt well prepared for teaching in everyday clinical practice. The main drawbacks were lack of time and staff, too many students per group and too little teaching knowledge. Nearly two-thirds of the AÄ found teaching in general as a strong or moderate burden, compared to about 50% of the OÄ and 60% KP. Aspirations for improvement of teaching included more precise characterisation of the learning objectives, greater appreciation of teaching as a whole, and regular measures to make teaching professional. DISCUSSION: Occupational group-related differences in everyday clinical practice and individual career progression, impact type, implementation and perception of the teaching activity. By focusing on learning objectives and essential teaching methods and examination formats relevant to teaching at the bedside, teacher training programs across professional groups can contribute to knowledge and expertise growth. Indications of a sustainable effect encourage the continuation and further development of the TTT concept.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Respeto , Competencia Clínica , Educación Médica , Humanos , EnseñanzaRESUMEN
The "Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020" from the German Federal Government should not be underestimated as only one among many announcement. Thus, the Surgical Working Group on Medical Education (CAL) of the German Association of Surgeons (DGCH) comments on the intended measures of the "Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020" and discusses the challenges, consequences and duties arising from the "Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020" for the representatives of the surgical societies and those engaged in surgical undergraduate training.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Alemania , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
Competency-based medical education is needed in order to meet the requirements of medical care currently and in the future. The basis of this are activity-based learning objectives that are merged in competency-based catalogues. A basis for a core curriculum of undergraduate medical training is the National Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM). Already in 2013, for surgery, the competencies which medical students should have achieved after completing the practical year (PJ) in relation to surgical diseases were defined in the special part of the National Catalogue of Learning Objectives in Surgery (NKLC). In the now amended general part of the NKLC, interdisciplinary competencies were defined and consented from all surgical disciplines, that are relevant for all surgical disciplines and that all representatives from the different surgical disciplines should incorporate in their surgical training. The complete NKLC is now available for faculties, teachers and students for trial (available online: https://www.dgch.de/index.php?id=190&L=528). The guiding principle for the entire development process was to make sure that students gain all competencies they need when starting to work as a medical doctor and therefor to increase patient safety.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Facultades de Medicina , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Alemania , Humanos , AprendizajeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study assessed the impact of medical students' emotion recognition ability and extraversion on their empathic communication, as perceived by simulated patients in a training context. METHODS: This study used a crossed-effect data structure and examined 245 students in their fourth year of medical school. The students' personality traits were assessed based on a self-assessment questionnaire of the short form of the Big Five Inventory; their emotion recognition ability was measured using a performance test (Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy-2, Adult Facial Expressions). Simulated patients evaluated the medical students' empathic communication. RESULTS: Students with a combination of high emotion recognition ability and extraversion received more positive ratings from simulated patients than their fellow students with a combination of emotion recognition ability and low extraversion. The main effects of emotion recognition or extraversion were not sufficient to yield similar effects. There were no other effects related to the remaining Big Five variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that to build rapport with patients, medical staff need to combine emotional capabilities with a dispositional interest in interpersonal encounters.
Asunto(s)
Empatía , Extraversión Psicológica , Simulación de Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Comunicación , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personalidad , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ensuring that all medical students achieve adequate clinical skills remains a challenge, yet the correct performance of clinical skills is critical for all fields of medicine. This study analyzes the influence of receiving feedback by teaching associates in the context of achieving and maintaining a level of expertise in complex head and skull examination. METHODS: All third year students at a German university who completed the obligatory surgical skills lab training and surgical clerkship participated in this study. The students were randomized into two groups. CONTROL GROUP: lessons by an instructor and peer-based practical skills training. Intervention group: training by teaching associates who are examined as simulation patients and provided direct feedback on student performance. Their competency in short- and long-term competence (directly after intervention and at 4 months after the training) of head and skull examination was measured. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 19 (IBM, Armonk, USA). Parametric and non-parametric test methods were applied. As a measurement of correlation, Pearson correlations and correlations via Kendall's-Tau-b were calculated and Cohen's d effect size was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 181 students were included (90 intervention, 91 control). Out of those 181 students 81 agreed to be videotaped (32 in the control group and 49 in the TA group) and examined at time point 1. At both time points, the intervention group performed the examination significantly better (time point 1, p = <.001; time point 2 (rater 1 p = .009, rater 2 p = .015), than the control group. The effect size (Cohens d) was up to 1.422. CONCLUSIONS: The use of teaching associates for teaching complex practical skills is effective for short- and long-term retention. We anticipate the method could be easily translated to nearly every patient-based clinical skill, particularly with regards to a competence-based education of future doctors.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Educación Basada en Competencias/métodos , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Evaluación Educacional , Aprendizaje , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Enseñanza , Educación Basada en Competencias/normas , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/normas , Retroalimentación , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is increasingly used at medical schools to assess practical competencies. To compare the outcomes of students at different medical schools, we introduced standardized OSCE stations with identical checklists. METHODS: We investigated examiner bias at standardized OSCE stations for knee- and shoulder-joint examinations, which were implemented into the surgical OSCE at five different medical schools. The checklists for the assessment consisted of part A for knowledge and performance of the skill and part B for communication and interaction with the patient. At each medical faculty, one reference examiner also scored independently to the local examiner. The scores from both examiners were compared and analysed for inter-rater reliability and correlation with the level of clinical experience. Possible gender bias was also evaluated. RESULTS: In part A of the checklist, local examiners graded students higher compared to the reference examiner; in part B of the checklist, there was no trend to the findings. The inter-rater reliability was weak, and the scoring correlated only weakly with the examiner's level of experience. Female examiners rated generally higher, but male examiners scored significantly higher if the examinee was female. CONCLUSIONS: These findings of examiner effects, even in standardized situations, may influence outcome even when students perform equally well. Examiners need to be made aware of these biases prior to examining.
Asunto(s)
Sesgo , Competencia Clínica , Evaluación Educacional/normas , Facultades de Medicina , Lista de Verificación , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Docentes Médicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Background The working party of the German Society for Surgery (DGCH) on undergraduate surgical education has developed a national expertise-based catalogue of learning goals in surgery (NKLC). This study analyses the extent to which the questions of the German second medical licensing examination compiled by the IMPP are congruent with the NKLC and which thematic focus is emphasised. Materials and Methods Firstly, a guideline and evaluation sheet were developed in order to achieve documentation of the individual examination questions of the second licensing examination with respect to the learning goals of the NKLC. In a retrospective analysis from autumn 2009 to autumn 2014, eleven licensing examinations in human medicine were screened independently by three different reviewers. In accordance with the guideline, the surgical questions were identified and subsequently matched to the learning goals of the NKLC. The analysis included the number of surgical learning goals as well as the number of surgical questions for each examination, learning goal, and different levels of expertise (LE). Results Thirteen reviewers from six surgical disciplines participated in the analysis. On average, reviewers agreed on the differentiation between surgical and non-surgical questions in 79.1% of all 3480 questions from 11 licensing examinations. For each examination (n = 320 questions), 98.8 ± 22.6 questions (min.: 69, max.: 150) were rated as surgical. For each surgical learning goal addressed, 2.2 ± 0.3 questions (min.: 1, max.: 16) were asked. For each examination, 23.5 ± 6.3 questions (min.: 11; max.: 31) referred to learning goals of LE 3, 52.5 ± 16.7 questions (min.: 34; max.: 94) addressed learning goals of LE 2 and 22.8 ± 7.7 questions (min.: 9; max.: 34) were related to learning goals of LE 1. 64 learning goals (27.8% of all learning goals of the NKLC) were not reflected in the examinations. With a total of 70 questions, the most frequently examined surgical topic was "disorders of the rheumatic spectrum". Conclusion The number of surgical examination questions in the German second medical licensing examination seems to be sufficient. However, the questions seem to be unevenly distributed between different surgical areas of undergraduate education. In order to achieve a more homogenous representation of relevant surgical topics, improved alignment is needed between the state examination with existing catalogues of learning goals by the IMPP.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Educación Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cirugía General/educación , Objetivos , Licencia Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Curriculum , Cirugía General/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alemania , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lectures remain an important teaching method to present and structure knowledge to many students concurrently. Adequate measures are necessary to maintain the quality of the lectures. The aim of this study was to determine the impact on the lecture quality using written structured feedback and to compare the ratings of surgical lectures between students and surgical peers. METHODS: Prospective analysis of two consecutive surgical lecture series for undergraduate students at Goethe-University Medical School was performed before and after evaluation of the lecturers via independent written feedback from trained undergraduate students and surgeons. The 22-item feedback instrument covered three areas of performance: content, visualization, and delivery. Additional suggestions for improvement were provided from both students and surgical peers who anonymously attended the lectures. The lecturers, experienced surgeons, as well as the student and peer raters were blinded in terms of the aim and content of the study. Their response to the feedback was collected using a web-based 13-item questionnaire. The Kendall's-W coefficient was computed to calculate inter-rater reliability (IRR). Differences between ratings before and after feedback were analyzed using Student's t-test for dependent samples. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov-test was used for independent samples. RESULTS: A total of 22 lectures from a possible 32 given by 13 lecturers were included and analyzed by at least three surgeons and two students. There were significant improvements in overall score as well as in the details of 9 of the 13 items were found. The average inter-rater reliability was 0.71. There were no differences in the ratings as a function of the rater's level of expertise (peers vs. students). We found that 13/23 lecturers (56.5%) answered the questionnaire, and 92% strongly agreed that the written feedback was useful. 76.9% of the lecturers revised their lecture based on the written feedback requiring on average 112.5 min (range from 20 to 300 min). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study indicates that structured written feedback provided by trained peers and students that is subsequently discussed by the lecturers concerned is a highly effective and efficient method to improve aspects of lecturing. We anticipate that structured written feedback by trained students that is discussed by the lecturers concerned will improve lecturing.