Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Urol ; 205(4): 1119-1125, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33249976

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Benign ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures following radical cystectomy are a critical complication. The incidence is highly dependent on study design, surgical technique and surgeon experience. We studied the incidence of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after open vs robot-assisted radical cystectomy with an intracorporeal urinary diversion, and determined the influence of the introduction of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, single center, cohort study was performed between January 2012 and December 2017 in all patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine which patient or disease-specific factors were associated with development of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures. RESULTS: Of 279 patients, 192 (69%) underwent open radical cystectomy and 87 (31%) underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. In total, 47/279 patients (17%) developed ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after a median of 3.0 months (95% CI 2.4-3.7). The difference in incidence of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures was statistically significant between open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (13% vs 25%, p <0.001). On multivariate analysis, only surgical technique (open vs robot-assisted radical cystectomy) was independently associated with development of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures (p=0.004). There was a peak incidence of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after robot-assisted radical cystectomy of 47% during the first year after introduction of the robot-assisted procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion can result in an initial peak incidence of strictures, highlighting the importance of surgeon experience and the presence of a learning curve. Nonetheless, after experience has been gained, our results show that patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion are still more likely to develop ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures compared to those undergoing open radical cystectomy.


Asunto(s)
Cistectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Obstrucción Ureteral/epidemiología , Derivación Urinaria/métodos , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Constricción Patológica , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
BJU Int ; 126(3): 388-395, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32512649

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of preoperative frailty screening in predicting postoperative severe complications and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort single-centre study in patients undergoing RC from September 2016 to December 2017. Preoperative frailty screening was implemented as standard care and was used to guide shared decision-making during multidisciplinary team meetings. Frailty screening consisted of validated tools to assess physical, mental and social frailty. Patients were considered frail when having two or more frailty characteristics. The primary endpoint was the composite of a severe complication (Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V) within 30 days and 1-year all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints included any complication (Clavien-Dindo II-V), length of stay, readmission within 30 days, and all-cause mortality. Logistic regression analysis and the concordance statistic (c-statistic) were used to describe the association and predictive value of preoperative frailty screening. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were included; 39 (61.9%) were considered frail. Preoperative frailty was associated with a seven-fold increased risk of a severe complication or death 1 year after RC [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 7.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-31.8; 22 patients]. Compared to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and Charlson Comorbidity Index, frailty showed the best model performance (Nagelkerke R2 0.20) and discriminative ability(c-statistic 0.72, P < 0.01) for the primary endpoint. After adding frailty to the conventional ASA risk score, the c-statistic improved by 11% (P < 0.01). Overall survival was significantly worse in frail patients (23.2 months, 95% CI 18.7-30.1) vs non-frail patients (32.9 months, 95% CI 30.0-35.9; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Frail patients undergoing RC are at high risk of postoperative adverse outcomes including death. Preoperative frailty screening improves preoperative risk stratification and may be used to guide patient selection for RC.


Asunto(s)
Cistectomía , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Femenino , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Eur Urol Focus ; 8(6): 1591-1598, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35577751

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accurate monitoring following focal treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) is paramount for timely salvage treatment or retreatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to detect residual PCa in the short-term follow-up of focal treatment with irreversible electroporation (IRE) using transperineal or transrectal template ± targeted biopsies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective international multicenter study of men with biopsy-proven PCa, treated with focal IRE, and followed by mpMRI (index-test) and template biopsies (reference-test) between February 2013 and January 2021, was conducted. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI were calculated for in- and outfield residual disease based on two definitions of significant PCa: University College London (UCL) 1-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) ≥3 or ISUP ≥1 with maximum cancer core length (MCCL) ≥6 mm, and UCL2-ISUP ≥2 or ISUP ≥1 with MCCL ≥4 mm. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 303 patients from five focal therapy centers were treated with primary IRE. The final analysis was performed on 217 men (median age 67, median prostate-specific antigen 6.2, 81% ISUP 2/3) who underwent both mpMRI and template biopsies. Multiparametric MRI missed 38/57 (67%) positive biopsy locations (UCL1) in 22 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of mpMRI to detect whole gland residual disease (UCL1) were 43.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28-59), 80.9% (95% CI: 75-86), 33.3% (95% CI: 21-47), and 86.7% (95% CI: 81-91), respectively. Based on UCL2, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 35.8% (95% CI: 25-48), 82.0% (95% CI: 75-88), 47.1% (95% CI: 34-61), and 74.1% (95% CI: 67-80), respectively. Limitations are the retrospective nature and short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI to detect residual clinically significant PCa following IRE was low. Follow-up template biopsies should be performed, regardless of mpMRI results. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect residual prostate cancer after treatment with irreversible electroporation. The accuracy of MRI is insufficient, and we emphasize the importance of confirmatory prostate biopsies.


Asunto(s)
Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA