Development of a US national-scale, mixed-source, pesticide, rural well database for use in drinking water risk assessment: an atrazine case study.

For pesticide registrations in the USA under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as implemented by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, drinking water risk assessments for groundwater sources are based on standard scenario modeling concentration estimates. The conceptual model for the drinking water protection goals is defined in terms of (1) a rural well in or near a relatively high pesticide use area, a shallow well (4-10 m); (2) long-term, single-station weather data; (3) soils characterized as highly leachable; (4) upper-end or surrogate, worst-case environmental fate parameters; and (5) maximum, annual use rates repeated every year. To date, monitoring data have not been quantitatively incorporated into FIFRA drinking water risk assessment; even though considerable, US national-scale temporal and spatial data for some chemistries exists. Investigations into drinking water monitoring data development have historically focused on single-source efforts that may not represent wide geographies and/or time periods, whereas Safe Drinking Water Act groundwater monitoring data are focused on a community-level scale rather than an individual, shallow, rural well. In the current case study, US national-scale, rural well data for the herbicide atrazine was collected, quality controlled, and combined into a single database from mixed sources (termed the atrazine rural well database) to (1) characterize differences between exposure estimates from standard EPA modeling approaches for specific characterization, (2) evaluate monitoring data toward direct use in US drinking water risk assessments to compliment or supersede standard modeling approaches to define risk, and (3) evaluate monitoring trends a function of time relative to label changes implemented as part of the registration review process. Of the 75,665 drinking water samples collected from groundwater, atrazine was only detected in 3185, a 4% detection rate.

Development of a mixed-source, single pesticide database for use in ecological risk assessment: quality control and data standardization practices.

Inclusion of pesticide monitoring data in pesticide risk assessment is important yet challenging for several reasons, including infrequent or irregular data collection, disparate sources procedures and associated monitoring periods, and interpretation of the data itself in a policy context. These challenges alone, left unaddressed, will likely introduce unintentional and unforeseen risk assessment conclusions. While individual water quality monitoring programs report standard operating procedures and quality control practices for their own data, cross-checking data for duplicated data from one database to another does not routinely occur. Consequently, we developed a novel quality control and assurance methodology to identify errors and duplicated records toward creating an aggregated, single pesticide database toward use in ecological risk assessment. This methodology includes (1) standardization and reformatting practices, (2) data error and duplicate record identification protocols, (3) missing or inconsistent limit of detection and quantification reporting, and (4) site metadata scoring and ranking procedures to flag likely duplicate records. We applied this methodology to develop an aggregated (multiple-source), national-scale database for atrazine from a diverse set of surface water monitoring programs. The resultant database resolved and/or removed approximately 31% of the total ~ 385,000 records that were due to duplicated records. Identification of sample replicates was also developed. While the quality control and assurances methodologies developed in this work were applied to atrazine, they generally demonstrate how a properly constructed and aggregated single pesticide database would benefit from the methods described herein before use in subsequent statistical and data analysis or risk assessment.