Cardiopulmonary-related patient-reported outcomes in a randomized clinical trial of radiation therapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Long-term prospective patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after breast cancer adjuvant radiotherapy is scarce. TomoBreast compared conventional radiotherapy (CR) with tomotherapy (TT), on the hypothesis that TT might reduce lung-heart toxicity. METHODS: Among 123 women consenting to participate, 64 were randomized to CR, 59 to TT. CR delivered 50 Gy in 25 fractions/5 weeks to breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, with a sequential boost (16 Gy/8 fractions/1.6 weeks) after lumpectomy. TT delivered 42 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks to breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, 51 Gy simultaneous-integrated-boost in patients with lumpectomy. PRO were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire QLQ-C30. PRO scores were converted into a symptom-free scale, 100 indicating a fully symptom-free score, 0 indicating total loss of freedom from symptom. Changes of PRO over time were analyzed using the linear mixed-effect model. Survival analysis computed time to > 10% PRO-deterioration. A post-hoc cardiorespiratory outcome was defined as deterioration in any of dyspnea, fatigue, physical functioning, or pain. RESULTS: At 10.4 years median follow-up, patients returned on average 9 questionnaires/patient, providing a total of 1139 PRO records. Item completeness was 96.6%. Missingness did not differ between the randomization arms. The PRO at baseline were below the nominal 100% symptom-free score, notably the mean fatigue-free score was 64.8% vs. 69.6%, pain-free was 75.4% vs. 75.3%, and dyspnea-free was 84.8% vs. 88.5%, in the TT vs. CR arm, respectively, although the differences were not significant. By mixed-effect modeling on early ≤2 years assessment, all three scores deteriorated, significantly for fatigue, P ≤ 0.01, without effect of randomization arm. By modeling on late assessment beyond 2 years, TT versus CR was not significantly associated with changes of fatigue-free or pain-free scores but was associated with a significant 8.9% improvement of freedom from dyspnea, P = 0.035. By survival analysis of the time to PRO deterioration, TT improved 10-year survival free of cardiorespiratory deterioration from 66.9% with CR to 84.5% with TT, P = 0.029. CONCLUSION: Modern radiation therapy can significantly improve long-term PRO. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00459628 , April 12, 2007 prospectively.

Combination therapeutics of Nilotinib and radiation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia as an effective method against drug-resistance.

Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is characterized by a very poor prognosis and a high likelihood of acquired chemo-resistance. Although tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has improved clinical outcome, most ALL patients relapse following treatment with TKI due to the development of resistance. We developed an in vitro model of Nilotinib-resistant Ph+ leukemia cells to investigate whether low dose radiation (LDR) in combination with TKI therapy overcome chemo-resistance. Additionally, we developed a mathematical model, parameterized by cell viability experiments under Nilotinib treatment and LDR, to explain the cellular response to combination therapy. The addition of LDR significantly reduced drug resistance both in vitro and in computational model. Decreased expression level of phosphorylated AKT suggests that the combination treatment plays an important role in overcoming resistance through the AKT pathway. Model-predicted cellular responses to the combined therapy provide good agreement with experimental results. Augmentation of LDR and Nilotinib therapy seems to be beneficial to control Ph+ leukemia resistance and the quantitative model can determine optimal dosing schedule to enhance the effectiveness of the combination therapy.

Are We Losing the Final Fight against Cancer?

Despite our increasing understanding of the biology and evolution of the cancer process, it is indisputable that the natural process of cancer creation has become increasingly difficult to cure, as more mutations are found with age. It is significantly more difficult to challenge the curative method when there is heterogeneity within the tumor, as it hampers clinical and genetic categorization. With advances in diagnostic technologies and screening leading to progressive tumor shrinkage, it becomes more difficult over time to evaluate the effects of treatment on overall survival. New treatments are often authorized based on early evidence, such as tumor response; disease-free, progression-free, meta-static-free, and event-free survival; and, less frequently, based on clinical endpoints, such as overall survival or quality of life, when standard guidelines are not available to approve pharmaceuticals. These clearances usually happen quite rapidly. Although approval takes longer, relative survival demonstrates the genuine worth of a novel medication. Pressure is being applied by pharmaceutical companies and patient groups to approve "new" treatments based on one of the above-listed measures, with results that are frequently insignificantly beneficial and frequently have no impact on quality of life.

Breast Cancer: Impact of New Treatments?

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer treatment has seen tremendous progress since the early 1980s, with the first findings of new chemotherapy and hormone therapies. Screening started in the same period. METHODS: A review of population data (SEER and the literature) shows an increase in recurrence-free survival until 2000 and it stagnates afterwards. RESULTS: Over the period 1980-2000, the 15% survival gain was presented by pharma as a contribution of new molecules. The contribution of screening during that same period was not implemented by them, although screening has been accepted as a routine procedure in the States since the 1980s and everywhere else since 2000. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of breast cancer outcome has largely focused on drugs, whereas other factors, such as screening, prevention, biologics, and genetics, were largely neglected. More attention should now be paid to examining the strategy based on realistic global data.

Correction: Storme, G.A. Breast Cancer: Impact of New Treatments? Cancers 2023, 15, 2205.

There was a cited reference error in the original article [...].

Lung-heart toxicity in a randomized clinical trial of hypofractionated image guided radiation therapy for breast cancer.

Background: TomoBreast hypothesized that hypofractionated 15 fractions/3 weeks image-guided radiation therapy (H-IGRT) can reduce lung-heart toxicity, as compared with normofractionated 25-33 fractions/5-7 weeks conventional radiation therapy (CRT). Methods: In a single center 123 women with stage I-II operated breast cancer were randomized to receive CRT (N=64) or H-IGRT (N=59). The primary endpoint used a composite four-items measure of the time to 10% alteration in any of patient-reported outcomes, physician clinical evaluation, echocardiography or lung function tests, analyzed by intention-to-treat. Results: At 12 years median follow-up, overall and disease-free survivals between randomized arms were comparable, while survival time free from alteration significantly improved with H-IGRT which showed a gain of restricted mean survival time of 1.46 years over CRT, P=0.041. Discussion: The finding establishes TomoBreast as a proof-of-concept that hypofractionated image-guided radiation-therapy can improve the sparing of lung-heart function in breast cancer adjuvant therapy without loss in disease-free survival. Hypofractionation is advantageous, conditional on using an advanced radiation technique. Multicenter validation may be warranted. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00459628. Registered 12 April 2007.

Small airways function in breast cancer patients before and after radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy treatments for early stage breast cancer patients potentially affect the lung in its most distal air spaces, and previous studies have indicated consistently low baseline values for diffusing capacity in breast cancer patients. We aimed to quantitatively assess baseline small airway function and the acute effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with no confounding effects from respiratory disease or considerable smoking history. In 60 breast cancer patients selected from an ongoing randomized controlled trial, the small airways function was assessed at baseline and 3 months later, after having received either conventional radiotherapy (CR; n = 26) or hypofractionated tomotherapy (TT; n = 34). All indices of small airway function in breast cancer patients were found to be indistinguishable from healthy controls. The total lung capacity was significantly decreased and ventilation heterogeneity was significantly increased 3 months after baseline in the CR arm, but not in the TT arm. When corrected for hemoglobin and lung volume, pulmonary diffusing capacity was not affected by radiotherapy in either treatment arm. Alternatively, discarding patients receiving chemotherapy or loco-regional treatment did not affect these results. We conclude that middle-aged women with breast cancer, but no history of respiratory disease, have normal baseline small airways function. Conventional radiotherapy induces a restrictive pattern and increases heterogeneity of ventilation, the latter most likely resulting from differential expansion between locally irradiated peripheral lung zones and the remainder of the lung. The TT modality did not lead to any such changes.

Health-related quality of life in survivors of stage I-II breast cancer: randomized trial of post-operative conventional radiotherapy and hypofractionated tomotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment is a key component of clinical oncology trials. However, few breast cancer trials comparing adjuvant conventional radiotherapy (CR) and hypofractionated tomotherapy (TT) have investigated HRQOL. We compared HRQOL in stage I-II breast cancer patients who were randomized to receive either CR or TT. Tomotherapy uses an integrated computed tomography scanner to improve treatment accuracy, aiming to reduce the adverse effects of radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 121 stage I-II breast cancer patients who had undergone breast conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy (MA) were randomly assigned to receive either CR or TT. CR patients received 25 × 2 Gy over 5 weeks, and BCS patients also received a sequential boost of 8 × 2 Gy over 2 weeks. TT patients received 15 × 2.8 Gy over 3 weeks, and BCS patients also received a simultaneous integrated boost of 15 × 0.6 Gy over 3 weeks. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires. The mean score (± standard error) was calculated at baseline, the end of radiotherapy, and at 3 months and 1, 2, and 3 years post-radiotherapy. Data were analyzed by the 'intention-to-treat' principle. RESULTS: On the last day of radiotherapy, patients in both treatment arms had decreased global health status and functioning scores; increased fatigue (clinically meaningful in both treatment arms), nausea and vomiting, and constipation; decreased arm symptoms; clinically meaningful increased breast symptoms in CR patients and systemic side effects in TT patients; and slightly decreased body image and future perspective. At 3 months post-radiotherapy, TT patients had a clinically significant increase in role- and social-functioning scores and a clinically significant decrease in fatigue. The post-radiotherapy physical-, cognitive- and emotional-functioning scores improved faster in TT patients than CR patients. TT patients also had a better long-term recovery from fatigue than CR patients. ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction did not show any significant differences between groups in HRQOL scores. CONCLUSIONS: TT patients had a better improvement in global health status and role- and cognitive-functioning, and a faster recovery from fatigue, than CR patients. These results suggest that a shorter fractionation schedule may reduce the adverse effects of treatment.

Scapula alata in early breast cancer patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of post-surgery short-course image-guided radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Scapula alata (SA) is a known complication of breast surgery associated with palsy of the serratus anterior, but it is seldom mentioned. We evaluated the risk factors associated with SA and the relationship of SA with ipsilateral shoulder/arm morbidity in a series of patients enrolled in a trial of post-surgery radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: The trial randomized women with completely resected stage I-II breast cancer to short-course image-guided RT, versus conventional RT. SA, arm volume and shoulder-arm mobility were measured prior to RT and at one to three months post-RT. Shoulder/arm morbidities were computed as a post-RT percentage change relative to pre-RT measurements. RESULTS: Of 119 evaluable patients, 13 (= 10.9%) had pre-RT SA. Age younger than 50 years old, a body mass index less than 25 kg/m2, and axillary lymph node dissection were significant risk factors, with odds ratios of 4.8 (P = 0.009), 6.1 (P = 0.016), and 6.1 (P = 0.005), respectively. Randomization group was not significant. At one to three months' post-RT, mean arm volume increased by 4.1% (P = 0.036) and abduction decreased by 8.6% (P = 0.046) among SA patients, but not among non-SA patients. SA resolved in eight, persisted in five, and appeared in one patient. CONCLUSION: The relationship of SA with lower body mass index suggests that SA might have been underestimated in overweight patients. Despite apparent resolution of SA in most patients, pre-RT SA portended an increased risk of shoulder/arm morbidity. We argue that SA warrants further investigation. Incidentally, the observation of SA occurring after RT in one patient represents the second case of post-RT SA reported in the literature.

Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries.

The burden of cancer is growing, and the disease is becoming a major economic expenditure for all developed countries. In 2008, the worldwide cost of cancer due to premature death and disability (not including direct medical costs) was estimated to be US$895 billion. This is not simply due to an increase in absolute numbers, but also the rate of increase of expenditure on cancer. What are the drivers and solutions to the so-called cancer-cost curve in developed countries? How are we going to afford to deliver high quality and equitable care? Here, expert opinion from health-care professionals, policy makers, and cancer survivors has been gathered to address the barriers and solutions to delivering affordable cancer care. Although many of the drivers and themes are specific to a particular field-eg, the huge development costs for cancer medicines-there is strong concordance running through each contribution. Several drivers of cost, such as over-use, rapid expansion, and shortening life cycles of cancer technologies (such as medicines and imaging modalities), and the lack of suitable clinical research and integrated health economic studies, have converged with more defensive medical practice, a less informed regulatory system, a lack of evidence-based sociopolitical debate, and a declining degree of fairness for all patients with cancer. Urgent solutions range from re-engineering of the macroeconomic basis of cancer costs (eg, value-based approaches to bend the cost curve and allow cost-saving technologies), greater education of policy makers, and an informed and transparent regulatory system. A radical shift in cancer policy is also required. Political toleration of unfairness in access to affordable cancer treatment is unacceptable. The cancer profession and industry should take responsibility and not accept a substandard evidence base and an ethos of very small benefit at whatever cost; rather, we need delivery of fair prices and real value from new technologies.

Lung Restriction in Patients With Breast Cancer After Hypofractionated and Conventional Radiation Therapy: A 10-Year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: Previous studies in patients with breast cancer have shown acute radiation therapy-induced reductions of pulmonary diffusing capacity, essentially owing to lung volume restriction. We aimed to assess the long-term effect of 2 radiation therapy regimens, which differed in terms of radiation technique and dose fractionation, on lung function. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From a randomized controlled trial comparing conventional 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (CR) and hypofractionated tomotherapy (TT), 84 patients with breast cancer (age at inclusion 54 ± 10 [standard deviation] years) could be assessed at baseline, after 3 months, and after 1, 2, 3, and 10 years. Measurements included forced vital capacity, total lung capacity (TLC), and diffusing capacity (TLco). RESULTS: Radiation therapy-induced lung function changes over 10 years (Δ) were similar for both treatment arms, and in a patient subgroup with negligible history of respiratory disease or smoking (n = 57) these averaged: Δ forced vital capacity = -13 (± 9) percent predicted; ΔTLco = -14 (± 12) percent predicted; and ΔTLC = -11 (± 9) percent predicted. The only significant correlation was between V20 (lung volume exposed to dose exceeding 20 Gy) and ΔTLco (rho = -0.36; P = .007). In this subgroup, as well as in the entire patient cohort, the incurred pulmonary restriction in terms of TLC and TLco showed a greater decline at 3 months for CR versus TT. However, at 10 years, no significant difference could be detected between CR and TT (P = .9 for TLC and P = .2 for TLco in the entire patient cohort). Of the patients with normal TLC and TLco at baseline (ie, above lower limits of normal), respectively 94% and 96% were still normal 10 years later. CONCLUSIONS: In women with breast cancer, conventional 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and hypofractionated tomotherapy induce similar restrictive lung patterns during the course of a 10-year period, despite some treatment-dependent differences in the first 3 months. The large majority of women with normal lung function at baseline maintained a normal lung function status 10 years after radiation therapy, irrespective of treatment arm.

Lung-Heart Outcomes and Mortality through the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic in a Prospective Cohort of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Patients.

We investigated lung-heart toxicity and mortality in 123 women with stage I-II breast cancer enrolled in 2007-2011 in a prospective trial of adjuvant radiotherapy (TomoBreast). We were concerned whether the COVID-19 pandemic affected the outcomes. All patients were analyzed as a single cohort. Lung-heart status was reverse-scored as freedom from adverse-events (fAE) on a 1-5 scale. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and pulmonary function tests were untransformed. Statistical analyses applied least-square regression to calendar-year aggregated data. The significance of outliers was determined using the Dixon and the Grubbs corrected tests. At 12.0 years median follow-up, 103 patients remained alive; 10-years overall survival was 87.8%. In 2007-2019, 15 patients died, of whom 11 were cancer-related deaths. In 2020, five patients died, none of whom from cancer. fAE and lung-heart function declined gradually over a decade through 2019, but deteriorated markedly in 2020: fAE dipped significantly from 4.6-4.6 to 4.3-4.2; LVEF dipped to 58.4% versus the expected 60.3% (PDixon = 0.021, PGrubbs = 0.054); forced vital capacity dipped to 2.4 L vs. 2.6 L (PDixon = 0.043, PGrubbs = 0.181); carbon-monoxide diffusing capacity dipped to 12.6 mL/min/mmHg vs. 15.2 (PDixon = 0.008, PGrubbs = 0.006). In conclusion, excess non-cancer mortality was observed in 2020. Deaths in that year totaled one-third of the deaths in the previous decade, and revealed observable lung-heart deterioration.

Longitudinal Preclinical Imaging Characterizes Extracellular Drug Accumulation After Radiation Therapy in the Healthy and Leukemic Bone Marrow Vascular Microenvironment.

PURPOSE: Recent initial findings suggest that radiation therapy improves blood perfusion and cellular chemotherapy uptake in mice with leukemia. However, the ability of radiation therapy to influence drug accumulation in the extracellular bone marrow tissue is unknown, due in part to a lack of methodology. This study developed longitudinal quantitative multiphoton microscopy (L-QMPM) to characterize the bone marrow vasculature (BMV) and drug accumulation in the extracellular bone marrow tissue before and after radiation therapy in mice bearing leukemia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We developed a longitudinal window implant for L-QMPM imaging of the calvarium BMV before, 2 days after, and 5 days after total body irradiation (TBI). Live time-lapsed images of a fluorescent drug surrogate were used to obtain measurements, including tissue wash-in slope (WIStissue) to measure extracellular drug accumulation. We performed L-QMPM imaging on healthy C57BL/6 (WT) mice, as well as mice bearing acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). RESULTS: Implants had no effects on calvarium dose, and parameters for wild-type untreated mice were stable during imaging. We observed decreased vessel diameter, vessel blood flow, and WIStissue with the onset of AML and ALL. Two to 10 Gy TBI increased WIStissue and vessel diameter 2 days after radiation therapy in all 3 groups of mice and increased single-vessel blood flow in mice bearing ALL and AML. Increased WIStissue was observed 5 days after 10 Gy TBI or 4 Gy split-dose TBI (2 treatments of 2 Gy spaced 3 days apart). CONCLUSIONS: L-QMPM provides stable functional assessments of the BMV. Nonmyeloablative and myeloablative TBI increases extracellular drug accumulation in the leukemic bone marrow 2 to 5 days posttreatment, likely through improved blood perfusion and drug exchange from the BMV to the extravascular tissue. Our data show that neo-adjuvant TBI at doses from 2 Gy to 10 Gy conditions the BMV to improve drug transport to the bone marrow.

Total marrow irradiation reduces organ damage and enhances tissue repair with the potential to increase the targeted dose of bone marrow in both young and old mice.

Total body irradiation (TBI) is a commonly used conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT), but dose heterogeneity and long-term organ toxicity pose significant challenges. Total marrow irradiation (TMI), an evolving radiation conditioning regimen for HCT can overcome the limitations of TBI by delivering the prescribed dose targeted to the bone marrow (BM) while sparing organs at risk. Recently, our group demonstrated that TMI up to 20 Gy in relapsed/refractory AML patients was feasible and efficacious, significantly improving 2-year overall survival compared to the standard treatment. Whether such dose escalation is feasible in elderly patients, and how the organ toxicity profile changes when switching to TMI in patients of all ages are critical questions that need to be addressed. We used our recently developed 3D image-guided preclinical TMI model and evaluated the radiation damage and its repair in key dose-limiting organs in young (~8 weeks) and old (~90 weeks) mice undergoing congenic bone marrow transplant (BMT). Engraftment was similar in both TMI and TBI-treated young and old mice. Dose escalation using TMI (12 to 16 Gy in two fractions) was well tolerated in mice of both age groups (90% survival ~12 Weeks post-BMT). In contrast, TBI at the higher dose of 16 Gy was particularly lethal in younger mice (0% survival ~2 weeks post-BMT) while old mice showed much more tolerance (75% survival ~13 weeks post-BMT) suggesting higher radio-resistance in aged organs. Histopathology confirmed worse acute and chronic organ damage in mice treated with TBI than TMI. As the damage was alleviated, the repair processes were augmented in the TMI-treated mice over TBI as measured by average villus height and a reduced ratio of relative mRNA levels of amphiregulin/epidermal growth factor (areg/egf). These findings suggest that organ sparing using TMI does not limit donor engraftment but significantly reduces normal tissue damage and preserves repair capacity with the potential for dose escalation in elderly patients.

External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-year results of an EORTC randomised study.

BACKGROUND: We did a randomised phase 3 trial assessing the benefit of addition of long-term androgen suppression with a luteinising-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist to external irradiation in patients with prostate cancer with high metastatic risk. In this report, we present the 10-year results. METHODS: For this open-label randomised trial, eligible patients were younger than 80 years and had newly diagnosed histologically proven T1-2 prostatic adenocarcinoma with WHO histological grade 3 or T3-4 prostatic adenocarcinoma of any histological grade, and a WHO performance status of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy plus immediate androgen suppression. Treatment allocation was open label and used a minimisation algorithm with institution, clinical stage of the disease, results of pelvic-lymph-node dissection, and irradiation fields extension as minimisation factors. Patients were irradiated externally, once a day, 5 days a week, for 7 weeks to a total dose of 50 Gy to the whole pelvis, with an additional 20 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles. The LHRH agonist, goserelin acetate (3·6 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks), was started on the first day of irradiation and continued for 3 years; cyproterone acetate (50 mg orally three times a day) was given for 1 month starting a week before the first goserelin injection. The primary endpoint was clinical disease-free survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00849082. FINDINGS: Between May 22, 1987, and Oct 31, 1995, 415 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups and were included in the analysis (208 radiotherapy alone, 207 combined treatment). Median follow-up was 9·1 years (IQR 5·1-12·6). 10-year clinical disease-free survival was 22·7% (95% CI 16·3-29·7) in the radiotherapy-alone group and 47·7% (39·0-56·0) in the combined treatment group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·42, 95% CI 0·33-0·55, p<0·0001). 10-year overall survival was 39·8% (95% CI 31·9-47·5) in patients receiving radiotherapy alone and 58·1% (49·2-66·0) in those allocated combined treatment (HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·45-0·80, p=0·0004), and 10-year prostate-cancer mortality was 30·4% (95% CI 23·2-37·5) and 10·3% (5·1-15·4), respectively (HR 0·38, 95% CI 0·24-0·60, p<0·0001). No significant difference in cardiovascular mortality was noted between treatment groups both in patients who had cardiovascular problems at study entry (eight of 53 patients in the combined treatment group had a cardiovascular-related cause of death vs 11 of 63 in the radiotherapy group; p=0·60) and in those who did not (14 of 154 vs six of 145; p=0·25). Two fractures were reported in patients allocated combined treatment. INTERPRETATION: In patients with prostate cancer with high metastatic risk, immediate androgen suppression with an LHRH agonist given during and for 3 years after external irradiation improves 10-year disease-free and overall survival without increasing late cardiovascular toxicity.

Breast cancer preoperative 18FDG-PET, overall survival prognostic separation compared with the lymph node ratio.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the overall survival prognostic value of preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in breast cancer, as compared with the lymph node ratio (LNR). METHODS: Data were abstracted at a median follow-up 14.7 years from a retrospective cohort of 104 patients who underwent PET imaging before curative surgery. PET-Axillary|Sternal was classified as PET-positive if hypermetabolism was visualized in ipsilateral nodal axillary and/or sternal region, else as PET-negative. The differences of 15 years restricted mean survival time ∆RMST according to PET and LNR were computed from Kaplan-Meier overall survival. The effect of PET and other patients' characteristics was analyzed through rankit normalization, which provides with Cox regression the Royston-Sauerbrei D measure of separation to compare the characteristics (0 indicating no prognostic value). Multivariate analysis of the normalized characteristics used stepwise selection with the Akaike information criterion. RESULTS: In Kaplan-Meier analysis, LNR > 0.20 versus ≤ 0.20 showed ∆RMST = 3.4 years, P = 0.003. PET-Axillary|Sternal positivity versus PET-negative showed a ∆RMST = 2.6 years, P = 0.008. In Cox univariate analyses, LNR appeared as topmost prognostic separator, D = 1.50, P < 0.001. PET ranked below but was also highly significant, D = 1.02, P = 0.009. In multivariate analyses, LNR and PET-Axillary|Sternal were colinear and mutually exclusive. PET-Axillary|Sternal improved as prognosticator in a model excluding lymph nodes, yielding a normalized hazard ratio of 2.44, P = 0.062. CONCLUSION: Pathological lymph node assessment remains the gold standard of prognosis. However, PET appears as a valuable surrogate in univariate analysis at 15-year follow-up. There was a trend towards significance in multivariate analysis that warrants further investigation.

First Multimodal, Three-Dimensional, Image-Guided Total Marrow Irradiation Model for Preclinical Bone Marrow Transplantation Studies.

PURPOSE: Total marrow irradiation (TMI) has significantly advanced radiation conditioning for hematopoietic cell transplantation in hematologic malignancies by reducing conditioning-induced toxicities and improving survival outcomes in relapsed/refractory patients. However, the relapse rate remains high, and the lack of a preclinical TMI model has hindered scientific advancements. To accelerate TMI translation to the clinic, we developed a TMI delivery system in preclinical models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A Precision X-RAD SmART irradiator was used for TMI model development. Images acquired with whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) were used to reconstruct and delineate targets and vital organs for each mouse. Multiple beam and CT-guided Monte Carlo-based plans were performed to optimize doses to the targets and to vary doses to the vital organs. Long-term engraftment and reconstitution potential were evaluated by a congenic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) model and serial secondary BMT, respectively. Donor cell engraftment was measured using noninvasive bioluminescence imaging and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Multimodal imaging enabled identification of targets (skeleton and spleen) and vital organs (eg, lungs, gut, liver). In contrast to total body irradiation (TBI), TMI treatment allowed variation of radiation dose exposure to organs relative to the target dose. Dose reduction mirrored that in clinical TMI studies. Similar to TBI, mice treated with different TMI regimens showed full long-term donor engraftment in primary BMT and second serial BMT. The TBI-treated mice showed acute gut damage, which was minimized in mice treated with TMI. CONCLUSIONS: A novel multimodal image guided preclinical TMI model is reported here. TMI conditioning maintained long-term engraftment with reconstitution potential and reduced organ damage. Therefore, this TMI model provides a unique opportunity to study the therapeutic benefit of reduced organ damage and BM dose escalation to optimize treatment regimens in BMT and hematologic malignancies.

Pattern of failure after helical tomotherapy in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Helical tomotherapy (HT, Hi-Art TomoTherapy(®)) is a recently developed radiation device delivering highly conformal dose with a rotational gantry resulting in more uniform target doses and better avoidance of organs at risk. Treatment failure patterns in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with HT were analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 63 patients with a biopsy-proven HNC were treated with HT. In patients with locoregional failure, the volume of failure (Vf) was contoured and co-registered with the initial planning computed tomography scan. With the use of dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis, the Vf was classified as "in-field" (InF), "marginal" (MF) or "outside-field" (OutF), if ≥ 95%, 20-94%, and < 20% of Vf, respectively, were within the 95% isodose. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 25 months (95% confidence interval 19.4-28 months). 2-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control were 66%, 54%, and 77%, respectively. 13 patients developed a locoregional failure (four local, eight regional, and one local and regional). After DVH analysis, there were ten InF and two MF recurrences as well as one OutF recurrence. CONCLUSION: Target delineation and coverage were adequate. The majority of locoregional failures were InF, i.e., in the high-dose region. Future work on dose escalation to the highest risk regions is recommended.

Two-Level Factorial Pre-TomoBreast Pilot Study of Tomotherapy and Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: Post Hoc Utility of a Mean Absolute Dose Deviation Penalty Score.

BACKGROUND: A 2-level factorial pilot study was conducted in 2007 just before starting a randomized clinical trial comparing tomotherapy and conventional radiotherapy (CR) to reduce cardiac and pulmonary adverse effects in breast cancer, considering tumor laterality (left/right), target volume (with/without nodal irradiation), surgery (tumorectomy/mastectomy), and patient position (prone/supine). The study was revisited using a penalty score based on the recently developed mean absolute dose deviation (MADD). METHODS: Eight patients with a unique combination of laterality, nodal coverage, and surgery underwent dual tomotherapy and CR treatment planning in both prone and supine positions, providing 32 distinct combinations. The penalty score was applied using the weighted sum of the MADDs. The Lenth method for unreplicated 2-level factorial design was used in the analysis. RESULTS: The Lenth analysis identified nodal irradiation as the active main effect penalizing the dosimetry by 1.14 Gy (P = 0.001). Other significant effects were left laterality (0.94 Gy), mastectomy (0.61 Gy), and interactions between left mastectomy (0.89 Gy) and prone mastectomy (0.71 Gy), with P-values between 0.005 and 0.05. Tomotherapy provided a small reduction in penalty (reduction of 0.54 Gy) through interaction with nodal irradiation (P = 0.080). Some effects approached significance with P-values > 0.05 and ≤ 0.10 for interactions of prone × mastectomy × left (0.60 Gy), nodal irradiation × mastectomy (0.59 Gy), and prone × left (0.55 Gy) and the main effect prone (0.52 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: The historical dosimetric analysis previously revealed the feasibility of tomotherapy, but a conclusion could not be made. The MADD-based score is promising, and a new analysis highlights the impact of factors and hierarchy of priorities that need to be addressed if major gains are to be attained.

Assessment of rectal distention in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using daily megavoltage CT image guidance.

PURPOSE: Assessment of rectal distention in a group of patients who are not receiving daily rectum emptying procedures during a course of prostate cancer radiotherapy to investigate which patients could benefit from daily rectum emptying. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients underwent daily megavoltage CT (MVCT) scanning with positioning based on bony anatomy. Emptying the rectum was only performed before planning CT and not during the actual treatment. The rectal average cross-sectional area (CSA) was determined on the MVCTs. The relative CSA (CSA(rel)) was defined as CSA on MVCT / CSA on planning CT. Additional prostate soft tissue matching was performed to verify the influence of rectal distention on prostate motion. RESULTS: Two distinct subgroups could be defined a posteriori. One group had a limited and stable rectal distention with a CSA (mean+/-SD) of 6.6+/-2.1cm(2), in contrast with a second group with large and variable rectal filling with a CSA of 9.5+/-3.7cm(2) (p<0.01). Mean anterior-posterior prostate displacement was 0.4+/-2.4 mm in the stable group versus -2.4+/-6.1 mm in the unstable group (p<0.01). A mean CSA(rel) of 1.35 of the first 3 days as cut-off value allowed for a correct a priori classification of 90% and 85% of the patients from groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on a few measurements of the CSA by daily MVCT imaging at the first days of treatment, rectum emptying may be omitted in part of the patients.