Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Z Gerontol Geriatr ; 48(5): 452-6, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25287678

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For general practioners (GP) the treatment of patients suffering from multimorbidity is an everyday challenge. For these patients guidelines which each focus on a specific chronic disease cannot be applied comprehensively and equally; therefore, it is necessary to prioritize. OBJECTIVE: Given this situation the study aimed at analyzing how GPs and patients deal with this challenge and what their priorities are. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Narrative interviews were conducted with 9 GPs and 19 of their multimorbid patients. The data were analyzed by means of content analysis. RESULTS: The majority of interviewed patients felt well or very well cared for by their GPs; however, GPs and multimorbid patients often had relatively different priorities. Whereas GPs mostly focused on the management of diseases that could lead to life-threatening situations, patients put an emphasis on maintaining autonomy and a social life. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that there is room for development in the way GPs and multimorbid patients communicate with each other, particularly as far as shared priority setting is concerned.


Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Medicina General/organización & administración , Médicos Generales/organización & administración , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Médicos Generales/psicología , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Narración , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Adulto Joven
2.
BMC Fam Pract ; 13: 45, 2012 May 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22639848

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Comparatively few studies address the problems related to multimorbidity. This is surprising, since multimorbidity is a particular challenge for both general practitioners and patients. This study focuses on the latter, analyzing the way patients aged 65-85 cope with multimorbidity. METHODS: 19 narrative in-depth interviews with multimorbid patients were conducted. The data was analysed using grounded theory. Of the 19 interviewed patients 13 were female and 6 male. Mean age was 75 years. Participating patients showed a relatively homogeneous socio-economic status. Patients were recruited from the German city of Hamburg and the state of North Rhine-Westphalia. RESULTS: Despite suffering from multimorbidity, interviewees held positive attitudes towards life: At the social level, patients tried to preserve their autonomy to the most possible extent. At the emotional level, interviewees oscillated between anxiety and strength - having, however, a positive approach to life. At the practical level, patients aimed at keeping their diseases under control. The patients tended to be critical in regards to medication. CONCLUSIONS: These findings might have implications for the treatment of multimorbid patients in primary care and further research: The generally presumed passivity of older individuals towards medical treatment, which can be found in literature, is not evident among our sample of older patients. In future, treatment of these patients might take their potential for pro-active cooperation more strongly into account than it is currently the case.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Envejecimiento/psicología , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento/fisiología , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Comorbilidad , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Narración , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Autonomía Personal , Investigación Cualitativa , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/psicología , Clase Social
3.
Int J Health Serv ; 33(4): 669-86; discussion 743-9, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14758855

RESUMEN

The aim of the study is to investigate to what extent trends in life expectancy are influenced by political variables and socioeconomic characteristics that play a role at the regional level of the federal states in Germany. Data on life expectancy in males and females at birth are analyzed from 1986 to 1998 for 12 federal states in Eastern and Western Germany. These states are classified into five types of political government since 1980: (1) long-term Christian democratic, (2) long-term social democratic, (3) change from Christian to social democratic, (4) change from communist to social democratic, and (5) change from communist to Christian democratic. The study showed three main results. First, life expectancy has been directly influenced by the major political forces that determined policies in East and West Germany. Second, life expectancy was higher in federal states with predominantly Christian democratic governments than in those with predominantly social democratic governments. Third, life expectancy was strongly related to the economic power of the federal states. Because federal states characterized by a more prosperous economic situation were those with a predominantly Christian democratic government, while federal states with a less prosperous situation were mostly governed by social democrats, it is difficult to disentangle the effects of economic and political factors on life expectancy. Nevertheless, this study underlines the importance of politics and policies on such robust and more general health indicators as mean life expectancy at birth.


Asunto(s)
Esperanza de Vida/tendencias , Sistemas Políticos , Cambio Social , Cristianismo , Comunismo , Países Desarrollados , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Política , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos
4.
Med Klin (Munich) ; 99(8): 435-40, 2004 Aug 15.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15309271

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: More and more, patients want to participate in medical decision making. They expect a patient-centered communication as well as adequate information. However, little is known about the physicians' perspective and skills regarding shared decision making (SDM). This paper presents data about the physicians' perspective and allows focused comparison with the patients' views. METHODS: Standardized survey of 502 physicians from ambulatory care practices and of 1,512 German-speaking people, aged 18-79 years. Patient data were collected from a population-based random sample of an access panel. The following topics were included in this survey: medical decision making in daily practice, communication skills and behavior of physicians from the perspectives of physicians and patients. RESULTS: A majority of physicians approve the concept of SDM. Especially younger physicians favor the concept of SDM. Overall, physicians underestimate their patients' preference to participate in medical decision making. Physicians also tend to overestimate their information and communication skills. CONCLUSION: Not only in the general public, but also among physicians, a model of SDM is widely accepted. The communication skills necessary for this process appear to exist. However, they need to be promoted and extended. Learning to communicate adequately should receive a greater focus in medical education and postgraduate training.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Participación del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria , Comunicación , Recolección de Datos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución Aleatoria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA