RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Appendicitis is among the most common acute conditions treated by general surgery. While uncomplicated appendicitis (UA) can be treated delayed or even non-operatively, complicated appendicitis (CA) is a serious condition with possible long-term morbidity that should be managed with urgent appendectomy. Distinguishing both conditions is usually done with computed tomography. The goal of this study was to develop a model to reliably predict CA with widespread available clinical and laboratory parameters and without the use of sectional imaging. METHODS: Data from 1132 consecutive patients treated for appendicitis between 2014 and 2021 at a tertiary care hospital were used for analyses. Based on year of treatment, the data was divided into training (n = 696) and validation (n = 436) samples. Using the development sample, candidate predictors for CA-patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score, duration of symptoms, white blood count (WBC), total bilirubin and C-reactive protein (CRP) on admission and free fluid on ultrasound-were first investigated using univariate logistic regression models and then included in a multivariate model. The final development model was tested on the validation sample. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis age, BMI, ASA score, symptom duration, WBC, bilirubin, CRP, and free fluid each were statistically significant predictors of CA (each p < 0.001) while gender was not (p = 0.199). In the multivariate analysis BMI and bilirubin were not predictive and therefore not included in the final development model which was built from 696 patients. The final development model was significant (x2 = 304.075, p < 0.001) with a sensitivity of 61.7% and a specificity of 92.1%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 80.4% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82.0%. The receiver operator characteristic of the final model had an area under the curve of 0.861 (95% confidence interval 0.830-0.891, p < 0.001. We simplified this model to create the NoCtApp score. Patients with a point value of ≤ 2 had a NPV 95.8% for correctly ruling out CA. CONCLUSIONS: Correctly identifying CA is helpful for optimizing patient treatment when they are diagnosed with appendicitis. Our logistic regression model can aid in correctly distinguishing UA and CA even without utilizing computed tomography.
Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Humanos , Apendicitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Apendicitis/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Apendicectomía , Bilirrubina , Índice de Masa Corporal , Proteína C-ReactivaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Early cholecystectomy is recommended for acute calculous cholecystitis to reduce complications and lower health care costs. However, not all patients admitted to emergency services due to acute calculous cholecystitis are considered for surgery immediately. Our intention was therefore to evaluate patient management and outcome parameters following cholecystectomy depending on the type of emergency service patients are primarily admitted to. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients that were treated for acute cholecystitis at our hospital between 2014 and 2021. Only patients that underwent surgical treatment for acute calculous cholecystitis were included. Patients with cholecystectomies that were performed due to other medical conditions were not incorporated. Primary outcomes were the perioperative length of stay and postoperative complications. Perioperative antimicrobial management and disease deterioration according to Tokyo Guidelines from 2018 due to inhouse organization were assessed as secondary outcome parameters. RESULTS: Of 512 patients included in our final analysis, 334 patients were primarily admitted to a surgical emergency service (SAG) whereas 178 were initially treated in a medical service (MAG). The latency between admission and cholecystectomy was significantly prolonged in the MAG with a median time to surgery of 2 days (Q25 1, Q75 3.25, IQR 2.25) compared to the SAG with a median time to surgery of 1 day (Q25 1, Q75 2, IQR 1) (p < 0.001). The duration of surgery was comparable between both groups. Necrotizing cholecystitis (27.2% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.007) and pericholecystic abscess or gallbladder perforation (7.5% vs. 14.6% p = 0.010) were less frequently described in the SAG. In the SAG, 85.7% of CCEs were performed laparoscopically, 6.0% were converted to open, and 10.4% were performed as open surgery upfront. In the MAG, 80.9% were completed laparoscopically, while 7.2% were converted and 11.2% were performed via primary laparotomy (p = 0.743). Histologically gangrenous cholecystitis was confirmed in 38.0% of the specimen in the SAG compared to 47.8% in the MAG (p = 0.033). While the prolonged preoperative stay led to prolonged overall length of stay, the postoperative length of stay was similar at a median of 3 days in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, we present the largest single center cohort of acute calculous cholecystitis evaluating the perioperative management and outcome of patients admitted to either medical or surgical service prior to undergoing cholecystectomy. In patients that were primarily admitted to medical emergency services, we found disproportionately more gallbladder necrosis, perforation, and gangrene. Despite prolonged time intervals between admission and cholecystectomy in the MAG and advanced cases of cholecystitis, we did not record a prolonged procedure duration, conversion to open surgery, or complication rate. However, patients with acute calculous cholecystitis should either be primarily admitted to a surgical emergency service or at least a surgeon should be consulted at the time of diagnosis in order to avoid disease progression and unnecessary health care costs.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Colecistitis Aguda , Colecistitis , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Colecistitis Aguda/diagnóstico , Hospitalización , Colecistitis/etiología , Colecistitis/cirugía , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tiempo de InternaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Abdominal gas gangrene caused by Clostridium perfringens is a rare differential diagnosis to pneumoperitoneum caused by bowel perforation. There are only a handful of case reports on this topic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present the case of a 58 year old cirrhotic patient who represented to our ER after complicated surgery for retroperitoneal liposarcoma. On admission he complained of abdominal pain and mild fever. Due to leukocytosis and CRP a CT scan was performed which showed extensive free air. The patient was taken to the OR for suspected bowel perforation. No perforation could be identified after extensive search and lavage. RESULTS: Twelve hours after surgery microbiology reported extensive growth of clostridium perfringens in the cultures drawn from ascites. The patient was successfully treated with antibiotics and discharged home soon after. CONCLUSION: Gas gangrene is a rare differential diagnosis to bowel perforation. Most reported cases are from cirrhotic patients. If no perforation can be identified in the OR postoperative antibiotics should cover clostridium perfringens.
Asunto(s)
Gangrena Gaseosa , Perforación Intestinal , Neumoperitoneo , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Clostridium perfringens , Gangrena Gaseosa/diagnóstico , Gangrena Gaseosa/etiología , Gangrena Gaseosa/terapia , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/diagnóstico , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumoperitoneo/complicacionesRESUMEN
Infectious complications are the major cause of morbidity and mortality after solid organ and stem cell transplantation. To better understand host and environmental factors associated with an increased risk of infection as well as the effect of infections on function and survival of transplanted organs, we established the DZIF Transplant Cohort, a multicentre prospective cohort study within the organizational structure of the German Center for Infection Research. At time of transplantation, heart-, kidney-, lung-, liver-, pancreas- and hematopoetic stem cell- transplanted patients are enrolled into the study. Follow-up visits are scheduled at 3, 6, 9, 12 months after transplantation, and annually thereafter; extracurricular visits are conducted in case of infectious complications. Comprehensive standard operating procedures, web-based data collection and monitoring tools as well as a state of the art biobanking concept for blood, purified PBMCs, urine, and faeces samples ensure high quality of data and biosample collection. By collecting detailed information on immunosuppressive medication, infectious complications, type of infectious agent and therapy, as well as by providing corresponding biosamples, the cohort will establish the foundation for a broad spectrum of studies in the field of infectious diseases and transplant medicine. By January 2020, baseline data and biosamples of about 1400 patients have been collected. We plan to recruit 3500 patients by 2023, and continue follow-up visits and the documentation of infectious events at least until 2025. Information about the DZIF Transplant Cohort is available at https://www.dzif.de/en/working-group/transplant-cohort .
Asunto(s)
Bancos de Muestras Biológicas , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Trasplante de Órganos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Proyectos de Investigación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Bacterianas , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a highly standardized surgical procedure with a low risk of complications. However, once complications develop, they can be life-threatening. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of blood tests on postoperative day one regarding their potential to predict postoperative complications METHODS: A cohort study of 1706 consecutive cholecystectomies performed at a tertiary hospital and teaching facility over a 5-year period between 2014 and 2019. RESULTS: Patients that had open CCE or conversion CCE were excluded. One thousand five hundred eighty-six patients were included in the final analysis that received a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CCE). One thousand five hundred twenty-three patients had blood tests on POD 1. Forty-one complications were detected including 14 bile leaks, 2 common bile duct injuries, 13 choledocholithiasis, 9 hematomas, and 2 active bleedings. Bilirubin was elevated in 351 patients on POD 1. A drop of more than 3 mg/dl of hemoglobin was reported in 39 patients. GPT was elevated 3 × above the upper limit in 102 patients. All three tests showed a low sensitivity and specificity in detecting postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative blood tests alone show a low specificity in detecting postoperative complications after laparoscopic CCE. Their main benefit appears to be the negative predictive value, when they are normal. Routine blood testing appears to be unnecessary and should be based on the intraoperative diagnosis and postoperative clinical findings.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Coledocolitiasis , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Conducto Colédoco , Pruebas Hematológicas , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is a rare disease in Austria, Switzerland and Germany (DACh) caused by an infection with the parasite Echinococcus multilocularis. The aim of the study was to describe differences in the detection and reporting systems of alveolar echinococcosis in Austria, Switzerland and Germany and to describe epidemiological trends. METHODOLOGY: As part of an epidemiological update on 6th September 2019 in Ulm, Germany, experts and representatives discussed differences in the reporting and recording systems as well as the current epidemiological situation. RESULTS: Since 2004, Austria has had an obligation to report suspected cases, diseases and deaths of alveolar echinococcosis by name in accordance with §1 Para. 1 of the Epidemiegesetz 1950 (EpidemieG) and the Ordinance on Notifiable Communicable Diseases. According to §7 Para. 3 of the German Infection Protection Act (IfSG), Germany has also been subject to a reporting obligation since 2001, but not by name. In addition, national registers are available in both countries, which can be used to answer scientific questions. In Switzerland, there is no obligation to report human alveolar echinococcosis since 1997. Efforts are currently being made to implement a national register for alveolar echinococcosis in Switzerland. Despite different reporting and recording systems, a similar epidemiological trend can be observed for DACh. CONCLUSIONS: In Austria, Switzerland and Germany there is a slightly increasing trend of human cases with alveolar echinococcosis. The direct comparability is limited due to different reporting obligations. The structures often do not allow a joint answering of scientific questions concerning diagnostics, treatment and care.
Asunto(s)
Equinococosis , Austria/epidemiología , Equinococosis/epidemiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Suiza/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) are common soft tissue sarcomas of adulthood. The aim of this study is to show resectability of even giant liposarcomas and to identify factors associated with recurrence and survival in primary retroperitoneal liposarcomas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Out of these 10 patients with primary giant, dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcomas were operated with en bloc compartment resection with intention of radical resection. Treatment consisted of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgical resection or surgical resection. RESULTS: In 6 patients, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was performed; 3 patients were treated with surgical resection alone and 1 patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median diameter of tumor size was 360 mm (300 to 440 mm). Operative outcome showed complete resection in all 10 patients. Local tumor free survival was in median 19 month. Tumor recurrence was seen in 3 of 4 patients (75%) without neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, and in 2 of 6 patients (33%) after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in 2 years follow-up. CONCLUSION: Even in case of giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma, complete resection is possible and remains the principal treatment. The rate of recurrence was improved in patients with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Liposarcoma , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales , Adulto , Humanos , Liposarcoma/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Appendectomy is the treatment of choice for acute appendicitis. The procedure can be performed open or laparoscopically. However, laparoscopy is not available on military missions abroad. It is unclear whether treatment outcomes differ between the two surgical approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment data of all patients undergoing open and laparoscopic appendectomies in the German Armed Forces Hospital of Ulm from 2013 to 2017 were collected retrospectively. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to minimize the influence of potential confounders and to assess the influence of surgical approach on outcome (reoperations, superficial and deep surgical infections, length of postoperative ileus, need for intravenous analgesics, and operative time). RESULTS: A total of 542 patients with complete datasets were included in the propensity score matching analysis, among these 64 with open and 478 laparoscopic procedures. There were no statistically significant differences between open and laparoscopic surgeries with respect to all outcome variables, with the exception of a 25-minute prolonged operative time for the open approach. CONCLUSIONS: Open appendectomy can be considered equivalent in outcome to the laparoscopic procedure and thus can be performed on military missions abroad without compromising outcome. Military surgeons must continue to be trained and confident in open appendectomy.
Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Personal Militar , Cirujanos , Humanos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicitis/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tiempo de Internación , Laparoscopía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad AgudaRESUMEN
Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency. Complicated appendicitis usually warrants perioperative antibiotic treatment in order to prevent infectious complications. Whether routine microbiological testing benefits the individual patient is a topic of debate. The goal of our study was to assess perioperative antibiotic prescriptions as well as the benefit of microbiological testing during the appendectomy as a predictor for bacteria encountered in infectious complications. This is a retrospective analysis of 1218 consecutive patients that underwent appendectomy at a tertiary referral center between 2014 and 2021. The patient charts were systematically analyzed regarding intraoperative outcome, microbiologic results, and postoperative infectious complications. 1218 patients were included in this study of which 768 were uncomplicated appendicitis (UA) and 450 were complicated appendicitis (CA). Microbiological testing was performed in 39.2% of UA cases (33.6% of which grew bacteria) compared to 74.9% of CA cases (78.6% positive cultures). The strongest individual predictors for SSI were gangrenous and perforated appendicitis. A total of 58 surgical-site infections developed, of which 49 were intra-abdominal fluid collections or abscesses. Thirty-two patients had revision surgery or CT-guided drainage for SSI. In the cases where microbiological testing was done both during the appendectomy and the SSI, 13/18 showed different bacteria on culture testing. The infectious outcome was favorable in 98.3%. While microbiological testing offers insights into resistance patterns, it is of little benefit for the individual patient, given the low predictive value for bacteria found during SSI. Achieving source control combined with empiric antibiotic coverage leads to favorable outcomes independent of culture results.
Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Humanos , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Apendicitis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Apendicectomía/métodos , Bacterias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The histological diagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis can be challenging. Decision support models based on deep learning (DL) are increasingly used to aid pathologists, but data on the histology of tissue-invasive parasitic infections are missing. The aim of this study was to implement DL methods to classify Echinococcus multilocularis liver lesions and normal liver tissue and assess which regions and structures play the most important role in classification decisions. METHODS: We extracted 15,756 echinococcus tiles from 28 patients using 59 whole slide images (WSI); 11,602 tiles of normal liver parenchyma from 18 patients using 33 WSI served as a control group. Different pretrained model architectures were used with a 60-20-20% random splitting. We visualized the predictions using probability-thresholded heat maps of WSI. The area-under-the-curve (AUC) value and other performance metrics were calculated. The GradCAM method was used to calculate and visualize important spatial features. RESULTS: The models achieved a high validation and test set accuracy. The calculated AUC values were 1.0 in all models. Pericystic fibrosis and necrotic areas, as well as germinative and laminated layers of the metacestodes played an important role in decision tasks according to the superimposed GradCAM heatmaps. CONCLUSION: Deep learning models achieved a high predictive performance in classifying E. multilocularis liver lesions. A possible next step could be to validate the model using other datasets and test it against other pathologic entities as well, such as, for example, Echinococcus granulosus infection.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Equinococosis , Echinococcus granulosus , Echinococcus multilocularis , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Animales , Humanos , Equinococosis/parasitologíaRESUMEN
(1) Background: Perioperative Antibiotics for acute complicated appendicitis are a standard of care. While there are plenty of trials for pediatric patients, data for elderly patients are scarce. The goal of our study was to evaluate whether elderly patients carry more resistant bacteria and thus have less favorable outcomes after an appendectomy that may warrant intensified perioperative antibiotic treatment (2) We present a retrospective single-center matched pair (139 patients each) analysis of perioperative and microbiological outcomes of an elderly appendicitis cohort (i.e., older than 60 years) compared with a younger adult cohort (i.e., ≤60 years). Both groups were matched one for one according to gender, duration of symptoms, c-reactive protein at presentation and whether they presented with uncomplicated or complicated appendicitis. (3) Results: After matching, complicated appendicitis was present in 76.3% of both groups. Elderly patients more frequently received preoperative diagnostic CT (p < 0.001) than the young. Both operative strategy (laparoscopic appendectomy in 92.1% each) and duration of surgery (57 vs. 56 min) were equal in both groups. Postoperative antibiotics were prescribed in ~57% for a median of 3 days in both groups and antibiotic selection was similar. The incidence of surgical site infections was higher in the young (12.2% vs. 7.9%) yet not significant. There was no difference in culture positivity or bacterial spectrum and the elderly cohort did not present with increased resistant bacterial isolates. (4) Conclusions: While overall resistant bacterial strains were rare, perioperative outcomes between the young and the elderly did not differ and did neither warrant longer nor intensified antibiotic treatment.
RESUMEN
Surgical therapy of duodenal perforation into the retroperitoneum entails high morbidity. Conservative treatment and endoscopic negative pressure therapy have been suggested as promising therapeutic alternatives. We aimed to retrospectively assess outcomes of patients treated for duodenal perforation to the retroperitoneum at our department. A retrospective analysis of all patients that were treated for duodenal perforation to the retroperitoneum at our institution between 2010 and 2021 was conducted. Different therapeutic approaches with associated complications within 30 days, length of in-hospital stay, number of readmissions and necessity of parenteral nutrition were assessed. We included thirteen patients in our final analysis. Six patients underwent surgery, five patients were treated conservatively and two patients received interventional treatment by endoscopic negative pressure therapy. Length of stay was shorter in patients treated conservatively. One patient following conservative and surgical treatment each was readmitted to hospital within 30 days after initial therapy whereas no readmissions after interventional treatment occurred. There was no failure of therapy in patients treated without surgery whereas four (66.7%) of six patients required revision surgery following primary surgical therapy. Conservative and interventional treatment were associated with fewer complications than surgical therapy which involves high morbidity. Conservative and interventional treatment using endoscopic negative pressure therapy in selected patients might constitute appropriate therapeutic alternatives for duodenal perforations to the retroperitoneum.
Asunto(s)
Úlcera Duodenal , Perforación Intestinal , Úlcera Péptica Perforada , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Úlcera Duodenal/complicaciones , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
(1) Background: Anaerobic infections in hepatobiliary surgery have rarely been addressed. Whereas infectious complications during the perioperative phase of liver resections are common, there are very limited data on the prevalence and clinical role of anaerobes in this context. Given the risk of contaminated bile in liver resections, the goal of our study was to investigate the prevalence and outcome of anaerobic infections in major hepatectomies. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 245 consecutive major hepatectomies that were performed at the department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery of the University Hospital of Tuebingen between July 2017 and August 2020. All microbiological cultures were screened for the prevalence of anaerobic bacteria and the patients' clinical characteristics and outcomes were evaluated. (3) Results: Of the 245 patients, 13 patients suffered from anaerobic infections. Seven had positive cultures from the biliary tract during the primary procedure, while six had positive culture results from samples obtained during the management of complications. Risk factors for anaerobic infections were preoperative biliary stenting (p = 0.002) and bile leaks (p = 0.009). All of these infections had to be treated by intervention and adjunct antibiotic treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics. (4) Conclusions: Anaerobic infections are rare in liver resections. Certain risk factors trigger the antibiotic coverage of anaerobes.
RESUMEN
(1) Background: Cholecystitis and cholangitis are among the most common diseases treated by general surgery. Gallstones lead to inflammation and bacterial infection of the biliary tract. Biliary infections can lead to live threatening bacteremia and liver abscesses. The true role of anaerobes remains unclear. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed bacterial cultures from biliary samples obtained from bile ducts and gallbladders at our tertiary care center. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed. (3) Results: In our database of 1719 patients, 365 patients had microbial testing, of which 42 grew anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobes were more frequently cultured in patients with hepatic abscesses and gallbladder perforation. These patients were older and had more comorbidities than the control group. The overall outcomes of all patients were favorable and the resistance rate to commonly used antibiotics remained low. (4) Conclusions: Anaerobes in biliary tract infections appear to be underdiagnosed and more prevalent in the elderly with advanced disease. Due to low antibiotic resistance, the combination of source control and adjunct anti-infective treatment leads to favorable outcomes.
RESUMEN
Kidney transplantation represents the gold standard treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. Improvements in surgical technique and pharmacologic treatment have continuously prolonged allograft survival in recent years. However, urological complications are frequently observed, leading to both postoperative morbidity and putative deterioration of allograft function. While open redo surgery in these patients is often accompanied by elevated surgical risk, endoscopic management of urological complications is an alternative, minimal-invasive option. In the present article, we reviewed the literature on relevant urological postoperative complications after kidney transplantation and describe preventive approaches during the pre-transplantation assessment and their management using minimal-invasive approaches.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Enfermedades Urológicas/cirugía , Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The range of indications for laparoscopic procedures has been continuously widened in recent years. At the same time, however, the diagnostic and therapeutic role of laparoscopy in the management of blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma remains controversial. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in PubMed from 2008 to 2019 on the use of laparoscopy in blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Studies were analyzed in terms of relevant operative and perioperative event rates (rate of missed injuries, conversion rate, postoperative complication rate). On the basis of this analysis, an algorithm for the use of laparoscopy in abdominal trauma was developed for clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 15 full texts with 5869 patients were found. With a rate of 1.4%, laparoscopically missed injuries were very rare for both penetrating and blunt abdominal trauma. Of all trauma laparoscopies 29.3% were converted to open surgery (laparotomy). Among the non-converted laparoscopies 60.5% were therapeutic. Complications occurred after trauma laparoscopy in 8.6% of cases. CONCLUSION: By means of systematic laparoscopic exploration, missed injuries in abdominal trauma are extremely rare, so that concerns in this respect no longer seem justified. A large proportion of intra-abdominal injuries can be treated using laparoscopy or laparoscopically assisted procedures.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Humanos , Laparotomía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Targeted therapies changed the treatment concepts of gastrointestinal stromal tumours significantly. As only possibility to cure surgical resection is the cornerstone of therapy. Thus it is necessary to find out which patients will benefit most regarding modality (neo- or adjuvant) and duration of chemotherapy. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort analysis the medical records of all consecutive patients treated in the department of general and visceral surgery of the university hospital Tübingen between 2004 and 2015 were investigated. Recurrence and survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Tumor location of GIST was gastric in 32, small bowel in 14, rectum in 3 and extraintestinal in 3 patients. Median tumor size was 46 mm. Median mitotic index was 4 per 50 hpf. Resection was achieved R0 in 46 patients, R1 in 4 patients and R2 in 2 patients. Mean overall survival was 58.9 months (range, 46-73 months). Mean recurrence free survival was 45.6 months (range, 36-57 months). Mean overall survival was 58.9 months (range, 46-73 months). Risk factors for recurrence were tumor location and high mitotic index Ki-67. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of GIST after surgical resection is favourable. Survival prognosis are excellent. Analysis of KI-67 mitotic index predicted best oncologic outcome.