Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Neuromodulation ; 26(2): 443-450, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36411150

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-term levodopa use is frequently associated with fluctuations in motor response and can have a serious adverse effect on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is effective in improving symptoms of diminished levodopa responsiveness. QoL improvements with DBS have been shown in several randomized control trials, mostly in Europe and the United States; however, there is a need for evidence from regions around the world. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to demonstrate improvement in PD-related QoL in patients undergoing DBS in a prospective, multicenter study conducted in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To evaluate the effect of neurostimulation on the QoL of patients with PD, a Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8); Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) I, II, III, and IV; and EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were administered at baseline and 12 months after DBS implantation. The mean change and percent change from baseline were reported for these clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Assessments were completed for 85 of the 89 implanted patients. DBS substantially improved patients' QoL and function. Implanted patients showed statistically significant mean improvement in PDQ-8 and UPDRS III (on stimulation/off medication). In the patients who completed the 12-month follow-up visit, the percent change was -22.2% for PDQ-8 and -51.6% for UPDRS III (on stimulation/off medication). Percent change from baseline to 12 months for UPDRS I, II, III, and IV and EQ-5D were -16.8%, -39.4%, -18.5%, and -50.0% and 22.7%, respectively. The overall rate of incidence for adverse events was low at 15.7%. Favorable outcomes were also reported based on patient opinion; 95.3% were satisfied with DBS results. CONCLUSIONS: These data were comparable to other studies around the world and showed alignment with the ability of DBS to meaningfully improve the QoL of patients with PD. More studies investigating DBS therapy for patients with PD are necessary to accurately characterize clinical outcomes for the global PD population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number for this study is NCT02937688.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Núcleo Subtalámico , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Prospectivos , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Neuromodulation ; 24(7): 1167-1175, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33449428

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assist in assessment of therapy risks and benefits of targeted drug delivery (TDD) for chronic nonmalignant pain using registry data on product performance, adverse events, and elective device replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Product Surveillance Registry (PSR) (NCT01524276) is an ongoing prospective, long-term, multicenter registry enrolling consented patients implanted with an intrathecal drug delivery system. Patients are followed prospectively with participating investigators providing pump and catheter performance data for events related to the device, procedure, and therapy. Event descriptions include patient symptoms and outcomes. RESULTS: Registry data from the 4646 patients (59.7% female) treated with TDD for chronic, nonmalignant pain at 59 registry sites between August 2003 and October 2019, with over 17,000 patient-years (4646 patients with 44 months average follow-up), were analyzed. Registry discontinuation was largely (46.2% of discontinued patients) due to study site closure and patient death; exit due to an adverse or device event was limited to 10.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Treating chronic pain with escalating doses of strong systemic opioids often leads to inconsistent pain control, impaired function, untenable side effects, and reduced quality of life and this practice has contributed to the current opioid crisis in the United States. TDD has been an available therapy for these patients for greater than 30 years, and data from this real-world registry offer supporting evidence to the long-term safety of this therapy as an alternative to systemic opioids, as well as insights into patient acceptance and satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Espinales , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Estados Unidos
3.
Neuromodulation ; 24(3): 556-565, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33296127

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Multiple variables play a role in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) treatment outcomes, including patient anatomy, pain pattern, lead location, stimulation parameters, and so on. A wide range of stimulation parameters are considered safe and on-label, and as a result a growing number of new frequencies and frequency-combinations are being incorporated into standard practice. A standardized approach to therapy delivery may provide more consistent outcomes for more patients. The Vectors study evaluated whether there is significant sustained improvement in pain and functional outcomes when therapy is delivered using a standardized approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vectors, a post-market, single-arm study evaluated the safety and efficacy of SCS with an implantable neurostimulator starting with 1 kHz stimulation, targeting the T9-T10 disc space following paresthesia mapping. Subjects with chronic intractable low back and leg pain (visual analogue scale [VAS] ≥ 50 mm) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was change in overall pain (VAS) at the three-month visit compared to baseline. Subjects were followed through 12 months. Secondary endpoints included changes in low back and leg pain, quality of life (European Quality of Life - Five Dimensions, EQ-5D-5L), disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), individual subject goals, and subject satisfaction. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in overall pain (VAS; 45.4 mm) through the three-month visit, which was sustained through 12 months. At 12 months, 79% of subjects had ≥50% improvement in at least one pain domain (overall, lowback or leg) with 85% of subjects reporting therapy satisfaction. There was a decrease in disability and an improvement in quality of life with 70% of subjects achieving a personal activity goal by the three-month visit. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term pain relief and improvement in quality of life and function were achieved when following a standardized workflow. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT03345472.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Calidad de Vida , Médula Espinal , Resultado del Tratamiento , Flujo de Trabajo
4.
Anesth Analg ; 130(2): 289-297, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567325

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs) for the treatment of cancer-related pain have been demonstrated in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Despite positive evidence for this therapy, IDDS remains underutilized to treat cancer pain. Real-world registry data augment existing safety and effectiveness data and are presented here to broaden awareness of this therapeutic option, needed for adequate cancer-related pain treatment, and as a viable tool addressing concerns with systemic opioid use. METHODS: This prospective, long-term, multicenter (United States, Western Europe, and Latin America) registry started in 2003 to monitor the performance of SynchroMed Infusion Systems. Patient-reported outcomes were added in 2013. Before data acquisition, all sites obtained Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approval and written patient consent. The study was registered (NCT01524276 at clinicaltrials.gov) before patients were enrolled. Patients who provided informed consent were enrolled in the registry at initial IDDS implant or replacement. RESULTS: Through July 2017, 1403 patients with cancer pain were enrolled and implanted. The average (minimum/maximum) age of patients was 59 years (13/93 years), with 56.6% female. The most frequent cancer types were lung, breast, colon/rectal, pancreatic, and prostate. The majority of patients whose registry follow-up ended (87%; 1141/1311) were followed through death, with 4.3% (n = 57) exiting due to device explant or therapy discontinuation; the remaining 113 (8.6%) discontinued for reasons such as transfer of care, lost to follow-up, and site closure. Pain scores within the cohort of patients providing baseline and follow-up data improved significantly at 6 (P = .0007; n = 103) and 12 (P = .0026; n = 55) months compared to baseline, with EuroQol with 5 dimensions (EuroQol-5D) scores showing significant improvement at 6 months (P = .0016; n = 41). Infection requiring surgical intervention (IDDS explant, replacement, pocket revision, irrigation and debridement, etc) was reported in 3.2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate and improved pain control in patients with cancer, even in advanced stages, with concurrent quality of life maintenance is attainable. Results from this large-scale, multicenter, single-group cohort supplement existing RCT data that support IDDS as a safe and effective therapeutic option with a positive benefit-risk ratio in the treatment of cancer pain.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Inyecciones Espinales/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Dolor en Cáncer/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/instrumentación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Bombas de Infusión Implantables , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Adulto Joven
5.
Neuromodulation ; 23(7): 996-1002, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31989725

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assist in the assessment of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy risks and benefits by providing surgical intervention rate, safety, and elective device replacement rate data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ongoing prospective, long-term, multicenter Product Surveillance Registry (PSR) (NCT01524276) enrolled consented patients implanted with the SynchroMed II infusion system. Pump and catheter performance data were collected, with patients followed prospectively for events related to the device, procedure, and therapy. Investigators provided event descriptions, patient symptoms, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: We analyzed registry data from 1743 patients (77% adult, 46.8% female) treated with ITB for severe spasticity at 53 registry sites between August 2003 and October 2017, for an accumulated 6481 patient-years. Discontinuation from the registry was largely (58.6% of discontinued patients) due to study site closure and patient relocation; exit due to an adverse event was limited to 0.3%. After 10 years, 87.2% of adult and 76.3% of pediatric patients continued with ITB. Overall, 99.1% of pumps reaching end of battery life were replaced at the time of explant. CONCLUSIONS: ITB therapy for the treatment of severe spasticity requires surgical implantation of a programmable infusion system for chronic drug delivery. If complications arise, many necessitate surgical intervention for correction. For spinal and cerebral spasticity in pediatric and adult patients, discontinuation rates due to an adverse event were low (0.3%), and there was high acceptance (99.1%) of surgical intervention for therapy continuation. Patient/caregiver willingness to accept surgical and other risks for therapy continuation was extremely high.


Asunto(s)
Baclofeno , Inyecciones Espinales , Relajantes Musculares Centrales , Espasticidad Muscular , Adulto , Baclofeno/uso terapéutico , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Bombas de Infusión Implantables , Masculino , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/uso terapéutico , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros
6.
Neuromodulation ; 20(2): 187-197, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27477589

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The catheter status of patients who presented with loss of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy effectiveness was investigated using measurements of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure transmitted through the catheter fluid path to the pump. The aim of the study was to estimate the appropriate threshold separating catheter complications from "normal" catheter function, and to compare catheter status based on CSF pressure with the clinical diagnosis. METHODS: This was a prospective, masked nonsignificant risk, research study. Patients (N = 47) received ITB for the treatment of severe spasticity and presented with symptoms of catheter malfunction. CSF pressure data were recorded using an external sensor connected to a needle inserted into the catheter access port. An algorithm calculated the energy of the variations in CSF pressure caused by respiration and heartbeat within the intrathecal space. These data were evaluated against a threshold that separated normal from abnormal catheter function. Catheter status based on the algorithm was compared with the clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 37 patients. Mean CSF pressure energy was significantly higher (p = 0.025; student t-test) for patients diagnosed with normal catheter function vs. catheters with complications. The CSF pressure algorithm matched the clinical diagnosis in 16 of 18 patients with catheter complications (sensitivity = 89%), and 13 of 19 patients with normal catheter function (specificity = 68%). CONCLUSION: In-clinic CSF pressure data acquisition is technically feasible. Overall, catheter status based on the algorithm demonstrated concordance with the clinical diagnosis in 29 of 37 patients (78.4%).


Asunto(s)
Baclofeno/administración & dosificación , Presión del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/efectos de los fármacos , Bombas de Infusión Implantables/efectos adversos , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
7.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 56(2): 234-45, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23303153

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited data have been published regarding the long-term results of sacral nerve stimulation, or sacral neuromodulation, for severe fecal incontinence. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to assess the outcome of sacral nerve stimulation with the use of precise tools and data collection, focusing on the long-term durability of the therapy. Five-year data were analyzed. DESIGN: Patients entered in a multicenter, prospective study for fecal incontinence were followed at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually after device implantation. PATIENTS: Patients with chronic fecal incontinence in whom conservative treatments had failed or who were not candidates for more conservative treatments were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with ≥ 50% improvement over baseline in fecal incontinence episodes per week during a 14-day test stimulation period received sacral nerve stimulation therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were assessed with a 14-day bowel diary and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life and Fecal Incontinence Severity Index questionnaires. Therapeutic success was defined as ≥ 50% improvement over baseline in fecal incontinence episodes per week. All adverse events were collected. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (110 women; mean age, 60.5 years) underwent implantation. Seventy-six of these patients (63%) were followed a minimum of 5 years (maximum, longer than 8 years) and are the basis for this report. Fecal incontinence episodes per week decreased from a mean of 9.1 at baseline to 1.7 at 5 years, with 89% (n = 64/72) having ≥ 50% improvement (p < 0.0001) and 36% (n = 26/72) having complete continence. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scores also significantly improved for all 4 scales between baseline and 5 years (n = 70; p < 0.0001). Twenty-seven of the 76 (35.5%) patients required a device revision, replacement, or explant. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic effect and improved quality of life for fecal incontinence is maintained 5 years after sacral nerve stimulation implantation and beyond. Device revision, replacement, or explant rate was acceptable, but future efforts should be aimed at improvement.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Sacro/inervación , Canal Anal/inervación , Enfermedad Crónica , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Electrodos Implantados , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 18(2): 103-12, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22453321

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present analysis was to report on the relationship between long-term improvement in quality of life (QOL) and fecal incontinence (FI) severity and long-term reduction in FI episodes after sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) or sacral neuromodulation. METHODS: Patients who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, and initially had more than 2 FI episodes per week, were offered SNS therapy. Patients with 50% or higher reduction in FI during a 2-week test period were implanted with a neurostimulator (InterStim; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn). Assessments were completed by patients at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after implant, and annually thereafter. The present report includes data from the 4-year postimplant follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients underwent test stimulation with a 90% success rate, and as a result, 120 (110 females) with a mean age of 60.5 years and a mean duration of FI of 6.8 years received long-term implantation. Of them, 78 patients completed all or part of the 4-year follow-up assessment. Fecal incontinence episodes decreased from a mean of 9.4 per week at baseline to 1.9 per week at 48 months (P < 0.001). The 4-year analyses showed that SNS had a positive and sustained impact on all 4 scales of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (P < 0.001), Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores improved from a mean of 39.9 to 28 (P < 0.001), and self-rated bowel health scores improved from a mean of 3.5 to 6.9 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sacral nerve stimulation not only restores or improves continence in treated patients with chronic FI but also improves their quality of life and symptom severity.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/inervación , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Electrodos Implantados , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Plexo Lumbosacro , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canal Anal/fisiopatología , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Incontinencia Fecal/diagnóstico , Incontinencia Fecal/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autoinforme , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA