Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ; 3(10): 3890-901, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21916438

RESUMEN

Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of galactoside-terminated alkanethiols have protein-resistance properties which can be tuned via the degree of methylation [Langmuir 2005, 21, 2971-2980]. Specifically, a partially methylated compound was more resistant to nonspecific protein adsorption than the hydroxylated or fully methylated counterparts. We investigate whether this also holds true for resistance to the attachment and adhesion of a range of marine species, in order to clarify to what extent resistance to protein adsorption correlates with the more complex adhesion of fouling organisms. The partially methylated galactoside-terminated SAM was further compared to a mixed monolayer of ω-substituted methyl- and hydroxyl-terminated alkanethiols with wetting properties and surface ratio of hydroxyl to methyl groups matching that of the galactoside. The settlement (initial attachment) and adhesion strength of four model marine fouling organisms were investigated, representing both micro- and macrofoulers; two bacteria (Cobetia marina and Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus), barnacle cypris larvae (Balanus amphitrite), and algal zoospores (Ulva linza). The minimum in protein adsorption onto the partially methylated galactoside surface was partly reproduced in the marine fouling assays, providing some support for a relationship between protein resistance and adhesion of marine fouling organisms. The mixed alkanethiol SAM, which was matched in wettability to the partially methylated galactoside SAM, consistently showed higher settlement (initial attachment) of test organisms than the galactoside, implying that both wettability and surface chemistry are insufficient to explain differences in fouling resistance. We suggest that differences in the structure of interfacial water may explain the variation in adhesion to these SAMs.


Asunto(s)
Organismos Acuáticos/fisiología , Incrustaciones Biológicas/prevención & control , Galactósidos/química , Compuestos de Sulfhidrilo/química , Adsorción , Animales , Organismos Acuáticos/efectos de los fármacos , Adhesión Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Adhesión Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Galactósidos/farmacología , Halomonadaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Halomonadaceae/fisiología , Compuestos de Sulfhidrilo/farmacología , Propiedades de Superficie , Thoracica/efectos de los fármacos , Thoracica/fisiología , Ulva/efectos de los fármacos , Ulva/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA