Climbing Fiber-Mediated Spillover Transmission to Interneurons Is Regulated by EAAT4.

Neurotransmitter spillover is a form of communication not readily predicted by anatomic structure. In the cerebellum, glutamate spillover from climbing fibers recruits molecular layer interneurons in the absence of conventional synaptic connections. Spillover-mediated signaling is typically limited by transporters that bind and reuptake glutamate. Here, we show that patterned expression of the excitatory amino acid transporter 4 (EAAT4) in Purkinje cells regulates glutamate spillover to molecular layer interneurons. Using male and female Aldolase C-Venus knock-in mice to visualize zebrin microzones, we find larger climbing fiber-evoked spillover EPSCs in regions with low levels of EAAT4 compared with regions with high EAAT4. This difference is not explained by presynaptic glutamate release properties or postsynaptic receptor density but rather by differences in the glutamate concentration reaching receptors on interneurons. Inhibiting glutamate transport normalizes the differences between microzones, suggesting that heterogeneity in EAAT4 expression is a primary determinant of differential spillover. These results show that neuronal glutamate transporters limit extrasynaptic transmission in a non-cell-autonomous manner and provide new insight into the functional specialization of cerebellar microzones.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) help maintain the fidelity and independence of point-to-point synaptic transmission. Whereas glial transporters are critical to maintain low ambient levels of extracellular glutamate to prevent excitotoxicity, neuronal transporters have more subtle roles in shaping excitatory synaptic transmission. Here we show that the patterned expression of neuronal EAAT4 in cerebellar microzones controls glutamate spillover from cerebellar climbing fibers to nearby interneurons. These results contribute to fundamental understanding of neuronal transporter functions and specialization of cerebellar microzones.

Crus I in the Rodent Cerebellum: Its Homology to Crus I and II in the Primate Cerebellum and Its Anatomical Uniqueness Among Neighboring Lobules.

In the human cerebellum, the crus I and crus II lobules (or the ansiform lobule), which are implicated in cognitive and visuomotor functions, are significantly expanded compared to other anterior and posterior lobules, which are involved mainly in somatosensorimotor function. In applying rodent models, it is essential to identify the lobules that are homologous to human crus I and crus II. Observation of the lobular structure in human, macaque, marmoset, rat, and mouse has indicated that human crus I and II are homologous to crus I in rodents (referred to as "ansiform area, AA"). This new lobular definition is supported by lobule-based mapping of the olivocerebellar climbing fiber and Purkinje cell (PC) projection patterns in rodents; crus II and simple lobules are innervated by the mediocaudal part of each inferior olive subnucleus and project to the dorsal part of the cerebellar nuclei, while crus I (or the AA) is innervated by the rostrolateral part of each inferior olive subnucleus and projects to the ventral part of the cerebellar nuclei. Concerning zebrin stripes, the central lobules (lobules VI-VII and AA or crus I in rodents) show a laterally expanded arrangement solely of positive stripes. Our recent analysis has shown that this arrangement of zebrin-positive stripes in the AA originates from their developmental process. Between E14.5 and E17.5, lateral protrusion and shift has been observed in the domains of protocadherin 10-positive PC subsets (which would become zebrin-positive later) in the central area of the immature cerebellum that eventually becomes lobules VI-VII and AA or crus I. These data suggest that the AA (or crus I in rodents) is a unique lobule in the mammalian cerebellum which is characterized by distinct connectivity from neighboring lobules, a massive expansion in skillful primates, and the formation of longitudinal stripes different from that in neighboring anterior and posterior lobules.

Correction to: Cerebellar Modules and Their Role as Operational Cerebellar Processing Units: A Consensus paper.

In the original version of this paper, the Title should have been written with "A Consensus paper" to read "Cerebellar Modules and Their Role as Operational Cerebellar Processing Units: A Consensus paper".

Cerebellar Modules and Their Role as Operational Cerebellar Processing Units: A Consensus paper [corrected].

The compartmentalization of the cerebellum into modules is often used to discuss its function. What, exactly, can be considered a module, how do they operate, can they be subdivided and do they act individually or in concert are only some of the key questions discussed in this consensus paper. Experts studying cerebellar compartmentalization give their insights on the structure and function of cerebellar modules, with the aim of providing an up-to-date review of the extensive literature on this subject. Starting with an historical perspective indicating that the basis of the modular organization is formed by matching olivocorticonuclear connectivity, this is followed by consideration of anatomical and chemical modular boundaries, revealing a relation between anatomical, chemical, and physiological borders. In addition, the question is asked what the smallest operational unit of the cerebellum might be. Furthermore, it has become clear that chemical diversity of Purkinje cells also results in diversity of information processing between cerebellar modules. An additional important consideration is the relation between modular compartmentalization and the organization of the mossy fiber system, resulting in the concept of modular plasticity. Finally, examination of cerebellar output patterns suggesting cooperation between modules and recent work on modular aspects of emotional behavior are discussed. Despite the general consensus that the cerebellum has a modular organization, many questions remain. The authors hope that this joint review will inspire future cerebellar research so that we are better able to understand how this brain structure makes its vital contribution to behavior in its most general form.

Heterogeneity of Purkinje cell simple spike-complex spike interactions: zebrin- and non-zebrin-related variations.

KEY POINTS: Cerebellar Purkinje cells (PCs) generate two types of action potentials, simple and complex spikes. Although they are generated by distinct mechanisms, interactions between the two spike types exist. Zebrin staining produces alternating positive and negative stripes of PCs across most of the cerebellar cortex. Thus, here we compared simple spike-complex spike interactions both within and across zebrin populations. Simple spike activity undergoes a complex modulation preceding and following a complex spike. The amplitudes of the pre- and post-complex spike modulation phases were correlated across PCs. On average, the modulation was larger for PCs in zebrin positive regions. Correlations between aspects of the complex spike waveform and simple spike activity were found, some of which varied between zebrin positive and negative PCs. The implications of the results are discussed with regard to hypotheses that complex spikes are triggered by rises in simple spike activity for either motor learning or homeostatic functions. ABSTRACT: Purkinje cells (PCs) generate two types of action potentials, called simple and complex spikes (SSs and CSs). We first investigated the CS-associated modulation of SS activity and its relationship to the zebrin status of the PC. The modulation pattern consisted of a pre-CS rise in SS activity, and then, following the CS, a pause, a rebound, and finally a late inhibition of SS activity for both zebrin positive (Z+) and negative (Z-) cells, though the amplitudes of the phases were larger in Z+ cells. Moreover, the amplitudes of the pre-CS rise with the late inhibitory phase of the modulation were correlated across PCs. In contrast, correlations between modulation phases across CSs of individual PCs were generally weak. Next, the relationship between CS spikelets and SS activity was investigated. The number of spikelets/CS correlated with the average SS firing rate only for Z+ cells. In contrast, correlations across CSs between spikelet numbers and the amplitudes of the SS modulation phases were generally weak. Division of spikelets into likely axonally propagated and non-propagated groups (based on their interspikelet interval) showed that the correlation of spikelet number with SS firing rate primarily reflected a relationship with non-propagated spikelets. In sum, the results show both zebrin-related and non-zebrin-related physiological heterogeneity in SS-CS interactions among PCs, which suggests that the cerebellar cortex is more functionally diverse than is assumed by standard theories of cerebellar function.

The Roles of the Olivocerebellar Pathway in Motor Learning and Motor Control. A Consensus Paper.

For many decades, the predominant view in the cerebellar field has been that the olivocerebellar system's primary function is to induce plasticity in the cerebellar cortex, specifically, at the parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapse. However, it has also long been proposed that the olivocerebellar system participates directly in motor control by helping to shape ongoing motor commands being issued by the cerebellum. Evidence consistent with both hypotheses exists; however, they are often investigated as mutually exclusive alternatives. In contrast, here, we take the perspective that the olivocerebellar system can contribute to both the motor learning and motor control functions of the cerebellum and might also play a role in development. We then consider the potential problems and benefits of it having multiple functions. Moreover, we discuss how its distinctive characteristics (e.g., low firing rates, synchronization, and variable complex spike waveforms) make it more or less suitable for one or the other of these functions, and why having multiple functions makes sense from an evolutionary perspective. We did not attempt to reach a consensus on the specific role(s) the olivocerebellar system plays in different types of movements, as that will ultimately be determined experimentally; however, collectively, the various contributions highlight the flexibility of the olivocerebellar system, and thereby suggest that it has the potential to act in both the motor learning and motor control functions of the cerebellum.

Structural basis of cerebellar microcircuits in the rat.

The topography of the cerebellar cortex is described by at least three different maps, with the basic units of each map termed "microzones," "patches," and "bands." These are defined, respectively, by different patterns of climbing fiber input, mossy fiber input, and Purkinje cell (PC) phenotype. Based on embryological development, the "one-map" hypothesis proposes that the basic units of each map align in the adult animal and the aim of the present study was to test this possibility. In barbiturate anesthetized adult rats, nanoinjections of bidirectional tracer (Retrobeads and biotinylated dextran amine) were made into somatotopically identified regions within the hindlimb C1 zone in copula pyramidis. Injection sites were mapped relative to PC bands defined by the molecular marker zebrin II and were correlated with the pattern of retrograde cell labeling within the inferior olive and in the basilar pontine nuclei to determine connectivity of microzones and patches, respectively, and also with the distributions of biotinylated dextran amine-labeled PC terminals in the cerebellar nuclei. Zebrin bands were found to be related to both climbing fiber and mossy fiber inputs and also to cortical representation of different parts of the ipsilateral hindpaw, indicating a precise spatial organization within cerebellar microcircuitry. This precise connectivity extends to PC terminal fields in the cerebellar nuclei and olivonuclear projections. These findings strongly support the one-map hypothesis and suggest that, at the microcircuit level of resolution, the cerebellar cortex has a common plan of spatial organization for major inputs, outputs, and PC phenotype.

Single axonal characterization of trigeminocerebellar projection patterns in the mouse.

The cerebellar projection from the trigeminal nuclear complex is one of the major populations of the cerebellar inputs. Although this projection is essential in cerebellar functional processing and organization, its morphological organization has not been systematically clarified. The present study addressed this issue by lobule-specific retrograde neuronal labeling and single axonal reconstruction with anterograde labeling. The cerebellar projection arose mainly from the interpolaris subdivision of the spinal trigeminal nucleus (Sp5I) and the principal trigeminal sensory nucleus (Pr5). Although crus II, paramedian lobule, lobule IX, and simple lobule were the major targets, paraflocculus, and other lobules received some projections. Reconstructed single trigeminocerebellar axons showed 77.8 mossy fiber terminals on average often in multiple lobules but no nuclear collaterals. More terminals were located in zebrin-negative or lightly-positive compartments than in zebrin-positive compartments. While Pr5 axons predominantly projected to ipsilateral crus II, Sp5I axons projected either predominantly to crus II and paramedian lobule often bilaterally, or predominantly to lobule IX always ipsilaterally. Lobule IX-predominant-type Sp5I neurons specifically expressed Gpr26. Gpr26-tagged neuronal labeling produced a peculiar mossy fiber distribution, which was dense in the dorsolateral lobule IX and extending transversely to the dorsal median apex in lobule IX. The projection to the cerebellar nuclei was observed in collaterals of ascending Sp5I axons that project to the diencephalon. In sum, multiple populations of trigeminocerebellar projections showed divergent projections to cerebellar lobules. The projection was generally complementary with the pontine projection and partly matched with the reported orofacial receptive field arrangement.

Clustered fine compartmentalization of the mouse embryonic cerebellar cortex and its rearrangement into the postnatal striped configuration.

Compartmentalization is essential for a brain area to be involved in different functions through topographic afferent and efferent connections that reflect this organization. The adult cerebellar cortex is compartmentalized into longitudinal stripes, in which Purkinje cells (PCs) have compartment-specific molecular expression profiles. How these compartments form during development is generally not understood. To investigate this process, we focused on the late developmental stages of the cerebellar compartmentalization that occur from embryonic day 17.5 (E17.5), when embryonic compartmentalization is evidently observed, to postnatal day 6 (P6), when adult-type compartmentalization begins to be established. The transformation between these compartmentalization patterns was analyzed by mapping expression patterns of several key molecular markers in serial cerebellar sections in the mouse. A complete set of 54 clustered PC subsets, which had different expression profiles of FoxP2, PLCß4, EphA4, Pcdh10, and a reporter molecule of the 1NM13 transgenic mouse strain, were distinguished in three-dimensional space in the E17.5 cerebellum. Following individual PC subsets during development indicated that these subsets were rearranged from a clustered and multilayered configuration to a flattened, single-layered and striped configuration by means of transverse slide, longitudinal split, or transverse twist spatial transformations during development. The Purkinje cell-free spaces that exist between clusters at E17.5 become granule cell raphes that separate striped compartments at P6. The results indicate that the ∼50 PC clusters of the embryonic cerebellum will ultimately become the longitudinal compartments of the adult cerebellum after undergoing various peri- and postnatal transformations that alter their relative spatial relationships.

Digital morphometry of rat cerebellar climbing fibers reveals distinct branch and bouton types.

Cerebellar climbing fibers (CFs) provide powerful excitatory input to Purkinje cells (PCs), which represent the sole output of the cerebellar cortex. Recent discoveries suggest that CFs have information-rich signaling properties important for cerebellar function, beyond eliciting the well known all-or-none PC complex spike. CF morphology has not been quantitatively analyzed at the same level of detail as its biophysical properties. Because morphology can greatly influence function, including the capacity for information processing, it is important to understand CF branching structure in detail, as well as its variability across and within arbors. We have digitally reconstructed 68 rat CFs labeled using biotinylated dextran amine injected into the inferior olive and comprehensively quantified their morphology. CF structure was considerably diverse even within the same anatomical regions. Distinctly identifiable primary, tendril, and distal branches could be operationally differentiated by the relative size of the subtrees at their initial bifurcations. Additionally, primary branches were more directed toward the cortical surface and had fewer and less pronounced synaptic boutons, suggesting they prioritize efficient and reliable signal propagation. Tendril and distal branches were spatially segregated and bouton dense, indicating specialization in signal transmission. Furthermore, CFs systematically targeted molecular layer interneuron cell bodies, especially at terminal boutons, potentially instantiating feedforward inhibition on PCs. This study offers the most detailed and comprehensive characterization of CF morphology to date. The reconstruction files and metadata are publicly distributed at NeuroMorpho.org.

Peri- and postnatal development of cerebellar compartments in the mouse.

The adult cerebellar cortex is compartmentalized into longitudinal stripes, in which Purkinje cells (PCs) have compartment-specific molecular expression profiles. Since the striped compartments have specific afferent and efferent projection patterns, they underlie the functional localization of the cerebellum. How these compartments form during development is generally not understood. Our recent study focuses on development of the cerebellar compartmentalization from embryonic day 17.5 (E17.5), when embryonic clustered compartmentalization is evidently observed, to postnatal day 6 (P6), when adult-type striped compartmentalization begins to be established, in mouse. FoxP2, one of the marker molecules for immature PCs, has been used to identify E17.5 PCs. PC subsets or clusters have been distinguished from each other by using different expression profiles of several marker molecules (PLCß4, EphA4, Pcdh10, and a reporter molecule of the 1NM13 transgenic mouse strain). Analysis of spatial organization of PC clusters by three-dimensional reconstruction from multiple-stained serial sections has indicated 54 PC clusters in the E17.5 cerebellum. Individual clusters are spatially rearranged into stripes in the period from E17.5 to P6. In summary, the clustered compartments in the E17.5 cerebellum are basically direct origin of the adult-type striped compartments in the cerebellar cortex.

Divergent topographic projection of cerebral cortical areas to overlapping cerebellar lobules through distinct regions of the pontine nuclei.

The massive axonal projection from the cerebrum to the cerebellum through the pontine nuclei supports the cerebrocerebellar coordination of motor and nonmotor functions. However, the cerebrum and cerebellum have distinct patterns of functional localization in their cortices. We addressed this issue by bidirectional neuronal tracing from 22 various locations of the pontine nuclei in the mouse in a comprehensive manner. Cluster analyses of the distribution patterns of labeled cortical pyramidal cells and cerebellar mossy fiber terminals classified all cases into six groups located in six different subareas of the pontine nuclei. The lateral (insular), mediorostral (cingulate and prefrontal), and caudal (visual and auditory) cortical areas of the cerebrum projected to the medial, rostral, and lateral subareas of the pontine nuclei, respectively. These pontine subareas then projected mainly to the crus I, central vermis, and paraflocculus divergently. The central (motor and somatosensory) cortical areas projected to the centrorostral, centrocaudal and caudal subareas of the pontine nuclei, which then projected mainly to the rostral and caudal lobules with a somatotopic arrangement. The results indicate a new pontine nuclei-centric view of the corticopontocerebellar projection: the generally parallel corticopontine projection to pontine nuclei subareas is relayed to the highly divergent pontocerebellar projection terminating in overlapping specific lobules of the cerebellum. Consequently, the mode of the pontine nuclei relay underlies the cerebellar functional organization.

Topographic organization in the cerebellar nuclei and inferior olive in relation to cerebellar hemispheric lobules in the mouse: Distinction between crus I and neighboring lobules.

The parallel closed-loop topographic connections between subareas of the inferior olive (IO), cerebellar cortex, and cerebellar nuclei (CN) define the fundamental modular organization of the cerebellum. The cortical modules or zones are organized into longitudinal zebrin stripes which are extended across transverse cerebellar lobules. However, how cerebellar lobules, which are related to the cerebellar functional localization, are incorporated into the olivo-cortico-nuclear topographic organization has not been fully clarified. In the present study, we analyzed the lobular topography in the CN and IO by making 57 small bidirectional tracer injections in the lateral zebrin-positive stripes equivalent with C2, D1, and D2 zones in every hemispheric lobule in zebrin stripe-visualized mice. C2, D1, and D2 zones were connected to the lateral part of the posterior interpositus nucleus (lPIN), and caudal and rostral parts of the lateral nucleus (cLN, rLN), respectively, and from the rostral part of the medial accessory olive (rMAO), and ventral and dorsal lamellas of the PO (vPO, dPO), respectively, as reported. Within these areas, crus I was specifically connected to the ventral parts of the lPIN, cLN, and rLN, and from the rostrolateral part of the rMAO and the lateral parts of the vPO and dPO. The results indicated that the cerebellar modules have lobule-related subdivisions and that crus I is topographically distinct from other lobules. We speculate that crus I and crus I-connected subdivisions in the CN and IO are involved more in nonmotor functions than other neighboring areas in the mouse.

Neurogenic timing of the inferior olive subdivisions is related to the olivocerebellar projection topography.

The olivocerebellar projection is organized into an intricate topographical connection from the inferior olive (IO) subdivisions to the longitudinally-striped compartments of cerebellar Purkinje Cells (PCs), to play an essential role in cerebellar coordination and learning. However, the central mechanisms for forming topography need to be clarified. IO neurons and PCs are generated during overlapping periods of a few days in embryonic development. Therefore, we examined whether their neurogenic timing is specifically involved in the olivocerebellar topographic projection relationship. First, we mapped neurogenic timing in the entire IO by using the neurogenic-tagging system of neurog2-CreER (G2A) mice and specific labeling of IO neurons with FoxP2. IO subdivisions were classified into three groups depending on their neurogenic timing range. Then, we examined the relationships in the neurogenic-timing gradient between IO neurons and PCs by labeling topographic olivocerebellar projection patterns and PC neurogenic timing. Early, intermediate, and late groups of IO subdivisions projected to late, intermediate, and early groups of the cortical compartments, respectively, except for a few particular areas. The results indicated that the olivocerebellar topographic relationship is essentially arranged according to the reverse neurogenic-timing gradients of the origin and target.

Heterogeneity of intrinsic plasticity in cerebellar Purkinje cells linked with cortical molecular zones.

In the cerebellar cortex, heterogeneous populations of Purkinje cells (PCs), classified into zebrin (aldolase C)-positive (Z+) and -negative (Z-) types, are arranged into separate longitudinal zones. They have different topographic neuronal connections and show different patterns of activity in behavior tasks. However, whether the zebrin type of PCs directly links with the physiological properties of the PC has not been well clarified. Therefore, we applied in vitro whole-cell patch-clamp recording in Z+ and Z- PCs in vermal and hemispheric neighboring zebrin zones in zebrin-visualized mice. Intrinsic excitability is significantly higher in Z- PCs than in Z+ PCs. Furthermore, intrinsic plasticity and synaptic long-term potentiation are enhanced more in Z- PCs than in Z+ PCs. The difference was mediated by different modulation of SK channel activities between Z+ and Z- PCs. The results indicate that cellular physiology differentially tunes to the functional compartmentalization of heterogeneous PCs.

Cerebellar connectivity maps embody individual adaptive behavior in mice.

The cerebellar cortex encodes sensorimotor adaptation during skilled locomotor behaviors, however the precise relationship between synaptic connectivity and behavior is unclear. We studied synaptic connectivity between granule cells (GCs) and Purkinje cells (PCs) in murine acute cerebellar slices using photostimulation of caged glutamate combined with patch-clamp in developing or after mice adapted to different locomotor contexts. By translating individual maps into graph network entities, we found that synaptic maps in juvenile animals undergo critical period characterized by dissolution of their structure followed by the re-establishment of a patchy functional organization in adults. Although, in adapted mice, subdivisions in anatomical microzones do not fully account for the observed spatial map organization in relation to behavior, we can discriminate locomotor contexts with high accuracy. We also demonstrate that the variability observed in connectivity maps directly accounts for motor behavior traits at the individual level. Our findings suggest that, beyond general motor contexts, GC-PC networks also encode internal models underlying individual-specific motor adaptation.

Compartmentalization of the deep cerebellar nuclei based on afferent projections and aldolase C expression.

The distribution of aldolase C (zebrin II)-positive and -negative Purkinje cells (PCs) can be used to define about 20 longitudinally extended compartments in the cerebellar cortex of the rat, which may correspond to certain aspects of cerebellar functional localization. An equivalent compartmental organization may exist in the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN). This DCN compartmentalization is primarily represented by the afferent projection pattern in the DCN. PC projections and collateral nuclear projections of olivocerebellar climbing fiber axons have a relatively localized terminal arbor in the DCN. Projections of these axons make a closed olivo-cortico-nuclear circuit to connect a longitudinal stripe-shaped cortical compartment to a small subarea in the DCN, which can be defined as a DCN compartment. The actual DCN compartmentalization, which has been revealed by systematically mapping these projections, is quite different from the cortical compartmentalization. The stripe-shaped alternation of aldolase C-positive and -negative narrow longitudinal compartments in the cerebellar cortex is transformed to the separate clustering of positive and negative compartments in the caudoventral and rostrodorsal DCN, respectively. The distinctive projection of aldolase C-positive and -negative PCs to the caudoventral and rostrodorsal DCN underlies this transformation. Accordingly, the medial cerebellar nucleus is divided into the rostrodorsal aldolase C-negative and caudoventral aldolase C-positive parts. The anterior and posterior interposed nuclei generally correspond to the aldolase C-negative and -positive parts, respectively. DCN compartmentalization is important for understanding functional localization in the DCN since it is speculated that aldolase C-positive and -negative compartments are generally associated with somatosensory and other functions, respectively.

Single axonal morphology reveals high heterogeneity in spinocerebellar axons originating from the lumbar spinal cord in the mouse.

Among the spinocerebellar projections vital for sensorimotor coordination of limbs and the trunk, the morphology of spinocerebellar axons originating from the lumbar cord has not been well characterized compared to those from thoracic and sacral cords. We reconstructed 26 single spinocerebellar axons labeled by biotinylated dextran injections into the gray matter of the lumbar spinal cord in mice. Axon terminals were mapped with the zebrin pattern of the cerebellar cortex. Reconstructed axons were primarily classified into ipsilaterally and contralaterally ascending axons, arising mainly from the dorsal and ventral horns, respectively. The majority of ipsilateral and contralateral axons took the dorsal-medullary and ventral-pontine pathways, respectively. The axons of both groups terminated mainly in the vermal and medial paravermal areas of lobules II-V and VIII-IXa, often bilaterally but predominantly ipsilateral to the axonal origin, with a weak preference to particular portions of zebrin stripes. The ipsilateral axons originating from the medial dorsal horn in the upper lumbar cord (n = 3) had abundant (43-147) mossy fiber terminals and no medullary collaterals. The ipsilateral axons originating from the lateral dorsal horn in the lower lumbar cord (n = 9) and the contralateral axons (n = 14) showed remarkable morphology variations. The number of their mossy fiber terminals varied from 2 to 172. Their collaterals, observed in 17 axons out of 23, terminated mainly in the medial cerebellar nucleus, nucleus X, and lateral reticular nucleus in various degrees. The results indicated that the lumbar spinocerebellar projection contains highly heterogeneous axonal populations regarding their pathway, branching, and termination patterns.

Striped Distribution Pattern of Purkinje Cells of Different Birthdates in the Mouse Cerebellar Cortex Studied with the Neurog2-CreER Transgenic Line.

Heterogeneity of Purkinje cells (PCs) that are arranged into discrete longitudinally-striped compartments in the cerebellar cortex is related to the timing of PC generation. To understand the cerebellar compartmental organization, we mapped the PC birthdate (or differentiation timing) in the entire cerebellar cortex. We used the birthdate-tagging system of Neurog2-CreER (G2A) mice hybridized with the AldocV strain which visualizes the zebrin (aldolase C) longitudinal striped pattern. The birthdate-specific distribution pattern of PCs was arranged into longitudinally-oriented stripes consistently throughout almost all lobules except for the nodulus, paraflocculus, and flocculus, in which distinct stripes were observed. Boundaries of the birthdate stripes coincided with the boundary of zebrin stripes or located in the middle of a zebrin stripe. Each birthdate stripe contained PCs born in a particular period between embryonic day (E) 10.0 and E 13.5. In the vermis, PCs were chronologically distributed from lateral to medial stripes. In the paravermis, PCs of early birthdates were distributed in the long lateral zebrin-positive stripe (stripe 4+//5+) and the medially neighboring narrow zebrin-negative substripe (3d-//e2-), while PCs of late birthdates were distributed in the rest of all paravermal areas. In the hemisphere, PCs of early and late birthdates were intermingled in the majority of areas. The results indicate that the birthdate of a PC is a partial determinant for the zebrin compartment in which it is located. However, the correlation between the PC birthdate and the zebrin compartmentalization is complex and distinct among the vermis, paravermis, hemisphere, nodulus, and flocculus.

Multiple signals evoked by unisensory stimulation converge onto cerebellar granule and Purkinje cells in mice.

The cerebellum receives signals directly from peripheral sensory systems and indirectly from the neocortex. Even a single tactile stimulus can activate both of these pathways. Here we report how these different types of signals are integrated in the cerebellar cortex. We used in vivo whole-cell recordings from granule cells and unit recordings from Purkinje cells in mice in which primary somatosensory cortex (S1) could be optogenetically inhibited. Tactile stimulation of the upper lip produced two-phase granule cell responses (with latencies of ~8 ms and 29 ms), for which only the late phase was S1 dependent. In Purkinje cells, complex spikes and the late phase of simple spikes were S1 dependent. These results indicate that individual granule cells combine convergent inputs from the periphery and neocortex and send their outputs to Purkinje cells, which then integrate those signals with climbing fiber signals from the neocortex.