Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(3): e22099, 2021 03 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33779568

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prolonged time of computer use increases the prevalence of ocular problems, including eye strain, tired eyes, irritation, redness, blurred vision, and double vision, which are collectively referred to as computer vision syndrome (CVS). Approximately 70% of computer users have vision-related problems. For these reasons, properly designed interventions for users with CVS are required. To design an effective screen intervention for preventing or improving CVS, we must understand the effective interfaces of computer-based interventions. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to explore the interface elements of computer-based interventions for CVS to set design guidelines based on the pros and cons of each interface element. METHODS: We conducted an iterative user study to achieve our research objective. First, we conducted a workshop to evaluate the overall interface elements that were included in previous systems for CVS (n=7). Through the workshop, participants evaluated existing interface elements. Based on the evaluation results, we eliminated the elements that negatively affect intervention outcomes. Second, we designed our prototype system LiquidEye that includes multiple interface options (n=11). Interface options included interface elements that were positively evaluated in the workshop study. Lastly, we deployed LiquidEye in the real world to see how the included elements affected the intervention outcomes. Participants used LiquidEye for 14 days, and during this period, we collected participants' daily logs (n=680). Additionally, we conducted prestudy and poststudy surveys, and poststudy interviews to explore how each interface element affects participation in the system. RESULTS: User data logs collected from the 14 days of deployment were analyzed with multiple regression analysis to explore the interface elements affecting user participation in the intervention (LiquidEye). Statistically significant elements were the instruction page of the eye resting strategy (P=.01), goal setting of the resting period (P=.009), compliment feedback after completing resting (P<.001), a mid-size popup window (P=.02), and CVS symptom-like effects (P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the study results, we suggested design implications to consider when designing computer-based interventions for CVS. The sophisticated design of the customization interface can make it possible for users to use the system more interactively, which can result in higher engagement in managing eye conditions. There are important technical challenges that still need to be addressed, but given the fact that this study was able to clarify the various factors related to computer-based interventions, the findings are expected to contribute greatly to the research of various computer-based intervention designs in the future.


Asunto(s)
Astenopía , Enfermedades Profesionales , Astenopía/prevención & control , Computadores , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Síndrome
2.
J Med Internet Res ; 21(4): e12231, 2019 04 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30990463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In addition to addiction and substance abuse, motivational interviewing (MI) is increasingly being integrated in treating other clinical issues such as mental health problems. Most of the many technological adaptations of MI, however, have focused on delivering the action-oriented treatment, leaving its relational component unexplored or vaguely described. This study intended to design a conversational sequence that considers both technical and relational components of MI for a mental health concern. OBJECTIVE: This case study aimed to design a conversational sequence for a brief motivational interview to be delivered by a Web-based text messaging application (chatbot) and to investigate its conversational experience with graduate students in their coping with stress. METHODS: A brief conversational sequence was designed with varied combinations of MI skills to follow the 4 processes of MI. A Web-based text messaging application, Bonobot, was built as a research prototype to deliver the sequence in a conversation. A total of 30 full-time graduate students who self-reported stress with regard to their school life were recruited for a survey of demographic information and perceived stress and a semistructured interview. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by Braun and Clarke's thematic method. The themes that reflect the process of, impact of, and needs for the conversational experience are reported. RESULTS: Participants had a high level of perceived stress (mean 22.5 [SD 5.0]). Our findings included the following themes: Evocative Questions and Clichéd Feedback; Self-Reflection and Potential Consolation; and Need for Information and Contextualized Feedback. Participants particularly favored the relay of evocative questions but were less satisfied with the agent-generated reflective and affirming feedback that filled in-between. Discussing the idea of change was a good means of reflecting on themselves, and some of Bonobot's encouragements related to graduate school life were appreciated. Participants suggested the conversation provide informational support, as well as more contextualized feedback. CONCLUSIONS: A conversational sequence for a brief motivational interview was presented in this case study. Participant feedback suggests sequencing questions and MI-adherent statements can facilitate a conversation for stress management, which may encourage a chance of self-reflection. More diversified sequences, along with more contextualized feedback, should follow to offer a better conversational experience and to confirm any empirical effect.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica/fisiología , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Adulto , Comunicación , Retroalimentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Surgery ; 170(1): 186-193, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33500156

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the "weekday effect" may influence postoperative outcomes, controversies regarding its existence remain. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the day of the week the surgery was performed and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Data from 58,646 patients who underwent elective abdominal surgery at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from May 2003 to February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Two elective surgery groups comprising of 33,513 (57.1%) and 25,113 (42.9%) patients who underwent surgery in the early and late days of the week, respectively, were analyzed. Late days of the week was defined as days where surgery was performed within 2 days before weekends or holidays and early days of the week as all other weekdays. These groups were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The adjusted 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay were compared. RESULTS: In the weighted sample, all 52 clinical covariates were comparable between the 2 groups. The weighted sample analysis did not reveal a significant difference in the 30-day mortality between early days of the week and late days of the week (0.19% early days of week vs 0.18% late days of the week; relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.50; P = .82). Similarly, the median length of hospital stay showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (median value for both groups, 5.0 days; interquartile range 3.0-8.0; relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.03; P = .16). CONCLUSION: A weekday effect associated with the day of elective surgery performed was not found in this study for either the 30-day postoperative mortality or length of hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Puntaje de Propensión , Abdomen/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis Químico de la Sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 95(7): e2775, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26886625

RESUMEN

Despite the rapid penetration of social media in modern life, there has been limited research conducted on whether social media serves as a credible source of health information. In this study, we propose to identify colorectal cancer information on Twitter and assess its informational credibility. We collected Twitter messages containing colorectal cancer-related keywords, over a 3-month period. A review of sample tweets yielded content and user categorization schemes. The results of the sample analysis were applied to classify all collected tweets and users, using a machine learning technique. The credibility of the information in the sampled tweets was evaluated. A total of 76,119 tweets were analyzed. Individual users authored the majority of tweets (n = 68,982, 90.6%). They mostly tweeted about news articles/research (n = 16,761, 22.0%) and risk/prevention (n = 14,767, 19.4%). Medical professional users generated only 2.0% of total tweets (n = 1509), and medical institutions rarely tweeted (n = 417, 0.6%). Organizations tended to tweet more about information than did individuals (85.2% vs 63.1%; P < 0.001). Credibility analysis of medically relevant sample tweets revealed that most were medically correct (n = 1763, 84.5%). Among those, more frequently retweeted tweets contained more medically correct information than randomly selected tweets (90.7% vs 83.2%; P < 0.01). Our results demonstrate an interest in and an engagement with colorectal cancer information from a large number and variety of users. Coupled with the Internet's potential to increase social support, Twitter may contribute to enhancing public health and empowering users, when used with proper caution.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Difusión de la Información , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos
5.
Ann Coloproctol ; 32(5): 184-189, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27847789

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Korean Society of Coloproctology holds its annual colorectal awareness month every September. This study analyzed the users and the contents of Korean tweets regarding colorectal cancer and estimated the transmissibility of the awareness campaign among Twitter users. METHODS: Prospective data collection was employed to accumulate Korean tweets containing the keywords "colorectal cancer," "colorectal cancer awareness campaign," "gold ribbon," and/or "love handle," from August 1 to September 30, 2014. Twitter users and contents were analyzed, and the credibility of information-sharing tweets throughout the study period was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 10,387 tweets shared by 1,452 unique users were analyzed. As for users, 57.8% were individuals whereas 5.8% were organizations/communities; spambots accounted for a considerable percentage (36.4%). As for content, most tweets were spam (n = 8,736, 84.1%), repetitively advertising unverified commercial folk remedies, followed by tweets that shared information (n = 1,304, 12.6%) and non-information (n = 347, 3.3%). In the credibility assessment, only 80.6% of the information-sharing tweets were medically correct. After spam tweets had been excluded, a significant increase was seen in the percentage of information-sharing tweets (77.1% to 81.1%, P = 0.045) during the awareness campaign month. CONCLUSION: Most Korean tweets regarding colorectal cancer during the study months were commercial spam tweets; informative public tweets accounted for an extremely small percentage. The transmissibility of the awareness campaign among Twitter users was questionable at best. To expand the reach of credible medical information on colorectal cancer, public health institutions and organizations must pay greater attention to social media.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA