Artificial Intelligence for Real-Time Prediction of the Histology of Colorectal Polyps by General Endoscopists.

BACKGROUND: Real-time prediction of histologic features of small colorectal polyps may prevent resection and/or pathologic evaluation and therefore decrease colonoscopy costs. Previous studies showed that computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) was highly accurate, though it did not outperform expert endoscopists. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of histologic predictions by general endoscopists before and after assistance from CADx in a real-life setting. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, single-group study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04437615). SETTING: 6 centers across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 1252 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy and 49 general endoscopists with variable experience in real-time prediction of polyp histologic features. INTERVENTION: Real-time use of CADx during routine colonoscopy. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end points were the sensitivity and specificity of CADx-unassisted and CADx-assisted histologic predictions for adenomas measuring 5 mm or less. For clinical purposes, additional estimates according to location and confidence level were provided. RESULTS: The CADx device made a diagnosis for 2695 polyps measuring 5 mm or less (96%) in 1252 patients. There was no difference in sensitivity between the unassisted and assisted groups (90.7% vs. 90.8%; P = 0.52). Specificity was higher in the CADx-assisted group (59.5% vs. 64.7%; P < 0.001). Among all 2695 polyps measuring 5 mm or less, 88.2% and 86.1% (P < 0.001) in the CADx-assisted and unassisted groups, respectively, could be resected and discarded without pathologic evaluation. Among 743 rectosigmoid polyps measuring 5 mm or less, 49.5% and 47.9% (P < 0.001) in the CADx-assisted and unassisted groups, respectively, could be left in situ without resection. LIMITATION: Decision making based on CADx might differ outside a clinical trial. CONCLUSION: CADx assistance did not result in increased sensitivity of optical diagnosis. Despite a slight increase, the specificity of CADx-assisted diagnosis remained suboptimal. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Olympus America Corporation served as the clinical study sponsor.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on primary endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies for adults with obesity.

This joint ASGE-ESGE guideline provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) in the management of obesity. The document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. It evaluates the efficacy and safety of EBMT devices and procedures that currently have CE mark or FDA-clearance/approval, or that had been approved within five years of document development. The guideline suggests the use of EBMTs plus lifestyle modification in patients with a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2, or with a BMI of 27.0-29.9 kg/m2 with at least 1 obesity-related comorbidity. Furthermore, it suggests the utilization of intragastric balloons and devices for endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) in conjunction with lifestyle modification for this patient population.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on primary endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies for adults with obesity.

This joint ASGE-ESGE guideline provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) in the management of obesity. The document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. It evaluates the efficacy and safety of EBMT devices and procedures that currently have CE mark or FDA-clearance/approval, or that had been approved within five years of document development. The guideline suggests the use of EBMTs plus lifestyle modification in patients with a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2, or with a BMI of 27.0-29.9 kg/m2 with at least 1 obesity-related comorbidity. Furthermore, it suggests the utilization of intragastric balloons and devices for endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) in conjunction with lifestyle modification for this patient population.

Update on Endoscopic Treatments for Obesity.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Increased morbidity seen with rising obesity rates continues to place an unheralded burden on our health system. Lack of higher bariatric surgery utilization and limitations with lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy highlights the need for additional therapies for obesity. Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMT) are effective, safe treatments for obesity. Current FDA-approved EBMT are confined to gastric modalities while small bowel directed therapies are still considered investigational. This review highlights current modalities of EBMT. RECENT FINDINGS: Many randomized controlled trials have been performed, including both open label and sham-controlled, which have demonstrated safety and efficacy of EBMT over lifestyle therapy alone. In addition, emerging evidence from clinical experience further supports EBMT for treatment of obesity. Current evidence supports the safety and efficacy of EBMT for obesity treatment in conjunction with lifestyle therapy. They can also be used concurrently with weight loss medications to increase total weight loss.

Changes in Transient Elastography with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Real-World Retrospective Analysis.

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), especially in patients with comorbid diabetes and obesity. This study investigated the effects of GLP-1RAs on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with MASLD, as measured by changes in vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and other clinical parameters in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of 96 patients with MASLD from a multidisciplinary care clinic who completed VCTE at baseline and follow-up within 6-24 months to compare changes in controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), as well as other metabolic markers, between GLP-1RA users and nonusers using two-sample t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. We also assessed whether improvements in hepatic steatosis, defined as a change in CAP >38 dB/m as previously described in the literature, were associated with improvement in fibrosis. Results: GLP-1RA use resulted in significant improvements in weight (-8.1 kg vs. -3.5 kg, P = 0.009), body mass index (BMI) (-2.9 kg/m2 vs. -1.3 kg/m2, P = 0.012), alanine aminotransferase (-15.0 IU/L vs. -4.0 IU/L, P = 0.017), aspartate aminotransferase (-5.0 IU/L vs. -1.0 IU/L, P = 0.021), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (-0.7% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.019), and CAP (-59.9 dB/m vs. -29.1 dB/m, P = 0.016). Responders also had significant improvements in weight (-9.2 kg vs. -1.9 kg, P < 0.001), BMI (-3.3 kg/m2 vs. -0.7 kg/m2, P < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (-6.1 mmHg vs. -0.7 mmHg, P = 0.028), HbA1c (-0.8% vs. 0.3%, P < 0.001), and LSM (-1.5 kPa vs. 0.1 kPa, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with MASLD treated with GLP-1RAs showed significant improvements in hepatic steatosis and multiple other metabolic parameters, with weight loss as the proposed mechanism for this liver improvement. In addition, change in CAP >38 dB/m was associated with improvements in LSM and other metabolic parameters, suggesting the clinical utility of VCTE in the surveillance of MASLD.