Comparative effectiveness of tofacitinib and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real-world practice: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of tofacitinib vs tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The study used data from a single academic referral hospital's registries of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib and examined remission rates based on the disease activity score (DAS)28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) after 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for achieving remission with tofacitinib compared with TNFi, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: This analysis included 665 patients (200 on tofacitinib and 455 on TNFi) who were followed up for at least 12 months. Of these, 96 patients in the tofacitinib group (48.0%) and 409 patients in the TNFi group (89.9%) were treatment-naïve to bDMARDs. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference in the remission rates between the two groups (18.0% vs 19.6%, p = 0.640). Multivariable analysis demonstrated comparable remission rates with tofacitinib and TNFi (OR 1.204, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.720-2.013). In the subpopulation naïve to JAKi and bDMARD, tofacitinib showed better remission rates than TNFi (OR 1.867, 95% CI 1.033-3.377). Tofacitinib had more adverse events (AEs) but similar rates of serious AEs (SAEs) to TNFi. CONCLUSION: In real-world settings, there was no significant difference in remission rates at 12 months between the tofacitinib and TNFi groups. In terms of safety, tofacitinib exhibited a higher incidence of AEs compared with TNFi, while the occurrence of SAEs was comparable between the groups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02602704.

Cost-of-illness changes before and after the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide, population-based observational study in Korea.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the direct healthcare cost progression from before to after systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosis and to compare healthcare costs by disease severity. METHODS: Patients with incident SLE diagnosed between 2008 and 2018 were identified from the Korean National Health Insurance database. Annual direct healthcare costs for 5 years before and after SLE were estimated and compared with those of age-, sex-, and calendar month-matched (1:4) controls, without SLE. Direct healthcare costs were compared by disease severity of SLE using regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 11 173 patients with SLE and 45 500 subjects without SLE, annual direct healthcare costs per person increased in the year before SLE diagnosis and peaked in the first year after diagnosis. They were 7.7-fold greater in the SLE patients than in the subjects without SLE ($5,871 vs $759). Severe SLE was associated with 3.284-fold (95% CI 3.075-3.507) higher annual costs than mild SLE during the year after diagnosis. Older age (age 60-79 years), lupus nephritis, interstitial lung diseases, and comorbidities such as avascular necrosis and chronic kidney disease were associated with higher annual direct healthcare costs (times [95% CI]) in the first year after diagnosis; aged 60-69, 1.119 [1.034-1.211], aged 70-79, 1.470 [1.342-1.611], 1.794 [1.711-1.881], 1.435 [1.258-1.638], 6.208 [4.541-8.487], and 1.858 [1.673-2.064], respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with SLE incurred significantly high direct healthcare costs than subjects without SLE during the first year after diagnosis. Disease severity, older age, major organ involvements and comorbidities were associated with increased healthcare costs.

Transcriptomic network analysis reveals key drivers of response to anti-TNF biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Anti-TNF biologics have been widely used to ameliorate disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a large fraction of patients show a poor response to these agents. Moreover, no clinically applicable predictive biomarkers have been established. This study aimed to identify response-associated biomarkers using longitudinal transcriptomic data in two independent RA cohorts. METHODS: RNA sequencing data from peripheral blood cell samples of Korean and Caucasian RA cohorts before and after initial treatment with anti-TNF biologics were analyzed to assess treatment-induced expression changes that differed between highly reliable excellent and null responders. Weighted correlation network, immune cell composition, and key driver analyses were performed to understand response-associated transcriptomic networks and cell types and their correlation with disease activity indices. RESULTS: In total, 305 response-associated genes showed significantly different treatment-induced expression changes between excellent and null responders. Co-expression network construction and subsequent key driver analysis revealed that 41 response-associated genes played a crucial role as key drivers of transcriptomic alteration in four response-associated networks involved in various immune pathways: type I interferon signalling, myeloid leucocyte activation, B cell activation, and NK cell/lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity. Transcriptomic response scores that we developed to estimate the individual-level degree of expression changes in the response-associated key driver genes were significantly correlated with the changes in clinical indices in independent patients with moderate or ambiguous response outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides response-specific treatment-induced transcriptomic signatures by comparing the transcriptomic landscape between patients with excellent and null responses to anti-TNF drugs at both gene and network levels.

The lessebo effect in randomized controlled trials of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the impact of negative expectations associated with receiving a placebo (the lessebo effect) on efficacy outcomes in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis on the American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, and 70% (ACR20, 50, 70) response rates in the placebo and active (biosimilar)-controlled groups (reference-pbo and reference-bs) of rituximab showing an insufficient response to methotrexate or tumor necrosis factor. We evaluated the difference in ACR20, 50, 70 response rates between the two groups (reference-bs vs. reference-pbo). RESULTS: Nine RCTs included a total of 2734 patients with RA. The pooled incidence of ACR20 response rate in the placebo- and active-controlled groups of the rituximab RCTs for RA was 53.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 49.9-56.3%) and 75.0% (95% CI 71.2-78.4%), respectively. The difference in the ACR20 response rate between the placebo- and active-controlled groups was -20.9% (95% CI -26.9 to 61.9%, p < 0.001). The pooled incidence of ACR50 response rate in the placebo- and active-controlled groups of the rituximab RCTs for RA was 29.0% (95% CI 26.2-32.0%) and 47.4% (95% CI 43.2-51.6%), respectively. The ACR50 response rates were significantly higher in the active-controlled groups than in the placebo-controlled groups (-18.4%; 95% CI -18.4 to -13.4%, p < 0.001). The difference in the ACR70 response rate between the placebo- and active-controlled groups was -14.9% (95% CI -22.2 to -7.6%, p < 0.001). The ACR20, 50, 70 response rates were significantly higher in the active-controlled groups than in the placebo-controlled group. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the use of a placebo can be associated with a clinically significant reduction in the magnitude of change of the ACR20, 50, 70 response rates in rituximab RCTs for RA. The lessebo effect has potential implications for the development of new treatments and appraisal of current treatment options for RA.

Placebo and nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of non-tumor necrosis factor biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis showing insufficient response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the frequency and magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses in placebo-controlled RCTs of non-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with insufficient response to TNF inhibitors. METHODS: A meta-analysis on rates of placebo response, adverse effects (AEs), severe AEs (SAEs), and withdrawal due to AEs in placebo-controlled RCTs of non-TNF biologics and JAK inhibitors in patients with RA and an insufficient response to TNF inhibitors was conducted. RESULTS: In 9 RCTs containing 3442 patients the pooled incidence of ACR20 response rate in placebo-treated patients was 22.1 (95% CI 16.4-29.1%) and 27.9% (95% CI 24.5-31.6%) in RCTs of non-TNF and JAK inhibitors, respectively. Strong negative correlation was observed between ACR20 response and AE rates in the placebo arm, indicating that the greater the placebo response, the weaker the nocebo response (r = -0.762, P = 0.017). Strong positive correlation was observed between ACR20 response in the placebo and active comparator arms, indicating that the greater the placebo response, the greater the treatment response (r = 0.737, P = 0.003). The pooled estimate in placebo-treated patients with ≥1 AE was 71.8 (95% CI 57.4-82.7%) and 58.7% (95% CI 52.8-64.3%) in RCTs of non-TNF and JAK inhibitors, respectively. The pooled estimate in placebo-treated patients withdrawing due to an AE was 3.8 (95% CI 2.7-5.3%) and 4.0% (95% CI 2.7-6.0%) in RCTs of non-TNF and JAK inhibitors, respectively. Strong positive correlation was observed between AE rates in the placebo and active arms, indicating that the greater the nocebo response, the stronger the AE rate in the active arm (r = 0.855, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There were higher placebo and less nocebo effects of JAK vs. non-TNF inhibitors in RA patients with an insufficient response to TNF inhibitors, and the greater the placebo response, the weaker the nocebo response and the greater the efficacy.

Safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in Korean adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A post-marketing surveillance study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to assess the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical settings in Korea. METHODS: This is a prospective, multi-centre post-marketing surveillance study. Data were prospectively collected within 6 months after the start of tofacitinib therapy. Safety was evaluated based on the presence of adverse events (AEs) observed in patients who received at least one dose of tofacitinib. Effectiveness was assessed according to the proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity and remission, American College of Rheumatology 20 criteria (ACR20), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, and change of Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28). RESULTS: The incidence rates [patients with events per 100 patient-years (PY)] of AEs and serious AEs were 56.92 and 10.69, respectively. Regarding AEs of special interest, the incidence rates were 4.33 per 100 PY for serious infections and infestations, 5.78 per 100 PY for herpes zoster, no event of tuberculosis, 0.29 per 100 PY for malignancy, 0.29 per 100 PY for venous thromboembolism (one event of deep vein thrombosis and no event of pulmonary embolism), 0.87 per 100 PY for major adverse cardiovascular event, and 0.58 per 100 PY for mortality. Moreover, ∼40.48% and 21.60% of patients achieved low disease activity and remission of DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The EULAR response was classified as good responders with 39.12% in the DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit/risk profile of tofacitinib in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical settings in Korea was similar to long-term clinical trial data.

Korean LupusPRO: Cross-Cultural validation study for systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the reliability and validity of the Korean version of LupusPRO version 1.7 (v1.7) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. METHODS: LupusPRO v1.7 was translated into Korean, followed by pretesting among five native Korean speakers. We administered the LupusPRO v1.7 survey to five SLE patients and made minor changes to clarify the language. Then, 133 SLE patients participated in the validation procedure. In each domain, the internal consistency reliability (ICR) and test-retest reliability (TRR) were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Criterion validity was evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficient with the other measures such as SF-36, EQ-5D VAS, and SELENA-SLEDAI PGA. Construct validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using the unweighted least square estimation method. RESULTS: The mean age of the 133 patients was 36.14 years, and 97% of them were women. Analysis of 130 returned questionnaires revealed that most ICRs of the Korean LupusPRO v1.7 domains were acceptable, with Cronbach's alphas in the range of 0.579-0.949, and most TRRs were good with ICCs from 0.582 to 0.851. Criterion validities presented significant correlations between the LupusPRO v1.7 and other measures validated. In the analysis of the CFA model, the goodness of fit indices demonstrated an acceptable fit. Factor loadings for most individual items were between 0.548 and 0.985. The average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) of most domains were greater than 0.5 and 0.7, respectively, demonstrating acceptable convergent and discriminant validities. CONCLUSIONS: The Korean version of LupusPRO v.17 had acceptable reliability and validity.

Comparative efficacy and safety of biologic agents in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of biologic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who show inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis with the Bayesian network, combining direct and indirect randomized controlled trial (RCT) data, was conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab, sirukumab, and secukinumab in patients with RA who showed inadequate response to TNF inhibitors. RESULTS: 8 RCTs enrolling a total of 3,617 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. More significant American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70 responses were obtained using therapies similar to these biologics than with placebo. Ranking probability based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that tocilizumab was probably the best treatment for ACR20 response, followed by rituximab, abatacept, sarilumab, sirukumab, secukinumab 150 mg, secukinumab 75 mg, and placebo. Furthermore, identical distribution trends were observed for ACR50 response rates. In comparison, ACR70-based SUCRA rating revealed that rituximab, followed by tocilizumab, abatacept, sirukumab, secukinumab 150 mg, sarilumab, secukinumab 75 mg, and placebo might potentially result in ACR70. There was no significant difference between the number of adverse events and severe adverse events between the treatments. CONCLUSION: All biologic agents studied were effective in treating patients with TNF inhibitor-refractory RA; however, tocilizumab, rituximab, and abatacept appeared to be more efficient than sarilumab, sirukumab, and secukinumab. There were no differences between the treatments with respect to safety.

COX-2 Inhibitor Use as an Early Treatment Option for Knee Osteoarthritis Patients in Korea: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the use of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors as an initial drug treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. METHODS: From 2013 to 2015, patients with knee OA were identified from the Korean nationwide claims database. Among them, we extracted incident cases of knee OA to identify the initial drug treatment. Trends in the use of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including COX-2 inhibitors were analyzed during the first year after their diagnosis. Associated factors for COX-2 inhibitor use were examined using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: We identified 2,857,999 incident knee OA patients (955,259 in 2013, 981,314 in 2014, and 921,426 in 2015). The mean ± standard deviation age of patients was 64.2 ± 9.8 years. The frequency of COX-2 inhibitor use as initial treatment increased from 3.5% in 2013 to 7.2% in 2015 (P < 0.01). In patients taking the medication regularly for one year after diagnosis (medication possession ratio ≥ 50%), COX-2 inhibitor use also rapidly increased from 5.5% in 2013 to 11.1% in 2015 (P < 0.01). However, the frequencies of non-selective NSAID and analgesic use did not decrease remarkably. Factors associated with patients using COX-2 inhibitors on initial drug treatment were older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.08), female (OR, 1.24), and comorbidity (OR, 1.03). Type of institution, physician speciality, and insurance type of patients were also associated. CONCLUSION: In Korea, COX-2 inhibitors have rapidly increased as an initial treatment for knee OA patients, but it has not appeared to reduce the use of non-selective NSAIDs and analgesics.

Placebo and nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of Janus kinase inhibitor monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis : A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the frequency and magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses in placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis on the rates of placebo response, adverse effects (AEs), severe AEs (SAEs) and withdrawal due to AEs in placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of JAK inhibitor therapy for RA. RESULTS: Five RCTs contained a total of 1422 patients (746 trial participants and 676 controls). The pooled incidence of an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate was 33.0% (95% CI 19.6-44.9%) in placebo-treated patients and 68.3% (95% CI 61.4-74.1%) in active drug-treated patients. A strong negative correlation was observed between drug efficacies (ACR20 response) and AE rates in the placebo arm, indicating that the stronger the placebo response, the weaker the nocebo response (r = -0.906, P = 0.034). The pooled estimate of at least one AE was 54.1% (95% CI 44.6-63.4%) in placebo-treated patients and 54.5% (95% CI 46.2-62.6%) in active drug-treated patients. The pooled SAE rate was 3.9% (95% CI 2.7-5.7%) in placebo-treated patients and 3.8% (95% CI 2.5-5.7%) in active comparator-treated patients. The pooled estimate of withdrawal owing to an AE was 4.1% (95% CI 1.4-11.3%) in placebo-treated patients and 2.1% (95% CI 0.8-5.4%) in active drug-treated patients. However, there were no differences in the pooled risk of AE, SAEs, or withdrawal owing to AEs between the active comparator and placebo groups. A strong positive correlation was observed in AE rates between the placebo and active arms, indicating that the stronger the nocebo response, the higher the AE rate in the active arm (r = 0.957, P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The frequency of placebo and nocebo responses was 33.0 and 54.1%, respectively, in JAK monotherapy trials for RA. The findings indicated that the strengths of placebo and nocebo responses are inversely proportional and that clinically significant differences were absent between AE, SAE, and dropout owing to AEs.

Use of OCT Retinal Thickness Deviation Map for Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy Screening.

PURPOSE: To investigate the use of a retinal thickness deviation map generated from swept-source (SS) OCT images for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screening. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 1192 Korean patients with a history of hydroxychloroquine treatment: 881 patients (1723 eyes) in the discovery set and 311 patients (591 eyes) in the validation set. Patients were screened for retinal toxicity using SS OCT, fundus autofluorescence, and standard automated perimetry. METHODS: According to the 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology guidelines, hydroxychloroquine retinopathy was diagnosed by the presence of abnormalities on ≥1 objective structural tests alongside corresponding visual field defects. The 12 × 9-mm2 macular volume SS OCT scan was performed, and the retinal thickness deviation map was generated automatically using the built-in software. On this map, yellow (retinal thickness, <5% of the normative level) or red (<1% of the normative level) pixels were defined as abnormal. Abnormal findings were evaluated, and diagnostic criteria were developed based on the discovery set data; criteria were validated using the validation set data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The rate and patterns of abnormalities on the retinal thickness deviation map and sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: The retinal thickness deviation map showed the following abnormal patterns in eyes with hydroxychloroquine retinopathy: pericentral (36.0%) or parafoveal (6.1%) ring, mixed-ring (34.2%), central island (13.2%), and whole macular thinning (10.5%). The criterion of ≥5 contiguous red pixels showing 1 of the 5 characteristic patterns in both eyes yielded the greatest diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity of 98.2% and 89.1% and of 100% and 87.5% in the discovery and validation set data, respectively). Moreover, the area of abnormal pixels on the map was correlated significantly with the mean deviation (P < 0.001) and pattern standard deviation (P < 0.001) on the Humphrey 30-2 test in eyes with hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The retinal thickness deviation map may facilitate the objective evaluation of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy because it does not require subjective, morphologic evaluation of the outer retinal layers. The map has the potential to enhance hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screening when used in conjunction with conventional screening methods.

Gender differences in factors associated with low quality of life and depression in Korean patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

PURPOSE: To identify predictors of low health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and depression in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with a focus on gender differences. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional cohort study. Both AS-related clinical data and contextual factors were obtained. HRQoL and depressive mood were assessed by EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), respectively. Gender-stratified multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among 211 patients, 161 were males. Males had similar disease activity and higher radiographic damage compared with females. There was no significant difference in EQ-5D index score between genders. CES-D score was higher in females. Higher ASDAS-C-reactive protein (CRP) was associated with low HRQoL in both males (Odds ratio [OR] 4.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.42-7.46) and females (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.02-8.48). Being employed was associated with decreased possibility of having low HRQoL in males (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.95). Regarding depression, higher ASDAS-CRP (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.03-3.40), current smoking (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.09-8.15), and being employed (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06-0.46) were associated with depression in males. For females, living with a partner was related to depression (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.93). CONCLUSION: AS patients with high disease activity are likely to be suffering from low HRQoL. Both disease-related factors and contextual factors were associated with depression, and predictors showed some differences between genders. Awareness of gender differences in comprehensive assessment can lead us to better personalized management in AS patients.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and mavrilimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: The relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and mavrilimumab were assessed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) presenting an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and mavrilimumab combined with DMARDs in patients with an inadequate response to DMARDs. RESULTS: In total, 8 RCTs with 2,965 patients met inclusion criteria. 21 pairwise comparisons were performed, including 12 direct comparisons of 7 interventions. In patients with active RA and an inadequate DMARD response, mavrilimumab 150 mg+methotrexate (MTX) and mavrilimumab 100 mg+MTX were the most effective treatments. Compared with placebo+MTX, all tofacitinib and mavrilimumab doses, except mavrilimumab 50 mg+MTX, achieved significant ACR20 responses. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that mavrilimumab 150 mg+MTX had the highest probability for best treatment outcome in terms of the ACR20 response rate, followed by mavrilimumab 100 mg+MTX, tofacitinib 10 mg+MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg+MTX, mavrilimumab 30 mg+MTX, mavrilimumab 50 mg+MTX, and placebo+MTX. No significant differences were noted in the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) after tofacitinib+MTX, mavrilimumab+MTX, or placebo+MTX. CONCLUSION: In patients with RA showing inadequate DMARD response, mavrilimumab 150 mg+MTX and mavrilimumab 100 mg+MTX, followed by tofacitinib 10 mg+MTX and tofacitinib 5 mg+MTX, were the most efficacious interventions and were not associated with a significant risk of SAEs.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and sirukumab in comparison with adalimumab as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: The relative efficacy and tolerability of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and sirukumab as monotherapy were assessed and compared with those of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were intolerant to or responded inadequately to methotrexate (MTX). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and sirukumab, and adalimumab in RA patients who are intolerant to or show an inadequate response to MTX. RESULTS: Three RCTs comprising 1,066 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tocilizumab 8 mg monotherapy was associated with the most favorable surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for the ACR20 response rate. Compared with adalimumab, tocilizumab, and sarilumab as monotherapy showed significantly higher ACR20 response rates. Ranking probability based on SUCRA indicated that tocilizumab 8 mg had the highest probability of being the best choice for achieving ACR20 response rate, followed by sarilumab 200 mg, adalimumab 40 mg, and sirukumab 50 mg. Moreover, the ACR50 response rate showed a similar distribution pattern to that of ACR20. Regarding adverse events, the ranking probability based on SUCRA indicated that sarilumab 200 mg was possibly the safest, followed by adalimumab 40 mg, tocilizumab 8 mg, and sirukumab 50 mg. However, the number of patients who experienced serious adverse events did not differ significantly between these biologics. CONCLUSION: Based on ACR20 and ACR50 response rates, monotherapy with tocilizumab 8 mg, followed by sarilumab and sirukumab monotherapy, was optimal for patients with RA responding inadequately to MTX or showing intolerance.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-tumour necrosis factor biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis showing insufficient response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Both biologic and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapies have demonstrated substantial effectiveness in placebo-controlled studies in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) showing inadequate responses to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness and safety of non-TNF biologics and JAK inhibitors in patients with RA showing insufficient response to TNF inhibitors. METHODS: A Bayesian network meta-analysis incorporating direct and indirect data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was used to investigate the effectiveness and safety of non-TNF biologics (abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, salirumab and sirukumab) and JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib) in patients with RA showing insufficient response to TNF inhibitors. RESULTS: Nine RCTs, evaluating 3577 patients for 12 weeks fulfilled the inclusion requirements. JAK inhibitors and non-TNF biologics achieved a significant American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response relative to the placebo. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) showed that JAK inhibitor treatment was most likely to achieve the highest ACR20 response rate, followed by non-TNF biologics and placebo. The ACR50 rate displayed similar patterns as the ACR20 response rate, but non-TNF biologics have a higher value than JAK inhibitors based on the ACR70 response rate. Adverse events did not reach statistical significance nor did serious adverse events when looking at safety over 12 weeks. The confidence intervals overlap, and there is no clinical significance to these safety data, even compared with placebo. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Both non-TNF biologics and JAK inhibitors have similar effects in patients with active RA that are refractory to anti-TNF treatment, and there were no differences with regard to safety among the treatments.

Uptake of Biosimilars and Its Economic Implication for the Treatment of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Korea.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the uptake of infliximab and etanercept biosimilars in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its economic implication for healthcare expenditure. METHODS: Using Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service National Patient Samples, we extracted RA patients who used biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) between 2009 and 2018. Descriptive statistics were used to explain the basic features of the data. We calculated the proportion of users of each bDMARD among total patients with bDMARDs half-yearly. We assessed changes in the utilization proportions of bDMARDs including 4 tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) and 2 non-TNFis, which have been approved for RA in Korea: etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, tocilizumab, and abatacept, and analyzed the changes in market share of biosimilars among the bDMARDs after their introduction. Overall trends of medical costs for each bDMARD were presented over the 10-year period. RESULTS: Since the introduction of the biosimilar TNFis in 2012, the proportion of their use among bDMARDs steadily increased to 15.8% in 2018. While there has been a gradual increase in the use of biosimilar TNFis, the use of the corresponding originators has been decreasing. The introduction of biosimilar TNFis has resulted in a decrease in the medical costs of patients using either originator or biosimilar TNFis. CONCLUSION: In Korea, the proportional use of biosimilar TNFis has gradually increased since their introduction. The availability of less expensive biosimilar TNFis seems to have brought about a decrease in the medical costs of users of the originators.

Risk of Tuberculosis Development in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Targeted Therapy: a Prospective Single Center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing targeted therapy have a higher risk of developing tuberculosis (TB). This requires diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). We aimed to evaluate whether diagnosis and treatment of LTBI in RA are effective in Korea, and to estimate the risk of TB development by calculating the incidence rate of active TB among RA patients receiving targeted therapy. METHODS: We analyzed data from two prospective cohort studies of RA patients who received biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. We selected new starters of targeted therapy and classified them into three groups receiving tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, non-TNF inhibitor, and JAK inhibitor, respectively. We then compared LTBI prevalence, treatments, and active TB incidence during first-line therapy in each group. RESULTS: A total of 765 RA patients (574 TNF inhibitor users, 132 non-TNF inhibitor users, and 59 JAK inhibitor users) were included in this study. Observation periods were 1,255.2 person-years (PYs), 264.7 PYs, and 53.3 PYs, respectively. All 765 patients underwent LTBI screening, and the positivity rate was 26.5% (n = 203). Of the 203 LTBI-positive patients, 189 (93.1%) received treatment. Only one patient, who was in the TNF inhibitor group, and was negative for the interferon gamma release assay (IGRA), did not receive LTBI treatment and developed active TB during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Although the prevalence of LTBI in RA patients who started targeted therapy was slightly elevated, the Korean guidelines specifying LTBI screening and treatment were effective in preventing latent TB from becoming active.

Fracture Risk and Its Prevention Patterns in Korean Patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the incidence of fractures and fracture risk factors in Korean patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). METHODS: All PMR patients who visited a rheumatology clinic at a tertiary referral hospital between March 2005 and March 2018 were retrospectively assessed. We estimated bone mineral density (BMD) screening rate within 6 months of the first visit and classified the patients according to the performance and results of BMD screening. Incidence rates (IRs) of fractures were calculated in each group and risk factors for fractures were identified using Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 95 PMR patients with median (interquartile range) age of 64.0 (56.0-72.0) years were included. Baseline BMD was assessed in only 55.8% of these patients (n = 53); 24 patients with osteoporosis, 20 with osteopenia, and 9 with normal BMD. During 433.1 person-years (PYs) of observation, 17 fractures occurred in 12 patients (IR, 3.93 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.46-6.26]/100 PYs); 8.32 (95% CI, 4.09-16.90)/100 PYs in the osteopenia group, 3.40 (95% CI, 1.30-8.90)/100 PYs in the osteoporosis group, and 3.37 (95% CI, 1.53-7.39)/100 PYs in the no BMD test group. Risk factors for fractures were female sex, advanced age (≥ 65 years), longer follow-up duration, initial glucocorticoid dose ≥ 10 mg/day, and higher cumulative glucocorticoid dose over the first 6 months. CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of fractures in Korean patients with PMR was 3.93/100 PYs. Female sex, advanced age, longer follow-up duration, and increased glucocorticoid dose are risk factors for osteoporotic fracture.

Erratum: Correction of Authors' Name Spelling in the Article "COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: Clinical Guidance of the Korean College of Rheumatology".

This corrects the article on p. e95 in vol. 36, PMID: 33783147.

COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: Clinical Guidance of the Korean College of Rheumatology.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused more than 100 million infections and 2 million deaths worldwide. In up to 20% of cases, COVID-19 infection can take a severe, life-threatening course. Therefore, preventive measures such as mask-wearing, hand hygiene, and social distancing are important. COVID-19 vaccines that use novel vaccine technology can prevent up to 95% of infections. However, the uncertainty regarding the efficacy and safety of vaccination in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease (AIIRD), who are immunocompromised due to underlying immune dysfunction and concomitant immunosuppressive treatment, warrants clear guidance. A task force of the Korean College of Rheumatology formulated a set of vaccination guidance based on the currently available data and expert consensus. The currently available COVID-19 vaccines are considered to be safe and effective. Every patient with AIIRD should receive one of the available COVID-19 vaccines unless contraindicated for medical reasons such as prior allergy/anaphylaxis to the COVID-19 vaccine or its components. Patients should continue immunosuppressive treatment for their underlying AIIRD, including biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). Corticosteroids should be reduced to the lowest dose possible without aggravating the AIIRD. To improve the vaccine response, methotrexate can be withheld for 1-2 weeks after each vaccination, and the timing of rituximab and abatacept infusion should be adjusted if clinically acceptable. Rheumatologists should play a leading role in educating and vaccinating patients with AIIRD.