CGRP and adrenomedullin binding correlates with transcript levels for calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs) in rat tissues.

1. Putative receptors for CGRP and adrenomedullin have been investigated in the rat. Calcitonin Receptor-Like Receptor (CRLR), in combination with Receptor Activity Modifying Proteins (RAMPs) is hypothesized to bind either CGRP or adrenomedullin. The receptors known as RDC1 and L1 have also been shown to bind CGRP and adrenomedullin respectively. 2. In this study it is shown that rat CRLR cDNA specifies a CGRP receptor when co-transfected with RAMP-1 cDNA and an adrenomedullin receptor when co-transfected with either RAMP-2 or RAMP-3 cDNA in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. 3. CRLR, RAMP, RCD1 and L1 mRNA levels and CGRP and adrenomedullin receptor densities have been measured and correlated with each other in eight rat tissues selected for their distinctive patterns of CGRP and adrenomedullin binding. 4. The data are consistent with the predictions of the CRLR/RAMP model. CGRP binding correlates well with RAMP-1 mRNA levels (R=1.0, P=0.007), adrenomedullin binding shows a tendency to vary with RAMP-2 mRNA levels (R=0.85, P=0.14) and total binding is correlated with CRLR mRNA levels (R=0.94, P=0.03). The data do not support the hypothesis that RDC1 and L1 account for the majority of CGRP and adrenomedullin binding respectively.

Prognostic value of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptors in patients with colon/rectal cancer: correlation with plasma prolactin.

Prognostic value of IGF-1 receptors (IGF-1R) was evaluated and compared with circulating prolactin (PRL) in 59 patients with Dukes B or C colon/rectal cancer. IGF-1R was estimated by radioligand binding assay and PRL was estimated by immunoradiometric assay. Eighty-five percent (50/59) of patients had IGF-1R- tumours while IGF-1R positivity was observed in only 15% (9/59) of patients. None of the clinicopathological parameters showed any association with IGF-1R status. No significant difference was observed in overall survival period between patients with IGF-1R+ tumours and those with IGF-1R- tumours. However, a significant difference in overall survival time was observed between patients with PRL < 20.0 and > 20.0 ng/ml plasma (X2 = 4.70, df = 1, P < 0.05). In bivariate analysis, patients with IGF-1R- tumours and concomitant hyperprolactinemia had unfavourable prognosis compared to their counterpart (X2 = 4.21, df = 1, P < 0.05). We conclude that there was a trend of better overall survival in patients with IGF-1R+ tumours, and PRL < 20.0 ng/ml plasma when compared to patients with IGF-1R- tumours, and PRL > 20.0 ng/ml plasma. Further, IGF-1R negativity in conjunction with hyperprolactinemia could be used as an indicator of unfavourable prognosis in patients with Dukes B or C colon/rectal cancer.

Prolactin as a local growth promoter in patients with breast cancer: GCRI experience.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of pre-operative prolactin (PRL) in conjunction with established prognosticators, and the risk of disease relapse in patients with early and advanced breast cancer. To confirm the hypothesis that PRL is produced by breast tumours molecular analysis of PRL, using immunohistochemistry, mRNA by RT-PCR and direct sequencing, was performed. Furthermore, presence of prolactin receptors (PRLR) was evaluated by immunohistochemical localization in these patients. METHODS: In 111 breast cancer patients, pre-operative PRL was determined by an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) method. Immunohistochemical localization of PRL (IHL-PRL) and PRLR was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Expression of PRL mRNA was carried out by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RT-PCR PRL amplimer was sequenced and compared with human pituitary PRL amplimer. RESULTS: Fifty-eight per cent (64/111) of the patients had hyperprolactinaemia (PRL520.0 ng/ml). With increasing tumour size, a higher incidence of hyperprolactinaemia was noted which was statistically significant (r=0.34, P=0.0001). In stage III patients, and in node positive patients, the incidence of hyperprolactinaemia was significantly higher compared to their respective counterparts (stage II vs stage III, r=0.37, P=0.00006; node negative vs node positive, r=0.30, P=0.001). Hyperprolactinaemic patients had a significantly higher risk of developing recurrent/metastatic disease and a higher mortality risk as compared to patients with PRL <20.0 ng/ml. The multivariate survival analysis indicated that apart from disease stage, prognosis of patients with pre-operative hyperprolactinaemia was poorer than that of patients with PRL <20.0 ng/ml. Seventy-eight per cent (87/111) of the tumours showed positive immunoreactivity with PRL antibody indicating that PRL, or a similar molecule, is produced ectopically by breast tumours. PRL mRNA expression using RT-PCR confirmed the de novo synthesis of PRL. PRL mRNA expression was seen in 52% (33/63) of tumours. Sequence analysis of the 234 bp PRL amplimer revealed that the sequence was homologous to the sequence of exon 5 of human pituitary PRL mRNA. Furthermore, PRLR were present in 80% of tumours detected by immunohistochemical localization. A significant positive correlation was noted between IHL-PRL and PRLR (r=0.26, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This multifaceted study of PRL suggests that breast cancer cells produce PRL and that this ectopically produced PRL may act as a major local growth promoter via autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. It may provide new insights into endocrine treatment of breast cancer.

Prognostic significance of plasma prolactin in breast cancer: comparison with the expression of c erb B-2 oncoprotein.

Having established prolactin to be an indicator of disease progression and hyperprolactinemia as an independent predictor of short term prognostication, we have in this report compared plasma prolactin with the expression of c erb B-2 oncoprotein, ER and PR. c erb B-2 oncoprotein, ER and PR are determinants of breast cancer biology. This is a retrospective study of 47 breast cancer patients. When patients were grouped according to the stage of the disease, plasma prolactin was higher in patients with advanced disease than those with stage II disease. The patients were sub-grouped according to prolactin < 20.0 ng/ml and > 20.0 ng/ml. The expression of c erb B-2, ER and PR did not differ in these two sub-groups. The overall survival differed significantly between the two sub-groups of prolactin. The patients were sub-grouped according to c erb B-2 positivity or negativity, there was no significant difference in survival. c erb B-2 expression did not differ between the three grades of the tumor, nodal and receptor positivity or negativity. Hence, the present study reinforces the positive association between hyperprolactinemia and unfavourable prognosis and finds c erb B-2 expression as a weak prognosticator in advanced breast cancer patients.

Can plasma prolactin predict tamoxifen resistance in patients with advanced breast cancer?

The antiestrogen tamoxifen (TAM) is an effective therapy for advanced breast cancer. However, its use is limited by the eventual development of acquired TAM resistance in many patients. There is now strong evidence to suggest that prolactin plays an important role in advanced breast cancer. We have measured plasma prolactin (PRL) and estrogen-receptor (ER) and progesterone-receptor (PR) in post-menopausal patients with breast cancer (Stage III, n = 44). The blood samples were collected pre-operatively and sequentially thereafter for a minimum period of 3 years or until the death of the patients. The ER and PR were estimated in breast tumor samples by dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) method. The patients were treated with surgery and radiotherapy followed by TAM (10 mg, 1 BD). Based on the response to treatments, the patients were divided into two groups: (1) TAM sensitive (n = 19) and (2) TAM resistant (n = 25). In the TAM sensitive group, patients responded to the treatment and did not develop progressive disease within a period of 3 years. On the contrary, in the group of TAM resistant, patients developed progressive disease within a period of 3 years. The development of progressive disease clearly indicated TAM resistance. Plasma PRL correlated well with the disease progression. This study clearly demonstrated that plasma prolactin accurately indicated the response and development of resistance to TAM in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Circulating epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Circulating epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) were estimated in 58 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and were correlated with clinically and biochemically important prognosticators. IGF-I levels were significantly low in patients as compared to controls. The relation of growth factors with clinically important prognosticators was non-significant. Moreover, the levels of EGF and IGF-I in the ER+/PR+ and ER-/PR- groups and in the low and high EGFR+ tumors did not differ significantly. Patients with EGF < 1.0 ng/ml had significantly better survival than those with EGF > 1.0 ng/ml.

Correlation of steroid receptors in synchronous tissues with survival in breast cancer patients.

Estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) were estimated in 129 synchronous (primary and metastatic lymph node) breast cancer tissues, of which 40% were premenopausal and 60% were postmenopausal. ER and PR accordance was seen in 68% and 70% patients, and ER and PR discordance was seen in 32% and 30%, respectively. The mean level of ER in patients having ER accordance was higher in responders than in nonresponders. In patients having steroid receptors in accordance, there was a trend towards gain of receptors (type II) in responders, and loss of receptors (type I) in nonresponders. In ER discordant cases 48% were of type I while in PR discordant cases 46% were of type I. In postmenopausal patients, survival was lower in patients showing accordance than in those showing discordance. In nonresponders showing loss of receptors in lymph node, the survival was shorter than in those who showed gain of receptors in lymph node. No such trend was seen in premenopausal patients. Our study suggests that in postmenopausal patients, survival was better related to ER accordance than ER discordance and PR accordance or discordance. However, a larger patient series is needed for confirmation.

Levels of circulating peptide and steroid hormones in men with lung cancer.

Levels of circulating peptide (FSH, LH, prolactin, ACTH, calcitonin, gastrin and insulin-like growth factor-1 [IGF-1]) and steroid (estradiol, progesterone, DHEA-S and testosterone) hormones were estimated by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) in male patients with lung cancer (n = 37) pre-therapeutically and compared with 25 age matched healthy controls. In this retrospective study, FSH, LH, prolactin, ACTH, calcitonin, gastrin and IGF-1 were significantly higher with concomitant lower levels of DHEA-S and testosterone, while the difference was statistically non-significant for estradiol and progesterone in patients with lung cancer when compared with controls. Early stage patients (Stage II) exhibited higher levels of gastrin as compared to advanced stage patients (Stages III and IV). It is suggested that hormonal imbalance might play an important role in the development and progression in male patients with lung cancer.

Endocrine status in stage II vs. advanced premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Circulating preoperative levels of DHEA-S, androstenedione and SHBG were measured in 40 premenopausal and 49 postmenopausal breast cancer patients, and in 30 and 15 age-matched healthy controls, respectively. Moreover, the levels of LH, FSH, prolactin, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, DHEA-S, androstenedione and SHBG of Stage II breast cancer patients were compared with advanced patients and also with controls. In premenopausal patients the levels of steroid hormones were significantly low whereas those of peptide hormones were significantly high. On the contrary, in postmenopausal patients, except DHEA-S, all other hormones were significantly elevated in comparison with controls. In premenopausal patients, DHEA-S, androstenedione, estradiol, progesterone, and testosterone decreased as stage advanced with concomitant increase of SHBG, LH, FSH and prolactin when compared with hormone levels of Stage II patients. In postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients, when compared with Stage II patients, the levels of SHBG, LH, FSH, and prolactin increased significantly, while DHEA-S, androstenedione, estradiol, and progesterone decreased as stage advanced.

Prognostic significance of immunohistochemically localized biomarkers in stage II and stage III breast cancer: a multivariate analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the expression of a panel of biomarkers such as prolactin (PRL), p53, Bcl-2, c-erb B2, Ki-67, CD44, and factor VIII-related antigen (FVIII-RA) in primary tumors of stage II and stage III breast cancer and its correlation with disease prognostication. METHODS: The streptavidin-biotin peroxidase complex technique was used for the detection of these antigens. Cytoplasmic staining pattern was observed for PRL, Bcl-2, and Ki-67. Staining pattern for p53 was nuclear. Membranous and/or cytoplasmic staining was noted for c-erb B2 and CD44. Microvessel staining was noted for FVIII-RA. RESULTS: Of the 93 primary breast tumors analyzed, positivity for PRL was noted in 82%, for p53 in 56%, for Bcl-2 in 73%, for c-erb B2 in 68%, and for Ki-67 and CD44 in 78% each. The microvessel count (MVC) for FVIII-RA ranged from 0.0 to 29.0, with a median of 6.0, which was used as a cutoff. MVC > or = 6.0 was noted in 51% of breast tumors. With increasing tumor size, the higher frequency of positivity of MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .0001), CD44 (P = .001), PRL (P = .002), and c-erb B2 (P = .008), and higher frequency of Bcl-2 negativity (P = .033), was noted. In stage III patients, a higher positivity of the following biomarkers was noted, compared with stage II patients: MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .0004), PRL (P = .0002), c-erb B2 (P = .001), and CD44 (P = .005). Further, Bcl-2 positivity was significantly lower in patients with stage III disease compared with those with stage II disease (P = .024). In patients with nodal involvement, the frequency of c-erb B2 (P = .006), MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .011), and PRL (P = .032) was higher than in those without nodal involvement. Moreover, in these patients, with the increase in the number of involved lymph nodes, there was a significant increase in frequency of CD44+ (P = .0004) and PRL+ (P = .013) tumors. Abnormal expression of one biomarker was seen in 7% of tumors, of two biomarkers in 4%, of three in 15%, of four in 19%, of five in 28%, of six in 20%, and of all seven biomarkers in 7% of tumors. The frequency of an increasing number of biomarkers coexpressed was higher in stage III patients compared with stage II patients (P = .00003). In the total number of patients (n = 93), tumors with Bcl-2 negativity (P = .00001), MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .001), PRL positivity (P = .02), and CD44 positivity (P = .034) had a significantly poorer overall survival (OS) compared with their respective counterparts. In stage II patients (n = 40), only p53 expression was significantly associated with reduced relapse-free survival (P = .009) and OS (P = .040). In multivariate analysis, p53 expression was an independent prognostic factor that influenced relapse-free survival (P = .034) of stage II breast cancer patients. However, it failed to attain statistical significance for OS. In stage III patients (n = 53), tumors with Bcl-2 negativity (P = .0005) and MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .039) had a significantly poorer OS compared with their respective counterparts. In multivariate analysis of stage III patients, Bcl-2 was the only independent prognostic factor (P = .001) for predicting OS. There was a significant association between coexpression of the biomarkers and OS (P = .001). The OS rates decreased with the increase in number of abnormally expressed biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: p53 expression in primary tumors was an independent prognostic factor that influenced relapse-free survival in patients with stage II disease. In stage III patients, lack of Bcl-2 expression was independently associated with a poor prognosis and, thus, may be an indicator of aggressive phenotype.

Clinical significance of p53, nm23, and bcl-2 in T3-4N1M0 oesophageal carcinoma: an immunohistochemical approach.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to test whether the expression of p53, nm23, and bcl-2 in T3-4N1M0 oesophageal carcinoma is associated with patient survival. METHODS: Immunohistochemical localisation of p53, nm23, and bcl-2 was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections (N = 46). The observed range of follow-up period was 0.2-24.0 months with a median of 11.0 months. A total of 85% (39/46) of the patients died within 24.0 months, which could be due to advanced disease at presentation. The immunohistochemical signal was expressed as the proportion of positive cells. The immunostaining for p53 was nuclear, whereas that for nm23 and bcl-2 was cytoplasmic in the neoplastic cells. RESULTS: p53 was expressed in 70% (32/46) of cases; nm23 in 29% (13/45), and bcl-2 in 67% (29/43) of tumours. The univariate analysis showed that the expression of two markers, i.e., expression of p53 and absence of nm23 were independently associated with unfavourable overall survival time. Despite a small number of patients treated with adjuvant therapy, we observed that tumours positive for p53 had an unfavourable prognosis when compared with tumours negative for p53. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings suggest: expression of p53 and nm23 negativity may be related to an unfavourable prognosis in patients with advanced oesophageal carcinoma.

Node negative breast carcinoma: hyperprolactinemia and/or overexpression of p53 as an independent predictor of poor prognosis compared to newer and established prognosticators.

The purpose of this study was to investigate a prognostic indicator that can differentiate node negative breast cancer patients (N = 39, T2N0M0) with high risk and low risk for the development of recurrence or metastases. Preoperative plasma prolactin (PRL) was estimated by radioimmunoassay. The expression of PRL, p53, nm23, and c-erbB2 was investigated by immunohistochemical (IHC) localization; cathepsin D (CD, Enzyme Linked Sorbant Assay) and estrogen- and progesterone-receptors (ER and PR, Dextran coated charcoal method) were estimated in the tumor cytosols. The follow-up period was 2-6 years. Statistical comparisons were made between each marker for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Of the 39 patients, 18 had hyperprolactinemia (PRL > 20.0 ng/ml plasma), whereas overexpression of p53 was observed in 55% (17/31) tumors. These were independently and in combination associated with a reduced RFS and OS. The rest of the investigated markers did not show promising results. Hyperprolactinemia and/or overexpression of p53 were associated with aggressiveness of the tumor, early disease relapse or metastases, and poor OS in patients with node negative breast cancer. These two markers may enhance our ability to identify node negative breast cancer patients with aggressive tumors, for whom the use of adjuvant chemo and/or endocrine therapy is unequivocally justified.

Plasma prolactin in patients with colorectal cancer. Value in follow-up and as a prognosticator.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative plasma prolactin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were assessed to monitor disease recurrence and to identify low-risk and high-risk patients with Dukes B or C colorectal cancer. METHODS: Prolactin and CEA were estimated by radioimmunoassay method. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and sequentially thereafter from patients with colorectal cancer (N = 114); the samples were compared with samples from age-matched healthy control subjects (smokers and nonsmokers, N = 45). For rest of the analysis, patients with Dukes A disease (N = 7) were not included because of the small number. In monitoring recurrences, the criteria for positive test for the two markers was a continual increase in the marker level after an initial decrease or persistent high level of the marker. These were the indicators of relapse or no response to treatment. To determine the efficacy of the preoperative markers, the patients were grouped according to disease status at the end of 3 years, i.e., patients who had response to the treatment modalities (N = 52) and patients who later had progressive disease (N = 55). To determine the prognostic significance of preoperative marker levels, the patients were divided according to the cutoff levels (upper normal limits); for prolactin the cutoff level was 20.0 ng/ml plasma, and for CEA it was 5.0 ng/ml plasma. RESULTS: Both of the markers were significantly high in patients with colorectal cancer compared with the markers of their respective control subjects (P < 0.0001). In monitoring disease course, the predictive power of prolactin was 100%, whereas that of CEA was 66%. Prolactin showed a lead time of 2-3 months. Preoperative prolactin levels were significantly higher in patients who later had progressive disease (P < 0.001) than in patients who had response to the treatments. However, such an intergroup variation was not observed for CEA. Patients with preoperative levels of prolactin greater than 20.0 ng/ml had shorter overall survival times than did those with prolactin levels less than 20.0 ng/ml plasma; such a trend was not observed for patients with CEA levels less than 5.0 ng/ml and those with CEA levels greater than 5.0 ng/ml plasma. CONCLUSION: Prolactin is a better overall marker than is CEA in patients with Dukes B or C colorectal cancer. The authors recommend the use of plasma prolactin levels to help identify low-risk and high-risk patient subgroups so that high-risk patients may be followed up more intensely and treated accordingly. Hyperprolactinemic patients with Dukes B or C disease have shortened survival time.

Coexpression of Bcl-2, c-Myc, and p53 oncoproteins as prognostic discriminants in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical use of Bcl-2, c-Myc, and p53 oncoproteins, either singly or in combination, as prognostic discriminants relative to recurrence and overall survival in patients with Dukes B or C colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Analyses were made on archival pathology tissues of 48 patients with colorectal cancer. The oncoproteins were localized using commercially available monoclonal antibodies: clone 124 for Bcl-2, 9E11 for c-Myc, and DO-7 for p53. The avidin-biotin peroxidase complex method was used. Patients were followed up for a period of 2 to 36 months. RESULTS: Expression of Bcl-2 and c-Myc was cytoplasmic, whereas nuclear p53 immunoreactivity was localized in the tumor cells. Sixty percent (29/48), 65 percent (31/48), and 37 percent (18/48) of the tumors showed overexpression of Bcl-2, c-Myc, and p53 oncoproteins, respectively. Fifty-four percent (18/33) and 100 percent (9/9) of moderately and poorly differentiated tumors, respectively, were positive for Bcl-2 (P < 0.01). No such correlation was noted for c-Myc and p53 oncoproteins. Univariate analysis showed that patients with Bcl-2 and c-Myc overexpression were associated with poorer overall survival than patients with Bcl-2-negative (P < 0.0124) and c-Myc-negative (P < 0.036) tumors. In addition, when patients were subgrouped according to Dukes stage, a statistically significant poorer overall survival was observed in Dukes C patients with Bcl-2-positive tumors (P < 0.017). Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that coexpression of three oncoproteins was predictive of a worse prognosis than for those individuals expressing none of the oncoproteins (P < 0.031) and only one positive oncoprotein (P < 0.014). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that oncoprotein coexpression possesses significant prognostic and potential therapeutic value; incorporation of molecular markers into future prospective randomized trials is advisable.

Overexpression of CD44: a useful independent predictor of prognosis in patients with colorectal carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: The goal was to investigate the potential correlation between overexpression of CD44, high microvessel count (MVC), and p21ras with length of relapse-free and overall survival in patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas. METHODS: CD44, factor VIII-related antigen (FVIII-RA), and p21ras were localized immunohistochemically in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps (n = 8) and adenocarcinomas (n = 98). The correlation between the expression of CD44, MVC in the areas with highest density, and p21ras with relapse-free and overall survival time was investigated. Data were analyzed statistically using univariate and multivariate systems. RESULTS: In patients with adenomatous polyps, the positivity of CD44, FVIII-RA, and p21ras was 75%, 62%, and 88%, respectively. In patients with colorectal carcinomas the positivity of CD44 was 55%, and for p21ras it was 52%. The median of FVIII-RA was 4 MVC (range, 0.0 to 32.33). MVC was greater than 4 in 53% of the patients with colorectal carcinomas. In univariate analysis, a significantly longer relapse-free time (CD44: P = .0004; FVIII-RA: P = .0006) and overall survival time (CD44: P = .0001; FVIII-RA: P = .001) were observed for patients with CD44-negative tumors and MVC below 4 as compared to those with CD44-positive tumors and MVC greater than 4. Similar observations were noted in patients with Dukes B and C disease and the rectum as the site of tumor. In multivariate analysis, only CD44 correlated significantly with both relapse-free (P = .0003) and overall survival (P = .00001). CONCLUSION: Univariate analysis showed CD44 and MVC to be independent predictors of prognosis in colorectal carcinomas. Multivariate analysis showed that CD44 positivity was the most important indicator of an unfavorable prognosis for relapse-free and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Thus, it can be deduced that whether CD44 is positive or negative in patients with colorectal cancer may have prognostic importance and in the future may be used as a factor in the pathologic evaluation of tumor specimens. This hypothesis needs to be tested prospectively in a larger number of patients.