Evaluation of candidate international standards for meningococcal serogroups A and X polysaccharide.

Polysaccharide (PS) based meningococcal vaccines are primarily evaluated by physicochemical methods to ensure batches are consistently manufactured. As PS content is determined by different methods across numerous laboratories, there is a need for International Standards (IS) to calibrate the assays. Following the successful introduction of the WHO Meningococcal group C (MenC) IS in 2011, NIBSC initiated projects to prepare similar standards for groups A, W, Y and X (MenA/W/Y/X) to standardise all meningococcal- PS based vaccines. On the basis of results from a collaborative study to evaluate preparations of MenA and MenX PS, both were established by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in Oct 2015 as; the First WHO International Standard for the Meningococcal Group A polysaccharide with a content of 0.845 ± 0.043 mg MenA PS per ampoule (expanded uncertainty with coverage factor of k=2.45 corresponding to a 95% level of confidence); the First WHO International Standard for the Meningococcal Group X polysaccharide with a content of 0.776 ± 0.089 mg MenX PS per ampoule (expanded uncertainty with coverage factor of k=2.45), as determined by quantitative NMR. The standards are available from NIBSC, who act as guardians and distributors of the material under the auspices of WHO.

Survey of peptide quantification methods and comparison of their reproducibility: A case study using oxytocin.

USP's peptide reference standards content is typically determined using an HPLC assay against an external standard for which the purity was determined by a mass balance approach. To explore the use of other analytical methods, the USP Biologics Department conducted a multi-laboratory collaborative study. The study determined the inter-laboratory variability for peptide quantitation using the following methods: HPLC assay, quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) spectroscopy, or amino acid analysis (AAA). The three methods were compared with regard to their suitability for quantitation of the nonapeptide oxytocin. In this study, the HPLC assay method using the same peptide bulk material as the standard showed the lowest inter-lab variability. The coefficient of variation (%CV) was calculated without counting the uncertainty associated with the purity assignment of the standard with mass balance. The proton qNMR method is a direct measurement of the peptide against an internal standard, which is not difficult to perform under common laboratory conditions. Because of the simpler operation and shorter analytical time, qNMR as a primary method for peptide reference standard value assignment deserves further exploration.