The four-factor personality model and its qualitative correlates among opioid agonist therapy clients.

Background: The Four Factor Personality Vulnerability model identifies four specific personality traits (e.g., sensation seeking [SS], impulsivity [IMP], anxiety sensitivity [AS], and hopelessness [HOP]) as implicated in substance use behaviors, motives for substance use, and co-occurring psychiatric conditions. Although the relationship between these traits and polysubstance use in opioid agonist therapy (OAT) clients has been investigated quantitatively, no study has examined the qualitative expression of each trait using clients' voice. Method: Nineteen Methadone Maintenance Therapy (MMT) clients (68.4% male, 84.2% white, mean age[SD] = 42.71 [10.18]) scoring high on one of the four personality traits measured by the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale [SURPS] completed a semi-structured qualitative interview designed to explore their lived experience of their respective trait. Thematic analysis was used to derive themes, which were further quantified using content analysis. Results: Themes emerging from interviews reflected (1) internalizing and externalizing symptoms, (2) adversity experiences, and (3) polysubstance use. Internalizing symptoms subthemes included symptoms of anxiety, fear, stress, depression, and avoidance coping. Externalizing subthemes included anger, disinhibited cognitions, and anti-social and risk-taking behaviors. Adverse experiences subthemes included poor health, poverty, homelessness, unemployment, trauma, and conflict. Finally, polysubstance use subthemes include substance types, methods of use, and motives. Differences emerged between personality profiles in the relative endorsement of various subthemes, including those pertaining to polysubstance use, that were largely as theoretically expected. Conclusion: Personality is associated with unique cognitive, affective, and behavioral lived experiences, suggesting that personality may be a novel intervention target in adjunctive psychosocial treatment for those undergoing OAT.

Craving and emotional responses to trauma and cannabis cues in trauma-exposed cannabis users: Influence of PTSD symptom severity.

Conditioned craving to trauma cues and avoidance learning have both been implicated in the high concurrence of trauma-related distress and substance misuse. Using a cue-exposure paradigm involving personalized trauma, cannabis, and neutral cues, we examined if conditioned craving and/or elevated negative affect to trauma cues are mechanisms linking PTSD and cannabis use disorder. Fifty-one trauma-exposed cannabis users were randomly presented the three cue types. Craving and emotional responses were evaluated after each cue using the Marijuana Craving Questionnaire-Short Form (Heishman et al., 2001) and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson et al., 1988). Relief cannabis craving (compulsivity and emotionality) was significantly higher after trauma than cannabis and neutral cues (p's < 0.001) and was also higher among those with more severe PTSD symptoms (p's < 0.05). The relationship between PTSD symptom severity and cannabis craving was stronger after trauma than cannabis cues for the compulsivity component of craving (p < .05). Relief craving was also higher after the cannabis cue than after the neutral cue (expectancy and purposefulness; p < .001). Negative affect was significantly higher: after trauma than cannabis and neutral cues (p's < 0.001); and among those with more severe PTSD symptoms (p < . 005). Positive affect was significantly lower after trauma than cannabis cues (p < .05). Trauma cue exposure might promote cannabis misuse through conditioned craving as well as the desire to relieve negative affect. Conditioned cannabis craving involving an uncontrollable compulsion to use cannabis in response to trauma reminders appears particularly likely among cannabis users with more severe PTSD symptoms.

Commentary on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on opioid use disorder treatment among Indigenous communities in the United States and Canada.

This commentary focuses on how some Indigenous communities in the United States (U.S.) and Canada are addressing the opioid epidemic within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, from the perspective of the co-authors as researchers, clinicians, and pharmacists working within or among Indigenous communities in three eastern Canadian provinces and two western U.S. states. The pandemic has likely exacerbated opioid use problems among Indigenous communities, especially for individuals with acute distress or comorbid mental illness, or who are in need of withdrawal management or residential services. In response to the pandemic, we discuss first how greater prescription flexibility has facilitated and even increased access to medications for opioid use disorder. Second, we describe how Indigenous-serving clinics have expanded telemedicine services, albeit not without some challenges. Third, we note challenges with restricted participation in traditional Indigenous healing practices that can be helpful for addiction recovery. Fourth, we mention providers' worries about the pandemic's impact on their patients' mental health and safety. We argue that certain treatment transformations may be helpful even after the pandemic is over, through enhancing access to community-grounded treatment, decreasing stigma, and promoting patient self-efficacy.

Symbolic, non-directional predictive cues affect action execution.

Predictive cues may help us to plan an action in anticipation of what will come next. Some cues such as arrows contain directional information to orient the actor. Other cues, however, may contain no spatial information that directly orients the actor to the upcoming action. Non-directional predictive cues have been shown to increase performance in visual search tasks but have not been explored in the planning and execution of actions. The first aim of this study is to determine whether participants can implicitly learn to associate symbolic cues with an upcoming action target location. The second aim is whether this association leads to transient or sustained activation of the action associated with the predicted target location. High and low predictive cues preceded target appearance at long cue-target-onset asynchronies (1,100-2,000 ms). The trajectories of participants' reaching movements were analyzed depending on whether they aimed at the predicted or the non-predicted side within each of the cue type conditions. For the highly predictive cue, participants' trajectories veered further toward the opposite target location when participants aimed for the predicted target location compared to when they aimed for the non-predicted target location. These results indicate that participants can associate an upcoming action with non-directional predictive cues but the predicted response was inhibited in the long intervening time between the cue and target. This finding is similar to the response to peripheral-onset cues in inhibition of return type paradigms.