Meaningful consumer involvement in cancer care: a systematic review on co-design methods and processes.

OBJECTIVE: Although the benefits of consumer involvement in research and health care initiatives are known, there is a need to optimize this for all people with cancer. This systematic review aimed to synthesize and evaluate the application of co-design in the oncology literature and develop recommendations to guide the application of optimal co-design processes and reporting in oncology research, practice, and policy. METHODS: A systematic review of co-design studies in adults with cancer was conducted, searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO databases and included studies focused on 2 concepts, co-design and oncology. RESULTS: A total of 5652 titles and abstracts were screened, resulting in 66 eligible publications reporting on 51 unique studies. Four frameworks were applied to describe the co-design initiatives. Most co-design initiatives were designed for use in an outpatient setting (n = 38; 74%) and were predominantly digital resources (n = 14; 27%) or apps (n = 12; 23%). Most studies (n = 25; 49%) used a co-production approach to consumer engagement. Although some studies presented strong co-design methodology, most (n = 36; 70%) did not report the co-design approach, and 14% used no framework. Reporting was poor for the participant level of involvement, the frequency, and time commitment of co-design sessions. Consumer participation level was predominantly collaborate (n = 25; 49%). CONCLUSIONS: There are opportunities to improve the application of co-design in oncology research. This review has generated recommendations to guide 1) methodology and frameworks, 2) recruitment and engagement of co-design participants, and 3) evaluation of the co-design process. These recommendations can help drive appropriate, meaningful, and equitable co-design, leading to better cancer research and care.

Characterisation of G8 human rotaviruses in Australian children with gastroenteritis.

This study describes the characterisation of G8 rotavirus strains isolated from humans with acute gastroenteritis. Six G8 strains were detected in Australia between 2002 and 2008. Four were G8P[14] strains, one was G8P[8]+[14] and one was G8 P non-typeable. By polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and enzyme immunoassay analysis, four G8 strains with visible RNA exhibited a long electropherotype and five G8 strains displayed subgroup I specificity. Sequence analysis of the VP7 gene indicated that the G8 strains exhibited the highest nucleotide and amino acid identity with a G8P[11] bovine rotavirus strain detected in Japan. VP4 sequence data of one G8P[14] strain revealed that the closest identity was to another human-bovine-like strain detected in Australia, MG6, a G6P[14] strain. The identification of G8 strains causing disease further extends the number of G8P[14] strains detected in Australian children, and indicates that there is a rare but ongoing presence of uncommon human strains within the community in Australia.