Comparative effectiveness and healthcare utilization for ambulatory cardiac monitoring strategies in Medicare beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Objective data comparing the diagnostic performance of different ambulatory cardiac monitors (ACMs) are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To assess variation in monitoring strategy, clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in patients undergoing ambulatory monitoring without a pre-existing arrhythmia diagnosis. METHODS: Using the full sample (100%) of Medicare claims data, we performed a retrospective cohort study of diagnostic-naïve patients who received first-time ACM in 2017 to 2018 and evaluated arrhythmia encounter diagnosis at 3-months, repeat ACM testing at 6 months, all-cause 90-day emergency department (ED) and inpatient utilization, and cost of different strategies: Holter; long-term continuous monitor (LTCM); non-continuous, event-based external ambulatory event monitor (AEM); and mobile cardiac telemetry (MCT). We secondarily performed a device-specific analysis by manufacturer, identified from unique claim modifier codes. RESULTS: ACMs were used in 287,789 patients (AEM = 10.3%; Holter = 53.8%; LTCM = 13.3%; MCT = 22.5%). Device-specific analysis showed that compared to Holter, AEM, MCT, or other LTCM manufacturers, a specific LTCM (ZioⓇ XT 14-day patch, iRhythm Technologies, San Francisco, CA) had the highest adjusted odds of diagnosis and lowest adjusted odds of ACM retesting. Findings were consistent for specific arrhythmia diagnoses of ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular block, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. As a category, LTCM was associated with the lowest 1-year incremental health care expenditures (mean Δ$10,159), followed by Holter ($10,755), AEM ($11,462), and MCT ($12,532). CONCLUSIONS: There was large variation in diagnostic monitoring strategy. A specific LTCM was associated with the highest adjusted odds of a new arrhythmia diagnosis and lowest adjusted odds of repeat ACM testing. LTCM as a category had the lowest incremental acute care utilization. Different monitoring strategies may produce different results with respect to diagnosis and care.

Colesevelam, Ezetimibe, and Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes From a Health Care Database.

BACKGROUND: Despite the prevalence of therapies available to patients at highest coronary heart disease risk, only a minority of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients reach desired cholesterol treatment levels, with limited data regarding their outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine "real-world" effectiveness of initiating treatment with either colesevelam or ezetimibe among individuals with evidence of T2DM and hypercholesterolemia (HCh). Key outcomes included treatment patterns and cardiovascular (CV) events. METHODS: This retrospective administrative claims-based study utilized medical, pharmacy, and enrollment data linked to laboratory results information from a large United States health plan (January 1, 2006, to March 31, 2011) and included individuals with recorded evidence of T2DM and HCh. The index date was the date of first pharmacy claim for colesevelam or ezetimibe, with cohort assignment based on index medication. Assessments included baseline characteristics, follow-up treatment patterns, and composite CV event, with propensity score matching to correct for sample selection bias. RESULTS: In total, 4231 individuals were identified with evidence of HCh and T2DM (ezetimibe n = 3384; colesevelam n = 847). After matching, the baseline characteristics between cohorts were rendered to be similar. Mean days of persistent medication use was lower with colesevelam compared with ezetimibe (P < 0.001). Compared with ezetimibe, a smaller percentage of individuals in the colesevelam cohort experienced a follow-up composite CV event, and adjusted Cox model results suggested decreased risk (hazard ratio = 0.58; P = 0.004) of a follow-up composite CV event. CONCLUSION: In this health care database analysis among patients with HCh and T2DM, colesevelam was associated with decreased risk of a composite CV event compared with ezetimibe, despite lower persistence.

Real-world primary nonadherence to antiobesity medications.

BACKGROUND: Primary nonadherence (PNA), when a medication is newly prescribed but not filled, has been identified as a major research gap potentially impacting the optimal treatment of patients with overweight and obesity who are newly prescribed antiobesity medications (AOMs). OBJECTIVES: To assess PNA among patients with newly prescribed AOMs and to examine factors associated with PNA to AOMs. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that used the Optum Integrated Clinical plus Claims database to identify individuals who had at least 1 prescription order for an AOM the US Food and Drug Administration approved for long-term use. Individuals with prescription orders between January 1, 2012, and February 28, 2019, were identified, and patient demographics, clinical characteristics, medication prescribed, baseline health care utilization, and obesity-related complications were described by PNA status. PNA was defined as no pharmacy claim for the AOM within 60 days of the date of the new prescription order as identified in electronic health record data. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine factors associated with PNA. RESULTS: The study sample included a total of 1,563 patients. The mean body mass index was 38.4 kg/m2; 10.7% were prescribed liraglutide 3.0 mg, 26.0% were prescribed lorcaserin, 36.3% of patients were prescribed naltrexone-bupropion, 5.4% were prescribed orlistat, and 21.6% were prescribed phentermine-topiramate. Most patients (91.1%) exhibited PNA, with only 8.9% filling their newly prescribed AOM within 60 days. Both the adherent and nonadherent groups were predominately female sex, White, and covered by commercial insurance. The mean age was similar between the 2 groups. Most obesity-related complications were less prevalent in the adherent group, although the Charlson comorbidity index score was similar between the 2 groups. After adjustment for patient demographics and clinical characteristics, there was not a statistically significant association between the specific AOM and PNA (P = 0.299). Patients with depression or living in the Midwest or South regions were at significantly increased risk of PNA. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of PNA to AOMs was very high, suggesting barriers in effective medical management of patients with overweight and obesity. Future research is warranted to understand reasons for PNA to AOMs and how to address these barriers. DISCLOSURES: Dr Kan, Dr Bae, Dr Dunn, and Dr Ahmad are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. Ms Buysman and Dr Gronroos are employees of Optum. Dr Swindle was an employee of Optum at the time the study was conducted and is currently employed at Evidera. Dr Bengtson is employed at Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Boehringer Ingelheim has no connection to this study), and during the conduct of this study was employed at Optum.

Weight management treatment modalities in patients with overweight or obesity: A retrospective cohort study of administrative claims data.

Background: The purpose of this study was to describe demographic and clinical characteristics among patients who have medical encounters for weight management treatments and to investigate the association of those characteristics with treatment modality. Methods: This was a retrospective database study using medical claims, pharmacy claims, and enrollment information from commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D members in the Optum Research Database from 01/01/2011-2/29/2020. Adult patients with a claim for a weight management treatment from 01/01/2012-2/28/2019 were categorized into cohorts according to the highest intensity intervention received. To examine the association between patient characteristics and treatment modality received, a multinomial logit model was performed. Results: Cohorts by increasing intensity included lifestyle intervention (LSI, n = 67,679), weight reduction pharmacotherapy (WRRx) with an anti-obesity medication (AOM, n = 6,905), weight reduction procedure (WRP, n = 1,172), and weight reduction surgery (WRS, n = 18,036). Approximately 32.1% and 16.6% of patients who received WRS or WRP had an LSI during the 12-month baseline, and only 0.6% and 0.4% had treatment with long-term AOMs. In a multinomial logit model, patients with type 2 diabetes (not including WRRx cohort), respiratory disorders, cardiovascular risk factors, pain disorders, and mental health conditions had increased odds of treatment with higher intensity intervention versus LSI. Patients who were male, received an intervention more recently (2016-2019), or had a Charlson comorbidity score of 1 (compared to 0) had decreased odds of treatment with higher intensity interventions. Conclusion: In this study, age, sex, body mass index, obesity-related complications, and Charlson comorbidity score appeared to influence the type of weight management treatment modality received. This study improves understanding of weight management treatment utilization and identifies gaps and opportunities to improve obesity care with the appropriate use of different treatment modalities.

Retrospective Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients with Skin and Soft Structure Infections Treated with Tedizolid in an Outpatient Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes data for patients who received tedizolid for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) are scant. We provide a real-world analysis of economic and clinical outcomes following tedizolid use in the outpatient setting. METHODS: This retrospective study of adults with skin infections treated with tedizolid (index period: 1 July 2014-31 May 2016) used data from the Optum Research and Impact National Benchmark databases. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients received tedizolid for the treatment of skin infections (with complications, n = 18; without complications, n = 73). Some patients had > 1 complication and infection site. Among patients with complications, pre-index complications during the [index date - 30] through [index date + 1] period included osteomyelitis (44.4%), septicemia (44.4%), and prosthetic joint/device/graft infection (16.7%). For the [index date - 7] through [index date + 1] period, the infection site included abscesses (55.6%) and chronic ulcers (38.9%). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) days supplied for the index tedizolid claim was 6.8 (2.3) days. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) during the 30-day post-index period included ≥ 1 ambulatory visit (100.0%), ≥ 1 emergency department (ED) visit (16.7%), and ≥ 1 hospitalization (22.2%). Median 30-day post-index all-cause costs were $11,098 [lower quartile (Q1), $5688; upper quartile (Q3), $16,246; mean (SD), $14,637 ($11,435)]. Among patients without complications, the pre-index infection site from ([index date - 7] through [index date + 1]) included abscesses (60.3%), chronic ulcers (37.0%), and cellulitis (2.7%). Mean (SD) days supplied for the index tedizolid claim was 6.6 (2.5) days. Thirty-day post-index HCRU included ≥ 1 ambulatory visit (91.8%), ≥ 1 ED visit (17.8%), and ≥ 1 hospitalization (5.5%). Median 30-day post-index all-cause costs were $3230 (Q1, $2345; Q3, $6847; mean [SD], $6898 [$11,129]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with tedizolid in the outpatient setting experienced a short duration of therapy, low hospital admission, and modest post-index HCRU indicators, suggesting its utility for outpatient therapy of ABSSSIs.

Healthcare costs among patients with hemophilia A treated with factor replacement or bypassing agents.

Objective: To assess real-world costs for patients with hemophilia A treated with bypassing agents versus factor VIII (FVIII) replacement. Methods: Claims data from a large US health insurer during 1 January 2006-30 September 2014 were used for analysis. Treated patients with hemophilia A were identified based on ≥1 medical claim with a diagnosis code for hemophilia A (ICD-9-CM 286.0) and ≥1 medical or pharmacy claim for bypassing therapy and/or FVIII replacement during 1 January 2007-31 August 2014. The bypassing therapy cohort comprised patients with ≥1 claim for bypassing therapy; all others were assigned to the factor replacement therapy cohort. Post-index hemophilia-related costs were computed as combined health plan plus patient paid amounts for medical claims with hemophilia A diagnosis code or hemophilia therapy procedure code (bypassing therapy, FVIII replacement therapy, desmopressin, antifibrinolytic therapy), as well as pharmacy claims for hemophilia therapy. Results: The study sample represented 580 patients: 50 (8.6%) in the bypassing therapy cohort (mean age: 38.5 years; mean post-index period: 2.1 years) and 530 (91.4%) in the factor replacement therapy cohort (mean age: 29.3 years; mean post-index period: 2.7 years). Compared with the factor replacement therapy cohort, mean per-patient-per-month hemophilia-related total costs were 4.8-fold higher in the bypassing therapy cohort ($57,232 vs. $11,899), comprising 4.4-fold higher medical costs ($45,911 vs. $10,352) and 7.3-fold higher outpatient pharmacy costs ($11,321 vs. $1547). Conclusions: Patients with hemophilia A treated with bypassing agents between 2007 and 2014 incurred substantially higher monthly hemophilia-related medical and pharmacy costs than patients treated only with FVIII replacement.

Lower Hospitalization and Healthcare Costs With Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker in a Retrospective Analysis of Patients With Heart Failure.

Background Outcomes data among patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction treated with sacubitril/valsartan ( SAC / VAL ) are largely limited to clinical trial results. We compared hospitalization and healthcare costs among real-world patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker ( ACEI / ARB ). Methods and Results Using retrospective administrative claims data, stable patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL or ACEI / ARB from October 2015 to June 2016 were identified. Postindex hospitalization and healthcare costs were assessed in propensity-matched cohorts using robust variance estimation. Time to first hospitalization was modeled using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable models. Postindex all-cause healthcare costs were modeled using an adjusted multivariable model. Among 279 patients per matched cohort, postindex hospitalization risk was lower for SAC / VAL compared with ACEI / ARB using Kaplan-Meier estimation and unadjusted Cox models. For HF hospitalization, the hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0.56 (0.33-0.94; P=0.030). Adjusted results were similar to unadjusted. Mean ( SD ) monthly healthcare costs were lower for SAC / VAL versus ACEI / ARB for all categories except pharmacy, with hospital costs being particularly disparate between cohorts: for HF hospitalization, $248 ($1588) for SAC / VAL versus $1122 ($7290) for ACEI / ARB . The adjusted risk of incurring increased all-cause postindex costs was lower for SAC / VAL versus ACEI / ARB (cost ratio [95% CI] 0.74 [0.59-0.94]; P=0.013). Conclusions In clinical practice, patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL were less likely to be hospitalized than matched patients treated with ACEI / ARB . Despite higher pharmacy costs, SAC / VAL -treated patients incurred lower monthly medical and total healthcare costs.

Short-term mortality and cost associated with cardiac device implantation in patients hospitalized with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The use of implantable cardiac devices in the management of heart failure has increased, but patient selection and inhospital outcomes in clinical practice have not been critically explored. Therefore, we evaluated the inhospital mortality and costs associated with patients with heart failure who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization device, or device lead. METHODS: We analyzed admissions with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure codes for implantation/revision of cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization device and a primary or secondary diagnosis code for heart failure in a prospective hospital database from 2004 to 2005. Odds ratios were calculated to quantify risk for mortality. Average accumulated costs over time were calculated before and after day of first device implant procedure. RESULTS: Among 27,907 hospitalizations, inhospital mortality varied based on day of device implantation and use of intravenous inotropic therapy. Mortality was 0.3% for patients who did not require inotropic drugs versus 3.3%, 6.6%, and 15.2% for patients who required initiation of drug before, on the day of, or after device implantation, respectively. Logistic regression demonstrated that the most potent risk for inhospital mortality was the use of inotropic drugs. Similar trends were observed for any vasoactive therapy. There was a marked increase in costs associated with these admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of cardiac devices during a hospitalization for heart failure may be associated with significant inhospital mortality if patients require intravenous vasoactive therapy. Risk stratification methodology that incorporates ongoing/anticipated need for these drugs will likely improve clinical decision making.

Resource utilization in patients hospitalized with heart failure: insights from a contemporary national hospital database.

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of disease severity and clinical trajectory has been described among patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF). However, little is known about the variability in and contributors to costs associated with HF hospitalizations. We examined the distribution of costs associated with a HF diagnosis in a large contemporary hospital database. METHODS: Diagnosis and procedure codes were systematically used to identify primary inpatient HF admissions to hospitals participating in the PREMIER database 2004-2005. Average costs per day and division of costs among hospital departments were evaluated based on patient and hospitalization characteristics. RESULTS: Total number of hospitalizations was 278,214; 36% had a length of stay (LOS) >5 days. There was a clear association between type of intravenous therapy, LOS, inhospital mortality, and cost. For example, patients initiated on a single intravenous inotrope had a longer mean LOS (9.6 days), greater inhospital mortality rate (14.7%), and higher mean total cost ($18,411) than any other medical therapy administered during hospitalization. The single largest contributor to cost was room and board. Forty-six percent of hospitalizations with diagnosis-related group code 127 (n = 234,204) exceeded average Medicare reimbursement. Variables on admission associated with highest cost hospitalizations were age <75 years, non-black race, male sex, and urban teaching hospital status. CONCLUSIONS: Length of stay is the determinant of cost for HF hospitalizations. Use of vasoactive therapy is a marker for longer LOS, higher mortality, and greater costs. Improved reimbursement rates or improved therapeutic options that lessen LOS are required if the costs of HF care are to be minimized.

Diabetic complications associated with new-onset diabetes mellitus in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Data are scarce regarding the incidence and risk factors for complications of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) in renal transplant patients. METHODS: United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data from primary renal transplant recipients during 1995-2001 who developed NODM was used to examine diabetic complications over the first three years posttransplant. Prognostic models were used to evaluate patient characteristics and treatment choices associated with risk of each class of complications. Propensity scores for choice of calcineurin inhibitor were included in multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The analysis included 21,489 patients, of whom 4,105 developed NODM by 3 years posttransplant. One or more NODM complications developed in 2,393 patients (58.3% of all patients with NODM), comprising ketoacidosis (334, 8.1%), hyperosmolarity (131, 3.2%), renal complications (1,286, 31.3%), ophthalmic complications (340, 8.3%), neurological complications (665, 16.2%), peripheral circulatory disorders (170, 4.1%) and hypoglycemia/shock (301, 7.3%). Complications developed within a mean of 500 to 600 days from diagnosis of NODM. Multivariate analysis showed that increased recipient age, higher body mass index, African-American race, hepatitis C infection, hypertension as cause of end-stage renal disease, cold ischemia >or=30 hours, and use of tacrolimus each increased risk of complications. CONCLUSION: NODM is associated with similar complications to those seen in the general population, but these appear to develop at an accelerated rate. Obesity and use of tacrolimus are the only modifiable factors that appear to affect risk of NODM or its complications.

Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Heart Failure: A Comparison of Costs between Matched Decedent and Survivor Cohorts.

INTRODUCTION: Prior research suggests increased costs during the final months of life, yet little is known about healthcare cost differences between patients with heart failure (HF) who die or survive. METHODS: A retrospective claims study from a large US health plan [commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D (MAPD)] was conducted. Patients were ≥18 years old with two non-inpatient or one inpatient claim(s) with HF diagnosis code(s). The earliest HF claim date during 1 January 2010-31 December 2011 was the index date. Cohort assignment was based on evidence of death within 1 year (decedents) or survival for >1 year (survivors) post-index. Per-patient-per-month (PPPM) and 1-year (variable decedent follow-up) costs (all-cause and HF-related) were calculated up to 1 year post-index. Cohorts were matched on demographic and clinical characteristics. Independent samples t tests and Pearson's chi-square tests were used to examine cohort differences. RESULTS: Among patients with HF, 8344 survivors were 1:1 matched to decedents [mean age 75 years, 50% female, 88% MAPD; mean time to decedents' death: 150 (SD 105) days]. Compared to survivors, more decedents had no pharmacy claims for HF-related outpatient pharmacotherapy within 60 days post-index (42.1% vs. 27.1%; p < 0.001). Decedents also incurred higher all-cause medical costs (PPPM: $21,400 vs. $2663; 1 year: $60,048 vs. $32,394; both p < 0.001) and higher HF-related medical costs (PPPM: $16,477 vs. $1358; 1 year: $39,052 vs. $16,519; both p < 0.001). Hospitalizations accounted for more than half of all-cause PPPM medical costs (54.6% for survivors, 84.3% for decedents). CONCLUSION: Patients with HF who died within 1 year after an index HF encounter incurred markedly higher costs within 1 year (despite the much shorter post-index period) and PPPM costs than those who survived, with the majority of costs attributable to hospitalizations for both patient cohorts. There may be opportunities for improving outcomes in HF, considering higher use of pharmacotherapy and lower costs were seen among survivors.

Chronic inotropic therapy in end-stage heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Interventions in advanced heart failure that provide symptom relief and decrease hospital readmission are important. Chronic intravenous inotropic therapy represents a pharmacologic approach that has been advocated for palliative treatment. However, little is known about associated mortality and cost. Therefore, we sought to describe the impact of chronic infusions on resource use and survival. METHODS: Data were reviewed for a 17-state Medicare region from 1995 to 2002. We obtained hospital and outpatient expenditures accrued up to 180 days before and after the initiation of chronic infusions. Health care use was defined by dollars reimbursed for drug and hospitalizations per beneficiary. Average accumulated cost curves were generated for dollars reimbursed for drug and for hospitalizations by days at risk. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort (n = 331) was 69.1 +/- 11.3 years. Mortality exceeded 40% at 6 months. Reductions in hospital days were observed at all time points. The amounts reimbursed at 30 and 60 days before and after initiation of inotrope favor drug therapy; however, at six months, the amounts reimbursed were greater due to the cost of milrinone. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic intravenous inotrope use was associated with a high mortality. The cost for milrinone was significant, but there was a decrease in expenditures for subsequent hospitalizations. In the absence of appropriately designed clinical trials, the data suggest that the decision to use inotropes, the choice of inotrope, and the duration of treatment should reflect the impact on resource use.

Digoxin use and digoxin toxicity in the post-DIG trial era.

BACKGROUND: The advent of medical therapies for congestive heart failure that have proven survival benefits, specifically angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-adrenergic antagonists, and the aldosterone antagonists, have called into question the use of digoxin for patients with normal sinus rhythm, left ventricular dysfunction, and symptomatic heart failure. This issue appears to have been heightened after the publication of the results of the Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) Trial in 1997 that did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact of digoxin on mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used data from a large heart failure registry to examine digoxin use at the time of hospital admission for heart failure, a surveillance system for recording toxic drug exposures to describe patterns in digoxin toxicity and industry estimates for the use of digoxin antibody. Digoxin use has decreased significantly from 31.4% in late 2001 to 23.5% in late 2004 (P < .00001) independent of patient age, gender, or baseline creatinine. Conversely, the number of toxic or potentially toxic exposures to digoxin requiring hospitalization has not decreased. CONCLUSION: Digoxin use is decreasing but there has not been a similar decline in cases of toxicity. Further analyses are required to delineate the reasons underlying these trends and the appropriateness of prescribing practices for both digoxin and its antidote.

Use of nesiritide before and after publications suggesting drug-related risks in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

CONTEXT: The rate of adoption of new therapies for cardiovascular diseases following the publication of favorable clinical trial results has been studied; however, less is known about the rates of de-adoption of a drug when negative studies are published. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of nesiritide before and after March and April 2005 publications in 2 high-impact journals that suggested an increased risk of renal failure and mortality with intravenous nesiritide for acute decompensated heart failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Analysis of a large prospective hospital database, developed for quality and utilization benchmarking, of 491 acute care US hospitals at which 385,627 inpatient admissions occurred with a primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code for heart failure between January and August 2001 (prior to nesiritide release) and January 2004 to December 2005 (before and after publication periods). In addition, any patient admitted who received nesiritide in the absence of a primary or secondary heart failure code was evaluated for potential off-label use of the drug. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Use of nesiritide and other intravenous vasoactive therapy among patients admitted with heart failure. RESULTS: Nesiritide use decreased from a peak of 16.6% (2351 of 14,167 admissions) in March 2005 to 5.6% (611 of 10,822 admissions) in December 2005 (P<.001). Among those patients treated with nesiritide, the mean duration of treatment changed minimally, from 2.3 to 2.1 days. Although the use of inotropes also decreased during the period under study, the changes were more modest; furthermore, of those patients who were prescribed intravenous vasoactive therapy, a higher percentage were prescribed inotropes after publication (3272 [21.5%] of 15 193 patients from January-April 2005 vs 5750 [29.6%] of 19 445 patients from May-December 2005, P<.001). The use of nesiritide, in the absence of an ICD-9 heart failure code, was small. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid de-adoption of nesiritide occurred following 2 publications suggesting risk with the drug. Further analyses are required to evaluate the consequences of these changes on patient outcomes and to anticipate how publications of adverse findings can influence practice.

Health Care Resource Utilization, Costs, and Persistence in Patients Newly Diagnosed as Having Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Newly Treated With Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the United States.

PURPOSE: This study compared health care resource utilization (HCRU), costs, and persistence among patients newly diagnosed as having nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and newly treated with dabigatran versus warfarin. METHODS: This retrospective claims-based study used data from a large US managed care organization. The earliest claim for dabigatran or warfarin during October 1, 2010 through October 31, 2011 was the index date, with cohort assignment based on index medication. Evidence of newly diagnosed NVAF within 30 days before the index date and no claims for oral anticoagulants during the 12-month preindex period were required. Cohorts were matched using propensity scores. Per-patient-per-month HCRU, costs, and persistence were calculated during the variable follow-up period of up to 12 months after the index date. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were used to examine differences in outcomes. FINDINGS: After matching, 869 patients per cohort were identified (mean age, 67.8 years; 40.4% female). Compared with warfarin, dabigatran had fewer per-patient-per-month emergency department (0.10 vs 0.13, P = 0.010), office (1.98 vs 2.96, P < 0.001), and outpatient (1.05 vs 1.48, P < 0.001) visits. Despite higher mean pharmacy costs for dabigatran (P < 0.001), mean total health care (P = 0.309) and medical costs (P = 0.568) were similar to warfarin. Persistence was higher with dabigatran versus warfarin (median, 204 vs 161 days; mean, 213.7 vs 195.5 days, P = 0.001). IMPLICATIONS: Among patients newly diagnosed as having NVAF, those newly treated with dabigatran had lower HCRU, higher persistence, and similar total health care costs compared with those treated with warfarin.

Evaluation of mortality and readmissions following hospitalization with heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of patient/clinical characteristics with mortality and readmission following a heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Claims data, linked to laboratory, race/ethnicity, and mortality data, from a large US health plan were utilized to identify individuals with ≥1 inpatient claim with a diagnosis code for HF (1 January 2008-30 September 2012). Study variables were analyzed using descriptive and multivariable approaches to identify patient/clinical characteristics associated with post-discharge outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included post-discharge mortality and readmission. RESULTS: A total of 126,214 individuals were identified with a HF-related hospitalization; 19.1% with data to calculate chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage. For the overall sample, mortality probability was 4.9% and 13.4% at 1 and 6 months post-discharge, respectively (4.5% and 12.4% for subset with calculated CKD stage), while readmission (all-cause) probability was 14.8% and 39.6% at 1 and 6 months post-discharge, respectively (18.4% and 44.5% for subset with calculated CKD stage). Within the subset with calculated CKD stage, mortality and readmission probabilities differed by CKD stage (p < 0.001), with decreased renal function corresponding with increased risk of mortality and readmission. After multivariable adjustment, increasing age was associated with increased risk of mortality, while advancing CKD stage, various index hospitalization variables (i.e., pre-admission emergency room visit, intensive care unit during hospitalization), and baseline all-cause hospitalization were associated with both increased risk of mortality and all-cause 1 month readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Calculated CKD, various index hospitalization variables, and baseline all-cause hospitalization were associated with increased risk of mortality and all-cause 1 month readmission among patients hospitalized with HF. Risk of post-discharge readmission and mortality increased with worse renal function, suggesting that improved management of this subset may reduce the burden and cost of this disease. Key study limitations include those related to retrospective claims-based studies and that renal function data were available for a subset of study patients.

Health Care Costs for Patients with Heart Failure Escalate Nearly 3-Fold in Final Months of Life.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a severe chronic disease with growing prevalence and health care burden as well as high mortality. End-of-life cost data for patients with HF may inform disease and medication therapy management. OBJECTIVES: To (a) characterize a real-world sample of patients with HF who died; (b) estimate health care costs for 6 months and semiannually for 24 months, before death; and (c) examine associations between patient characteristics and predeath health care costs. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D (MAPD) enrollees (aged ≥ 18 years), using data from a large national health plan. Included patients had evidence of HF during January 1, 2009-December 31, 2013, based on ≥ 1 inpatient hospitalization or ≥ 2 noninpatient encounters with diagnosis code for HF and evidence of mortality during July 1, 2009-December 31, 2013. Demographic data, comorbidities, guideline-directed HF-related outpatient pharmacotherapy (HFRx), and predeath health care costs (all-cause and HF-related) were described. A generalized linear model examined associations between all-cause health care costs (months 6 and 1 previous to death) and specific patient characteristics. RESULTS: Of 48,026 identified patients, mean age was 77.9 years; 52.8% were female; 93.0% were MAPD enrolled; 92.5% had Quan-Charlson comor-bidity score ≥ 3; and about one quarter (26.0%) had no evidence of HFRx. Over the last 6 months of life, monthly all-cause total cost increased 3.2-fold for MAPD enrollees and 2.8-fold for commercial enrollees, although pharmacy cost decreased slightly (0.8-fold for both plan types). Cumulative 6-month all-cause medical cost was $37,186 for MAPD enrollees and $143,363 for commercial enrollees (68.8% and 73.2% due to hospitalization, respectively), and cumulative HF-related medical cost was $20,794 for MAPD enrollees and $78,440 for commercial enrollees (88.8% and 95.3% due to hospitaliza-tion, respectively). Over the last 24 months, semiannual all-cause total cost increased 3.2-fold for MAPD enrollees and 4.5-fold for commercial enroll-ees, although pharmacy cost increased only slightly (1.1-fold and 1.3-fold, respectively). Based on multivariable analysis, factors associated with higher risk of incurring a cost increase between month 6 and month 1 before death included older age (75-84 years: cost ratio [CR] = 1.33, P < 0.001; 226585 years: CR = 1.43, P < 0.001), comorbid coronary heart disease (CR = 1.12, P = 0.003), and no evidence of HFRx (CR = 1.48, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HF experienced ≥ 2.8-fold increase in monthly all-cause total cost over the last 6 months of life, which was driven by hospitalization. Although MAPD enrollees incurred greater cost increases, cumulative costs were higher for commercial enrollees. After multivariable adjustment, older age, comorbid coronary heart disease, and no evidence of HFRx were among factors associated with higher risk of cost increase over the last 6 months of life. Study findings provide predeath cost information that should be useful in value assessments of innovative HF interventions and highlight impact of HFRx on predeath health care costs.

Can statistical linkage of missing variables reduce bias in treatment effect estimates in comparative effectiveness research studies?

AIM: Missing data, particularly missing variables, can create serious analytic challenges in observational comparative effectiveness research studies. Statistical linkage of datasets is a potential method for incorporating missing variables. Prior studies have focused upon the bias introduced by imperfect linkage. METHODS: This analysis uses a case study of hepatitis C patients to estimate the net effect of statistical linkage on bias, also accounting for the potential reduction in missing variable bias. RESULTS: The results show that statistical linkage can reduce bias while also enabling parameter estimates to be obtained for the formerly missing variables. CONCLUSION: The usefulness of statistical linkage will vary depending upon the strength of the correlations of the missing variables with the treatment variable, as well as the outcome variable of interest.

Reviewing a clinical decision aid for the selection of anticoagulation treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: applications in a US managed care health plan database.

PURPOSE: The Clinical Decision Aid was created to assist in selecting anticoagulant therapies for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The aid incorporates a patient's absolute risk for stroke and bleeding, relative stroke risk reduction, and increase in relative bleeding risk to identify the agent with the lowest net risk. We describe theoretical implications of utilizing the aid at a US managed care population level. METHODS: This retrospective study used claims data from a large US managed care database including enrollees in commercial and Medicare Advantage plans. The distribution of patients across each possible combination of scores on the HAS-BLED scale (evidence of hypertension, abnormal renal or liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile INR, age >65 years, and drugs or alcohol abuse or dependence) and the CHA2DS2-VASc scale (CHADS2 [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism] with additional nonmajor stroke risk factors, including age 65-74 years, female sex, and vascular disease) was generated. We assessed the correlation between the HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores and derived the optimal treatment options based on various bleeding ratios. FINDINGS: Data from 48,260 patients were included in the analysis. The MAPD subset had a higher mean HAS-BLED score (2.17 vs 1.39; P < 0.001) and a higher mean CHA2DS2-VASc score (3.35 vs 2.05; P < 0.001) than did the commercial subset. Pearson coefficients suggested a moderate to strong positive correlation between the HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores among the commercial (0.730; P < 0.001) and MAPD (0.568; P < 0.001) enrollees. Based on a 2:1 bleeding-to-stroke risk ratio, 70.50% of patients would be recommended treatment with apixaban; 25.86%, no treatment; 3.62%, acetylsalicylic acid; and 0.01%, dabigatran 150 mg, if the Clinical Decision Aid were to be used for anticoagulant treatment selection. IMPLICATIONS: Evidence-based clinical decision-making tools utilizing risk assessment for recommending a treatment may be valuable for not only health care providers but also health care payers in optimizing care at the population level.

Clinical and economic outcomes associated with amlodipine/renin-angiotensin system blocker combinations.

OBJECTIVES: Since treatment regimen type can influence adherence and other outcomes, this study examined adherence, cardiovascular events, and economic outcomes in patients with hypertension treated with fixed-dose combination (FDC) amlodipine/olmesartan (AML/OM), FDC AML/benazepril (AML/BEN), and loose-dose combination AML plus angiotensin II receptor blockers (LDC AML/ARBs). METHODS: Commercial health plan enrollees aged at least 18 years with index claim(s) for AML/OM, AML/BEN, or LDC AML/ARB were identified. Absence of study drug 6 months pre index, and continuous enrollment for at least 12 months post index were required. Descriptive analyses were executed to make comparisons between treatments, as well as multivariate models adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, including propensity for assignment to study drug. RESULTS: Descriptive results suggested mean follow-up adherence was higher in the AML/OM cohort [proportion of days covered (PDC) = 0.63] compared with the AML/BEN (PDC = 0.55; p < 0.001) and LDC AML/ARB cohorts (PDC = 0.34; p < 0.001). The proportion of individuals with an incident follow-up cardiovascular event composite was lower in the AML/OM cohort versus the AML/BEN and LDC AML/ARB cohorts (5.94% versus 7.85% and 16.89% respectively). Adjusted Cox models suggested that patients initiated on LDC AML/ARB (hazard ratio 1.35; p < 0.001), but not on AML/BEN, were at greater risk of a follow-up cardiovascular event (composite) compared with AML/OM. Adjusted generalized linear models suggested that mean follow-up per-member-per-month overall costs were higher in the AML/BEN (cost ratio = 1.169; p < 0.001; unadjusted mean cost US$780) and LDC AML/ARB cohorts (cost ratio = 1.286; p < 0.001; unadjusted mean cost US $1394) compared with the AML/OM cohort (unadjusted mean cost US $740). CONCLUSION: The results suggested that treatment with FDC AML/OM was associated with greater likelihood of adherence and lower overall costs than with FDC AML/BEN and LDC AML/ARB, and lower risk of cardiovascular event composite versus LDC AML/ARB.