RESUMEN
We report a case of nocardiosis in a patient with several risk factors for this rare infection. Radiologically, the patient's multiple lung abscesses were misinterpreted as pulmonary metastases. Diagnosis was finally reached by the growth of Nocardia asteroides in two different blood culture sets. Nocardia bacteraemia is a rare clinical event. Despite initiation of an effective antibiotic therapy, the patient died. Autopsy revealed disseminated nocardial abscesses in the lungs, the kidneys and the brain.
Asunto(s)
Absceso/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Absceso Encefálico/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Absceso Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Nocardiosis/diagnóstico , Nocardia asteroides , Infecciones Oportunistas/diagnóstico , Neumonía Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Absceso/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso/patología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/patología , Absceso Encefálico/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso Encefálico/patología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Quimioterapia Combinada , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Renales/patología , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Pulmón/patología , Absceso Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso Pulmonar/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/cirugía , Nocardiosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Nocardiosis/patología , Infecciones Oportunistas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Oportunistas/patología , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
COVID-19 infections are accompanied by adverse changes in inflammatory pathways that are also partly influenced by increased oxidative stress and might result in elevated DNA damage. The aim of this case-control study was to examine whether COVID-19 patients show differences in oxidative stress-related markers, unconjugated bilirubin (UCB), an inflammation panel and DNA damage compared to healthy, age-and sex-matched controls. The Comet assay with and without the treatment of formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG) and H2O2 challenge was used to detect DNA damage in whole blood. qPCR was applied for gene expression, UCB was analyzed via HPLC, targeted proteomics were applied using Olink® inflammation panel and various oxidative stress as well as clinical biochemistry markers were analyzed in plasma. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients (n = 48) demonstrated higher serum levels of 55 inflammatory proteins (p < 0.001), including hs-C-reactive protein levels (p < 0.05), compared to healthy controls (n = 48). Interestingly, significantly increased age-related DNA damage (%-DNA in tail) after formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG) treatment was measured in younger (n = 24, average age 55.7 years; p < 0.05) but not in older COVID-19 patients (n = 24, average age 83.5 years; p > 0.05). Although various oxidative stress markers were not altered (e.g., FRAP, malondialdehyde, p > 0.05), a significant increased ratio of oxidized to reduced glutathione was detected in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). UCB levels were significantly lower in individuals with COVID-19, especially in younger COVID-19 patients (p < 0.05). These results suggest that COVID-19 infections exert effects on DNA damage related to age in hospitalized COVID-19 patients that might be driven by changes in inflammatory pathways but are not altered by oxidative stress parameters.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Proteómica , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , ADN-Formamidopirimidina Glicosilasa/metabolismo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Peróxido de Hidrógeno , Daño del ADN , Ensayo Cometa/métodos , Estrés Oxidativo , Inflamación , BilirrubinaRESUMEN
A 60-year-old woman and her 67-year-old male partner, admitted for pneumonia and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, respectively, had severe anaemia (Hb 5.3 and 5.2 g/dL, respectively), as a result from massive infestation with Cimex lectularius. After two erythrocyte transfusions and thorough decontamination, their clinical course was unremarkable.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/etiología , Chinches/patogenicidad , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/complicaciones , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anemia/diagnóstico , Anemia/terapia , Animales , Transfusión Sanguínea , Descontaminación , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Standard blood laboratory parameters may have diagnostic potential, if polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) tests are not available on time. We evaluated standard blood laboratory parameters of 655 COVID-19 patients suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, who underwent PCR testing in one of five hospitals in Vienna, Austria. We compared laboratory parameters, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between positive and negative PCR-tested patients and evaluated the ability of those parameters to distinguish between groups. Of the 590 patients (20-100 years, 276 females and 314 males), 208 were PCR-positive. Positive compared to negative PCR-tested patients had significantly lower levels of leukocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocytes, and thrombocytes; while significantly higher levels were detected with erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, C-reactive-protein, ferritin, activated-partial-thromboplastin-time, alanine-aminotransferase, aspartate-aminotransferase, lipase, creatine-kinase, and lactate-dehydrogenase. From all blood parameters, eosinophils, ferritin, leukocytes, and erythrocytes showed the highest ability to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative patients (area-under-curve, AUC: 72.3-79.4%). The AUC of our model was 0.915 (95% confidence intervals, 0.876-0.955). Leukopenia, eosinopenia, elevated erythrocytes, and hemoglobin were among the strongest markers regarding accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and post-test probabilities. Our findings suggest that especially leukopenia, eosinopenia, and elevated hemoglobin are helpful to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative tested patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Anciano , Austria/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Femenino , Pruebas Hematológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently finally determined in laboratory settings by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase-chain-reaction (rt-PCR). However, simple testing with immediately available results are crucial to gain control over COVID-19. The aim was to evaluate such a point-of-care antigen rapid test (AG-rt) device in its performance compared to laboratory-based rt-PCR testing in COVID-19 suspected, symptomatic patients. METHODS: For this prospective study, two specimens each of 541 symptomatic female (54.7%) and male (45.3%) patients aged between 18 and 95 years tested at five emergency departments (ED, n = 296) and four primary healthcare centres (PHC, n = 245), were compared, using AG-rt (positive/negative/invalid) and rt-PCR (positive/negative and cycle threshold, Ct) to diagnose SARS-CoV-2. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios (LR+/-) of the AG-rt were assessed. RESULTS: Differences between ED and PHC were detected regarding gender, age, symptoms, disease prevalence, and diagnostic performance. Overall, 174 (32.2%) were tested positive on AG-rt and 213 (39.4%) on rt-PCR. AG correctly classified 91.7% of all rt-PCR positive cases with a sensitivity of 80.3%, specificity of 99.1%, PPV of 98.3, NPV of 88.6%, LR(+) of 87.8, and LR(-) of 0.20. The highest sensitivities and specificities of AG-rt were detected in PHC (sensitivity: 84.4%, specificity: 100.0%), when using Ct of 30 as cut-off (sensitivity: 92.5%, specificity: 97.8%), and when symptom onset was within the first three days (sensitivity: 82.9%, specificity: 99.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The highest sensitivity was detected with a high viral load. Our findings suggest that AG-rt are comparable to rt-PCR to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 suspected symptomatic patients presenting both at emergency departments and primary health care centres.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos Virales/inmunología , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Intervalos de Confianza , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
African tick bite fever is an emerging infectious disease among travellers caused by the pathogen Rickettsia africae. Most travel-associated cases have been reported from countries in southern Africa. So far it has rarely been reported among travellers to eastern Africa and our patient is one of the first described cases imported from Tanzania. A woman presented with fever, chills, headache, myalgia and a rickettsial eschar on her ankle after returning from Tanzania. The diagnosis of African tick bite fever is often based on clinical grounds due to a lack of reliable diagnostic tests at commencement of symptoms. In this patient direct molecular detection of R. africae was performed by PCR from a sample obtained non-invasively with a swab from the rickettsial eschar. A positive PCR result was achieved although the patient had already started antibiotic treatment with doxycycline. In conclusion, this non-invasive method enables early diagnosis of African tick bite fever by direct molecular detection of R. africae and might improve the management of undifferentiated fever in travellers from Africa.