Cryoballoon ablation without use of contrast for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is usually preceded by demonstrating pulmonary vein (PV) occlusion using contrast. The aim of the study was to determine efficacy and safety of a simplified protocol for CBA performed without demonstrating PV occlusion and compare achieved results with conventional CBA. METHODS: Paroxysmal AF patients undergoing a first-time CBA were prospectively included. In the non-contrast (NC) group CBA was performed using standardized protocol without demonstrating PV occlusion. In the conventional contrast (CC) group ablations were performed after confirmation of PV occlusion. RESULTS: The NC and CC groups comprised 51 and 22 patients, respectively. PVI according to the group assignment was achieved in 34 (67%) and 21 (95.5%) patients from the NC and CC groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In the NC group, 184 (90%) out of 204 veins were isolated without venography. There were no differences between the NC and CC groups in terms of procedure duration (89.7 ± 22.6 vs. 90.0 ± 20.6 min; p = 0.7) and fluoroscopy time (15.3 ± 6.3 vs. 15 ± 4.5 min; p = 0.8). In the NC group, the use of contrast was significantly lower compared to the CC group (4.9 ± 10.1 vs. 19.4 ± 8.6 mL, p < 0.001). There were no serious adverse events in both groups. A 1-year freedom from AF was achieved in 73.5% and 71.5% of patients from the NC and CC groups, respectively (p = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Cryoballoon ablation without demonstrating vein occlusion with contrast is safe and feasible. Proposed simplified approach enables isolation of the vast majority of pulmonary veins with a significant reduction in the amount of contrast used.

Bipolar Endo-Epicardial Radiofrequency Ablation of Therapy-Resistant Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Brief Case Series.

Despite extensive conventional endoepicardial ablation, significant intramural arrhythmogenic substrate may remain out of reach of unipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The authors present clinical findings and procedural workflow for bipolar radiofrequency ablation (B-RFA) with 1 catheter placed against the endocardium and the other in the pericardial sac to ablate refractory ventricular arrhythmias. No serious adverse events occurred during B-RFA procedures, and the short-term and midterm clinical results were satisfactory. Optimal catheter choice and ablation parameters settings for B-RFA remain to be determined.

Atrial fibrillation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: role of pulmonary veins.

AIM: We aimed to characterize electrophysiological properties of pulmonary veins (PVs) in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome and atrial fibrillation (AF), and to compare them to those in patients with WPW without AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 31 patients (mean age 40 ± 15 years, 23 males) with WPW were recruited: 16 patients with (AF group) and 15 without (controls) a history of AF. The basic electrophysiological (EPS) and echocardiographic data were not different between the 2 groups. Effective refractory periods (ERPs) of PVs were significantly shorter in the AF group compared to controls: left superior (LS) PV ERP 185±29 versus 230 ± 24 ms, P = 0.001; left inferior PV ERP 198 ± 25 versus 219 ± 26 ms, P = 0.04; right superior (RS) PV ERP 207 ± 25 versus 236 ± 19 ms, P = 0.001; right inferior PV ERP 208 ± 30 versus 240 ± 19 ms, P = 0.003. Maximal veno-atrial conduction delay (i.e., the maximal prolongation of interval from stimulus delivered at PV ostia to proximal coronary sinus after extrastimulus compared to the basic drive cycle) was longer in the AF group when pacing from LSPV (69.3 ± 37.9 vs 32.6 ± 16.1 ms, P = 0.01) and RSPV (74.1 ± 25.9 vs 50.2 ± 26.5 ms, P = 0.04). During EPS, AF was induced more often in the AF group (n = 7) compared to controls (n = 1; P = 0.04). Follow-up revealed that AF recurred in 3 patients in the AF group and none of the controls. CONCLUSION: Patients with WPW syndrome and AF have shorter ERPs of PVs and greater maximal veno-atrial conduction delay compared to patients with WPW without AF. These findings suggest a potential role of PVs in the development of AF in patients with WPW.

Simultaneous Entrainment Response Assessment at Multiple Sites.

BACKGROUND: The entrainment response, defined as the difference between the postpacing interval and the tachycardia cycle length (TCL) recorded from a mapping catheter, allows to track down the components of the tachycardia loop. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate if the postpacing interval measured simultaneously from multiple sites that are remote from the pacing site (PPIR) could be clinically useful in mapping re-entrant circuits. METHODS: Ninety-two episodes of entrainment response in 29 patients with different macro-re-entrant tachycardias were evaluated using a standardized entrainment protocol. The spatial distribution of different values of PPIR-TCL in a simulation and a computational model of an entrained re-entrant tachycardia was also analyzed. RESULTS: The PPIR exceeded TCL by more than 20 milliseconds only if both pacing and recording sites were outside the tachycardia circuit. The PPIR-TCL at in-circuit sites was always ≤20 milliseconds. Sites with negative PPIR-TCL values were found either outside or inside the tachycardia circuit. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of entrainment response from catheters remote from the pacing site may enhance spatial mapping of the tachycardia circuit. The PPIR-TCL above 20 milliseconds has an excellent positive predictive value in identifying sites outside the tachycardia circuit.

Effect of the restitution properties of cardiac tissue on the repeatability of entrainment mapping response.

BACKGROUND: The difference between the postpacing interval (PPI) and the tachycardia cycle length (TCL; PPI-TCL) is a useful tool in mapping macro-reentrant tachycardias. However, entrainment pacing causes some perturbation of the conduction velocity within the tachycardia circuit, which may affect the repeatability and consequently the accuracy of the measurement of PPI-TCL. The aim of this study was to assess PPI-TCL repeatability both in vivo and in silico. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the experimental part, entrainment pacing was performed twice at each of the 124 tested sites for 30 patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of atrial and ventricular re-entrant arrhythmias. A similar protocol was used in a simplified computer model of the cardiac tachycardia circuit in a 2-dimensional tissue strip using a Fenton-Karma model of cardiac tissue. In vivo, in the case of fast tachycardias (<350 ms), PPI-TCL variability observed was doubled compared with slow tachycardias (>350 ms; 95% Limits of Agreement ranged from -21.4 to 21.6 ms for TCL<350 ms and from -10.8 to 11.5 ms for TCL>350 ms). Simulations show that this increase of variability may be because of the oscillations of the conduction velocity inside the tachycardia circuits. The effect of the restitution properties of cardiac tissue on the outcome of entrainment pacing is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: PPI-TCL is characterized by a high repeatability with the differences between the results for individual stimulations of ≤20 ms. The variability of this parameter is significantly lower in the case of slow tachycardias.