RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We present final 5-year outcomes of the multicenter randomized sham-controlled trial of a water vapor therapy (Rezum™) for treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 197 subjects >50 years of age with International Prostate Symptom Score ≥13, maximum flow rate ≤15 ml/second and prostate volume 30 to 80 cc were randomized and followed for 5 years. From the control arm of 61 subjects, a subset of 53 subjects requalified and after 3 months received treatment as part of the crossover group and were also followed for 5 years. The total number of vapor treatments to each lobe of the prostate was determined by length of prostatic urethra and included middle lobe treatment per physician discretion. RESULTS: Significant improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms was observed at <3 months post-thermal therapy, remaining durable through 5 years in the treatment group (International Prostate Symptom Score reduced 48%, quality of life increased 45%, maximum flow rate improved 44%, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index decreased 48%). Surgical re-treatment rate was 4.4% with no reports of device or procedure related sexual dysfunction or sustained de novo erectile dysfunction. Results within the crossover group were similar through 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive treatment with water vapor thermal therapy provides significant and durable symptom relief as well as flow rate improvements through 5 years, with low surgical re-treatment rates and without impacting sexual function. It is a versatile therapy, providing successful treatment to obstructive lateral and middle lobes.
Asunto(s)
Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/terapia , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Anciano , Estudios Cruzados , Disfunción Eréctil/epidemiología , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Hipertermia Inducida/estadística & datos numéricos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/diagnóstico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Calidad de Vida , Retratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/epidemiología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/etiología , Vapor , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION The advent of ureteroscopy has revolutionized the treatment many urologic diseases, including benign essential hematuria. This systematic review examines the treatment of benign essential hematuria (BEH) with ureteroscopic interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature from 1977 to May 2020. We included studies that evaluated the use of ureteroscopy to diagnose or treat BEH. Demographics, follow up, findings, treatment method and success rate were extracted from each identified paper. Quality analysis was performed independently by both authors. RESULTS: Our search resulted in 587 articles. Fifteen of these studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. No randomized controlled trials were found. All 15 studies were case series. Nine studies were graded as good, five as fair, and one as poor. Follow up ranged from 2 to 108 months. A total of 307 patients underwent ureteroscopy for suspected BEH; 223 (73%) were diagnosed with a discrete lesion, 33 (11%) with a diffuse lesion, and 44 (14%) had no lesions seen on ureteroscopy. Of those diagnosed with discrete lesions, the most common was minute venous ruptures (35%), followed by hemangiomas (26%). Ureteroscopic treatment successfully relieved the hematuria and symptoms in most patients, and was more successful in those treated for discrete lesion (115/120, 96%) than diffuse (10/19, 53%). CONCLUSIONS: Ureteroscopic treatment of BEH yields excellent outcomes. In this systematic review, 96% of patients with discrete lesions and 53% of patients with diffuse lesions had resolution of their hematuria after ureteroscopic interventions.
Asunto(s)
Hematuria/patología , Hematuria/cirugía , Ureteroscopía , HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION Erectile dysfunction is common after radical cystectomy; however, research on sexual dysfunction after this procedure is relatively scarce. Our goal was to evaluate the incidence of penile prosthesis implantation after radical cystectomy, with a focus on rural/urban disparity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the SEER-Medicare database to identify patients with bladder cancer diagnosed between 1991-2009 who had a radical cystectomy (ICD-9 codes 57.7, 57.71, 57.79). The outcome was placement of a penile implant (ICD-9 codes 64.95 and 64.97). Covariates extracted included rural county status, age, race, ethnicity, marital status, geographic region, socioeconomic status, Charlson comorbidity, pathologic cancer stage, and type of urinary diversion. RESULTS: A total of 95 penile implants were performed in the 11,477 cystectomy patients (0.83%). Patients who had a penile implant were mostly from urban counties (85.1%) and in the Western region of the United States (83.9%). After controlling for covariates, rural patients who underwent an ileal conduit for urinary diversion were less likely to have a penile prosthesis procedure after radical cystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Penile prosthetic procedures are uncommon in bladder cancer patients who have undergone radical cystectomy; therefore, sexual health should be considered and discussed with patients after radical cystectomy.
Asunto(s)
Cistectomía , Disfunción Eréctil/cirugía , Medicare , Implantación de Pene/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Cistectomía/métodos , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Población Rural , Estados Unidos , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Sperm play an essential role in embryonic genome activation and embryonic progression to blastocyst. In the present work, we focus on development of embryos created as a result of ICSI with testicular or epididymal sperm from azoospermic males and compare this to outcomes from normospermic males. The objective of this study was to determine if sperm origin influences clinical outcomes, the kinetics of embryo development, or the incidence of cleavage anomalies and multinucleation. METHODS: A total of 93 consecutive intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles (ICSI) performed for 83 couples were included in this study. Observations were made on 594 fertilized oocytes cultured in the EmbryoScope using time-lapse microscopy (TLM). Epididymal sperm (n = 29) cycles or surgically retrieved sperm from the testis (TESE; n = 37 cycles) of men with either obstructive (OA) or non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) were used to inject oocytes. A further 27 ICSI cycles were performed using ejaculated sperm from normospermic males, designated as our control sperm (CS) group. Kinetic data and cycle outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate was not different between the three groups (TESE 51.4%, PESA 57.7%, and CS 59.3%). A non-significant decrease was observed in both implantation (30.9%) and live birth rate (43%) with TESE as compared to PESA (35.3%, 58%, respectively) and CS groups (45.1%, 56%, respectively). Failure to compact was significantly higher amongst TESE-NOA embryos (35.2%; P < 0.001) as compared to TESE-OA (4%), PESA (9%), and CS (3.8%) embryos. The two points at which TESE-derived embryos (both NOA and OA) behaved most differently from PESA and CS embryos was at cc2 (t3-t2; time to initiation of the second cell cycle) and tSB (time to start of blastulation). A significantly lower percentage of TESE embryos exhibited kinetics typically ascribed to high quality embryos with the greatest developmental potential. Finally, the incidence of direct uneven cleavage (DUC) was observed to be significantly higher after ICSI with sperm retrieved from azoospermic males. CONCLUSIONS: TLM allowed a more in depth comparison of paternal influence on embryo morphokinetics and helped to identify specific differences in cell cycle kinetics. TESE-NOA embryos exhibited a higher incidence of compaction failure.
Asunto(s)
Azoospermia/fisiopatología , Ciclo Celular/fisiología , Espermatozoides/citología , Testículo/citología , Adulto , Tasa de Natalidad , Blastocisto/citología , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Masculina/fisiopatología , Masculino , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/métodos , Recuperación de la EspermaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: To determine the factors used to make the decision between vasovasostomy (VV) and vasoepididymostomy (VE) by leaders performing microsurgical vasectomy reversal using a questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was sent to all members of the Society for the Study of Male Reproduction (SSMR), a male reproduction subspecialty society of the AUA, using the SurveyMonkey platform. RESULTS: Sixty-seven surgeons responded to the questionnaire (27% of SSMR members). Of which 72% of members performed less than 50 vasectomy reversals per year. Also, 71% of members stated that less than 20% of their vasectomy reversals are vasoepididymostomies. When evaluating epididymal fluid at the time of reversal, 87% would perform a VE for pasty fluid, 66% with creamy fluid without sperm heads and 55% with no or scant fluid. With respect to banking sperm, 36% take sperm or testicular tissue at the time of VE while 37% sometimes take sperm mostly depending on the couple's preference. The Berger end-to-side with intussusception VE technique is used by the majority of members (78%). The presence of intact sperm or sperm parts determined the location in the epididymis for anastomosis for 55% and 19% of members respectively. Postoperative semen testing after a VE is evaluated first between 6 weeks to 3 months for 64%. The procedure is considered a failure between 6 to 12 months for 34% and 12 to 18 months for another 48% if no sperm is seen on semen analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Most members perform a VE with pasty fluid or creamy fluid without sperm heads. Three out of four members are using the Berger end-to-side intussusception technique to perform their VE. More studies are needed to determine the optimal circumstances to perform a VE as there is significant variation in responses even among members of the SSMR.
Asunto(s)
Epidídimo/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Conducto Deferente/cirugía , Vasovasostomía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis de Semen , Manejo de Especímenes , Espermatozoides , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Infertility affects approximately 15% of all couples, and male factor contribute to up to 50% of cases. Unfortunately, the cause of male infertility is unknown in about 30% of these cases. Infertility of unknown origin is classified as idiopathic male infertility when abnormal semen parameters are present. Despite not having a definable cause, these men may respond to treatment. This review focuses on the use of empiric hormonal therapies for idiopathic male infertility. METHODS: A detailed PubMed/MEDLINE search was conducted to identify all publications pertaining to empiric use of hormonal therapies in the treatment of idiopathic male infertility using the keywords "idiopathic," "male infertility," "empiric treatment," "clomiphene," "SERM," "gonadotropin," "aromatase inhibitor," and "androgen." These manuscripts were reviewed to identify treatment modalities and results. RESULTS: Gonadotropins, androgens, aromatase inhibitors, and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) have all been used with varying results. The studies on these treatments are of variable quality. The most well-studied agents are the SERMs which show a modest increase in semen parameters and pregnancy rates. Aromatase inhibitors are most effective in non-idiopathic patients. Gonadotropin treatment is limited by their inconvenience and relative ineffectiveness in this population. Testosterone suppresses spermatogenesis and should not be used to treat infertility. CONCLUSION: Gonadotropins, SERMs, and aromatase inhibitors may improve semen parameters and hormone levels in men with idiopathic infertility with the best results from SERMs. Testosterone should never be used to treat infertility. Large multicenter randomized controlled studies are needed to better determine the success of empiric use of hormonal therapy on pregnancy rates.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To present an overview of our surgical experience in the management of growing teratoma syndrome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy between November 2005 and February 2012 revealed 15 patients who met the criteria for growing teratoma syndrome. Their clinical data, imaging characteristics, and surgical and oncological outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 23 years. Primary testis tumors included non-seminomatous germ cell tumor in 12 of 15 patients, seminoma in two of 15 patients and hemorrhagic mass in one patient. Mature teratoma was present in just six (40%) of the orchiectomy specimens. All patients received preoperative chemotherapy. On imaging, the median size of the largest retroperitoneal mass was 7 cm (range 3.9-24.5 cm). The median rate of linear growth was 0.5 cm/month (range 0.03-2.9), and the increase in volume was 9.2 cm(3) /month. All tumors were found to have cystic and necrotic components. Median operative time was 6.2 h (range 4.2-15.2 h). Estimated blood loss was 600 mL (range 100-7000 mL), and median length of stay was 5 days (range 3-19 days). Four patients required resection of non-retroperitoneal growing teratoma masses after post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy to achieve tumor-free status. There were two minor (Clavien I-II) and two major postoperative complications (Clavien ≥III). All patients are alive and disease free with a median duration of follow-up of 8 months (range 1-64 months). CONCLUSIONS: Growing teratoma syndrome tumors vary in their growth rate, but they all appear to have cystic features with necrosis elements on radiographic evaluation. Aggressive surgical excision is associated with excellent outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Teratoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background: Nephrolithiasis seriously affects people's health with increasing prevalence and high recurrence rates. However, there is still a lack of effective interventions for the clinical prevention of kidney stones. Hyperoxaluria-induced renal tubular epithelial cell (TEC) injury is a known key factor in kidney stone formation. Thus, developing new drugs to inhibit the hyperoxaluria-induced TEC injury may be the best way. Methods: We synthesized the Se@SiO2 nanocomposites as described in Zhu's study. The size and morphology of the Se@SiO2 nanocomposites were captured by transmission electron microscopy. Cell viability was measured by a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. The mice were randomly divided into the following four groups: (I) the control group (n=6); (II) the Se@SiO2 group (n=6); (III) the glyoxylic acid monohydrate (GAM) group; and (IV) the GAM + Se@SiO2 group (n=6). The concentration of Se in the mice was quantified using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Results: The CCK-8 assays showed that Se@SiO2 nanocomposites had almost no obvious cytotoxicity on the Transformed C3H Mouse Kidney-1 (TCMK-1) cell. The mice kidney Se concentration levels in the Se@SiO2 groups (Se@SiO2 6.905±0.074 mg/kg; GAM + Se@SiO2 7.673±2.85 mg/kg) (n=6) were significantly higher than those in the control group (Control 0.727±0.072 mg/kg; GAM 0.747±0.074 mg/kg) (n=6). The Se@SiO2 nanocomposites reduced kidney injury, calcium oxalate crystal deposition, and the osteoblastic-associated proteins in the hyperoxaluria mice models. Conclusions: Se@SiO2 nanocomposites appear to protect renal TECs from hyperoxaluria by reducing reactive oxygen species production, suggesting the potential role of preventing kidney stone formation and recurrence.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) represents the persistent absence of sperm in ejaculate without obstruction, stemming from diverse disease processes. This survey explores global practices in NOA diagnosis, comparing them with guidelines and offering expert recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 56-item questionnaire survey on NOA diagnosis and management was conducted globally from July to September 2022. This paper focuses on part 1, evaluating NOA diagnosis. Data from 367 participants across 49 countries were analyzed descriptively, with a Delphi process used for expert recommendations. RESULTS: Of 336 eligible responses, most participants were experienced attending physicians (70.93%). To diagnose azoospermia definitively, 81.7% requested two semen samples. Commonly ordered hormone tests included serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (97.0%), total testosterone (92.9%), and luteinizing hormone (86.9%). Genetic testing was requested by 66.6%, with karyotype analysis (86.2%) and Y chromosome microdeletions (88.3%) prevalent. Diagnostic testicular biopsy, distinguishing obstructive azoospermia (OA) from NOA, was not performed by 45.1%, while 34.6% did it selectively. Differentiation relied on physical examination (76.1%), serum hormone profiles (69.6%), and semen tests (68.1%). Expectations of finding sperm surgically were higher in men with normal FSH, larger testes, and a history of sperm in ejaculate. CONCLUSIONS: This expert survey, encompassing 367 participants from 49 countries, unveils congruence with recommended guidelines in NOA diagnosis. However, noteworthy disparities in practices suggest a need for evidence-based, international consensus guidelines to standardize NOA evaluation, addressing existing gaps in professional recommendations.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a common, but complex problem, with multiple therapeutic options and a lack of clear guidelines. Hence, there is considerable controversy and marked variation in the management of NOA. This survey evaluates contemporary global practices related to medical and surgical management for patients with NOA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 56-question online survey covering various aspects of the evaluation and management of NOA was sent to specialists around the globe. This paper analyzes the results of the second half of the survey dealing with the management of NOA. Results have been compared to current guidelines, and expert recommendations have been provided using a Delphi process. RESULTS: Participants from 49 countries submitted 336 valid responses. Hormonal therapy for 3 to 6 months was suggested before surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) by 29.6% and 23.6% of participants for normogonadotropic hypogonadism and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism respectively. The SSR rate was reported as 50.0% by 26.0% to 50.0% of participants. Interestingly, 46.0% reported successful SSR in <10% of men with Klinefelter syndrome and 41.3% routinely recommended preimplantation genetic testing. Varicocele repair prior to SSR is recommended by 57.7%. Half of the respondents (57.4%) reported using ultrasound to identify the most vascularized areas in the testis for SSR. One-third proceed directly to microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in every case of NOA while others use a staged approach. After a failed conventional TESE, 23.8% wait for 3 months, while 33.1% wait for 6 months before proceeding to mTESE. The cut-off of follicle-stimulating hormone for positive SSR was reported to be 12-19 IU/mL by 22.5% of participants and 20-40 IU/mL by 27.8%, while 31.8% reported no upper limit. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest survey to date on the real-world medical and surgical management of NOA by reproductive experts. It demonstrates a diverse practice pattern and highlights the need for evidence-based international consensus guidelines.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of severe pain after ureteric stent removal. To evaluate the efficacy of a single dose of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in preventing this complication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed at our institution. Adults with an indwelling ureteric stent after ureteroscopy were randomised to receive either a single dose of placebo or an NSAID (rofecoxib 50 mg) before ureteric stent removal. Pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) just before and 24 h after stent removal Pain medication use after ureteric stent removal was measured using morphine equivalents. RESULTS: In all, 22 patients were enrolled and randomised into the study before ending the study after interim analysis showed significant decrease in pain level in the NSAID group. The most common indication for ureteroscopy was urolithiasis (14 patients). The proportion of patients with severe pain (VAS score of ≥7) during the 24 h after ureteric stent removal was six of 11 (55%) in the placebo group and it was zero of 10 in the NSAID group (P < 0.01). There were no complications related to the use of rofecoxib. CONCLUSIONS: We found a 55% incidence of severe pain after ureteric stent removal. A single dose of a NSAID before stent removal prevents severe pain after ureteric stent removal.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa 2/administración & dosificación , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Lactonas/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Stents , Sulfonas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Uréter , Ureteroscopía , Urolitiasis/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Varicocele is a common problem among infertile men. Varicocele repair (VR) is frequently performed to improve semen parameters and the chances of pregnancy. However, there is a lack of consensus about the diagnosis, indications for VR and its outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore global practice patterns on the management of varicocele in the context of male infertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty practicing urologists/andrologists from 23 countries contributed 382 multiple-choice-questions pertaining to varicocele management. These were condensed into an online questionnaire that was forwarded to clinicians involved in male infertility management through direct invitation. The results were analyzed for disagreement and agreement in practice patterns and, compared with the latest guidelines of international professional societies (American Urological Association [AUA], American Society for Reproductive Medicine [ASRM], and European Association of Urology [EAU]), and with evidence emerging from recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Additionally, an expert opinion on each topic was provided based on the consensus of 16 experts in the field. RESULTS: The questionnaire was answered by 574 clinicians from 59 countries. The majority of respondents were urologists/uro-andrologists. A wide diversity of opinion was seen in every aspect of varicocele diagnosis, indications for repair, choice of technique, management of sub-clinical varicocele and the role of VR in azoospermia. A significant proportion of the responses were at odds with the recommendations of AUA, ASRM, and EAU. A large number of clinical situations were identified where no guidelines are available. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest global survey performed to date on the clinical management of varicocele for male infertility. It demonstrates: 1) a wide disagreement in the approach to varicocele management, 2) large gaps in the clinical practice guidelines from professional societies, and 3) the need for further studies on several aspects of varicocele management in infertile men.
RESUMEN
Background: Although posttransplant anemia (PTA) is a common complication after kidney transplant, it has not been thoroughly evaluated for appropriate treatment. Roxadustat can stimulate erythropoiesis by increasing erythropoietin (EPO) production and improving the utilization of iron. However, there are currently a few case reports describing its effect on PTA in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in KTRs with PTA. Methods: In this retrospective study, KTRs with early PTA were divided into a roxadustat group, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) group, and untreated group (neither roxadustat nor ESA) according to the treatment prescribed by their physicians. We compared the levels of hemoglobin (Hb), creatinine, lipids, hepcidin, intact fibroblast growth factor 23 (iFGF23) and iron-related indices, at baseline and different time points posttransplant. Outcome was assessed at both month 3 and month 12 posttransplant. Adverse events during the treatment course were also recorded. Results: A total of 57 KTRs were included (n=22 roxadustat group, n=13 ESA group, n=22 untreated group). There was no difference in age, sex, body mass index, dialysis method and duration, donor type among three groups at baseline. The mean Hb levels at month 3 posttransplant (128.00±19.62 vs. 118.59±11.60 g/L, P=0.048) and the average change in Hb levels from week 2 to month 3 (48.05±22.53 vs. 31.45±12.96 g/L, P=0.005) in the roxadustat group were significantly higher than those in the untreated group. However, there was no significant difference in the above indices between the roxadustat and ESA groups. At month 3, the total iron binding capacity (TIBC) and levels of transferrin were significantly higher while levels of ferritin, hepcidin and iFGF23 were significantly lower in the roxadustat group than in other groups (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels among the three groups at month 3. During the follow-up, no adverse events related to roxadustat were reported. Conclusions: Administration of roxadustat in KTRs with early PTA could elevate Hb levels effectively and safely by enhancing endogenous EPO production and improving iron utilization. Further randomized studies with larger sample size are necessary to verify our results.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Azoospermia is defined as the absence of spermatozoa in the pellet of a centrifuged semen sample. In fact, when a basic semen analysis fails to detect sperm in the ejaculate, there is still the possibility of detecting rare sperm after centrifugation of the sample and examination of the pellet. In this study, we assessed the role of Cytospin centrifugation in combination with the nuclear fast picroindigocarmine (NF-PIC) staining in identifying sperm in azoospermic samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semen samples of 251 men diagnosed as having azoospermia after standard examination were further analyzed by Cytospin centrifugation in combination with NF-PIC staining. RESULTS: Sperm were detected in 60 men (23.9%), thus changing their diagnosis to cryptozoospermia. CONCLUSIONS: By identifying sperm in the semen of men who were thought to have total azoospermia, the Cytospin NF-PIC test can alter the diagnosis and further treatment of these men.
RESUMEN
Antisperm antibodies (ASA), as a cause of male infertility, have been detected in infertile males as early as 1954. Multiple causes of ASA production have been identified, and they are due to an abnormal exposure of mature germ cells to the immune system. ASA testing (with mixed anti-globulin reaction, and immunobead binding test) was described in the WHO manual 5th edition and is most recently listed among the extended semen tests in the WHO manual 6th edition. The relationship between ASA and infertility is somewhat complex. The presence of sperm agglutination, while insufficient to diagnose immunological infertility, may indicate the presence of ASA. However, ASA can also be present in the absence of any sperm agglutination. The andrological management of ASA depends on the etiology and individual practices of clinicians. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the causes of ASA production, its role in immunological male infertility, clinical indications of ASA testing, and the available therapeutic options. We also provide the details of laboratory procedures for assessment of ASA together with important measures for quality control. Additionally, laboratory and clinical scenarios are presented to guide the reader in the management of ASA and immunological male infertility. Furthermore, we report the results of a recent worldwide survey, conducted to gather information about clinical practices in the management of immunological male infertility.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The success of vasectomy is determined by the outcome of a post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA). This article describes a step-by-step procedure to perform PVSA accurately, report data from patients who underwent post vasectomy semen analysis between 2015 and 2021 experience, along with results from an international online survey on clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a detailed step-by-step protocol for performing and interpretating PVSA testing, along with recommendations for proficiency testing, competency assessment for performing PVSA, and clinical and laboratory scenarios. Moreover, we conducted an analysis of 1,114 PVSA performed at the Cleveland Clinic's Andrology Laboratory and an online survey to understand clinician responses to the PVSA results in various countries. RESULTS: Results from our clinical experience showed that 92.1% of patients passed PVSA, with 7.9% being further tested. A total of 78 experts from 19 countries participated in the survey, and the majority reported to use time from vasectomy rather than the number of ejaculations as criterion to request PVSA. A high percentage of responders reported permitting unprotected intercourse only if PVSA samples show azoospermia while, in the presence of few non-motile sperm, the majority of responders suggested using alternative contraception, followed by another PVSA. In the presence of motile sperm, the majority of participants asked for further PVSA testing. Repeat vasectomy was mainly recommended if motile sperm were observed after multiple PVSA's. A large percentage reported to recommend a second PVSA due to the possibility of legal actions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlighted varying clinical practices around the globe, with controversy over the significance of non-motile sperm in the PVSA sample. Our data suggest that less stringent AUA guidelines would help improve test compliance. A large longitudinal multi-center study would clarify various doubts related to timing and interpretation of PVSA and would also help us to understand, and perhaps predict, recanalization and the potential for future failure of a vasectomy.
RESUMEN
Sperm vitality testing is a basic semen examination that has been described in the World Health Organization (WHO) Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen from its primary edition, 40 years ago. Several methods can be used to test sperm vitality, such as the eosin-nigrosin (E-N) stain or the hypoosmotic swelling (HOS) test. In the 6th (2021) edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual, sperm vitality assessment is mainly recommended if the total motility is less than 40%. Hence, a motile spermatozoon is considered alive, however, in certain conditions an immotile spermatozoon can also be alive. Therefore, the differentiation between asthenozoospermia (pathological decrease in sperm motility) and necrozoospermia (pathological decrease in sperm vitality) is important in directing further investigation and management of infertile patients. The causes leading to necrozoospermia are diverse and can either be local or general, testicular or extra-testicular. The andrological management of necrozoospermia depends on its etiology. However, there is no standardized treatment available presently and practice varies among clinicians. In this study, we report the results of a global survey to understand current practices regarding the physician order of sperm vitality tests as well as the management practices for necrozoospermia. Laboratory and clinical scenarios are presented to guide the reader in the management of necrozoospermia with the overall objective of establishing a benchmark ranging from the diagnosis of necrozoospermia by sperm vitality testing to its clinical management.
RESUMEN
Retrograde ejaculation (RE) is a condition defined as the backward flow of the semen during ejaculation, and when present can result in male infertility. RE may be partial or complete, resulting in either low seminal volume or complete absence of the ejaculate (dry ejaculate). RE can result from anatomic, neurological or pharmacological conditions. The treatment approaches outlined are determined by the cause. Alkalinizing urinary pH with oral medications or by adding sperm wash media into the bladder prior to ejaculation may preserve the viability of the sperm. This article provides a step-by-step guide to diagnose RE and the optimal techniques to retrieve sperm.
RESUMEN
The current WHO 2010 manual for human semen analysis defines leukocytospermia as the presence of peroxidase-positive leukocytes at a concentration >1×106/mL of semen. Granular leukocytes when activated are capable of generating high levels of reactive oxygen species in semen resulting in oxidative stress. Oxidative stress has been correlated with poor sperm quality, increased level of sperm DNA fragmentation and low fertility potential. The presence of leukocytes and pathogens in the semen may be a sign of infection and/or localized inflammatory response in the male genital tract and the accessory glands. Common uro-pathogens including Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma hominis, and Escherichia coli can cause epididymitis, epididymo-orchitis, or prostatitis. The relationship between leukocytospermia and infection is unclear. Therefore, we describe the pathogens responsible for male genital tract infections and their association with leukocytospermia. The review also examines the diagnostic tests available to identify seminal leukocytes. The role of leukocytospermia in male infertility and its management is also discussed.