Endothelial dysfunction of the cornea after exposure to sprayed venom from hornets.

PURPOSE: Ocular injuries due to Hymenoptera venom are uncommon and most injuries occur on the ocular surface. We reported two rare cases of corneal endothelial damage caused by hornet venom that was sprayed, not injected, through stinging in the eye. OBSERVATIONS: Case 1: A 57-year-old male patient was injured when a hornet sprayed venom into his left eye. He was referred to our hospital because the edoema and epithelial erosion of the cornea persisted. The patient presented with bullous keratopathy, asymmetrical iris atrophy, irreversible mydriasis, and glaucoma. His cataract progressed, and his best-corrected visual acuity was 0.03. Cataract surgery was performed after anti-inflammatory treatment with steroids, and Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was performed 6 months later. The patient recovered well postoperatively: his best-corrected visual acuity improved to 1.0 and he continued his glaucoma treatment. Case 2: A 75-year-old male patient had damage to his corneal epithelium, severe conjunctivitis, and conjunctival edoema when sprayed hornet venom entered his left eye. At initial presentation, the corneal endothelial cell density had decreased to 1042 cells/mm2. The conjunctival sac was washed, and steroid and topical antibacterial instillations were administered. His best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.07 at the initial visit to 0.5. However, the corneal opacification and glaucoma persisted, and 3 months later the corneal endothelial cell density decreased to 846 cells/mm2. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Corneal injuries caused by sprayed hornet venom are rare; however, they can cause intense anterior chamber inflammation and severe, irreversible corneal endothelial damage. In such cases, prompt initial treatment, the administration of adequate anti-inflammatory medication, and careful evaluation of the corneal endothelium are required.

Prognosis and etiology of traumatic and non-traumatic corneal perforations in a tertiary referral hospital: a 30-year retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To clarify the prognosis of corneal perforation, we compared the etiology and characteristics of patients with traumatic and non-traumatic corneal perforations. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients treated for traumatic or non-traumatic corneal perforations at a single tertiary hospital from 1989 to 2019. The variables collected included the primary cause of corneal perforation, final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and treatment administered. The initial treatment administered and treatment success rates were compared between the traumatic and non-traumatic groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of final visual acuity. RESULTS: Ninety eyes of 90 patients (mean age, 61.1 ± 19.7 years) were included. Traumatic and non-traumatic corneal perforations occurred in 40 (44.4%) and 50 eyes (55.6%), respectively. Among non-traumatic causes, infection and autoimmune disease were the causes for corneal perforation in 18 (20.0%) and 12 eyes (13.3%), respectively. The success rate for the closure of the perforated site with the initial procedure was significantly higher in traumatic corneal perforations than in non-traumatic corneal perforations (90.0% and 72.2%, respectively; p = 0.038). Patients with traumatic corneal perforation had significantly better final BCVA than those with non-traumatic corneal perforation (0.71 ± 1.18 and 1.52 ± 1.12, respectively; p = 0.0016). On multivariate analysis, older age and non-traumatic corneal perforation were significantly related to the final lower BCVA (p < 0.001 and p = 0.029, respectively). CONCLUSION: Traumatic corneal perforation demonstrated a significantly better prognosis than non-traumatic corneal perforation. It is critical to consider the primary cause of corneal perforation to anticipate prognosis.

[Endovascular Treatment for Carotid Blowout Syndrome after Radiation for Esophageal Cancer:A Case Report].

Here, we discuss a case of carotid blowout syndrome successfully treated with endovascular parent artery occlusion. A 71-year-old woman underwent treatment for esophageal cancer resection, followed by 50-Gy radiotherapy, 19 years prior. Due to local recurrence, she underwent 66- and 72-Gy radiation treatments at 2 and 4 years after the initial treatment, respectively. Afterward, tracheostomy and enterostomy were performed. This time, she was transported to our emergency department because of acute eruptive bleeding from the tracheal tube. As her vitals indicated shock, emergency endovascular treatment was performed. Digital subtraction angiography revealed that the common carotid artery in the left-sided of the neck had a pseudoaneurysm extruding to the pharyngeal cavity, which was considered to be the lesion responsible for the acute rupture. She was diagnosed as having carotid blowout syndrome. Balloon test occlusion showed that the cross flow via the anterior and posterior communicating arteries was sufficient, so parent artery occlusion was chosen for bleeding control. Carotid bifurcation was preserved to keep the collateral circulation via the external carotid artery. The patient was discharged 22 days after treatment, without any neurological deficits. Although injured vessel removal with high-flow bypass was an ideal treatment to achieve bleeding control without ischemic complication, endovascular treatment can be an efficient second-best treatment. To minimize the risk of late ischemic complications, flow preservation via carotid bifurcation might be important.

Severe fishhook-related ocular injury: A case series.

This study examined the treatment, clinical course, and prognosis of two patients who visited our institution with severe ocular fishhook-related injuries with complications. The first patient was a 57-year-old man injured in the right eye by a fishhook lacerating the right upper eyelid. Although no aqueous humor leakage was observed, intraocular hemorrhage was severe, and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was "counting fingers" at 15 cm. The eyelid was sutured and vitreous surgery with cataract surgery was performed for traumatic cataract, vitreous hemorrhage, and retinal detachment. The patient experienced recurring iritis and the BCVA recovered to 20/100 eight months postoperatively. The second patient was a 62-year-old man who incurred a penetrating right-eye fishhook injury on a ship with BCVA of "hand motion." The sclera and iris were ruptured with severe hemorrhage and a shallow anterior chamber without leakage of aqueous humor. A damaged lens and vitreous hemorrhage were observed with intraocular pressure of 38 mmHg. The ruptured sclera was sutured and vitreous surgery with lensectomy was performed. After 16 months, the BCVA improved to 20/40; however, glaucoma control was maintained by topical medication. Therefore, ocular fishhook-related injury could result in irreversible visual impairment. It is important to pay attention and protect the eyes from moving fishhooks during fishing. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: There are few reports on fishhook injury of the eye with resulting complications such as retinal detachment. We present the characteristics of the injury, treatment, clinical course, and prognosis of two patients with severe fishhook-related injuries of the eye with complications. Following treatment, most complications, including vitreous hemorrhage, detached lens, and retinal detachment, safely resolved in these cases; however, both patients required further treatment for recurring inflammation of the iris or glaucoma. The visual acuity of both patients improved over several months. Fishhook-related injuries of the eyes might result in irreversible visual impairment. It is important to pay attention and protect the eyes from moving fishhooks during fishing.