Current topics in angiotensin II type 1 receptor research: Focus on inverse agonism, receptor dimerization and biased agonism.

Although the octapeptide hormone angiotensin II (Ang II) regulates cardiovascular and renal homeostasis through the Ang II type 1 receptor (AT1R), overstimulation of AT1R causes various human diseases, such as hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy. Therefore, AT1R blockers (ARBs) have been widely used as therapeutic drugs for these diseases. Recent basic research and clinical studies have resulted in the discovery of interesting phenomena associated with AT1R function. For example, ligand-independent activation of AT1R by mechanical stress and agonistic autoantibodies, as well as via receptor mutations, has been shown to decrease the inverse agonistic efficacy of ARBs, though the molecular mechanisms of such phenomena had remained elusive until recently. Furthermore, although AT1R is believed to exist as a monomer, recent studies have demonstrated that AT1R can homodimerize and heterodimerize with other G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR), altering the receptor signaling properties. Therefore, formation of both AT1R homodimers and AT1R-GPCR heterodimer may be involved in the pathogenesis of human disease states, such as atherosclerosis and preeclampsia. Finally, biased AT1R ligands that can preferentially activate the ß-arrestin-mediated signaling pathway have been discovered. Such ß-arrestin-biased AT1R ligands may be better therapeutic drugs for cardiovascular diseases. New findings on AT1R described herein could provide a conceptual framework for application of ARBs in the treatment of diseases, as well as for novel drug development. Since AT1R is an extensively studied member of the GPCR superfamily encoded in the human genome, this review is relevant for understanding the functions of other members of this superfamily.

Structure-Function Basis of Attenuated Inverse Agonism of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers for Active-State Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor.

Ligand-independent signaling by the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) can be activated in clinical settings by mechanical stretch and autoantibodies as well as receptor mutations. Transition of the AT1R to the activated state is known to lower inverse agonistic efficacy of clinically used AT1R blockers (ARBs). The structure-function basis for reduced efficacy of inverse agonists is a fundamental aspect that has been understudied not only in relation to the AT1R but also regarding other homologous receptors. Here, we demonstrate that the active-state transition in the AT1R indeed attenuates an inverse agonistic effect of four biphenyl-tetrazole ARBs through changes in specific ligand-receptor interactions. In the ground state, tight interactions of four ARBs with a set of residues (Ser109(TM3), Phe182(ECL2), Gln257(TM6), Tyr292(TM7), and Asn295(TM7)) results in potent inverse agonism. In the activated state, the ARB-AT1R interactions shift to a different set of residues (Val108(TM3), Ser109(TM3), Ala163(TM4), Phe182(ECL2), Lys199(TM5), Tyr292(TM7), and Asn295(TM7)), resulting in attenuated inverse agonism. Interestingly, V108I, A163T, N295A, and F182A mutations in the activated state of the AT1R shift the functional response to the ARB binding toward agonism, but in the ground state the same mutations cause inverse agonism. Our data show that the second extracellular loop is an important regulator of the functional states of the AT1R. Our findings suggest that the quest for discovering novel ARBs, and improving current ARBs, fundamentally depends on the knowledge of the unique sets of residues that mediate inverse agonistic potency in the two states of the AT1R.

The non-biphenyl-tetrazole angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist eprosartan is a unique and robust inverse agonist of the active state of the AT1 receptor.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conditions such as hypertension and renal allograft rejection are accompanied by chronic, agonist-independent, signalling by angiotensin II AT1 receptors. The current treatment paradigm for these diseases entails the preferred use of inverse agonist AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs). However, variability in the inverse agonist activities of common biphenyl-tetrazole ARBs for the active state of AT1 receptors often leads to treatment failure. Therefore, characterization of robust inverse agonist ARBs for the active state of AT1 receptors is necessary. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: To identify the robust inverse agonist for active state of AT1 receptors and its molecular mechanism, we performed site-directed mutagenesis, competition binding assay, inositol phosphate production assay and molecular modelling for both ground-state wild-type AT1 receptors and active-state N111G mutant AT1 receptors. KEY RESULTS: Although candesartan and telmisartan exhibited weaker inverse agonist activity for N111G- compared with WT-AT1 receptors, only eprosartan exhibited robust inverse agonist activity for both N111G- and WT- AT1 receptors. Specific ligand-receptor contacts for candesartan and telmisartan are altered in the active-state N111G- AT1 receptors compared with the ground-state WT-AT1 receptors, suggesting an explanation of their attenuated inverse agonist activity for the active state of AT1 receptors. In contrast, interactions between eprosartan and N111G-AT1 receptors were not significantly altered, and the inverse agonist activity of eprosartan was robust. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Eprosartan may be a better therapeutic option than other ARBs. Comparative studies investigating eprosartan and other ARBs for the treatment of diseases caused by chronic, agonist-independent, AT1 receptor activation are warranted.

Activation of G-protein-coupled receptors: a common molecular mechanism.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of proteins that contain a seven transmembrane helical structural motif. They mediate responses to several ligands by binding and activating intracellular heterotrimeric G proteins. Since the cloning of the first GPCR, insights gained from structure-function studies, genetics and drug development have contributed to uncovering a common mechanism that explains the activation of diverse GPCRs by their cognate agonists. This mechanism takes into consideration the conservation of the structure-function relationship in the basic seven transmembrane structural motif, and the dynamic changes in receptor conformation that are associated with activation. Combining models derived from the X-ray structure of rhodopsin with structure-function data allows a deeper understanding of the activation mechanism of GPCRs.

Angiotensinergic stimulation of vascular endothelium in mice causes hypotension, bradycardia, and attenuated angiotensin response.

It is not clear whether endothelial cell (EC) activation by the hormone angiotensin II (Ang II) modulates contraction of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in the vasculature and whether impairment of this regulation in vivo contributes to hypertension. Delineation of the actions of Ang II through the type 1 receptor (AT1R) on ECs in the blood vessels has been a challenging problem because of the predominance of the AT1R functions in VSMCs that lie underneath the endothelium. We have obviated this limitation by generating transgenic (TG) mice engineered to target expression of the constitutively active N111G mutant AT1R only in ECs. In these TG mice, the enhanced angiotensinergic signal in ECs without infusion of Ang II resulted in hypotension and bradycardia. The pressor response to acute infusion of Ang II was significantly reduced. Increased expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and production of hypotensive mediators, nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate, cause these phenotypes. Hypotension and bradycardia observed in the TG mice could be rescued by treatment with an AT1R-selective antagonist. Our results imply that the Ang II action by means of EC-AT1R is antagonistic to vasoconstriction in general, and it may moderate the magnitude of functional response to Ang II in VSMCs. This control mechanism in vivo most likely is a determinant of altered hemodynamic regulation involved in endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive cardiovascular disease.

"Network leaning" as a mechanism of insurmountable antagonism of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor by non-peptide antagonists.

A mechanistic understanding of the insurmountable antagonism of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor could be fundamental in the quest for discovery and improvement of drugs. Candesartan and EXP3174 are competitive, reversible insurmountable antagonists of the AT(1) receptor. They contain di-acidic substitutions, whereas the surmountable antagonist, losartan, contains only one acidic group. We tested the hypothesis that these two classes of ligands interact with the AT(1) receptor through similar but not identical bonds and that the differences in the acid-base group contacts are critical for insurmountable antagonism. By pharmacological characterization of site-directed AT(1) receptor mutants expressed in COS1 cells we show that specific interactions with Gln(257) in transmembrane 6 distinguishes insurmountable antagonists and that abolishing these interactions transforms insurmountable to surmountable antagonism. In the Q257A mutant, the dissociation rate of [(3)H]candesartan is 2.8-fold more than the rate observed with wild type, and the association rate was reduced 4-fold lower than the wild type. The pattern of antagonism of angiotensin II concentration-response in the Q257A mutant pretreated with EXP3174 and candesartan is surmountable. We propose that leaning ability of insurmountable antagonists on Gln(257) in the wild-type receptor is the basis of an antagonist-mediated conformational transition, which is responsible for both slow dissociation and inhibition of maximal IP response.

Adenosine activates aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase activity in the kidney and increases dopamine.

Renal sodium handling is important for regulating BP, and renal dopamine and adenosine play an important role in renal sodium handling, however the interaction of these hormones in the kidney was not clarified. In in vivo experiments, adenosine significantly increased water and sodium excretion by 50% compared with vehicle when infused into the left renal artery, accompanied by an increase in urinary dopamine excretion in the left kidney. Neither water-sodium excretion nor dopamine excretion changed in the vehicle-infused kidney. Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase activity in the left kidney was significantly higher than that in the noninfused right kidney. The increase in water-sodium excretion induced by adenosine was significantly inhibited by SCH23390, a selective D1 receptor antagonist. In in vitro experiments, porcine renal proximal tubular cells were incubated with 250 microM L-dopa and N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine, an adenosine type 1 receptor agonist, after treatment with adenosine deaminase. N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine significantly increased dopamine formation at a concentration of 10(-9) to 10(-7) M, and this was completely inhibited by 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthin, an adenosine A1 antagonist. These results show that renal dopamine synthesis is stimulated by adenosine through the activation of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase and suggest that adenosine leads to an increase in renal dopamine and natriuresis.