Intra-abdominal Abscess After Appendectomy-Are Drains Necessary in All Patients?

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that patients who develop a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess (PIAA) after appendectomy have a greater number of health care visits with drain placement. Our institution developed an algorithm to limit drain placement for only abscesses with a size >20 cm2. We sought to determine the adherence to and effectiveness of this algorithm. METHODS: This prospective observational study included patients aged 2-18 y old who developed a PIAA from September 2017 to June 2019. Outcomes were compared between patients with a small or large abscess. Analysis was performed in STATA; P < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. The median age was 10.6 y (7, 11.7); 60% were men, and 60% were Caucasian. The median duration of symptoms before diagnosis of appendicitis was 3 d (2, 6). Thirteen patients (43%) were diagnosed with a PIAA while still inpatient, and 17 (57%) were readmitted at a later date. After algorithm implementation, 95% (n = 19) of patients with a large abscess had aspiration ± drain placement, whereas 30% (n = 3) with a small abscess underwent drainage. Length of stay after abscess diagnosis, total duration of antibiotics, and number of health care visits were the same between groups. One patient with a small abscess required reoperation for an obstruction, whereas one patient with a large abscess that was drained was readmitted for a recurrent abscess. CONCLUSIONS: Small PIAA can be successfully managed without intervention. Our proposed algorithm can assist in determining which patients can be treated with antibiotics alone.

Impact of an institution-designed algorithm for the management of dislodged gastrostomy tubes.

BACKGROUND: Gastrostomy tube (GT) dislodgement is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits. We aim to assess the efficacy of our institution's algorithm in reducing surgical consultation and GT contrast studies for replacement of dislodged GT and to examine the need for operation before and after algorithm implementation. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed between March 2017-February 2018 (prealgorithm) and March 2018-December 2018 (postalgorithm) for patients <18 years presenting to the ED with GT dislodgement. Demographics and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 433 visits among 279 patients were included, 200 (46.2%) pre and 233 (53.8%) postalgorithm implementation. Median ED LOS was 2.1 h (IQR 1.4, 3.0). Surgery was consulted in 92 visits (21.3%) and a contrast study obtained in 287 (66.3%). The GT was replaced by ED providers in 363 visits (83.8%) and by surgery in 70 (16.2%). Surgical consultation increased postalgorithm (16.5% vs. 25.3%; p = 0.03). Six (1.4%) patients required reoperation, with 5 occurring postalgorithm, p = 0.22. For GTs placed < 8 weeks prior to the dislodgment, there were no differences in surgical consultations, contrast studies performed, or need for reoperation pre and postalgorithm. CONCLUSION: An algorithm for replacement of dislodged GT is usable, effective, and increased surgical team involvement without significant changes in patient outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.