Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci ; 22(3): 531-536, 2024 Aug 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39069693

RESUMEN

Objective: : To investigate the effectiveness and safety of brexpiprazole as an adjunctive treatment to antidepressant therapy (ADT) in Asian adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and inadequate response in a real-life clinical setting in Singapore. Methods: : This was a prospective, observational 3-month study of patients with MDD who had brexpiprazole added to their existing ADT. The study was conducted at two sites in Singapore between September 2020 and October 2021. The co-primary endpoints were Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S). Other endpoints included Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), and safety. Results: : Twenty patients were enrolled and 16 completed the study. There were improvements in PHQ-9, CGI-S, SDS, and GAD-7 scores from baseline at Week 12, with a mean difference of -4.8, -1.3, -8.5, and -6.2, respectively. The CGI-I score improved from baseline with a mean score of 2.3 at Week 12. One third achieved response and 25% achieved remission based on PHQ-9 scores at Week 12. Similar results were obtained using CGI-S scores (38% for both). The incidences of adverse events (AEs) and treatment-related AEs were 55% (11/20) and 50% (10/20), respectively. There were no deaths or severe AEs. Two patients withdrew brexpiprazole during the study. Conclusion: : The observed effects and safety of adjunctive brexpiprazole in Asian adults with MDD in the real-world setting in Singapore were consistent with those from clinical trials.

2.
BMJ Open ; 11(11): e051895, 2021 11 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34848518

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To measure the psychological well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs) during this COVID-19 pandemic and examine the experiences of the subgroup of participants who were also HCWs during the 2003 SARS epidemic. DESIGN: Anonymous online survey adapted from a similar study conducted during the SARS epidemic, disseminated from July 2020 to August 2020. SETTING: Nine healthcare institutions across Singapore ranging from primary care, community care, tertiary care and specialised referral centres. PARTICIPANTS: Employees working in the participating healthcare institutions. RESULTS: Of 3828 survey returns, 3616 had at least one completed item on the questionnaire. Majority were female (74.7%), nurses (51.7%), foreign-born (53.2%) and not working in the tertiary care setting (52.1%). The median score on the Impact of Events Scale (IES) was 15 (IQR 23) and 28.2% of the sample scored in the moderate/severe range. 22.7% of the participants were also HCWs during SARS and more than half of them felt safer and better equipped in the current pandemic. 25.2% of SARS HCWs and 25.9% of non-SARS HCWs had moderate/severe IES scores (p=0.904). After adjusting for age, marital status, parity and length of work experience, racial minority groups and living apart from family were independent predictors of high IES regardless of prior SARS epidemic experience. Daily exposure to confirmed or suspect COVID-19 cases increased the odds of high IES for non-SARS HCWs only. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Overall, while 28% of HCWs in our study suffered from significant trauma-related psychological symptoms regardless of prior experience with the SARS epidemic, those with prior experience reported feeling safer and better equipped, finding the workload easier to manage, as well as having more confidence in their healthcare leaders. We recommend for more trauma-informed support strategies for our HCWs especially those from racial minority groups, who are foreign-born and isolated from their families.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Recursos Humanos
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32916996

RESUMEN

This study aimed to explore changes in psychological responses (perceived stress, traumatic stress, stigma, coping) over time in residents, as well as their predictors. The level of perceived stress, traumatic stress, stigma, and coping responses were assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale, Impact of Event-Revised, Healthcare Workers Stigma Scale, and Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE) Inventory, respectively. We collected responses from 274 residents at baseline and 221 residents at 3 months follow-up (timepoint 2) from the National Healthcare Group (NHG) residency programs in Singapore. All residents reported lower perceived stress and lower perceived stigma compared to baseline. Use of avoidance coping was associated with all three psychological responses (perceived stress, traumatic stress, and stigma) across the two timepoints. Compared to baseline, specific factors associated with perceived stress and traumatic stress at timepoint 2 were living alone, less problem solving, and seeking social support. Residency programs should encourage active coping strategies (e.g., seeking social support, positive thinking, problem solving) among residents, and proactively identify residents who may be at higher risk of psychological sequelae due to circumstances that contribute to isolation.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Infecciones por Coronavirus/psicología , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/psicología , Neumonía Viral/psicología , Estigma Social , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Adulto , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapur , Estrés Psicológico/etnología
5.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 32(4): 446.e9-446.e10, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20633754

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Psoriasis is a commonly diagnosed skin disorder that requires a long-term management and can have a profound impact on the quality of life of patients. Drugs that have been associated with the precipitation or exacerbation of psoriasis include lithium, beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agents and antimalarials. Despite extensive use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in clinical practice, there have been very few reports of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-related psoriasis. The main purpose of this study was to report fluoxetine-induced psoriasis in two Chinese women. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Although both patients had been taking fluoxetine for an extended period of time, the time scale of these two case studies suggests that fluoxetine played a causative role in these patients' psoriasis.


Asunto(s)
Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Psoriasis/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Fluoxetina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Trastornos del Humor/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA