Postoperative Bisphosphonates Use is Associated with Reduced Adverse Outcomes After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty of Hip and Knee: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

Bisphosphonates have been associated with a decreased risk of revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty of the hip or knee (TJA) because of their effects on decreased periprosthetic bone loss and prosthetic migration. However, the results in the early literature are inconsistent, and the influence of bisphosphonates on associated complications and subsequent TJA remains unknown. This study investigated the association between the use of bisphosphonates and the risk of adverse outcomes after primary TJA. This matched cohort study utilized the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan to identify patients who underwent primary TJA over a 15-year period (January 2000-December 2015 inclusive). Study participants were further categorized into two groups, bisphosphonate users and nonusers, using propensity score matching. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of revision surgery, adverse outcomes of primary surgery and subsequent TJA were calculated using Cox regression analysis. This study analyzed data from 6485 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 20,920 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risk of revision hip and knee arthroplasty was significantly lower in the bisphosphonate users than in the nonusers (aHR, 0.54 and 0.53, respectively). Furthermore, the risk of a subsequent total joint arthroplasty, adverse events and all-cause mortality were also significantly reduced in the bisphosphonate users. This study, involving a large cohort of patients who underwent primary arthroplasties, revealed that bisphosphonate treatment may potentially reduce the risk of revision surgery and associated adverse outcomes. Furthermore, the use of bisphosphonates after TJA is also associated with a reduced need for subsequent arthroplasty.Research Registration Unique Identifying Number (UIN): ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier-NCT05623540 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05623540 ).

Optimal reimplantation timing in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: an observative cohort study in Asian population.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing for reimplantation for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has not been established and varies from a few weeks to several months. The aim of this study was to assess the commendable time between implant removal and reimplantation in patients who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 361 patients who were treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee chronic PJI at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, surgical variables, microbiology data, and time to reimplantation were recorded. All patients were followed for a minimum of one year. Treatment failure was defined by Delphi criteria. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate survival rates and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of treatment failure. RESULTS: In final analysis, 27 (7.5%) had treatment failure. Factors related to treatment failure including interim spacer exchange (OR, 3.13; confidence interval (CI), 1.04-9.09, p = 0.036), higher ESR level at reimplantation (OR, 1.85; CI, 1.05-3.57; p = 0.04), and time to reimplantation (OR, 1.00; CI, 1.003-1.005, p = 0.04). Performing revision arthroplasty surgery from 16 to 20 weeks had highest successful rate. The reimplantation over 24 weeks had a lower successful rate. However, no statistical significance in comparing each interval group. CONCLUSION: Our study emphasized the importance of timely reimplantation in achieving successful outcomes. Factors such as ESR levels, spacer exchange, and the duration of time to reimplantation influenced the likelihood of treatment failure in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee PJI.

Worse Outcomes Are Associated With Proximal Femoral Replacement Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral replacements (PFRs) are often used in the setting of severe bone loss. As osteolysis has become less common, PFR may be used to address other causes of bone loss such as infection or periprosthetic fracture. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of PFR for non-neoplastic conditions. METHODS: A retrospective review of 46 patients undergoing PFR at a single institution was performed. The electronic records were reviewed to extract relevant information including the reason for use of PFR, surgical variables, follow-up, and complications. Survivorship curves were generated and differences in survivorship were evaluated using the log-rank test. Radiographic evaluation was also performed. RESULTS: Using revision as an endpoint, the Kaplan-Meier analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated a survival rate of 74% at 1 year and 67% at 5 years. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection demonstrated the lowest survivorship with a failure rate of 47%. Furthermore, a high dislocation rate at 17.4% (n = 8) was observed. The use of dual-mobility articulation was effective in reducing dislocation. CONCLUSION: PFR is a valuable reconstructive option for patients with massive proximal femoral bone loss. This study demonstrates that patients with periprosthetic joint infection who undergo PFR reconstruction are at very high risk of subsequent failure, most commonly from reinfection and instability. The use of a dual-mobility articulation in association with PFR appears to help mitigate risk of subsequent dislocation.

Interim Spacer Exchange for Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Almost Half the Patients Subsequently Fail.

BACKGROUND: Interim spacer exchange may be performed in patients undergoing 2-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection. Several studies have demonstrated that interim spacer exchange is associated with poor outcomes. This study investigated the survivorship and risk factors for failure in patients with an interim spacer exchange. METHODS: Two institutional databases identified 182 patients who underwent spacer exchange from 2000 to 2017. Primary outcomes included progression to reimplantation, treatment success, and mortality. Bivariate analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors associated with failure. Kaplan-Meier curves using host and local grades were generated to evaluate for primary outcomes and differences in survivorship. RESULTS: The overall failure rate was 49% in patients with a spacer exchange. Most patients (60%) failed before 2 years. Higher comorbidity scores, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and non-White race were more prevalent in patients who failed. Negative cultures at the time of exchange were more prevalent in patients who did not fail. Failure rate was higher in immunocompromised conditions, and those who had revision prior to exchange. After considering clinically relevant variables, advanced host grade C was the single factor associated with treatment failure. Although survivorship curves were not significantly different between extremity local grades, higher host grades were associated with treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Almost 1 out of 2 patients with spacer exchange were found to fail the intended 2-stage revision arthroplasty. Benefits of delivering additional antibiotic load with a new spacer should be balanced against poor outcomes in patients with the aforementioned risk factors.

Which Minor Criteria is the Most Accurate Predictor for the Diagnosis of Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection in the Asian Population?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of minor criteria from the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) for the diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in an Asian population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 76 patients who underwent a revision knee or hip arthroplasty at an academic institution between September 2018 and December 2019. All major and minor 2018 ICM criteria were available for all patients included. Cases with at least 1 major criterion or score ≥6 in minor criteria were considered as infected. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by a receiver operative characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC) for each minor criterion. An AUC value of more than 0.9 was considered outstanding and 0.8-0.9 as excellent. RESULTS: When using 2018 ICM threshold, the diagnostic performance ranked based on AUC was the following: alpha defensin (0.92), positive histology (0.83), leukocyte esterase (0.82), synovial white blood cell (0.81), serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (0.78), synovial polymorphonuclear neutrophils (0.77), serum C-reactive protein (0.74), D-dimer (0.59), single positive culture (0.53), and positive intraoperative purulence (0.51). Alpha defensin was considered as an outstanding test among the 2018 ICM minor criteria. Positive histology, leukocyte esterase, and synovial white blood cell were considered as excellent tests. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, alpha-defensin has the best diagnostic performance in Asian population among the minor criteria of 2018 ICM.

Drug-induced psoriasiform alopecia associated with interleukin-17 inhibitor therapy.

Drug-induced psoriasiform alopecia is an increasingly recognized form of alopecia mostly reported in association with TNF-alpha inhibitors. However, drug-induced psoriasiform alopecia in association with IL-17A inhibitors has not been described. We present a 62-year-old woman with severe psoriasis who developed new psoriatic plaques on the scalp with alopecia after initiating ixekizumab (anti-IL-17A). Scalp biopsy specimens revealed a non-cicatricial alopecia with increased telogen/catagen follicles, atrophy of the sebaceous glands, peribulbar and perifollicular inflammation with frequent lymphocytes, plasma cells, eosinophils, psoriasiform dermatitis, and lack of intra-corneal or intra-epidermal neutrophils. Overall, the clinical and histopathologic findings were most compatible with a drug-induced psoriasiform alopecia in association with IL-17A inhibitor therapy. Our case shows that drug-induced psoriasiform alopecia can paradoxically occur in patients on IL-17A inhibitor therapy and contributes to the growing list of cutaneous eruptions associated with biologic agents.

High incidence of adnexotropism in cytotoxic cutaneous lymphomas.

BACKGROUND: Primary cutaneous gamma-delta T-cell lymphoma (PCγδTCL) and primary cutaneous aggressive epidermotropic T-cell lymphomas (PCAETCL) are rare aggressive cytotoxic cutaneous lymphomas (CyCL) often difficult to diagnose. Histopathologically, PCAETCL and PCγδTCL may resemble mycosis fungoides (MF) and the presence of adnexotropism in CyCL (CyCL) contributes to this diagnostic challenge, especially in the setting of atypical and double-negative phenotypes. METHODS: In this retrospective study clinical data and histopathological section of 91 patients were analyzed for signs of clinical and histopathological signs adnexotropism. RESULTS: Adnexotropism was identified in 48.4% (44/91) of cases, including PCAETCL (40.9%, 18/44), PCγδTCL and cytotoxic cutaneous lymphomas, not otherwise specified (CyCTCL, NOS) (43.2%, 19/44 and 15.9%, 7/44). Comparison between disease-related mortality with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of non-adnexotropic vs adnexotropic CyCL did not show any significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.8). Clinically they present with patches, plaques, and tumors and commonly with ulceration, but follicular prominence or alopecia are rare. Clinical signs of adnexotropism such as alopecia and hypo- or anhidrosis were rarely seen. CONCLUSION: Adnexotropism is a common finding in CyCL, especially in PCAETCL. Adnexotropic CyCL may be histopathologically difficult to distinguish from folliculotropic mycosis fungoides. A comprehensive IHC panel should be routinely performed in such cases.

Vulvar Elastosis: A Novel Diagnostic Entity.

ABSTRACT: In vulvar biopsies, we have observed histopathologic abnormalities of elastic fibers identical to solar elastosis, with thick, curled, and irregular pale grey fibers in the dermis. In severe cases, changes resemble nodular solar elastosis. We retrospectively evaluated 238 vulvar biopsies with the goal of defining and characterizing changes of vulvar elastosis. Of 238 vulvar biopsies reviewed, 107 (45%) exhibited vulvar elastosis. Patients with vulvar elastosis were older (mean = 65 years old) compared to those without (mean = 44 years old). Sixty-six (62%) were graded as mild, 27 (25%) moderate, and 14 (13%) severe. Vulvar elastosis was significantly more common in women ≥45 years old (P-value < 0.001). There was moderate correlation between age and severity (correlation coefficient = 0.55, P-value < 0.001). Vulvar elastosis was observed in a variety of inflammatory and non-inflammatory pathologies. In 5 cases, the sole pathology was vulvar elastosis presenting clinically as either a pruritic or painful white to white-yellow papule or plaque, or vulvar pain or burning without a clinical lesion. Vulvar elastosis is a novel diagnostic entity occurring in a sun-protected site and its pathogenesis may be a degenerative phenomenon possibly related to advancing age and/or hormonal changes.

Association of Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusion With Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Prior registry data suggest that perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion may increase the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients status post surgery. However, there are limited data that explore VTE risk after perioperative transfusion in the setting of primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Our aim is to investigate the association between perioperative RBC transfusion and the development of symptomatic VTE after adjusting for confounding variables. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing primary TJA at a single institution from 2001 to 2016. The primary outcome was development of symptomatic VTE (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) up to 90 days following primary TJA. To identify the association between RBC transfusion and development of VTE, univariate and multivariate analyses were used, as well as a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching based on patient comorbidities. RESULTS: Of the 29,003 patients who underwent TJA, 2500 (8.62%) received RBC transfusion perioperatively and 302 (1.04%) developed a postoperative VTE within 90 days of surgery. While univariate analysis did suggest a slightly increased incidence of VTE in association with RBC transfusion (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-2.16), this difference was eliminated when multivariate analysis (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.12-1.39) and propensity score matching (propensity-matched OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8) were employed. CONCLUSION: Perioperative RBC transfusion does not significantly increase the incidence of symptomatic VTE following primary TJA in the 90-day postoperative period after adjustment for host VTE risk scores and other confounding variables. Perioperative RBC transfusion may be safely administered if indicated following total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Direct Anterior Approach to the Hip Does Not Increase the Risk for Subsequent Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest an increased risk for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) utilizing the direct anterior (DA) approach to the hip. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether such an increased risk does indeed exist on a large cohort of patients, operated by experienced surgeons and taking into account various confounders. METHODS: This was a single institutional study, including all patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty during the last decade, who were operated on by four high-volume arthroplasty surgeons utilizing a single surgical approach. Three of them utilized the direct lateral (DL) approach while one of them used the DA approach throughout the entire study. Patient characteristics, demographics, and comorbidities were assessed as well as operative and perioperative factors and their association with PJI. Association between surgical approach and PJI was evaluated in a univariate followed by a multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 10,201 patients were included in the study. Of those, 4390 (43.0%) underwent total hip arthroplasty through the DA approach and 5811 (57.0%) through the DL approach. PJI rates were 0.9% (38/4390) in the DA group compared with 1.3% (73/5811) in the DL group (P = .068). Results from a regression analysis showed no significant association between PJI and DA approach (adjusted odds ratio 0.760, 95% confidence interval 0.428-1.348, P = .348). The risk remained nonsignificant in patients with higher body mass index. There were also no significant differences in the infecting organisms between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The DA approach to the hip does not increase the risk for subsequent PJI.

Effectiveness of Different Wound Dressings in the Reduction of Blisters and Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal type of dressing in the setting of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains uncertain. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare various wound dressings and identify the optimal type of dressings for blister reduction and prevention of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients after TJA. METHODS: Studies comparing 2 or more dressing groups after TJA (hip or knee) were systematically searched on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Two authors performed the study selection, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction. Both outcomes were assessed using odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities to determine a hierarchy of dressings. A sensitivity analysis was performed to reduce the effect of intransitivity between studies. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies, consisting of 12 dressing types in 7293 TJAs, were included in the final analysis. The highest incidence of blisters occurred when using negative-pressure wound therapy (OR 9.33, 95% CI 3.51-24.83, vs gauze). All dressings ranked better than gauze in infection rate except for hydrofiber (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.02-112.53) and fabric dressings (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.24-9.02). For blister reduction, alginate (SUCRA = 87.7%) and hydrofiber with hydrocolloid (SUCRA = 92.3%) were ranked as the optimal dressings before and after a sensitivity analysis, respectively. Antimicrobial dressing (SUCRA = 83.7%) demonstrated the most efficacy for preventing PJI. CONCLUSION: Based on the evidence from our analysis, an antimicrobial dressing is the optimal dressing to prevent PJI. If negative-pressure wound therapy is used, surgeons should be aware of an increased incidence of blister formation. Further studies should focus on the alginate versus hydrofiber and hydrocolloid dressing to determine the optimal dressing to reduce blisters.

Risk Factors and Effect of Acute Kidney Injury on Outcomes Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a potentially avoidable complication associated with negative outcomes including discharge to facilities and mortality. Few studies have identified modifiable risk factors or strategies that the surgeon may use to reduce this risk. METHODS: We identified all patients undergoing primary TJA at a single hospital from 2005 to 2017, and collected patient demographics, comorbidities, short-term outcomes, as well as perioperative laboratory results. We defined AKI as an increase in creatinine levels by 50% or 0.3 points. We compared demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes between patients who developed AKI and those who did not. Multivariate regressions identified the independent effect of AKI on outcomes. A stochastic gradient boosting model was constructed to predict AKI. RESULTS: In total, 814 (3.9%) of 20,800 patients developed AKI. AKI independently increased length of stay by 0.26 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.38, P < .001), in-hospital complication risk (odds ratio = 1.73, 95% CI 1.45-2.07, P < .001), and discharge to facility risk (odds ratio = 1.26, 95% CI 1.05-1.53, P = .012). Forty-one predictive variables were included in the predictive model, with important potentially modifiable variables including body mass index, perioperative hemoglobin levels, surgery duration, and operative fluids administered. The final predictive model demonstrated excellent performance with a c-statistic of 0.967. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that AKI has adverse effects on outcome metrics including length of stay, discharge, and complications. Although many risk factors are nonmodifiable, maintaining adequate renal perfusion through optimizing preoperative hemoglobin, sufficient fluid resuscitation, and reducing blood loss, such as through the use of tranexamic acid, may aid in mitigating this risk.

Molecular analysis of atypical deep penetrating nevus progressing to melanoma.

Deep penetrating nevi (DPN) are dermal-based, heavily pigmented melanocytic proliferations primarily resulting from mutations in B-catenin and BRAF or, less commonly, NRAS. DPNs are considered to be intermediate grade tumors which are stable with low risk of malignant transformation. The precise risk for transformation is unknown. Only rare cases of DPN progressing to melanoma have been described. We present a case of a 53-year-old female with a blue-black thigh lesion, on histopathology illustrating a melanocytic proliferation with morphology most consistent with a DPN progressing to melanoma. Targeted next generation sequencing performed on both the atypical melanocytic proliferation and melanoma components showed NRAS and CTNNB1 mutations but no evidence of TERT promoter mutation or chromosomal copy number aberrations. The melanoma had additional mutations including a hotspot TERT promoter mutation as well as unbalanced chromosomal copy number aberrations. This report details the progression of DPN to melanoma through a prominent ultraviolet signature and acquisition of genetic aberrations. While the vast majority of DPNs are benign stable nevi, there are rare examples, which may progress to melanoma. This report documents a case and shows the molecular evolution by which the tumor transformed to melanoma.

A Novel Adjunct Indicator of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Platelet Count and Mean Platelet Volume.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is difficult and often requires a combination of objective findings. The purpose of this study is to determine whether platelets, a known acute phase reactant, would be able to further aid in the diagnosis of PJI. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review study was performed on all revision total hip and knee arthroplasties done between 2000 and 2016 (n = 4939). PJI was defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria (n = 949). Platelet count and mean platelet volume were assessed from each patient's preoperative complete blood count. These values were then assessed as a ratio via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio for PJI patients was 33.45 compared to 25.68 for patients in the aseptic revision cohort (P < .001). ROC curve analysis demonstrates that a ratio of 31.70 has a sensitivity of 48.10 (95% confidence interval 44.9-51.4) and a specificity of 80.85 (95% confidence interval 79.6-82.1). This specificity was higher than that of both estimated sedimentation ratio (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for the same cohorts using optimal values determined via ROC curve analysis. When used in conjunction with ESR and CRP, there was a statistically significant increase in the diagnostic performance of the model used to assess PJI relative to the model that just employed ESR and CRP (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that platelets and their associated serum biomarkers are associated with PJI and warrant consideration in patients who are being evaluated for potential PJI.

Reporting Outcomes of Treatment for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Knee and Hip Together With a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up is Reliable.

BACKGROUND: Although there is an increasing trend toward reporting the outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty separately, it remains unknown whether joint-specific reporting is necessary for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) as sample sizes are already low, given its relatively rare occurrence. The aim of this study is to compare treatment outcomes of PJI occurring after knee and hip arthroplasty. Furthermore, we aim to establish the necessary follow-up time for an accurate reporting of PJI treatment outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study of 792 cases of hip and knee PJI treated with irrigation and debridement or two-stage exchange arthroplasty from 2000 to 2017 was performed. Treatment failure was defined based on the Delphi method-based criteria. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were generated, and a log-rank test was used to evaluate differences in survivorship. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and a sensitivity analysis using propensity matching were performed. A two-piecewise linear regression model was used to examine the threshold effect of time after treatment on survival rates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between hip and knee PJIs in overall survivorship (P = .71), or when stratified by irrigation and debridement (P = .39), or two-stage exchange arthroplasty (P = .59). There was also no difference by joint in the multivariate or sensitivity analysis. Survival rates had the most dramatic rates of decrease in the initial months after treatment of PJI but began to plateau after 1.09 years. CONCLUSION: This study reveals no difference in treatment outcomes between knee and hip PJIs. In addition, given the difficulty with obtaining follow-up, we suggest that one-year follow-up is sufficient for an accurate reporting of treatment failure.

Comparison of Postoperative Complications and Survivorship of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal failure (CRF) is an established risk factor for surgical site infection (SSI) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total joint arthroplasty. However, there is limited literature comparing outcomes between patients who receive dialysis vs renal transplantation. We examined and compared clinical outcomes of patients receiving dialysis vs those who had a prior renal transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 107 patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty between 2000 and 2017, who were receiving dialysis (n = 50), or had a prior renal transplantation (n = 57). The cohorts were compared with respect to postoperative complications, including 90-day SSI, PJI, and failure resulting in revision procedure. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for complications and revision. RESULTS: A significantly higher rate of postoperative complications was seen in dialysis patients (28.0%) compared with renal transplant (7.1%). In particular, increased SSI and PJI rates were observed in dialysis group compared with the transplant cohort (18.0% vs 3.5%). In addition, increased revision rates (24.0% vs 3.5%) and decreased survivorship for the implant were observed in dialysis patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with renal transplant were less likely to require revision arthroplasty and that total knee arthroplasty (vs total hip arthroplasty) was an independent risk factor for failure in dialysis patients. CONCLUSION: This study provides further evidence that patients on dialysis who are on transplant list should await arthroplasty until transplant has taken place. In dialysis patients who are not transplant candidates, extreme care should be exercised, and additional strategies used to minimize the high complication rate that may be encountered.

Increased Postoperative Glucose Variability Is Associated With Adverse Outcome Following Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Glucose variability in the postoperative period has been associated with increased rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary arthroplasty. It is unknown how postoperative glucose control affects outcome of surgical treatment of PJI patients. We hypothesized that postoperative glucose variability adversely affects the outcome of 2-stage exchange arthroplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of 665 patients with PJI of the knee and hip who underwent 2-stage exchange arthroplasty from 2000 to 2017. Of them, 341 PJIs with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, and either a minimum of 2 glucose values per day or greater than 3 overall during the reimplantation were included. Glucose variability was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation. Adverse outcomes included treatment failure according to the Delphi consensuses criteria, reinfection, reoperation, and mortality. A subgroup analysis was performed based on patients with or without diabetes. RESULTS: Glucose variability following reimplantation was associated with higher treatment failure, reinfection, and reoperation. Adjusted analysis indicated that for every standard deviation (15%) increase in the coefficient of variation, the risks of treatment failure, reinfection, and reoperation increased by 27%, 31%, and 26%. Although stratifying patients with (n = 81) or without diabetes (n = 260), these associations remained robust in nondiabetic patients, but not in diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: Higher glucose variability is associated with increased risks of treatment failure, reinfection, and reoperation after 2-stage exchange arthroplasty in PJI patients. Compared to diabetic patients, nondiabetic patients have a higher association between glucose variability and poor outcomes. Reducing adverse outcomes may be achieved with close monitoring and strict postoperative glucose control.

Treatment Outcomes and Attrition in Gram-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: While the prevailing belief is that periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by Gram-negative (GN) organisms confers a poorer prognosis than Gram-positive (GP) cases, the current literature is sparse and inconsistent. The purpose of this study is to compare the treatment outcomes for GN PJI vs GP PJI and Gram-mixed (GM) PJI. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1189 PJI cases between 2007 and 2017 was performed using our institutional PJI database. Treatment failure defined by international consensus criteria was compared between PJI caused by GN organisms (n = 45), GP organisms (n = 663), and GM (n = 28) cases. Multivariate regression was used to predict time to failure. RESULTS: GM status, but not GN, had significantly higher rates of treatment failure compared to GP PJI (67.9% vs 33.2% failure; hazards ratio [HR] = 2.243, P = .004) in the multivariate analysis. In a subanalysis of only the 2-stage exchange procedures, both GN and GM cases were significantly less likely to reach reimplantation than GP cases (HR = .344, P < .0001; HR = .404, P = .013). CONCLUSION: Although there was no observed difference in the overall international consensus failure rates between GN (31.1% failure) and GP (33.2%) PJI cases, there was significant attrition in the 2-stage exchange GN cohort, and these patients were significantly less likely to reach reimplantation. Our findings corroborate the prevailing notion that GN PJI is associated with poorer overall outcomes vs GP PJI. These data add to the current body of literature, which may currently underestimate the overall failure rates of GN PJI treated via 2-stage exchange and fail to identify pre-reimplantation morbidity.

Is Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Improving Over Time?

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether the outcomes of treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are improving with time. This study evaluated trends in PJI treatment outcomes in the hip and knee following 2-stage exchange arthroplasty and irrigation and debridement (I&D) over the last 17 years. METHODS: We reviewed 550 two-stage exchange arthroplasties and 194 I&Ds between 2000 and 2016 at our institution. Treatment success was defined according to the Delphi consensus criteria and Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were generated. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was generated to determine time trends in the outcome of PJI treatment with the year of surgery included as both a continuous covariate (per 1-year increase) and a categorical covariate (2000-2010 or 2011-2016). RESULTS: The survivorship of I&D, 2-stage revision, and the total combined cohort were comparable between 2000-2010 and 2011-2016 groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the year of surgery was not associated with treatment failure following an I&D or 2-stage exchange arthroplasty, and neither did it increase the risk of non-reimplantation. When year of surgery was considered as a categorical variable, there remained no significant difference in treatment failure following an I&D or 2-stage exchange arthroplasty between the 2000-2010 cohort and 2011-2016 cohort. CONCLUSION: Despite the increasing clinical focus, research advances, and growing literature relating to PJI, we were unable to detect any substantial improvement in the treatment success rates of PJI at our institution over the 17 years examined in this study. Novel treatments and techniques are certainly needed as current and prior strategies remain far from optimal.

Use of Antimicrobial-Impregnated Incise Drapes to Prevent Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of 9774 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial-impregnated incise drapes are often used despite any literature that demonstrates a reduction in the rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of antimicrobial-impregnated incise drapes with nonantimicrobial-impregnated incise drapes for the prevention of PJI in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: A retrospective study of 9774 primary TJAs from 2000 to 2012 was performed. Patients who received an antimicrobial-impregnated incise drape (n = 5241) were compared with patients who received a nonantimicrobial-impregnated incise drape (n = 4533). The decision to use an antimicrobial drape was based on the surgeon's discretion. Patients who developed PJI within 1 year after index surgery were identified. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching were performed to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: The overall PJI rate was 1.14% (60 of 5241) for patients who received an antimicrobial-impregnated incise drape compared with 1.26% (57 of 4533) for those with a nonantimicrobial-impregnated incise drape. There was no difference in the PJI rate between patients with an antimicrobial-impregnated incise drape and those who received nonantimicrobial-impregnated incise drape in the univariate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63-1.30), multivariate (adjusted OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.63-1.34), or propensity score matching analysis (OR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.52-1.35). CONCLUSION: Despite the increasing adoption of the use of antimicrobial-impregnated incise drapes in our institute, this study suggests that antimicrobial-impregnated incise drapes do not reduce PJI in patients undergoing primary TJAs.