Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 20(10): 43-52, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31541537

RESUMEN

Postmastectomy radiation therapy is technically difficult and can be considered one of the most complex techniques concerning patient setup reproducibility. Slight patient setup variations - particularly when high-conformal treatment techniques are used - can adversely affect the accuracy of the delivered dose and the patient outcome. This research aims to investigate the inter-fraction setup variations occurring in two different scenarios of clinical practice: at the reference and at the current patient setups, when an image-guided system is used or not used, respectively. The results were used with the secondary aim of assessing the robustness of the patient setup procedure in use. Forty eight patients treated with volumetric modulated arc and intensity modulated therapies were included in this study. EPID-based in vivo dosimetry (IVD) was performed at the reference setup concomitantly with the weekly cone beam computed tomography acquisition and during the daily current setup. Three indices were analyzed: the ratio R between the reconstructed and planned isocenter doses, γ % and the mean value of γ from a transit dosimetry based on a two-dimensional γ -analysis of the electronic portal images using 5% and 5 mm as dose difference and distance to agreement gamma criteria; they were considered in tolerance if R was within 5%, γ % > 90% and γ mean  < 0.4. One thousand and sixteen EPID-based IVD were analyzed and 6.3% resulted out of the tolerance level. Setup errors represented the main cause of this off tolerance with an occurrence rate of 72.2%. The percentage of results out of tolerance obtained at the current setup was three times greater (9.5% vs 3.1%) than the one obtained at the reference setup, indicating weaknesses in the setup procedure. This study highlights an EPID-based IVD system's utility in the radiotherapy routine as part of the patient's treatment quality controls and to optimize (or confirm) the performed setup procedures' accuracy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Dosimetría in Vivo/métodos , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Aceleradores de Partículas/instrumentación , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Errores de Configuración en Radioterapia/prevención & control , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Programas Informáticos
2.
Technol Cancer Res Treat ; 17: 1533033818803582, 2018 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30343642

RESUMEN

Acute skin toxicity observed in radiotherapy treatment of head and neck cancer is a big concern. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the feasibility of a skin dose reduction in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma without compromising the overall plan quality. This research focused on comparison of the skin dose reduction that can be obtained for the main high conformal radiotherapy delivery techniques. Sixteen cases of early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma were included in this study. For each case, a dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy, a volumetric modulated arc therapy, and a helical tomotherapy treatment plans were performed with and without the skin as a sensitive structure in the inverse plan optimization. The dosimetric results obtained for the different treatment techniques and plan optimizations were compared. Dose-volume histogram cutoff points of D95%, D98%, and the homogeneity index were used for target comparison, while Dmean and Dmax/D1cc were used for the organs at risk. The skin volume receiving 5 Gy and then 10 to 70 Gy of radiation dosage registered at step of 10 Gy and Dmean were used for the skin dose comparison. One-way analysis of variance was used to assess the dosimetric results obtained for the different types of treatment plans and techniques investigated. A total of 96 treatment plans were analyzed. When the neck skin was considered in the treatment optimization process, the skin volume that received more than 30 Gy was reduced by 3.7% for dynamic intensity modulated, 4.1% for volumetric modulated arc, and 4.3% for dynamic intensity modulated, while the target dose coverage and organs at risk dosages remained unvaried ( p > .05).


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Órganos en Riesgo , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Piel/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patología , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Traumatismos por Radiación , Radiometría , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA