Serial intravascular ultrasound evaluation of the DESolve™ novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold system.

INTRODUCTION: Bioresorbable coronary scaffolds (BRS) have been developed to increase the late safety of coronary angioplasty by providing transitory coronary support and then being fully incorporated to the vessel wall. In the present trial, we sought to evaluate the performance and changes over time in the DESolve™ novolimus-eluting BRS using serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in patients submitted to percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS: Single-center, prospective, non-randomized study involving 17 consecutive patients submitted to implantation of the DESolve™ scaffold and serial evaluated with IVUS at different time points (post procedure, 6 and 18 months). Primary endpoint included the variation in lumen, scaffold, and vessel diameter and area along the months. RESULTS: Angiographic success was achieved in all cases. Scaffold area and volume on IVUS were significantly greater at 6 months than at baseline (6.41 ± 1.35 mm2 vs. 7.35 ± 1.53 mm2 , P < 0.002; and 101.19 ± 20.9 mm3 vs. 118.51 ± 26.6 mm3 , P = 0.001). Late lumen loss was 0.22 ± 0.30 mm at 6 months and 0.33 ± 0.44 mm at 18 months. No major adverse cardiac events occurred. At late follow-up (18 months) the scaffold was not visualized by IVUS; therefore the evaluation was restricted to lumen and vessel at that time point. CONCLUSIONS: IVUS serial evaluation of the novel DESolve BRS showed an increase in the device dimensions between baseline and 6 months, with concomitant enlargement of lumen dimensions and effective suppression of neointimal proliferation. At 18 months, no footprint of the scaffold was detected and the initial lumen enlargement was sustained.

One-year results of the INSPIRE trial with the novel MGuard stent: serial analysis with QCA and IVUS.

BACKGROUND: The newly developed balloon-expandable Mguard stent system, a combination of an ultra-thin polymer mesh sleeve attached to the external surface of a BMS, was conceived to provide embolic protection during PCI of SVG and thrombus-containing lesions. Although the acute results (<30 days) have pointed to the efficacy of this novel device, few is known about its long-term performance. METHODS: The present article address the 1-year clinical results of a cohort of 30 patients enrolled in the INSPIRE trial. Inclusion critiria was de novo lesions in SVG or native vessels with angiographic evidence of instability with potential to provoke flow disturbances and/or distal embolization. The primary endpoint (incidence of MACE-composite of cardiac death, nonfatal MI, and TLR) up to 30 days of the procedure has already been published. Secondary endpoints here presented included in-stent late lumen loss (QCA), % of stent obstruction (IVUS) at 6 months and combined MACE at 1 year. QCA and IVUS were performed by independent corelabs. RESULTS: Mean population age was 63 years with 38% of diabetics. Overall, 55% presented with ACS and 57% of lesions were located in SVG. Most lesions had complex morphology including the presence of thrombus (26%) and ulceration (20%). Distal/proximal protection devices were not used. Preprocedural QCA data showed lesion length and reference vessel diameter of 12.0 ± 4.5 mm and 3.0 ± 0.5 mm. The MGuard stent was successfully delivered in all cases and final TIMI-3 was achieved in 100% with no MACE up to 30 days. At 6 months, in-stent late loss and % of stent obstruction were 1.0 ± 0.4 mm and 28.5 ± 15.6%. Up to 1 year there was no case of cardiac death, two MI (one Q-wave and one non-Q-wave) and six cases of ischemia-driven TLR. Of note, there was no case of definite/probable stent thorombosis. CONCLUSIONS: In this series of patients treated with MGuard stent, the novel device showed no midterm efficacy and safety concerns.

De-escalação de inibidores dos receptores P2Y12 após intervenção coronária percutânea / P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation after percutaneous coronary interventions

Em pacientes que apresentam síndromes coronárias agudas e são tratados com intervenção coronária percutânea, a prescrição do esquema antiplaquetário duplo, composto de ácido acetilsalicílico e um inibidor dos receptores P2Y12, é mandatória, contribuindo para a redução de eventos cardíacos maiores. No entanto, ao mesmo tempo em que previne eventos isquêmicos, essa associação pode precipitar complicações hemorrágicas maiores, o que é mais comumente observado quando são prescritos os medicamentos mais potentes, como o prasugrel ou o ticagrelor. Essas constatações levaram à procura de alternativas terapêuticas capazes de manter a proteção contra eventos isquêmicos e, ao mesmo tempo, prevenir a ocorrência de hemorragias. Uma das estratégias que está em estudo é a de-escalação dos inibidores P2Y12, que consiste no uso dos medicamentos mais potentes numa fase precoce após o procedimento, com substituição deles pelo clopidogrel, após um período de, em geral, 30 dias de evolução; outra possibilidade seria a simples redução da dose do fármaco de maior potência, algo que, até o momento, só pode ser cogitado com o prasugrel. A de-escalação pode ser feita de forma guiada, utilizando testes de mensuração objetiva da agregação plaquetária ou exames para avaliar o perfil genético dos pacientes, ou não guiada, na qual o cardiologista simplesmente faz a substituição ou redução da dose ao fim do período estipulado, sem o auxílio de exames complementares. A literatura contempla ensaios clínicos com essas duas opções de estratégia, os quais são discutidos nesta revisão. Até o momento, nenhuma diretriz médica recomenda de forma explícita o uso regular dessa alternativa terapêutica.

In patients who have acute coronary syndromes and are treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, the prescription of a dual antiplatelet regimen, consisting of acetylsalicylic acid and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is mandatory, contributing to the reduction of major cardiac events. However, while preventing ischemic events, this association may precipitate major bleeding complications, which is more commonly seen when more potent drugs, such as prasugrel or ticagrelor, are prescribed. These findings led to the search for therapeutic alternatives that could maintain the protection against ischemic events and, at the same time, prevent the occurrence of hemorrhages. One of the strategies being studied is de-escalation of P2Y12 inhibitors, which consists of the use of more potent drugs in an early phase after the procedure, replacing them with clopidogrel, after a period of, in general, 30 days of clinical course. Another possibility would be to simply reduce the dose of the most potent drug, which so far can only be considered with prasugrel. De-escalation can be done in a guided way, using objective measuring tests of platelet aggregation or exams to assess the genetic profile of patients, or unguided, in which the cardiologist simply replaces or reduces the dose at the end of the stipulated period, with no ancillary tests. The literature includes clinical trials with these two strategy options, which are discussed in this review. So far, no medical guideline explicitly recommends the regular use of this therapeutic alternative.

Ácido acetilsalicílico versus inibidores dos receptores P2Y12 para prevenção secundária em pacientes tratados por meio de intervenção coronária percutânea / Aspirin versus P2Y12 inhibitors for secondary prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention

Na atualidade, as intervenções coronárias percutâneas com implante de um stent farmacológico constituem o principal método de revascularização miocárdica em centros hospitalares terciários, independentemente da forma clínica de apresentação da doença arterial coronária. É de conhecimento geral que, para sua efetivação, há necessidade do uso de um esquema antiplaquetário duplo, constituído pela associação do ácido acetilsalicílico e um inibidor dos receptores plaquetários P2Y12, que é o cerne da prevenção das tromboses após implantes das endopróteses, sendo também indicado para prevenir a ocorrência de eventos aterotrombóticos na evolução clínica tardia, qualquer que seja o modelo de stent utilizado. Após período variável de tempo, independentemente de fatores como forma clínica de apresentação da coronariopatia e do tipo de stent implantado, esse esquema é interrompido, e, na atualidade, as principais diretrizes preconizam a suspensão do inibidor dos receptores P2Y12 e a manutenção do ácido acetilsalicílico em longo prazo como uma das principais medidas farmacológicas de prevenção secundária da aterosclerose. No entanto, recentemente, em razão de sua maior potência antiplaquetária e provável menor potencial de causar hemorragias significantes, em especial no tubo digestivo, os inibidores P2Y12 têm sido considerados alternativa válida e atraente como antiplaquetário de utilização em longo prazo, alternativa ainda não referendada pelas diretrizes. Esta revisão discute os pormenores relacionados a essa importante decisão que deve ser tomada pelo cardiologista no momento da interrupção dos diferentes esquemas antitrombóticos inicialmente utilizados após uma intervenção coronária percutânea. Em princípio, a escassez de estudos clínicos conclusivos e normativos, em especial na população tratada por meio de uma intervenção percutânea, faz com que o ácido acetilsalicílico ainda se mantenha como o único antiagregante plaquetário com indicação classe I com a finalidade de prevenção secundária da aterosclerose.

Currently, percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent implantation is the main method of myocardial revascularization in tertiary care hospitals, regardless of the clinical presentation of coronary artery disease. It is well known that to be effective, it requires the use of a dual antiplatelet therapy, which is a combination of acetylsalicylic acid and a P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibitor, which plays a key role in preventing thromboses after endoprosthesis implantation and is also indicated to prevent atherothrombotic events in the late clinical course, regardless of the stent model used. After a variable period of time, depending on some factors, such as the clinical presentation of coronary artery disease and the type of stent implanted, this therapy is discontinued, and the main current guidelines recommend interrupting the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and maintaining acetylsalicylic acid in the long term, as one of the main pharmacological measures for secondary prevention of atherosclerosis. However, recently, due to their greater antiplatelet potency and probable lower potential for significant bleeding, especially in the digestive tract, P2Y12 inhibitors have been considered a valid and attractive option as an antiplatelet agent for long-term use; but this alternative has not been endorsed by guidelines yet. This review discusses the details related to this important decision that must be made by cardiologists when discontinuing the different antithrombotic therapies initially used after percutaneous coronary intervention. In principle, the scarcity of conclusive and normative clinical studies, especially in the population treated by percutaneous intervention, means that acetylsalicylic acid is the only antiplatelet agent with class I indication for secondary prevention of atherosclerosis.

Drug-eluting stents vs bare metal stents for the treatment of large coronary vessels.

BACKGROUND: Lately drug-eluting stents (DES) have dramatically reduced restenosis rates and need for repeat revascularization in a wide subset of lesion and patients. However, their benefit for the treatment of large vessels (> 3.0 mm) has yet to be established. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether DES are superior to bare metal stents (BMS) in terms of clinical outcomes for the treatment of large coronary vessels. METHODS: This study assessed the long-term outcomes (cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, and need for repeat intervention in the treated vessel) of patients treated with either a DES (Cypher and Taxus) or a BMS of > or = 3.5 mm in diameter. A total of 250 consecutive patients who underwent DES implantation were clinically followed for 1 year and compared to 250 patients who were treated with BMS. Interventions in the setting of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction and treatment of bypass grafts were excluded. RESULTS: Cypher was the DES deployed in 70.8% of cases. Most of the enrolled patients were men (78%) with single vessel disease (65.6%). The left anterior descending artery was the culprit vessel in 34.2% of cases. Bare metal stent and DES cohorts had equivalent interpolated reference vessel diameter (3.19 +/- 0.3 mm for BMS vs 3.18 +/- 0.2 for DES; P = .1). Lesion was significantly longer in the group treated with DES (13.4 +/- 5.1 mm for BMS group vs 14.3 +/- 3.5 for DES; P = .0018). After 1 year of clinical follow-up, 95.2% of patients treated with DES and 91.2% of the patients who received BMS were free of major events (P = .2). A trend toward higher target-lesion revascularization was noticed in the group treated with BMS (4.8% vs 1.6%; P = .07). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous treatment of large coronary vessels carries a low risk of clinical events irrespective of the type of stent used.

Intervenção coronária percutânea no paciente com alto risco de hemorragia / Percutaneous coronary intervention in the patient at high risk of bleeding

Na atualidade, as intervenções coronárias percutâneas são responsáveis por mais de 80% dos procedimentos de revascularização miocárdica. Esse resultado é possível por dois grandes avanços: o desenvolvimento de stents farmacológicos eficazes e seguros, somado a uma farmacoterapia antitrombótica potente e efetiva na prevenção de eventos aterotrombóticos, a qual, em geral, deve ser mantida por cerca de 6 a 12 meses após a intervenção índice. No entanto, expressivo contingente de casos, que a literatura situa em até 20% dos pacientes tratados, apresenta risco para desenvolver hemorragias significantes, que podem ter grave impacto no prognóstico. Assim, essa população requer uma série de cuidados relacionados com a indicação, a realização e o acompanhamento tardio. O processo se inicia pela identificação dos casos mais predispostos, o que, na maior parte das situações, é simples, havendo inclusive escores de risco que auxiliam o car­ diologista. Na sequência, a indicação do procedimento deve ser feita com propriedade. Os cuidados são iniciados pela prescrição preferencial do clopidogrel ao invés dos demais inibidores da P2Y12; no momento do procedimento, sempre que viável, a opção pela via radial é vantajosa, em especial em síndromes coronárias agudas. O uso de um modelo de stent com liberação de medicamentos também é recomendado nesses casos, pois os stents contemporâneos são seguros a ponto de permitirem a abreviação com segurança do tempo de uso do esquema antiplaquetário duplo. Por fim, mais recentemente, tem sido discutida a monoterapia com inibidores do receptor P2Y12, na qual a suspensão precoce do ácido acetilsalicílico não comprometeria a segurança e, ao mesmo tempo, seria capaz de prevenir eventos hemorrágicos de vulto.

Currently, percutaneous coronary interventions account for more than 80% of myocardial revascularization procedures. This result was enabled by two major advances: the development of effective and safe drug­eluting stents, in addition to a potent and effective antithrombotic pharmacotherapy in the prevention of atherothrombotic events, which, in general, should be maintained for about 6 to 12 months after the index intervention. However, a significant number of cases (up to 20% of treated patients according to literature) are at risk for developing significant bleeding, which can have a serious impact on prognosis. Therefore, this population requires a series of care measures related to indication, performance of the procedure, and late follow­up. The process begins with the identification of the most predisposed cases, which, in most situations, is simple, and there are risk scores that help the cardiologist. Next, the indication of the procedure should be done appropriately. Care begins with the preferential prescription of clopidogrel instead of other P2Y12 inhibitors; at the time of the procedure, whenever feasible, the option for the radial access is advantageous, especially in acute coronary syndromes. The use of a drug­eluting stent is also recommended in these cases, since contemporary stents are safe enough to safely shorten the duration of use of the dual antiplatelet regimen. Finally, more recently, monotherapy with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors has been discussed, in which early withdrawal of acetylsalicylic acid would not compromise safety and, at the same time, it would be able to prevent major bleeding events.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold.

BACKGROUND:: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were developed to improve the long-term results of percutaneous coronary intervention, restoring vasomotion. OBJECTIVES:: To report very late follow-up of everolimus-eluting Absorb BVS (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, USA) in our center. METHODS:: Observational retrospective study, in a single Brazilian center, from August 2011 to October 2013, including 49 patients submitted to Absorb BVS implantation. Safety and efficacy outcomes were analyzed in the in-hospital and very late follow-up phases (> 2 years). RESULTS:: All 49 patients underwent a minimum follow-up of 2.5 years and a maximum of 4.6 years. Mean age was 56.8 ± 7.6 years, 71.4% of the patients were men, and 26.5% were diabetic. Regarding clinical presentation, the majority (94%) had stable angina or silent ischemia. Device success was achieved in 100% of cases with 96% overall procedure success rate. Major adverse cardiovascular events rate was 4% at 30 days, 8.2% at 1 year, and 12.2% at 2 years, and there were no more events until 4.6 years. There were 2 cases of thrombosis (1 subacute and 1 late). CONCLUSIONS:: In this preliminary analysis, Absorb BVS showed to be a safe and effective device in the very late follow-up. Establishing the efficacy and safety profiles of these devices in more complex scenarios is necessary. FUNDAMENTO:: Os suportes vasculares bioabsorvíveis (SVB) foram desenvolvidos com o intuito de melhorar os resultados da intervenção coronária percutânea a longo prazo, restabelecendo-se a vasomotricidade. OBJETIVOS:: Reportar o seguimento muito tardio do implante do SVB eluidor de everolimus Absorb® (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, EUA) em nosso centro. MÉTODOS:: Estudo observacional, retrospectivo, em um único centro brasileiro, que incluiu 49 pacientes submetidos ao implante do SVB Absorb® entre agosto/2011 e outubro/2013. Foram analisados os desfechos de segurança e eficácia na fase hospitalar e bastante tardia (> 2 anos). RESULTADOS:: Todos os 49 pacientes completaram um seguimento mínimo de 2,5 anos, sendo o máximo de 4,6 anos. A média de idade foi 56,8 ± 7,6 anos, sendo 71,4% da população estudada do sexo masculino e 26,5% composta por diabéticos. Considerando a apresentação clínica, a grande maioria (94%) tinha angina estável ou isquemia silenciosa. Obteve-se sucesso do dispositivo em 100% dos casos e do procedimento, em 96%. A taxa de eventos cardiovasculares maiores foi de 4% aos 30 dias, de 8,2% em 1 ano, e de 12,2% em 2 anos, sem mais eventos até 4,6 anos. Houve 2 casos de trombose (1 subaguda e 1 tardia) até o último seguimento. CONCLUSÕES:: Nesta análise preliminar, o uso do SVB Absorb® mostrou-se seguro e eficaz no seguimento bastante tardio. Faz-se necessário estabelecer o perfil de eficácia e segurança destes dispositivos em cenários de maior complexidade.

Adequação das práticas do laboratório de cateterismo durante a pandemia de COVID-19: o protocolo do Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia / Adapted Catheterization Laboratory Practices during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia Protocol

Introdução A pandemia global da doença de coronavírus 2019 (COVID-19) causada pelo novo vírus de síndrome respiratória aguda grave coronavírus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) começou em Wuhan, China, em dezembro de 2019 e afetou mais de 4,4 milhões de pessoas em todo o mundo, com 302.169 mortes até o dia 16 de maio de 2020.1 Embora os sintomas respiratórios sejam a apresentação mais comum de COVID-19, o envolvimento cardíaco é uma característica proeminente dessa doença, ocorrendo em 20% a 30% dos pacientes hospitalizados e contribuindo para 40% dos óbitos.2-4 O envolvimento cardíaco relacionado à COVID-19 tem sido documentado por elevações em biomarcadores cardíacos e frequentemente apresenta alterações no segmento ST-T no eletrocardiograma (ECG) de 12 derivações, motivo pelo qual a equipe do laboratório de cateterismo é frequentemente ativada. Além disso, as atividades do laboratório de cateterismo devem continuar no atendimento a pacientes não COVID-19 que apresentam síndrome coronariana aguda (SCA) verdadeira, infarto do miocárdio com supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (IAMCSST) e doença cardíaca isquêmica estável muito sintomática. Devido à escalada no número de casos de COVID-19 na cidade de São Paulo, epicentro da doença no Brasil, reformularam-se a logística e as práticas no laboratório de cateterismo cardíaco do Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, que entraram em vigor em abril de 2020 e continuarão durante o período da pandemia. Os objetivos são fornecer atendimento otimizado à população que necessita de procedimentos cardíacos invasivos durante a pandemia, com a proteção adequada aos profissionais de saúde (PS), pacientes e seus familiares. Os protocolos aqui descritos representam os esforços multidisciplinares e dinâmicos do Departamento de Cardiologia Invasiva do Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia validados pelo Comitê de Controle de Infecção da instituição. Essas práticas estão sujeitas a alterações em função do estado epidemiológico local, a fase da epidemia e a disponibilidade de equipamento de proteção individual (EPI). Estes protocolos podem não se aplicar a outras localidades sem casos (ou casos esporádicos) de COVID-19 ou a serviços que atendem diferentes perfis populacionais com logísticas e disponibilidade de EPI diversas.

Very long-term follow-up of strut apposition and tissue coverage with Biolimus A9 stents analyzed by optical coherence tomography.

First generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are associated with reduced in-stent restenosis but significant increased risk of very late stent thrombosis (VLST). The absence of polymer in DES systems may reduce the occurrence of VLST. Optic coherence tomography (OCT) has been used for stent analysis as a surrogate safety endpoint. This study aimed to assess the long-term follow up of strut apposition and tissue coverage of BioMatrix DES by OCT. 20 patients undergoing BioMatrix DES (n = 15) or S-Stent BMS (n = 5) implantation were followed for at least 5 years and evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and OCT. The difference between the stent types was evaluated by nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test while categorical variables were evaluated by Fisher exact test. Rates of in-stent late loss were similar between groups [0.40 (0.21;0.77) vs. 0.68 (0.66; 0.82) mm, p = 0.205, for BioMatrix and S-Stent, respectively]. The vessel, stent and lumen volumes did not differ between groups. Patients treated with BioMatrix had significantly less stent obstruction [5.6 (4.4;9.7) vs. 28.6 (24.7;29.0) %, p = 0.001]. OCT analysis of 12 stents (Biomatrix = 9 and S-Stent = 3) demonstrated 126 (8.7 %) uncovered struts in the BioMatrix group compared to 23 (4.0 %) in the S-Stent group (p = 0.297), being the majority of them well apposed (117/126 and 21/23, respectively, p = 0.292). Only 9 (0.6 %) struts in the DES and 2 (0.4 %) struts in the BMS groups were simultaneously uncovered and malapposed (p = 0.924). BioMatrix DES was associated with lower rates of in-stent obstruction, and similar percentage of neointimal coverage on struts and of complete strut apposition.

Perfil contemporâneo da intervenção coronária percutânea em octogenários / Contemporary profile of percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians

Introdução: Com o aumento da longevidade observado nas últimas décadas, as intervenções coronárias percutâneas (ICP) em octogenários são cada vez mais indicadas. Objetivo: Traçar o perfil clínico-epidemiológico-angiográfico e os principais detalhes associados à ICP dos pacientes octogenários. Métodos: Cento e cinquenta pacientes octogenários foram submetidos à ICP entre janeiro de 2015 a dezembro de 2016, no Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, correspondendo a 3,7% dos 3987 casos tratados e a 18% dos com idade >70 anos, e incluídos de forma sequencial e prospectiva. Não houve critérios de exclusão. Os resultados clínicos expostos foram restritos à fase hospitalar. Resultados: A maioria (63%) era do sexo masculino, com idade média de 86±3,9 anos (máximo de 102 anos). Do total de pacientes, 91,3% eram hipertensos, 37,4% diabéticos, a ICP prévia foi realizada em para 17,4%, enquanto 34,1% apresentaram infarto prévio. A cinecoronariografia identificou que 70,4% eram multiarteriais, dos quais 4% exibiam lesões não pro - tegidas do tronco da coronária esquerda. A maioria (55%) apresentava disfunção ventricular significativa. Stents farmacológicos (SF) foram utilizados em 97,2% dos casos. O sucesso angiográfico foi obtido em 97,5% e o sucesso clínico em 93,2%. A mortalidade e o infarto ocorreram abaixo de 4,3% dos casos. Conclusão: Nessa população, observaram-se que os pacientes octogenários constituíram a minoria dos idosos tratados; a doença multiarterial grave foi o achado predominante; os stents farmacológicos foram implantados quase em todos os casos e os sucessos angiográfico e clínico apresentaram-se elevado

With the increase in longevity observed in recent decades, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in octogenarians are increasingly indicated. Objective: To outline the clinical, epidemiological and angiographic profile and main details associated with PCI in octogenarian patients. Methods: One hundred and fifty octogenarian patients underwent PCI between January 2015 and December 2016 at the Dante Pazzanese In - stitute of Cardiology, corresponding to 3.7% of the 3987 cases treated and 18% of those aged> 70 years, and included sequentially and prospectively. There were no exclusion criteria. The clinical results were restricted to the hospital phase. Results: The majority (63%) were males, with a mean age of 86±3.9 years (maximum 102 years). Of the total patients, 91.3% were hypertensive, 37.4% were diabetic, 17.4% had previously undergone PCI, while 34.1% had previous infarction. The coronary angiography indicated that 70.4% were multiarterial, of which 4% had unprotected lesions of the trunk of the left coronary artery. The majority (55%) had significant ventricular dysfunction. Pharmacological stents were used in 97.2% of the cases. Angiographic success was achieved in 97.5% and clinical success in 93.2%. Mortality and infarction occurred in less than 4.3% of the cases. Conclusion: In this population, it was observed that octogenarian patients constituted a minority of treated elderly; severe multivessel disease was the predominant finding; pharmacological stents were implanted in almost all cases, and angiographic and clin

Serial greyscale and radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound assessment of plaque modification and vessel geometry at proximal and distal edges of bare metal and first-generation drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the correlation between modifications in plaque composition at stent edges and the changes in vessel geometry. This study sought to evaluate, by serial greyscale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and Virtual Histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS), the modifications in plaque composition at the edges of drug-eluting and bare metal stents and the correlation of these findings with changes in the measurements of vessel, lumen and plaque area at those segments. METHODS AND RESULTS: Single-centre, prospective and randomised (1:1) evaluation of 40 patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with bare metal (Driver; Medtronic, Santa Clara, CA, USA; n=20 patients) or drug-eluting stents (Cypher; Cordis, Miami Lakes, FL, USA; n=20 patients). IVUS and VH-IVUS assessments were done post-procedure and at nine months. Primary endpoint included the modification in vessel, lumen and plaque area and in the composition of the plaque in the mean time between the baseline and follow-up procedure. At the proximal edge of the vessel treated with the Cypher stent, a trend toward positive vessel remodelling (D=+0.6 mm², p=0.06) was observed while at the distal edge, less plaque growth (D=+0.2 mm² vs. D=+1.1 mm², p<0.001), resulted in a larger lumen area at follow-up. By VH, there was a marked reduction in the percentage of fibrotic tissue and necrotic core at the edges of both stents and a positive correlation was seen between increase in percentage of fibro-fatty component and increase in plaque area (r=0.78, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) experienced less plaque growth, especially at the distal edge of the stents. Modifications in plaque composition, with increase in fibrofatty tissue component, may partially explain these findings.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold / Seguimento Muito Tardio de Pacientes após Intervenção Coronária Percutânea com Suporte Vascular Bioabsorvível Eluidor de Everolimus

Abstract Background: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were developed to improve the long-term results of percutaneous coronary intervention, restoring vasomotion. Objectives: To report very late follow-up of everolimus-eluting Absorb BVS (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, USA) in our center. Methods: Observational retrospective study, in a single Brazilian center, from August 2011 to October 2013, including 49 patients submitted to Absorb BVS implantation. Safety and efficacy outcomes were analyzed in the in-hospital and very late follow-up phases (> 2 years). Results: All 49 patients underwent a minimum follow-up of 2.5 years and a maximum of 4.6 years. Mean age was 56.8 ± 7.6 years, 71.4% of the patients were men, and 26.5% were diabetic. Regarding clinical presentation, the majority (94%) had stable angina or silent ischemia. Device success was achieved in 100% of cases with 96% overall procedure success rate. Major adverse cardiovascular events rate was 4% at 30 days, 8.2% at 1 year, and 12.2% at 2 years, and there were no more events until 4.6 years. There were 2 cases of thrombosis (1 subacute and 1 late). Conclusions: In this preliminary analysis, Absorb BVS showed to be a safe and effective device in the very late follow-up. Establishing the efficacy and safety profiles of these devices in more complex scenarios is necessary.

Resumo Fundamento: Os suportes vasculares bioabsorvíveis (SVB) foram desenvolvidos com o intuito de melhorar os resultados da intervenção coronária percutânea a longo prazo, restabelecendo-se a vasomotricidade. Objetivos: Reportar o seguimento muito tardio do implante do SVB eluidor de everolimus Absorb® (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, EUA) em nosso centro. Métodos: Estudo observacional, retrospectivo, em um único centro brasileiro, que incluiu 49 pacientes submetidos ao implante do SVB Absorb® entre agosto/2011 e outubro/2013. Foram analisados os desfechos de segurança e eficácia na fase hospitalar e bastante tardia (> 2 anos). Resultados: Todos os 49 pacientes completaram um seguimento mínimo de 2,5 anos, sendo o máximo de 4,6 anos. A média de idade foi 56,8 ± 7,6 anos, sendo 71,4% da população estudada do sexo masculino e 26,5% composta por diabéticos. Considerando a apresentação clínica, a grande maioria (94%) tinha angina estável ou isquemia silenciosa. Obteve-se sucesso do dispositivo em 100% dos casos e do procedimento, em 96%. A taxa de eventos cardiovasculares maiores foi de 4% aos 30 dias, de 8,2% em 1 ano, e de 12,2% em 2 anos, sem mais eventos até 4,6 anos. Houve 2 casos de trombose (1 subaguda e 1 tardia) até o último seguimento. Conclusões: Nesta análise preliminar, o uso do SVB Absorb® mostrou-se seguro e eficaz no seguimento bastante tardio. Faz-se necessário estabelecer o perfil de eficácia e segurança destes dispositivos em cenários de maior complexidade.

Serial angiographic and intravascular ultrasound evaluation to interrogate the presence of late "catch-up" phenomenon after Cypher® sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Despite the expressive reduction in the intimal hyperplasia (IH) formation after DES implantation at the mid-term, late restenosis has been recently noticed. Our objective was to determine, by means of serial angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at two different time points, whether the occurrence of the "late catch-up" phenomenon occurs after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. Thirty-eight non-complex patients treated with a single 18-mm SES who had systematic serial QCA and IVUS analyses at mean 8 and 20 months were enrolled. Primary endpoint is to evaluate the temporal course of IH formation after SES implantation, by comparing QCA in-stent late loss and IVUS percent IH obstruction between the invasive follow-ups. Mean cohort age was 59.3 years and 31.6% were diabetics. Baseline reference vessel diameter was 2.8 ± 0.4 mm and lesion length was 11.5 ± 3.5 mm. Left anterior descending artery was the most frequent target vessel (55.3%). Between 8 and 20 months, a non-significant increase in in-stent late loss from 0.10 ± 0.18 to 0.15 ± 0.30 mm (P = 0.38) was observed. By IVUS, a slight increase in the percent IH obstruction (1.03 ± 2.13 to 1.76 ± 1.87%, P = 0.12) was detected between the two evaluations. Interestingly, all the neoformed tissue accrued from 8 to 20 months accumulated in the distal portion of the stent. In the non-complex scenario, SES implantation was associated with a minimal, non-significant increase in the IH volume between 8 and 20 months.

Serial angiography and intravascular ultrasound: results of the SISC Registry (Stents In Small Coronaries).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the novel CardioMind Sparrow (CMS) stent (CardioMind, Inc., Sunnyvale, California) against the Multi-Link Pixel (MLP) stent (Guidant Corp., Santa Clara, California) for small vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The CMS consists of a guidewire-based, self-expandable, ultra-thin nitinol stent with smaller profile and improved flexibility and deliverability. The performance of this novel device against a standard balloon-expandable stent for small vessel PCI has not been determined. METHODS: Twenty-one patients were treated with the CMS and compared with 30 patients treated with MLP. Only single de novo lesions <14 mm in length, in native vessels of 2.0 to 2.5 mm were included. The primary goal was the comparison of quantitative coronary angiography lumen loss and intravascular ultrasound intimal hyperplasia (IH) formation between groups at 6 months. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar between groups. The CMS cohort had smaller vessels (2.20 +/- 0.20 mm vs. 2.43 +/- 0.16 mm, p < 0.0001) and shorter lesions (10.86 +/- 3.19 mm vs. 13.12 +/- 2.79 mm, p = 0.0091). Six-month late loss was significantly lower among CMS cohort (0.73 +/- 0.57 mm vs. 1.11 +/- 0.72 mm, p = 0.038). By intravascular ultrasound, 6-month IH volume was similar between groups (1.45 +/- 0.46 mm(3)/mm vs. 1.65 +/- 1.02 mm(3)/mm, p = 0.50). However, CMS presented a mean 13.39% expansion of its volumes, resulting in a significantly lower percentage of IH volumetric obstruction (31.94 +/- 8.19% vs. 39.90 +/- 4.72%, p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Despite producing similar amounts of IH volume, the self-expanding CMS stent presented chronic expansion of its volumes, better accommodating the neoformed tissue and resulting in significantly lower late loss and percent of IH volumetric obstruction in comparison with the MLP stent.

Resposta vascular após implante de stents liberadores de biolimus A9 compolímero bioabsorvível e stents liberadores de everolimus com polímero durável. Resultados da análise de tomografia de coerência óptica do estudo randomizado BIOACTIVE / Vascular response after implantation of biolimus A9-eluting stent with bioabsorbable polymer and everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer. Results of the optical coherence tomography analysis of the BIOACTIVE randomized trial

No estudo BIOACTIVE, avaliamos as respostas vasculares após implante do stent eluidor de biolimus A9 (SEB; BioMatrix®) e o stent eluidor de everolimus (SEE; XIENCE V®). Apresentamos a análise detomografia de coerência óptica (OCT) 6 meses pós-intervenção. Métodos: Os pacientes foram randomizados para tratamento com SEB (n = 22) ou SEE (n = 18). O desfecho primário foi a frequência de hastes não cobertas e mal apostas pela OCT. Resultados: A OCT foi realizada em 26 pacientes (SEB: n = 15; SEE: n = 11) e foram analisadas 749 imagens tomográficas e 7.725 hastes de stent. SEB e SEE apresentaram áreas luminais e dos stents semelhantes.A área de hiperplasia neointimal, a espessura neointimal e o porcentual de obstrução intra-stent (8,44 ± 5,10% vs. 9,21 ± 6,36%; p = 0,74) foram similares. As taxas de hastes não cobertas (SEB: 2,10 ± 3,60% vs. SEE: 2,46 ± 2,15%; p = 0,77) e mal apostas (SEB: 0,48 ± 1,48% vs. SEE 0,44 ± 1,05%; p = 0,94) foram baixas e semelhantes. A frequência de frames com sinais compatíveis com infiltrado inflamatório peri-haste foi baixa e similar entre SEB (15,53 ± 20,77%) e SEE (11,70 ± 27,51%; p = 0,68).Conclusões: Stents farmacológicos de segunda geração SEB e SEE se mostraram igualmente eficientes emsuprimir a formação neointimal aos 6 meses, com respostas vasculares favoráveis. A frequência de framescom sinais de infiltrado peri-haste por paciente foi baixa, e menor do que a historicamente observada comos stents farmacológicos de primeira geração...

In BIOACTIVE study, we evaluated vascular responses after the implant of biolimus A9-eluting stent (BES; BioMatrixTM) and the everolimus-eluting stent (EES; XIENCE VTM). In this study, we present the optical coherence tomography analysis (OCT) 6 months post-intervention. Methods: Patients were randomized to treatment with BES (n = 22) or EES (n = 18). The primary outcome was the frequency of non-covered, poorly positioned struts by OCT.Results: OCT was performed in 26 patients (BES: n = 15; EES: n = 11) and 749 tomographic images and 7,725stent struts were analyzed. BES and EES showed similar luminal and stent areas. Neointimal hyperplasia area, neointimal thickness and the percentage of in-stent obstruction (8.44 ± 5.10% vs. 9.21 ± 6.36%; p = 0.74) were similar. The rates of not covered struts (BES: 2.10 ± 3.60% vs. ESS: 2.46 ± 2.15%, p = 0.77) and poorly positioned struts (BES: 0.48 ± 1.48% vs. EES 0.44 ± 1.05%, p = 0.94) were similarly low. The frequency of frames with signs consistent with peri-strut inflammatory infiltrate was low and similar between BES (15.53 ± 20.77%) and EES (11.70 ± 27.51%; p = 0.68). Conclusions: The second-generation drug-eluting stents BES and EES were equally effective at suppressing the neointimal formation after 6 months, with favorable vascular responses. The frequency of frameswith peri-strut infiltrate signals per patient was low, and lower than that observed historically with firstgenerationdrug-eluting stents...

Desfechos clínicos precoces e tardios após tratamento de enxertos de veia safena com stents MGuardTM vs. stents farmacológicos / Early and late clinical outcomes after saphenous vein graft treatment with MGuardTM stents vs. drug-eluting stents

Introdução: O stent MGuard™, revestido por malha polimérica microscópica, tem a finalidade de reduzir a embolização distal de fragmentos durante a intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) em enxertos de veia safena (EVS). Avaliamos os desfechos clínicos precoces e tardios de pacientes submetidos à ICP de EVS com stents MGuard™ vs. stents farmacológicos (SF). Métodos: Estudo observacional, retrospectivo, realizado em dois centros terciários, envolvendo uma coorte de pacientes com lesões em EVS, tratados de forma eletiva ou de emergência com stents MGuard™ ou SF. Resultados: Foram incluídos 271 pacientes, sendo 220 tratados com SF. O Grupo MGuard™ apresentou maior proporção de mulheres (25,5% vs. 10,5%; p=0,01), com média de idades de 65,0 ± 13,9 anos vs. 69,0 ± 9,6 anos (p = 0,06). O Grupo SF utilizou com maior frequência filtro de proteção distal (5,8% vs. 10,0%; p = 0,001). Sucesso angiográfico foi obtido na maioria dos casos (96,2% vs. 98,0%; p = 0,22). O Grupo MGuard™ teve menores taxas de eventos cardiovasculares adversos maiores (ECAM) na fase hospitalar que o Grupo SF (1,9% vs. 13,6%; p = 0,01) devido exclusivamente à menor incidência de infarto periprocedimento. Entretanto, a taxa de ECAM em 1 ano foi maior no grupo MGuard™ (14,3% vs. 4,4%; p = 0,01) à custa de maior taxa de revascularização da lesão alvo (7,1% vs. 1,3%; p = 0,048). Conclusões: A utilização de stent MGuard™ resultou em redução de eventos na fase hospitalar, porém, no longo prazo, os SF foram superiores em reduzir desfechos maiores, sobretudo a necessidade de revascularização da lesão alvo

Background: The MGuard™ stent, which has a microscopic polymer mesh coating, is intended to reduce the distal embolization of fragments during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in saphenous vein grafts (SVG). This study evaluated the early and late clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PCI in SVG with MGuard™ stents vs. drug­eluting stents (DES). Methods: Observational, retrospective study conducted at two tertiary centers, involving a cohort of patients with SVG lesions submitted to elective or emergency treatment with MGuard™ stents or DES. Results: A total of 271 patients were included, of whom 220 were treated with DES. The MGuard™ group had a higher proportion of women (25.5% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.01), with a mean age of 65.0 ± 13.9 years vs. 69.0 ± 9.6 years (p = 0.06). The DES group more frequently used distal protection filter (5.8% vs. 10.0%; p = 0.001). Angiographic success was attained in most cases (96.2% vs. 98.0%; p = 0.22). The MGuard™ group had lower rates of early major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) than the DES group (1.9% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.01), due solely to the lower incidence of periprocedural infarction. However, the MACE rate at 1 year was higher in the MGuard™ group (14.3% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.01) at the expense of a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (7.1% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.048). Conclusions: The use of the MGuard™ stent resulted in a reduction of events during hospitalization; however, in the long term the DES were superior in reducing major outcomes, mainly the need for target lesion revascularization

Fatores predisponentes para revascularização angiográfica incompleta em pacientes com intervenção coronária percutânea de múltiplos vasos / Predisposing factors for incomplete angiographic revascularization in patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention

A revascularização miocárdica anatômica completa está associada a um melhor controle dossintomas anginosos e a menores índices de eventos cardíacos maiores tardios. No entanto, em substancial número de pacientes tratados por meio de intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP), não logramos sua obtenção. Assim, nosso objetivo foi avaliar os fatores associados à revascularização miocárdica incompleta (RMI) em casos de ICP multiarterial. Métodos: Estudo de coorte envolvendo 1.049 pacientes revascularizados de forma prospectiva e consecutivapor meio de ICP com tratamento de dois ou mais vasos, entre 2012 e 2014, divididos em dois grupos: RMI(n = 324; 30,9%) e revascularização miocárdica completa (n = 725; 69,1%).Resultados: A RMI foi significativamente associada a faixa etária maior (66,5 anos vs. 64,1 anos; p = 0,003),hipertensão arterial (92,2% vs. 86,0%; p = 0,006), insuficiência renal crônica (36.4% vs. 26.0%; p < 0,001), síndrome coronariana aguda (26,3% vs. 21,0%; p = 0,05), revascularização cirúrgica prévia (16,1% vs. 7,1%;p = 0,001), lesões em enxertos venosos (3,4% vs. 1,0%; p < 0,001) e oclusões crônicas (3,3% vs. 1,4%; p =0,005), bem como a menor acesso a stents farmacológicos (57,8% vs. 64,8%; p = 0,002). Os resultados clínicos hospitalares não diferiram entre os grupos.Conclusões: A RMI ocorreu em cerca de um terço dos casos tratados, tendo sido observada associação significativa, com um perfil clínico de maior risco e com intervenções em lesões alvo comumente associadas com menor sucesso do procedimento. O grau de revascularização não gerou impacto nosresultados clínicos da fase hospitalar...

Complete anatomical myocardial revascularization is associated with better anginacontrol and lower rates of cardiac events. However, in a significant number of patients treated bypercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), complete revascularization is not achieved. Thus, the aimof this study was to evaluate factors associated with incomplete myocardial revascularization (IMR) in multivessel PCI patients. Methods: This was a cohort study involving 1,049 prospectively and consecutively revascularized patients through PCI with treatment of two or more vessels, between 2012 and 2014, divided into two groups: IMR(n = 324; 30.9%) and complete myocardial revascularization (n = 725; 69.1%). Results: IMR was significantly associated with older age (66.5 years vs. 64.1 years; p = 0.003), arterial hypertension (92.2% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.006), chronic renal failure (36.4 % vs. 26.0%; p < 0.001), acute coronary syndrome (26.3% vs. 21.0%; p = 0.05), previous surgical revascularization (16.1% vs. 7.1 %; p = 0.001), saphenous venous graft lesions (3.4% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001), and chronic occlusions (3.3% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.005), as well as lower access to drug-eluting stents (57.8% vs. 64.8%; p = 0.002). In-hospital clinical outcomes did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: IMR occurred in approximately one-third of treated cases, and a significant association was observed with a higher-risk clinical profile and with target lesion interventions commonly associated with lower procedure success. The degree of revascularization had no impact on in-hospital clinical outcomes...