Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and other complications in type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: This study deals with cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) in type 1 diabetic patients and its association with other complications. We searched for CAN in 684 patients (age, 47 +/- 12 years; diabetes duration, 22 +/- 11 years) by cardiovascular responses to deep breathing and standing. Patients considered as positive had laboratory evaluation: "Ewing" tests (deep breathing, Valsalva, stand test, hand grip); heart rate variability (HRV) [low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) power] and spontaneous baroreflex slope (SBS). Logistic regression was used to identify the combination of patient characteristics, including other complications, most associated with CAN severity according to Ewing Score (ES 0-5). RESULTS: 66.2% presented no significant abnormality (ES 0-0.5), 21.5 % had mild abnormalities (ES 1-2), and 12.3% had confirmed autonomic failure (ES > 2). Decrease in LF, HF and SBS was highly correlated to CAN severity. In the stepwise regression, age, retinopathy, nephropathy, bladder dysfunction, erectile dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy and hypertension remained correlated with CAN, whereas digestive neuropathy, BMI and HbA1c were excluded. Despite a small number of events, we found a significant association between coronary disorders and CAN severity. CONCLUSIONS: Simple bedside tests can detect CAN. HRV and SBS provide additional elements on CAN severity. Diabetes duration did not discriminate sufficiently patients with CAN. The association with retinopathy is in favor of the role of poor glycemic control in CAN development. This study shows the interest of CAN detection and the need to look for extracardiac autonomic neuropathy and silent myocardial ischemia in patients with confirmed CAN.

Borderline personality disorder and rTMS: a pilot trial.

A randomized, controlled study was carried out to assess the effect of a series of 10 sessions of high-frequency rTMS to the right DLPFC in 10 Borderline Personality Disorder patients. Patients in the rTMS group showed improvements in anger, affective instability (Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index) and planning (Tower Of London). Two smoking cessations were observed.

Completion surgery or not after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer?

OBJECTIVES: The role of additional surgery in patients responding to radiation and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer is controversial. The goal of this study was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of two groups of patients, with or without additional surgery. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred and eleven patients with advanced cervical cancer who responded to chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy were included in a retrospective, multicenter series. RESULTS: Of the patients who had completion surgery (Group 1), 22.4% (15/67) had recurrence compared with 36.4% (16/44) of those who did not have surgery (Group 2). The difference is statistically significant (p=0.01). The relative risk of disease progression or death was 0.41 (95% confidence interval 0.20-0.85) (p=0.01) in favor of completion surgery. After multivariate analysis, only age, pathology and initial tumor size remained significant (respectively p=0.003, p=0.001 and p=0.03). Among the locations of recurrence in Group 1, 46.7% were pelvic (7/15) compared with 56.2% in Group 2 (9/16). In Group 1, 16.4% (11/67) of the patients died of disease compared to 20.4% (9/44) in Group 2. Of these, 45.4% (5/11) in Group 1 died after pelvic recurrence as compared to 77.8% (7/9) in Group 2. CONCLUSION: Completion surgery does not improve OS but may improve DFS. There is no consensus regarding completion surgery in advanced cervical cancer with a good response to the standard treatment but we think it is safer to propose it.

Mathematical modeling of hepatitis C virus transmission in hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: A deterministic mathematical model is developed to explain nontransfusion nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) from patient to patient during hemodialysis sessions. METHODS: The model requires 4 sequential steps for cross-transmission: (1) The dialysis session contains at least 1 patient infected with HCV; (2) a hemodialysis staff member connects an uninfected patient to dialysis after having connected an infected patient; (3) the hemodialysis staff member does not change gloves between an infected patient and an uninfected patient; and (4) the uninfected patient is contaminated after exposure to the blood of an infected patient. RESULTS: We tested the model by comparing observed incidences of HCV infection from epidemiologic studies with calculated incidences. Calculated incidences are closed to observed incidences. We assessed the impact of prevalence of HCV infection, no glove change between patients, and nurse:patient ratio on the incidence of HCV infection. We found linear relationships between incidence and prevalence and between incidence and no glove change, and an increasing logarithmic relationship between incidence and nurse:patient ratio. CONCLUSION: Our model should be able to estimate the likely incidence of infection in hemodialysis centers. Compliance with recommended hand hygiene and glove use practices, especially glove changes between patients, is essential to prevent HCV infection in hemodialysis centers, particularly those with high HCV prevalence. Mathematical modeling can used as a tool for control.