RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Disparities between tumors arising via different sporadic carcinogenetic pathways have not been studied systematically. This retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluated the differences in the risk for non-colorectal malignancy between sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from different DNA mismatch repair status. METHODS: A retrospective European multicenter cohort study including in total of 1706 CRC patients treated between 1996 and 2019 in three different countries. The proficiency (pMMR) or deficiency (dMMR) of mismatch repair was determined by immunohistochemistry. Cases were analyzed for tumor BRAFV600E mutation, and BRAF mutated tumors were further analyzed for hypermethylation status in the promoter region of MLH1 to distinguish between sporadic and hereditary cases. Swedish and Finish patients were matched with their respective National Cancer Registries. For the Czech cohort, thorough scrutiny of medical files was performed to identify any non-colorectal malignancy within 20 years before or after the diagnosis of CRC. Poisson regression analysis was performed to identify the incidence rates of non-colorectal malignancies. For validation purposes, standardized incidence ratios were calculated for the Swedish cases adjusted for age, year, and sex. RESULTS: Of the 1706 CRC patients included in the analysis, 819 were female [48%], median age at surgery was 67 years [interquartile range: 60-75], and sporadic dMMR was found in 188 patients (11%). Patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher incidence rate ratio (IRR) for non-colorectal malignancy before and after diagnosis compared to patients with a pMMR tumor, in both uni- (IRR = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.89-3.31, p = 0.003) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.67-3.01, p = 0.004). This association applied whether or not the non-colorectal tumor developed before or after the diagnosis of CRC in both uni- (IRR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.28-2.98, p = 0.004), (IRR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.72-3.49, p = 0.004) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 1.67,95% CI = 1.05-2.65, p = 0.029), (IRR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.63-3.42, p = 0.005), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective European multicenter cohort study, patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher risk for non-colorectal malignancy than those with pMMR CRC. These findings indicate the need for further studies to establish the need for and design of surveillance strategies for patients with dMMR CRC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Estudios de Seguimiento , Homólogo 1 de la Proteína MutL/genética , Mutación , Pronóstico , Incidencia , Suecia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Parenteral fluid (PF) therapy of patients in end-of-life (EOL) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess associations between PF, quality of the EOL care process and symptom burden in dying cancer patients, using a population-based approach. METHODS: This was a nationwide retrospective register study of all adult cancer deaths with documented information on PF in the last 24 h of life as reported to the Swedish Register of Palliative Care during a three-year period (n = 41,709). Prevalence and relief of symptoms during the last week of life as well as EOL care process quality indicators were assessed in relation to PF in those patients who had a documented decision to focus on EOL care (immediately dying, n = 23,112). Odds ratios were calculated, adjusting for place of death (hospital vs. non-hospital). RESULTS: PF was administered to 30.9% of immediately dying patients in hospitals compared to 6.5% outside of hospitals. PF was associated with a higher likelihood for breathlessness and nausea. In patients screened for EOL symptoms with a validated instrument, PF was inversely associated with the likelihood of complete relief of breathlessness, respiratory secretions, anxiety, nausea and pain. Several palliative care quality indicators were inversely associated with PF, including EOL conversations and prescriptions of injectable drugs as needed. These associations were more pronounced in hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Parenteral fluid therapy in the last 24 h of life was associated with inferior quality of the EOL care process and with increased symptom burden in imminently dying cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia , Neoplasias , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Cuidado Terminal , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suecia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Fluidoterapia/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Carga SintomáticaRESUMEN
AIMS: We assessed the association between insulin resistance and blood glucose concentrations at type 2 diabetes diagnosis and future development of diabetes-related complications and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 864 individuals with type 2 diabetes (median age 60 years) whose fasting C-peptide and HbA1c were measured at diabetes diagnosis. The median follow-up time until death or study end was 16.4 years (interquartile range 13.3-19.6). The association between C-peptide and mortality/complications was estimated by Cox regression adjusted for sex, age at diabetes diagnosis, smoking, hypertension, BMI, total cholesterol, and HbA1c. C-peptide and HbA1c were converted to Z scores before the Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: An increase by one standard deviation in fasting C-peptide at diabetes diagnosis was associated with all-cause (hazard ratio [HR] 1.33; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.12-1.58; p = 0.001) and cancer mortality (HR 1.51; 95% CI 1.13-2.01; p = 0.005) in the fully adjusted model. An increase by one standard deviation in HbA1c at diabetes diagnosis was associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.07-1.44; p = 0.005), major cardiovascular events (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.04-1.39; p = 0.015), stroke (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.09-1.70; p = 0.006), and retinopathy (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.34-1.76; p < 0.0001) in the fully adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS: Fasting C-peptide at type 2 diabetes diagnosis is an independent risk factor for total and cancer-related mortality. Thus, treatment of type 2 diabetes should focus not only on normalising blood glucose levels but also on mitigating insulin resistance.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neoplasias , Glucemia/análisis , Péptido C , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Ayuno , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This follow-up study on perceived self-image and psychophysical distress/psychic symptoms was based on a ranomized contolled study of art therapy on women with breast cancer. METHOD: The aim was to examine the long-term effects of time-limited art therapy using the instruments of Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB) and Symptom Check List-90 (SCL-90). RESULTS: Three attachment clusters of the SASB showed significant changes post therapy: Autonomous self (cluster 1), Accepting self (cluster 2), and Loving self (cluster 3). Clusters 2 and 3 continued to change in favor of the intervention group at the 5-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in the SCL-90 results between the intervention group and the control group in the follow-up study. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The art therapy intervention was both therapeutic and psycho-educative. The conclusion of this study is that approaching emotions through time-limited art therapy seems to have a long-lasting effect on the attachment behavioral system shown in the SASB model post intervention, and this effect remained 5 years later.
Asunto(s)
Arteterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Emociones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , AutoimagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The HYPO-RT-PC trial compared conventionally fractionated radiotherapy with ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with localised prostate cancer. Ultra-hypofractionation was non-inferior to conventional fractionation regarding 5-year failure-free survival and toxicity. We aimed to assess whether patient-reported quality of life (QOL) differs between conventional fractionation and ultra-hypofractionation up to 6 years after treatment in the HYPO-RT-PC trial. METHODS: HYPO-RT-PC is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial done in 12 centres (seven university hospitals and five county hospitals) in Sweden and Denmark. Inclusion criteria were histologically verified intermediate-to-high-risk prostate cancer (defined as T1c-T3a with one or two of the following risk factors: stage T3a; Gleason score ≥7; and prostate-specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL with no evidence of lymph node involvement or distant metastases), age up to 75 years, and WHO performance status 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to conventional fractionation (78·0 Gy in 39 fractions, 5 days per week for 8 weeks) or ultra-hypofractionation (42·7 Gy in seven fractions, 3 days per week for 2·5 weeks) via a minimisation algorithm with stratification by trial centre, T-stage, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen. QOL was measured using the validated Prostate Cancer Symptom Scale (PCSS) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at baseline, the end of radiotherapy, months 3, 6, 12, and 24 after radiotherapy, every other year thereafter up to 10 years, and at 15 years. The primary endpoint (failure-free survival) has been reported elsewhere. Here we report QOL, a secondary endpoint analysed in the per-protocol population, up to 6 years after radiotherapy. The HYPO-RT-PC trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN45905321. FINDINGS: Between July 1, 2005, and Nov 4, 2015, 1200 patients were enrolled and 1180 were randomly assigned (conventional fractionation n=591, ultra-hypofractionation n=589); 1165 patients (conventional fractionation n=582, ultra-hypofractionation n=583) were included in this QOL analysis. 158 (71%) of 223 patients in the conventional fractionation group and 146 (66%) of 220 in the ultra-hypofractionation group completed questionnaires at 6 years. The median follow-up was 48 months (IQR 25-72). In seven of ten bowel symptoms or problems the proportion of patients with clinically relevant deteriorations at the end of radiotherapy was significantly higher in the ultra-hypofractionation group than in the conventional fractionation group (stool frequency [p<0·0001], rush to toilet [p=0·0013], flatulence [p=0·0013], bowel cramp [p<0·0001], mucus [p=0·0014], blood in stool [p<0·0001], and limitation in daily activity [p=0·0014]). There were no statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients with clinically relevant acute urinary symptoms or problems (total 14 items) and sexual functioning between the two treatment groups at end of radiotherapy. Thereafter, there were no clinically relevant differences in urinary, bowel, or sexual functioning between the groups. At the 6-year follow-up there was no difference in the incidence of clinically relevant deterioration between the groups for overall urinary bother (43 [33%] of 132 for conventional fractionation vs 33 [28%] of 120 for ultra-hypofractionation; mean difference 5·1% [95% CI -4·4 to 14·6]; p=0·38), overall bowel bother (43 [33%] of 129 vs 34 [28%] of 123; 5·7% [-3·8 to 15·2]; p=0·33), overall sexual bother (75 [60%] of 126 vs 59 [50%] of 117; 9·1% [-1·4 to 19·6]; p=0·15), or global health/QOL (56 [42%] of 134 vs 46 [37%] of 125; 5·0% [-5·0 to 15·0]; p=0·41). INTERPRETATION: Although acute toxicity was higher for ultra-hypofractionation than conventional fractionation, this long-term patient-reported QOL analysis shows that ultra-hypofractionation was as well tolerated as conventional fractionation up to 6 years after completion of treatment. These findings support the use of ultra-hypofractionation radiotherapy for intermediate-to-high-risk prostate cancer. FUNDING: The Nordic Cancer Union, the Swedish Cancer Society, and the Swedish Research Council.
Asunto(s)
Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma is a cancer type with generally excellent prognosis when diagnosed at an early stage, but there is a subset of patients with relapsing disease in spite of early diagnosis and surgical treatment. There is a need to find prognostic markers to identify these patients with increased risk of relapse. Depth of myometrial invasion, histological grade, and presence of lymphovascular invasion are known risk factors. DNA content (ploidy) and proliferation measured as S-phase fraction (SPF) have been discussed as prognostic markers but need additional evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated relapse-free survival (RFS) with respect to ploidy and SPF, which was analyzed by flow cytometry on fresh tumor tissue, in a cohort of 1001 women treated for stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma in northern Sweden during the period of 1993-2010, with a median follow up time of 12.0 years. Data were obtained from historical records. RESULTS: In simple analysis, both aneuploidy and high SPF were associated to increased risk of relapse with hazard ratios (HR) 2.37 (95% CI 1.52-3.70) and 1.94 (95% CI 1.24-3.02), respectively. Our data also confirmed stage, tumor grade, and ploidy as independent prognostic markers in an age adjusted cox regression multivariable analysis but we did not find SPF to contribute to prognosis. However, the combination of aneuploidy and high SPF identified a group of patients with increased risk of relapse, HR 2.02 (95% CI 1.19-3.44). CONCLUSION: In this study, which is the largest study of ploidy and SPF in stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma using fresh frozen tissue, aneuploidy was shown to be an independent prognostic marker. Furthermore, the combination of aneuploidy and high SPF could be used to identify patients with increased risk of relapse.
Asunto(s)
ADN de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Endometriales , Aneuploidia , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Pronóstico , Fase SRESUMEN
Perinatal factors have been associated with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) in case-control studies. However, (i) the contributions of factors including fetal growth remain unknown, ( ii) these factors have not been examined in cohort studies and (iii) few assessments have evaluated risk in specific STS subtypes. We sought to identify the role of perinatal and familial factors on the risk of STS in a large population-based birth cohort. We identified 4,023,436 individuals in the Swedish Birth Registry born during 1973-2012. Subjects were linked to the Swedish Cancer Registry, where incident STS cases were identified. We evaluated perinatal and familial factors obtained from Statistics Sweden, including fetal growth, gestational age, and presence of a congenital malformation. Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between perinatal factors and STS overall, as well as by common subtypes. There were 673 individuals diagnosed with STS in 77.5 million person-years of follow-up. Having a congenital malformation was associated with STS (IRR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.23-2.35). This association was stronger (IRR = 2.90, 95% CI: 1.25-6.71) in recent years (2000-2012). Low fetal growth was also associated with STS during the same time period (IRR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.05-3.29). Being born preterm was associated with rhabdomyosarcoma (IRR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.08-2.79). In our cohort study, those with congenital malformations and other adverse birth outcomes were more likely to develop a STS compared to their unaffected contemporaries. These associations may point to disrupted developmental pathways and genetic factors influencing the risk of STS.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Sarcoma/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Anamnesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Sarcoma/genética , Suecia/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer has gained increased attention due to its proposed high radiation-fraction sensitivity. Recent reports from studies comparing moderately hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy support the clinical use of moderate hypofractionation. To date, there are no published randomised studies on ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy. Here, we report the outcomes of the Scandinavian HYPO-RT-PC phase 3 trial with the aim to show non-inferiority of ultra-hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority trial done in 12 centres in Sweden and Denmark, we recruited men up to 75 years of age with intermediate-to-high-risk prostate cancer and a WHO performance status between 0 and 2. Patients were randomly assigned to ultra-hypofractionation (42·7 Gy in seven fractions, 3 days per week for 2·5 weeks) or conventional fractionated radiotherapy (78·0 Gy in 39 fractions, 5 days per week for 8 weeks). No androgen deprivation therapy was allowed. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical or clinical failure, analysed in the per-protocol population. The prespecified non-inferiority margin was 4% at 5 years, corresponding to a critical hazard ratio (HR) limit of 1·338. Physician-recorded toxicity was measured according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) morbidity scale and patient-reported outcome measurements with the Prostate Cancer Symptom Scale (PCSS) questionnaire. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN45905321. FINDINGS: Between July 1, 2005, and Nov 4, 2015, 1200 patients were randomly assigned to conventional fractionation (n=602) or ultra-hypofractionation (n=598), of whom 1180 (591 conventional fractionation and 589 ultra-hypofractionation) constituted the per-protocol population. 1054 (89%) participants were intermediate risk and 126 (11%) were high risk. Median follow-up time was 5·0 years (IQR 3·1-7·0). The estimated failure-free survival at 5 years was 84% (95% CI 80-87) in both treatment groups, with an adjusted HR of 1·002 (95% CI 0·758-1·325; log-rank p=0·99). There was weak evidence of an increased frequency of acute physician-reported RTOG grade 2 or worse urinary toxicity in the ultra-hypofractionation group at end of radiotherapy (158 [28%] of 569 patients vs 132 [23%] of 578 patients; p=0·057). There were no significant differences in grade 2 or worse urinary or bowel late toxicity between the two treatment groups at any point after radiotherapy, except for an increase in urinary toxicity in the ultra-hypofractionation group compared to the conventional fractionation group at 1-year follow-up (32 [6%] of 528 patients vs 13 [2%] of 529 patients; (p=0·0037). We observed no differences between groups in frequencies at 5 years of RTOG grade 2 or worse urinary toxicity (11 [5%] of 243 patients for the ultra-hypofractionation group vs 12 [5%] of 249 for the conventional fractionation group; p=1·00) and bowel toxicity (three [1%] of 244 patients vs nine [4%] of 249 patients; p=0·14). Patient-reported outcomes revealed significantly higher levels of acute urinary and bowel symptoms in the ultra-hypofractionation group compared with the conventional fractionation group but no significant increases in late symptoms were found, except for increased urinary symptoms at 1-year follow-up, consistent with the physician-evaluated toxicity. INTERPRETATION: Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy is non-inferior to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for intermediate-to-high risk prostate cancer regarding failure-free survival. Early side-effects are more pronounced with ultra-hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation whereas late toxicity is similar in both treatment groups. The results support the use of ultra-hypofractionation for radiotherapy of prostate cancer. FUNDING: The Nordic Cancer Union, the Swedish Cancer Society, and the Swedish Research Council.
Asunto(s)
Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Anciano , Dinamarca , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Suecia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains 1 (LRIG1) copy number alterations and unbalanced gene recombination events have been reported to occur in breast cancer. Importantly, LRIG1 loss was recently shown to predict early and late relapse in stage I-II breast cancer. METHODS: We developed droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays for the determination of relative LRIG1 copy numbers and used these assays to analyze LRIG1 in twelve healthy individuals, 34 breast tumor samples previously analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and 423 breast tumor cytosols. RESULTS: Four of the LRIG1/reference gene assays were found to be precise and robust, showing copy number ratios close to 1 (mean, 0.984; standard deviation, +/- 0.031) among the healthy control population. The correlation between the ddPCR assays and previous FISH results was low, possibly because of the different normalization strategies used. One in 34 breast tumors (2.9%) showed an unbalanced LRIG1 recombination event. LRIG1 copy number ratios were associated with the breast cancer subtype, steroid receptor status, ERBB2 status, tumor grade, and nodal status. Both LRIG1 loss and gain were associated with unfavorable metastasis-free survival; however, they did not remain significant prognostic factors after adjustment for common risk factors in the Cox regression analysis. Furthermore, LRIG1 loss was not significantly associated with survival in stage I and II cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although LRIG1 gene aberrations may be important determinants of breast cancer biology, and prognostic markers, the results of this study do not verify an important role for LRIG1 copy number analyses in predicting the risk of relapse in early-stage breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Dosificación de Gen , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Pronóstico , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: One-quarter of all cancer deaths in Sweden occur in hospitals. If the place of death affects the quality of end-of-life (EOL) is largely unknown. METHODS: This population-based, retrospective study included all adults cancer deaths reported to the Swedish Register of Palliative Care in 2011-2013 (N = 41,729). Hospital deaths were compared to deaths occurring in general or specialised palliative care, or in nursing homes with respect to care quality indicators in the last week of life. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with specialised palliative home care as reference. RESULTS: Preferred place of death was unknown for 63% of hospitalised patients and consistent with the actual place of death in 25% compared to 97% in palliative home care. Hospitalised patients were less likely to be informed when death was imminent (OR: 0.3; CI: 0.28-0.33) as were their families (OR: 0.51; CI: 0.46-0.57). Validated screening tools were less often used in hospitals for assessment of pain (OR: 0.32; CI: 0.30-0.34) or other symptoms (OR: 0.31; CI: 0.28-0.34) despite similar levels of EOL symptoms. Prescriptions of as needed drugs against anxiety (OR: 0.27; CI: 0.24-0.30), nausea (OR: 0.19; CI: 0.17-0.21), or pulmonary secretions (OR: 0.29; CI: 0.26-0.32) were less prevalent in hospitals. Bereavement support was offered after 57% of hospital deaths compared to 87-97% in palliative care units and 72% in nursing homes. CONCLUSIONS: Dying in hospital was associated with inferior end-of-life care quality among cancer patients in Sweden.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/terapia , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Suecia , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the best circulating tumour marker for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) but has suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. Circulating type IV collagen (COLIV) is a new potential CLM marker. Here, COLIV and CEA were measured in patients with resectable CLM. COLIV levels were also related to the type of CLM. The prognostic value of these markers and the type of CLM on survival was evaluated. Preoperative plasma samples (n = 94) from patients (n = 85) with CLM undergoing liver resection were used. Seven patients underwent repeated liver resection. Samples from 118 healthy individuals served as control. Samples after liver resection (n = 27) were analysed and related to recurrence. COLIV and CEA levels were analysed, and the type of CLM was classified using paraffinated tissue. Results were analysed by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. CLM patients had significantly elevated levels of COLIV compared to controls (p = 0.001). The sensitivity of COLIV was not better than CEA, but improved sensitivity for detecting CLM was observed with a combination of the two markers compared to using either marker alone (p = 0.001). Circulating COLIV was elevated in 81 % and CEA in 56 % of CLM patients at diagnosis, and high marker levels were related to poor survival. In follow-up samples (n = 27), patients with CLM recurrence (n = 14) had significantly elevated COLIV levels compared to patients without postoperative recurrence (n = 10) (p = 0.001). COLIV is a promising tumour marker for CLM and can possibly be used to detect postoperative CLM recurrence. The combination of COLIV and CEA is superior to either marker alone in detecting CLM.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/sangre , Colágeno Tipo IV/sangre , Neoplasias Colorrectales/sangre , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Matriz Extracelular/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes , Periodo Posoperatorio , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Swedish Cancer Register (SCR), an old and reputable health data register, contributes a large amount of data used in research. The quality of the research using SCR data depends on the completeness and validity of the register. In Sweden, every healthcare provider is obligated to report newly detected cases of cancer to the SCR regardless of the diagnostic basis. This study aimed to clarify whether there is an under-reporting of patients with cancer to the SCR or an over-reporting of cancer as cause of death to the SRPC as all patients do not appear in both registers. In addition, this study looked at the distribution of under-reporting or over-reporting related to age, sex, type of cancer, diagnostic basis, and department responsible for cancer diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of the 10 559 patients whose cause of death was cancer as reported to the SRPC (2009), 1394 patients (13.2%) were not registered in the SCR (1958-2009). Medical records from a representative sample of 203 patients were collected and reviewed. RESULTS: The medical records for 193 patients were obtained; of those, 183 (95%) patients should have been reported to the SCR. Among these, radiologic investigation was the most common basis for diagnosis and there was a significant over-representation of cancer of the pancreas, lung, liver, and bile ducts. DISCUSSION: This study cannot quantify the completeness of the SCR. The findings indicate that 12.5% of patients dying of cancer in palliative care are not reported, that specialized hospital departments diagnose the vast majority of the unreported patients, and that routines for how to report patients to the SCR based on radiological findings should be revised.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Sistema de Registros , SueciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most patients with glioblastoma are older than 60 years, but treatment guidelines are based on trials in patients aged only up to 70 years. We did a randomised trial to assess the optimum palliative treatment in patients aged 60 years and older with glioblastoma. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were recruited from Austria, Denmark, France, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and Turkey. They were assigned by a computer-generated randomisation schedule, stratified by centre, to receive temozolomide (200 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 of every 28 days for up to six cycles), hypofractionated radiotherapy (34·0 Gy administered in 3·4 Gy fractions over 2 weeks), or standard radiotherapy (60·0 Gy administered in 2·0 Gy fractions over 6 weeks). Patients and study staff were aware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN81470623. FINDINGS: 342 patients were enrolled, of whom 291 were randomised across three treatment groups (temozolomide n=93, hypofractionated radiotherapy n=98, standard radiotherapy n=100) and 51 of whom were randomised across only two groups (temozolomide n=26, hypofractionated radiotherapy n=25). In the three-group randomisation, in comparison with standard radiotherapy, median overall survival was significantly longer with temozolomide (8·3 months [95% CI 7·1-9·5; n=93] vs 6·0 months [95% CI 5·1-6·8; n=100], hazard ratio [HR] 0·70; 95% CI 0·52-0·93, p=0·01), but not with hypofractionated radiotherapy (7·5 months [6·5-8·6; n=98], HR 0·85 [0·64-1·12], p=0·24). For all patients who received temozolomide or hypofractionated radiotherapy (n=242) overall survival was similar (8·4 months [7·3-9·4; n=119] vs 7·4 months [6·4-8·4; n=123]; HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·63-1·06; p=0·12). For age older than 70 years, survival was better with temozolomide and with hypofractionated radiotherapy than with standard radiotherapy (HR for temozolomide vs standard radiotherapy 0·35 [0·21-0·56], p<0·0001; HR for hypofractionated vs standard radiotherapy 0·59 [95% CI 0·37-0·93], p=0·02). Patients treated with temozolomide who had tumour MGMT promoter methylation had significantly longer survival than those without MGMT promoter methylation (9·7 months [95% CI 8·0-11·4] vs 6·8 months [5·9-7·7]; HR 0·56 [95% CI 0·34-0·93], p=0·02), but no difference was noted between those with methylated and unmethylated MGMT promoter treated with radiotherapy (HR 0·97 [95% CI 0·69-1·38]; p=0·81). As expected, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the temozolomide group were neutropenia (n=12) and thrombocytopenia (n=18). Grade 3-5 infections in all randomisation groups were reported in 18 patients. Two patients had fatal infections (one in the temozolomide group and one in the standard radiotherapy group) and one in the temozolomide group with grade 2 thrombocytopenia died from complications after surgery for a gastrointestinal bleed. INTERPRETATION: Standard radiotherapy was associated with poor outcomes, especially in patients older than 70 years. Both temozolomide and hypofractionated radiotherapy should be considered as standard treatment options in elderly patients with glioblastoma. MGMT promoter methylation status might be a useful predictive marker for benefit from temozolomide. FUNDING: Merck, Lion's Cancer Research Foundation, University of Umeå, and the Swedish Cancer Society.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Tasa de Supervivencia , Temozolomida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The standard treatment of glioblastoma, an aggressive brain tumour, includes radiotherapy combined with temozolomide. Based on a randomised trial, showing five months increased survival, TTF has been introduced in the management of patients with good performance status. Data from the Swedish national quality registry for CNS tumours have been analysed for TTF usage. The results demonstrate that 65 percent of the patients accepted treatment with TTF. More than half of the treated patients interrupted treatment due to low compliance or their own wish. Median treatment time was 164 days, with a range from 0 to 774 days. There was a large variation between different regions in how many patients were offered TTF treatment. A non-significant trend to better survival was seen for the group of TTF-treated patients compared to individually matched controls. In summary, TTF is a new treatment for glioblastoma, with potential to prolong survival also in real world patients. Today, the treatment is not offered equally to all patients, despite national guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Humanos , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Temozolomida/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia CombinadaRESUMEN
Sex disparities in glioblastoma (GBM) have received increasing attention. Sex-related differences for several molecular markers have been reported, which could impact on clinical factors and outcomes. We therefore analyzed data on all patients with GBM reported to the Swedish National Quality Registry for Primary Brain Tumors, according to sex, with a focus on prognostic factors and survival. All glioma patients registered during 20 years, from 1 January 1999 until 31 December 2018, with SNOMED codes 94403, 94413, and 94423, were analyzed. Chi2-test, log-rank test, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. We identified 5243 patients, of which 2083 were females and 3160 males, resulting in a ratio of 1:1.5. We found sex related differences, with women having diagnostic surgery at a significantly higher age (p = 0.001). Women were also reported to have a worse preoperative performance status (PPS) (<0.001). There was no gender difference for the type of surgery performed. For women with radical surgery, overall survival was slightly better than for men (p = 0.045). The time period did not influence survival, neither for 1999-2005 nor 2006-2018, after temozolomide treatment was introduced (p = 0.35 and 0.10, respectively). In the multivariate analysis including sex, age, surgery, and PPS, a survival advantage was noted for women, but this was not clinically relevant (HR = 0.92, p = 0.006). For patients with GBM; sex-related differences in clinical factors could be identified in a population-based cohort. In this dataset, for survival, the only advantage noted was for women who had undergone radical surgery, although this was clinically almost negligible.
RESUMEN
Cryoprevention (CP) using ice (IC) is an effective strategy to prevent chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM). However, the use of IC may cause adverse reactions and requires water of safe quality to minimize risk of serious infections. This randomized, blinded, parallel group, phase 3 trial was conducted in five Scandinavian centers. Eligible patients were diagnosed with multiple myeloma or lymphoma, scheduled to receive conditioning with high-dose chemotherapy prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients were assigned to cooling with IC or a novel intraoral cooling device (ICD). The primary outcome was the highest OM score during the study period, expressed as peak value on the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS-total). When the entire study population (n = 172) was analyzed for peak OMAS-total, the two cooling methods were equally effective. However, when the lymphoma group was analyzed separately, the ICD significantly reduced the peak OMAS-total score to a greater extent compared to IC (xÌ ± SD; 1.77 ± 1.59 vs. 3.08 ± 1.50; p = 0.047). Combined with existing evidence, the results of the present trial confirm that CP is an effective method to prevent OM. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT03203733.
Asunto(s)
Crioterapia , Linfoma , Mieloma Múltiple , Estomatitis , Crioterapia/instrumentación , Crioterapia/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Linfoma/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Estomatitis/prevención & control , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFB1) acts as a growth inhibitor of normal colonic epithelial cells, however, as a tumor promoter of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. To explore the association between genetic polymorphisms in the TGFB1 pathway and CRC susceptibility and clinical outcome, we carried out a case-control study on a Swedish population of 308 CRC cases and 585 age- and gender-matched controls. The cases were sampled prospectively and had up to 16 years follow-up, making the study material particularly suitable for survival analysis. On the basis of their reported or predicted functional effect, nine single-nucleotide polymorphisms (TGFB1: Leu10Pro; TGFBR1: 9A/6A and IVS7G+24A; FURIN: C-229T; THBS1: T+42C; LTBP1L: C-256G; LTBP4: T-893G and Thr750Ala; BAMBI: T-779A) were selected for genotyping. We evaluated the associations between genotypes and CRC and Dukes' stage. Survival probabilities were compared between different subgroups. The observed statistically significant associations included a decreased CRC risk for TGFBR1 IVS7G+24A minor allele carriers (odds ratio (OR): 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.97), less aggressive tumors with Dukes' stage A+B for carriers of LTBP4 Thr750Ala and BAMBI T-779A minor alleles (OR: 0.58, 95%CI: 0.36-0.93 and OR: 0.51, 95%CI: 0.29-0.89, respectively) and worse survival for FURIN C-229T heterozygotes (hazard ratio: 1.63, 95%CI: 1.08-2.46). As this is the first study about the influence of the polymorphisms in the TGFB1 pathway on CRC progression, further studies in large independent cohorts are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Polimorfismo Genético , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta1/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias del Colon/genética , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Exones/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oportunidad Relativa , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/genética , Receptor Tipo I de Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Transformadores beta/genética , Neoplasias del Recto/genética , Neoplasias del Recto/patologíaRESUMEN
No reliable, non-invasive biomarker of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) exists: circulating CA15-3 (cCA15-3) is the marker mostly used to monitor mBC. Circulating collagen IV (cCOLIV) has been evaluated in other metastatic cancers and has been found to be a promising biomarker. The overarching aim of this study was to evaluate cCOLIV as a potential biomarker in patients with mBC. The first aim was to determine the levels of cCOL IV and cCA15-3 in patients with healthy controls, primary breast cancer (pBC) and mBC. The second aim was to compare levels of cCOLIV and cCA15-3 in patients with different metastatic sites of BC. The third aim was to investigate the prognostic value of cCOLIV and cCA15-3 for mBC patients. The fourth aim was to analyse whether a combination of the two biomarkers was more accurate in detecting mBC than a single marker. Lastly, we investigated the tissue expression levels of COLIV in BC bone metastases (BM) and liver metastases (LM). Plasma levels of cCOLIV and cCA15-3 from healthy controls and patients with pBC and mBC were measured. COLIV expression in tissue from patients with LM and BM was analysed using immunohistochemistry. Clinical and survival data were collected from medical charts. The levels of cCOLIV and cCA15-3 were significantly elevated in mBC patients compared with healthy controls and pBC patients. No differences in cCOLIV and cCA15-3 levels were found based on the metastatic site. High levels of cCOLIV, but not cCA15-3, correlated with poorer survival. cCOLIV alone and the combination of cCA15-3 and cCOLIV were superior to cCA15-3 at detecting mBC. COL IV was highly expressed in the tissue of LM and BM. Our study suggests that cCOLIV is a potential marker to monitor patients with BC.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Colágeno Tipo IV/análisis , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/química , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucina-1/análisisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients have a good prognosis after adequate treatment. Previous treatment with mantle field irradiation has been accompanied by an increased long-term risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study identified co-morbidity factors for the development of cardiovascular side effects and initiated an intervention study aimed to decrease morbidity and mortality of CVD in HL survivors. DESIGN: Hodgkin lymphoma patients aged ≤45 years diagnosed between 1965 and 1995 were invited to participate. In total, 453 patients completed a questionnaire that addressed co-morbidity factors and clinical symptoms. Of these, 319 accepted to participate in a structured clinical visit. The statistical analyses compared individuals with CVD with those with no CVD. RESULTS: Cardiovascular disease was reported by 27.9%. Radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR]: 3.27), hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were shown to be independent risk factors for the development of CVD. The OR for CVD and valve disease in patients who received radiotherapy towards mediastinum was 4.48 and 6.07, respectively. At clinical visits, 42% of the patients were referred for further investigation and 24% of these had a cardiac ultrasound performed due to previously unknown heart murmurs. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy towards mediastinum was an independent risk factor for CVD as well as hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. A reasonable approach as intervention for this cohort of patients is regular monitoring of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia and referral to adequate investigation when cardiac symptoms appear. Broad knowledge about the side effects from radiotherapy in the medical community and well-structured information regarding late side effects to the patients are all reasonable approaches as late effects can occur even 40 years after cancer treatment.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/radioterapia , Humanos , Mediastino , Factores de Riesgo , SobrevivientesRESUMEN
In genome-wide association studies, inherited risk of glioma has been demonstrated for rare familial syndromes and with common variants from 3-5 chromosomal regions. To assess the degree of familial aggregation of glioma, the authors performed a pooled analysis of data from 2 large glioma case-control studies in the United States (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (1994-2006) and University of California, San Francisco (1991-2004)) and from the Swedish Cancer Registry (1958-2006) to measure excess cases of cancer among first-degree relatives of glioma probands. This analysis included 20,377 probands with glioma and 52,714 first-degree relatives. No overall increase was found in the expected number of cancers among family members; however, there were 77% more gliomas than expected. There were also significantly more sarcoma and melanoma cases than expected, which is supported by evidence in the literature, whereas there were significantly fewer-than-expected cases of leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and bladder, lung, pancreatic, prostate, and uterine cancers. This large pooled analysis provided sufficient numbers of related family members to examine the genetic mechanisms involved in the aggregation of glioma with other cancers in these families. However, misclassification due to unvalidated cancers among family members could account for the differences seen by study site.