Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
AJP Rep ; 9(3): e302-e309, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31555492

RESUMEN

Objective This study aims to investigate accuracy of group beta Streptococcus (GBS) rectovaginal cultures at 35 to 37 weeks in predicting intrapartum colonization. Study Design Institutional review board (IRB) approved prospective cohort study of 302 women from October 2015 to May 2017. Patients had the following tests for GBS: first trimester urine culture, rectovaginal culture at 35 to 37 weeks, and intrapartum rectovaginal culture. Outcomes included accuracy of 35- to 37-week GBS rectovaginal culture in detecting results intrapartum, and accuracy of first trimester urine culture in comparison to intrapartum rectovaginal cultures. Results There was sufficient evidence of agreement between results at 35 to 37 weeks with intrapartum cultures ( p = 0.001). However, agreement was weak, 11 patients (3.7%) were GBS positive intrapartum but negative at 35 to 37 weeks; and 33 patients (11%) were initially GBS positive but were negative intrapartum. Sensitivity and specificity of the 35- to 37-week culture was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI]:54-84%) and 87% (95% CI: 83-91%), respectively. There was also weak agreement between first trimester urine culture and intrapartum rectovaginal culture. Specificity for this assessment was 98% (95% CI: 97-100%) and was significantly different compared with antepartum GBS culture ( p < 0.001). Accuracy between antepartum GBS rectovaginal culture and urine culture was similar (85 vs. 87%, p = 0.47). Conclusion The 35- to 37-week GBS rectovaginal culture might be a poor predictor for intrapartum colonization.

3.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 137(2): 192-195, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28196269

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine reference ranges for patient vital signs during the immediate postpartum period. METHODS: A retrospective chart review collected data on the variables of interest for all women with 0-24-hour postpartum data available at two hospitals in the USA, between July 1, 2012, and January 31, 2015. Patients were excluded if they had received antihypertensives, uterotonics, or blood products. Regression lines, with 95% prediction intervals, were constructed for shock index, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, pulse pressure, and rate over pressure evaluation (ROPE) values. RESULTS: There were 8874 patients and 87 336 data measurements included in the analysis. During the 24 hours following delivery, an increase in ROPE values, and decreases in pulse pressure, heart rate, and systolic blood pressure were recorded for all patients; an increase in shock index was observed among patients who had cesarean deliveries. Anomalous values for the shock index (>1.0), and reference ranges for pulse pressure (21.09-69.32 mm Hg), ROPE (1.01-3.22 bpm/mm Hg), heart rate (51-112 bpm), and SBP (81-137 mm Hg) were generated. CONCLUSION: Specific reference ranges for patients during the postpartum period could be used in future studies to determine the parameters, or combinations of parameters, that perform best as early markers of hemodynamic compromise in women experiencing early postpartum hemorrhage.


Asunto(s)
Atención Perinatal , Hemorragia Posparto/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Choque/diagnóstico , Signos Vitales , Adulto , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Embarazo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Choque/fisiopatología , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA