Self-management strategies for people with epilepsy: An overview of reviews.

OBJECTIVE: This overview of systematic reviews aimed to appraise evidence regarding self-management strategies on health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, medication compliance, seizure status and psychosocial outcomes compared to usual care for people with epilepsy. METHODS: Databases were searched until September 2022 using MeSH terms included OVID Medline, Embase and Cochrane. Following application of eligibility criteria, data were extracted and quality of articles was assessed using the AMSTAR2 checklist. A narrative synthesis of evidence included certainty of evidence evaluated using a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: The 12 selected reviews contained three meta-analyses and 91 unique primary studies. One review considered only epilepsy with intellectual disability and three considered paediatrics. Interventions included technologically-based interventions, small group discussion, or counselling and educational programs. There was high certainty evidence to suggest self-management is associated with improvement in health-related quality of life and moderate certainty evidence to suggest improvement in depression symptoms. There was low certainty evidence to suggest a modest reduction in negative health events and a minimal increase in the satisfaction with life. There was no evidence of benefit favouring self-management on measures of adherence epilepsy self-management, perception of self-efficacy, medication adherence or seizure status. SIGNIFICANCE: Despite high certainty evidence to suggest that self-management strategies for people with epilepsy improve health-related quality of life, benefits have not been demonstrated for outcomes that would be expected to be associated with these improvements, such as seizure status. These results provide support for self-management strategies to supplement usual care for people with epilepsy.

Self-management Programs Within Rehabilitation Yield Positive Health Outcomes at a Small Increased Cost Compared With Usual Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if self-management programs, supported by a health professional, in rehabilitation are cost effective. DATA SOURCES: Six databases were searched until December 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials with adults completing a supported self-management program while participating in rehabilitation or receiving health professional input in the hospital or community settings were included. Self-management programs were completed outside the structured, supervised therapy and health professional sessions. Included trials had a cost measure and an effectiveness outcome reported, such as health-related quality of life or function. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations was used to determine the certainty of evidence across trials included in each meta-analysis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated based on the mean difference from the meta-analyses of contributing health care costs and quality of life. DATA EXTRACTION: After application of the search strategy, two independent reviewers determined eligibility of identified literature, initially by reviewing the title and/or abstract before full-text review. Using a customized form, data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Forty-three trials were included, and 27 had data included in meta-analyses. Where self-management was a primary intervention, there was moderate certainty of a meaningful positive difference in quality-of-life utility index of 0.03 units (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.06). The cost difference between self-management as the primary intervention and usual care (comprising usual intervention/therapy, minimal intervention [including education only], or no intervention) potentially favored the comparison group (mean difference=Australian dollar [AUD]90; 95% confidence interval, -AUD130 to AUD310). The cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for self-management programs as a stand-alone intervention was AUD3000, which was below the acceptable willingness-to-pay threshold in Australia per QALY gained (AUD50,000/QALY gained). CONCLUSIONS: Self-management as an intervention is low cost and could improve health-related quality of life.

An evidence-based demand management strategy using a hub and spoke training model reduces waiting time for children's therapy services: An implementation trial.

BACKGROUND: Waiting lists for community-based paediatric therapy services are common and lead to poorer health outcomes, anxiety and missed opportunities for treatment during crucial developmental stages. The Specific Timely Appointments for Triage (STAT) model has been shown to reduce waiting lists in a range of health settings. AIMS: To determine whether providing training and support in the STAT model to champions within five community health centres using a remote 'hub and spoke' approach could reduce waiting time from referral to first appointment. METHODS: Representatives from five community health centres providing paediatric therapy services (speech therapy, occupational therapy and other allied health services) participated in five online workshops over 6 months. They were guided sequentially through the steps of the STAT model: understanding supply and demand, reducing backlogs, preserving space for new patients based on demand and redesigning models of care to maintain flow. Waiting time was measured in three consecutive years (pre, during and post intervention) and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Employee satisfaction and perception of the model were explored using surveys. RESULTS: Data from 2564 children (mean age 3.2 years, 66% male) showed a 33% reduction in waiting time from the pre-intervention (median 57 days) to the post-intervention period (median 38 days, p < 0.01). The total number of children waiting was observed to reduce from 335 immediately prior to the intervention (mean per centre 67, SD 25.1) to 112 (mean 22, SD 13.6) after implementation (t[8] = 3.56, p < 0.01). There was no impact on employee satisfaction or other aspects of service delivery. CONCLUSION: Waiting lists are a major challenge across the health system. STAT provides a practical, low-cost, data-driven approach to tackling waiting times. This study demonstrates its effectiveness in paediatric therapy services and provides evidence for a 'hub and spoke' approach to facilitate implementation that could be provided at scale.

Recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: Guideline adherence for hip and knee osteoarthritis management is often poor, possibly related to the quality and/or inconsistent recommendations. This systematic review of hip and knee osteoarthritis guidelines aimed to appraise the quality and consistency in recommendations across higher-quality guidelines. METHODS: Eight databases, guideline repositories, and professional associations websites were searched on 27/10/2022. Guideline quality was appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II tool) (six domains). Higher quality was defined as scoring ≥60% for domains 3 (rigour of development), 6 (editorial independence), plus one other. Consistency in recommendations across higher-quality guidelines was reported descriptively. This review was registered prospectively (CRD42021216154). RESULTS: Seven higher-quality and 18 lesser-quality guidelines were included. AGREE II domain scores for higher-quality guidelines were > 60% except for applicability (average 46%). Higher-quality guidelines consistently recommended in favour of education, exercise, and weight management and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (hip and knee), and intra-articular corticosteroid injections (knee). Higher quality guidelines consistently recommended against hyaluronic acid (hip) and stem cell (hip and knee) injections. Other pharmacological recommendations in higher-quality guidelines (e.g., paracetamol, intra-articular corticosteroid (hip), hyaluronic acid (knee)) and adjunctive treatments (e.g., acupuncture) were less consistent. Arthroscopy was consistently recommended against in higher-quality guidelines. No higher-quality guidelines considered arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Higher-quality guidelines for hip and knee osteoarthritis consistently recommend clinicians implement exercise, education, and weight management, alongside consideration of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and intra-articular corticosteroid injections (knee). Lack of consensus on some pharmacological options and adjunctive treatments creates challenges for guideline adherence. Future guidelines must prioritise providing implementation guidance, considering consistently low applicability scores.

A walking programme for adults living in the community after hip fracture: A feasibility randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of a walking programme for community-dwelling adults recovering from hip fracture. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial with embedded qualitative analysis. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Aged at least 60 years and living in the community after hip fracture. INTERVENTIONS: In addition to standard care, the experimental group received weekly home-based physiotherapy for 12 weeks to facilitate 100 minutes/week of moderate-intensity walking. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility domains of demand, acceptability, implementation, practicality and limited efficacy. RESULTS: Of 158 potentially eligible, 38 participated (23 women, mean age 80 years, SD 9). The recruitment rate of 24% indicated low demand. Participants considered the walking programme highly acceptable. The programme was implemented as intended; the experimental group received a mean of 11 (SD 1) consultations and averaged more than 100 min of walking per week. The programme was practical with no serious adverse events and no between-group difference in risk of falling or hospital readmissions. Demonstrating evidence of efficacy, there were moderate standardized mean differences for physical activity favouring the experimental group, who increased daily moderate-intensity physical activity compared to the control group (MD 8 min, 95% CI 2-13). There were no between-group differences in mobility, walking confidence or quality of life. CONCLUSION: A walking programme for community-dwelling older adults after hip fracture was acceptable, could be implemented as intended and was practical and demonstrated preliminary evidence of efficacy in increasing physical activity. However, low demand would threaten the feasibility of such a programme.

An innovative model of access and triage to reduce waiting in an outpatient epilepsy clinic: an intervention study.

BACKGROUND: Delayed access to outpatient care may negatively impact on health outcomes. We aimed to evaluate implementation of the Specific Timely Appointments for Triage (STAT) model of access in an epilepsy clinic to reduce a long waitlist and waiting time. METHODS: This study is an intervention study using pre-post comparison and an interrupted time series analysis to measure the effect of implementation of the STAT model to an epilepsy clinic. Data were collected over 28 months to observe the number of patients on the waitlist and the waiting time over three time periods: 12 months prior to implementation of STAT, ten months during implementation and six months post-intervention. STAT combines one-off backlog reduction with responsive scheduling that protects time for new appointments based on historical data. The primary outcomes were the number of patients on the waitlist and the waiting time across the three time periods. Secondary outcomes evaluated pre- and post-intervention changes in number of appointments offered weekly, non-arrival and discharge rates. RESULTS: A total of 938 patients were offered a first appointment over the study period. The long waitlist was almost eliminated, reducing from 616 during the pre-intervention period to 11 post-intervention (p = 0.002), but the hypothesis that waiting time would decrease was not supported. The interrupted time series analysis indicated a temporary increase in waiting time during the implementation period but no significant change in slope or level in the post- compared to the pre-intervention period. Direct comparison of the cohort of patients seen in the pre- and post-intervention periods suggested an increase in median waiting time following the intervention (34 [IQR 25-86] to 46 [IQR 36-61] days (p = 0.001)), but the interquartile range reduced indicating less variability in days waited and more timely access for the longest waiters. CONCLUSIONS: The STAT model was implemented in a specialist epilepsy outpatient clinic and reduced a large waitlist. Reductions in the waitlist were achieved with little or no increase in waiting time. The STAT model provides a framework for an alternative way to operate outpatient clinics that can help to ensure that all people referred are offered an appointment in a timely manner.

Access to and effectiveness of clinical supervision for allied health workers: A cross-sectional survey.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical supervision supports patient care and health worker wellbeing. However, access to effective clinical supervision is not equitable. We aimed to explore the access and effectiveness of clinical supervision in allied health workers. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey design using the Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale (MCSS-26), including open-ended survey responses, to collect data on effectiveness. Multivariable regression was conducted to determine how MCSS-26 scores differed across discipline, work location and setting. Open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: 1113 workers completed the survey, with 319 (28%) reporting they did not receive supervision; this group were more likely to hold management positions, work in a medical imaging discipline and practice in a regional or rural location. For those who received supervision, MCSS-26 scores significantly differed between disciplines and work settings; psychologists and those practising in private practice settings (i.e. fee-for-service) reported the highest levels of effectiveness. Suggested strategies to enhance effectiveness included the use of alternate supervision models, dedicated time for supervision, and training. CONCLUSION: Targeted subgroups for improving access include senior staff, medical imaging professionals, and those working across regional and rural settings. Where supervision was least effective, strategies to address behaviours with organisational support may be required.

Barriers and facilitators to implementing self-directed therapy activities in inpatient rehabilitation settings.

BACKGROUND: Self-directed therapy activities are not currently part of routine care during inpatient rehabilitation. Understanding patient and clinician perspectives on self-directed therapy is key to increasing implementation. The aim of this study was to investigate barriers and facilitators to implementing a self-directed therapy programme ("My Therapy") in adult inpatient rehabilitation settings. METHODS: My Therapy was recommended by physiotherapists and occupational therapists and completed by rehabilitation inpatients independently, outside of supervised therapy sessions. Physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and patients were invited to complete an online questionnaire comprising open-ended questions on barriers and facilitators to prescribing and participating in My Therapy. A directed content analysis of free-text responses was undertaken, with data coded using categories of the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B model). RESULTS: Eleven patients and 20 clinicians completed the questionnaire. Patient capability was reported to be facilitated by comprehensive education by clinicians, with mixed attitudes towards the format of the programme booklet. Clinician capability was facilitated by staff collaboration. One benefit was the better use of downtime between the supervised therapy sessions, but opportunities for patients to engage in self-directed therapy were compromised by the lack of space to complete the programme. Clinician opportunity was reported to be provided via organisational support but workload was a reported barrier. Patient motivation to engage in self-directed therapy was reported to be fostered by feeling empowered, engaged, and encouraged to participate. Clinician motivation was associated with belief in the value of the programme. CONCLUSION: Despite some barriers to rehabilitation patients independently practicing therapeutic exercises and activities outside of supervised sessions, both clinicians and patients agreed it should be considered as routine practice. To do this, patient time, ward space, and staff collaboration are required. Further research is needed to scale-up the implementation of the My Therapy programme and evaluate its effectiveness.

Behaviour change interventions to increase physical activity in hospitalised patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

BACKGROUND: Low physical activity levels are a major problem for people in hospital and are associated with adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression aimed to determine the effect of behaviour change interventions on physical activity levels in hospitalised patients. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials of behaviour change interventions to increase physical activity in hospitalised patients were selected from a database search, supplemented by reference list checking and citation tracking. Data were synthesised with random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses, applying Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. The primary outcome was objectively measured physical activity. Secondary measures were patient-related outcomes (e.g. mobility), service level outcomes (e.g. length of stay), adverse events and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty randomised controlled trials of behaviour change interventions involving 2,568 participants (weighted mean age 67 years) included six trials with a high risk of bias. There was moderate-certainty evidence that behaviour change interventions increased physical activity levels (SMD 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.55). Findings in relation to mobility and length of stay were inconclusive. Adverse events were poorly reported. Meta-regression found behaviour change techniques of goal setting (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.05-0.53) and feedback (excluding high risk of bias trials) (SMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.11-0.60) were independently associated with increased physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted behaviour change interventions were associated with increases in physical activity in hospitalised patients. The trials in this review were inconclusive in relation to the patient-related or health service benefits of increasing physical activity in hospital.

The impact of additional allied health staffing on rehabilitation outcomes at discharge from a sub-acute geriatric evaluation and management unit: A quasi-experimental, pre-post intervention study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of increasing allied health staffing levels on patient and health service outcomes across 1) all Geriatric Evaluation and Management patients, and 2) Geriatric Evaluation and Management patients discharged to home in the community. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, pre-post intervention study. SETTING: Two sub-acute hospital units in an Australian, tertiary health service. SUBJECTS: Data related to patients admitted to the study units, who were classified as Geriatric Evaluation and Management patients. INTERVENTIONS: Comparison of therapy time across two units with a differential in staffing allocation over a six-month trial period. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes: length of stay, readmission rate, and improvement on the Functional Independence Measure. Secondary outcomes: total cost of admission per patient and number of allied health sessions. RESULTS: Data were analysed for 214 patients (mean age = 79.9, standard deviation (SD) = 9.4 years, mean Functional Independence Measure (FIM = 64.9, SD = 21.2) admitted to the intervention unit, and 199 patients (mean age = 81.3, SD = 8.5, mean FIM = 64.2, SD = 24.0) admitted to the control unit. The overall difference in staffing allocation between the control and intervention units for the trial period was 21%. There was no statistically significant difference between units in subacute length of stay (Adj Coef = -0.10 days, 95%CI = -0.39 to 0.19), rate of readmission (OR = 1.0, 95%CI = 0.5 to 2.0) or change in function (Coef = 1.42 FIM change score, 95%CI = -2.4 to 5.3). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing allied health staffing allocation to a unit over six-months did not impact change in function or length of stay for patients admitted for Geriatric Evaluation and Management.

The impact of outsourcing bed-based aged care services on quality of care: A multisite observational study.

BACKGROUND: Outsourcing health-care services has become popular globally, provided by both profit and non-for-profit organizations with varying degrees of quality. To date, few published studies have evaluated the quality of care in health services using outsourcing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in quality of care (effectiveness, safety and patient experience) for a Transition Care Program designed to improve older people's independence and confidence after a hospital stay, when provided within a public health network compared to being outsourced to private facilities. METHODS: For clients discharged to a residential Transition Care Program operating across three sites from a large health service network (n = 1546), an audit of medical records was completed. Site 1 remained within the public health service (internally managed), whereas Sites 2 and 3 involved outsourcing to residential aged care facilities. The main outcome measures were discharge destination, length of stay and number of falls. Client demographics were analysed descriptively, and inferential statistics for continuous data and negative binomial regression for event data were used to examine differences between the sites. RESULTS: There were differences in quality of care between the internally and outsourced managed sites. One outsourced site discharged a smaller proportion to rehabilitation (P = 0.003) compared to the other two sites. There were differences in length of stay between the three sites. The length of stay was a mean of 4.8 days less at Site 1 (internally managed) (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.5 to 9.1) than Site 2 and 4.6 days less (95% CI 1.2 to 8.1) than Site 3. For those discharged to permanent residential care, the length of stay was 9.4 days less at the internal site than Site 2 (95% CI 3.5 to 15.2) and 7.0 days less than Site 3 (95% CI 1.9 to 12). Additionally, a lower rate of falls was recorded at Site 1 (internally managed) compared to Site 2 (outsourced) (incidence rate ratio = 0.44 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.60), P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An internally managed Transition Care Program in a public health network was associated with better quality of care outcomes compared to outsourced services.

Caregivers' Perceptions of a High Repetition Sit-To-Stand Exercise Program for Children with Cerebral Palsy Who Have Mobility Limitations.

AIMS: To explore caregiver perceptions about the outcomes and feasibility of a high repetition sit-to-stand home-based exercise program on themselves and their children with cerebral palsy who have mobility limitations. METHODS: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 caregivers (17 women, mean age 39 y 6 mo (SD 8 y 4 mo) of 19 children with cerebral palsy (10 males, mean age 7 y 2 mo (SD 2 y 1 mo) classified as level III (n = 8) or IV (n = 11) on the Gross Motor Function Classification System. The children had completed a 6-week task-specific sit-to-stand exercise program. Each week a physical therapist and caregivers supervised the program: twice by the physical therapist and three times by the caregivers. Interviews were completed immediately after program completion, and transcripts were analyzed using a process of inductive thematic analysis within an interpretive description framework. RESULTS: Themes were: (1) caregivers saw positive changes in their children from completing the program, (2) seeing positive changes gave caregivers hope that their child could develop with further training, and (3) the program was feasible to complete. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers perceived positive changes in their children and expressed increased hope for their child's future after a high repetition sit-to-stand exercise program, suggesting the program is feasible with caregiver supervision.

Effectiveness of knowledge brokering and recommendation dissemination for influencing healthcare resource allocation decisions: A cluster randomised controlled implementation trial.

BACKGROUND: Implementing evidence into clinical practice is a key focus of healthcare improvements to reduce unwarranted variation. Dissemination of evidence-based recommendations and knowledge brokering have emerged as potential strategies to achieve evidence implementation by influencing resource allocation decisions. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of these two research implementation strategies to facilitate evidence-informed healthcare management decisions for the provision of inpatient weekend allied health services. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This multicentre, single-blinded (data collection and analysis), three-group parallel cluster randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation was conducted in Australian and New Zealand hospitals between February 2018 and January 2020. Clustering and randomisation took place at the organisation level where weekend allied health staffing decisions were made (e.g., network of hospitals or single hospital). Hospital wards were nested within these decision-making structures. Three conditions were compared over a 12-month period: (1) usual practice waitlist control; (2) dissemination of written evidence-based practice recommendations; and (3) access to a webinar-based knowledge broker in addition to the recommendations. The primary outcome was the alignment of weekend allied health provision with practice recommendations at the cluster and ward levels, addressing the adoption, penetration, and fidelity to the recommendations. The secondary outcome was mean hospital length of stay at the ward level. Outcomes were collected at baseline and 12 months later. A total of 45 clusters (n = 833 wards) were randomised to either control (n = 15), recommendation (n = 16), or knowledge broker (n = 14) conditions. Four (9%) did not provide follow-up data, and no adverse events were recorded. No significant effect was found with either implementation strategy for the primary outcome at the cluster level (recommendation versus control ß 18.11 [95% CI -8,721.81 to 8,758.02] p = 0.997; knowledge broker versus control ß 1.24 [95% CI -6,992.60 to 6,995.07] p = 1.000; recommendation versus knowledge broker ß -9.12 [95% CI -3,878.39 to 3,860.16] p = 0.996) or ward level (recommendation versus control ß 0.01 [95% CI 0.74 to 0.75] p = 0.983; knowledge broker versus control ß -0.12 [95% CI -0.54 to 0.30] p = 0.581; recommendation versus knowledge broker ß -0.19 [-1.04 to 0.65] p = 0.651). There was no significant effect between strategies for the secondary outcome at ward level (recommendation versus control ß 2.19 [95% CI -1.36 to 5.74] p = 0.219; knowledge broker versus control ß -0.55 [95% CI -1.16 to 0.06] p = 0.075; recommendation versus knowledge broker ß -3.75 [95% CI -8.33 to 0.82] p = 0.102). None of the control or knowledge broker clusters transitioned to partial or full alignment with the recommendations. Three (20%) of the clusters who only received the written recommendations transitioned from nonalignment to partial alignment. Limitations include underpowering at the cluster level sample due to the grouping of multiple geographically distinct hospitals to avoid contamination. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to a lack of power at the cluster level, this trial was unable to identify a difference between the knowledge broker strategy and dissemination of recommendations compared with usual practice for the promotion of evidence-informed resource allocation to inpatient weekend allied health services. Future research is needed to determine the interactions between different implementation strategies and healthcare contexts when translating evidence into healthcare practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618000029291.

What is the effect of delays in access to specialist epilepsy care on patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between delays in access to specialist epilepsy care and patient outcomes. METHODS: Three databases were searched using eligibility criteria related to the concepts of timely access, epilepsy, and clinical outcome. Comparative data on patient outcomes by time to treatment was required for inclusion. Studies were selected independently by two researchers who reviewed title/abstract, then full text articles. Data were extracted and risk of bias was evaluated. Results were synthesized in random effects model meta-analyses, and strength of the body of evidence was evaluated. Descriptive analysis was conducted for studies not included in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies, reported in 40 papers, were included. The studies investigated impact of delays in diagnosis, commencement of medication, or surgery for children and adults. Early diagnosis and access to specialist neurology care was associated with improvements in seizure status, development, and/or intelligence quotients. Meta-analyses provided low to high certainty evidence of increased odds of improved seizure outcome with early commencement of medication depending on follow-up period and individual risk factors. There was moderate certainty evidence that people with favorable seizure outcomes wait less time (MD 2.8 years, 95% CI 1.7-3.9) for surgery compared to those with unfavorable outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: This review provides evidence that earlier access to specialist epilepsy care for diagnosis, commencement of medication, and surgery is associated with better patient outcomes.

Sit-to-stand training for self-care and mobility in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To investigate if a sit-to-stand exercise programme for children with cerebral palsy (CP) would improve self-care and mobility. METHOD: Thirty-eight children with CP (19 males, 19 females; mean age 8y 0mo, SD 2y 4mo, age range 4y 0mo-12y 4mo) classified in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels III and IV and their caregivers were randomly allocated to sit-to-stand training plus routine physiotherapy (balance and gait training) or routine physiotherapy only (controls). Task-specific sit-to-stand training was completed five times a week for 6 weeks under physiotherapist (twice weekly) and caregiver (three times weekly) supervision. Blinded outcome assessments at week 7 were the self-care and mobility domains of the Functional Independence Measure for Children, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST), and Modified Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI). RESULTS: The sit-to-stand group self-care increased by 2.2 units (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-3.1) and mobility increased by 2.2 units (95% CI 1.4-3.0) compared to the control group. In the sit-to-stand group, the FTSST was reduced by 4.0 seconds (95% CI -4.7 to -3.2) and the MCSI was reduced by 0.8 units (95% CI -1.2 to -0.4) compared to the control group. INTERPRETATION: A sit-to-stand exercise programme for children with CP classified in GMFCS levels III and IV improved sit-to-stand performance and resulted in small improvements in self-care and mobility, while reducing caregiver strain. What this paper adds Sit-to-stand training improved independence in self-care and mobility for children with cerebral palsy (CP). Home-based sit-to-stand training programmes for children with CP can reduce the burden on supervising caregivers.

Locomotor and robotic assistive gait training for children with cerebral palsy.

AIM: To determine if robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) using surface muscle electrical stimulation and locomotor training enhances mobility outcomes when compared to locomotor training alone in children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: Forty children (18 females, 22 males; mean age 8y 1mo, SD 2y 1mo; range 5y 1mo-12y 11mo) with CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels (GMFCS) III, IV, and V were randomly assigned to the RAGT and locomotor training (RAGT+LT) group or locomotor training only group (dosage for both: three 1-hour sessions a week for 6 weeks). Outcomes were assessed at baseline T1 (week 0), post-treatment T2 (week 6), and retention T3 (week 26). The primary outcome measure was the Goal Attainment Scale. Secondary outcome measures included the 10-metre walk test, children's functional independence measure mobility and self-care domain, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, and the Gross Motor Function Measure. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups for both the primary and secondary outcome measures. All participants completed the intervention in their original group allocation. There were no reported adverse events. INTERPRETATION: The addition of RAGT to locomotor training does not significantly improve motor outcomes in children with CP in GMFCS levels III, IV, and V. Future studies could investigate health and well-being outcomes after locomotor training. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Marginally ambulant and non-ambulant children with cerebral palsy can participate in locomotor training. Robotic assisted gait training when added to locomotor training does not appear to be any more effective than locomotor training alone.

Self-managed occupational therapy and physiotherapy for adults receiving inpatient rehabilitation ('My Therapy'): protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Process evaluations have been recommended alongside clinical and economic evaluations to enable an in-depth understanding of factors impacting results. My Therapy is a self-management program designed to augment usual care inpatient rehabilitation through the provision of additional occupational therapy and physiotherapy exercises and activities, for the patient to complete outside of supervised therapy. The aims of the process evaluation are to assess the implementation process by investigating fidelity, quality of implementation, acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility and adaptation of the My Therapy intervention; and identify contextual factors associated with variations in outcomes, including the perspectives and experiences of patients and therapists. METHODS: The process evaluation will be conducted alongside the clinical and economic evaluation of My Therapy, within eight rehabilitation wards across two public and two private Australian health networks. All participants of the stepped wedge cluster randomised trial (2,160 rehabilitation patients) will be included in the process evaluation (e.g., ward audit); with a subset of 120 participants undergoing more intensive evaluation (e.g., surveys and activity logs). In addition, 24 staff (occupational therapists and physiotherapists) from participating wards will participate in the process evaluation. The mixed-methods study design will adopt a range of quantitative and qualitative research approaches. Data will be collected via a service profile survey and audits of clinical practice across the participating wards (considering areas such as staffing profiles and prescription of self-management programs). The intensive patient participant data collection will involve structured therapy participation and self-management program audits, Exercise Self Efficacy Scale, patient activity logs, patient surveys, and patient-worn activity monitors. Staff data collection will include surveys and focus groups. DISCUSSION: The process evaluation will provide context to the clinical and economic outcomes associated with the My Therapy clinical trial. It considers how clinical and economic outcomes were achieved, and how to sustain the outcomes within the participating health networks. It will also provide context to inform future scaling of My Therapy to other health networks, and influence future models of rehabilitation and related policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000313831; registered 22/03/2021, http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380828&isReview=true ).

Self-managed occupational therapy and physiotherapy for adults receiving inpatient rehabilitation ('My Therapy'): protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Ensuring patients receive an effective dose of therapeutic exercises and activities is a significant challenge for inpatient rehabilitation. My Therapy is a self-management program which encourages independent practice of occupational therapy and physiotherapy exercises and activities, outside of supervised therapy sessions. METHODS: This implementation trial aims to determine both the clinical effectiveness of My Therapy on the outcomes of function and health-related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness per minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in functional independence achieved and per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained, compared to usual care. Using a stepped-wedge cluster randomised design, My Therapy will be implemented across eight rehabilitation wards (inpatient and home-based) within two public and two private Australian health networks, over 54-weeks. We will include 2,160 patients aged 18 + years receiving rehabilitation for any diagnosis. Each ward will transition from the usual care condition (control group receiving usual care) to the experimental condition (intervention group receiving My Therapy in addition to usual care) sequentially at six-week intervals. The primary clinical outcome is achievement of a MCID in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) at discharge. Secondary outcomes include improvement in quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) at discharge, length of stay, 30-day re-admissions, discharge accommodation, follow-up rehabilitation services and adverse events (falls). The economic outcomes are the cost-effectiveness per MCID in functional independence (FIM™) achieved and per QALY gained, for My Therapy compared to usual care, from a health-care sector perspective. Cost of implementation will also be reported. Clinical outcomes will be analysed via mixed-effects linear or logistic regression models, and economic outcomes will be analysed via incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. DISCUSSION: The My Therapy implementation trial will determine the effect of adding self-management within inpatient rehabilitation care. The results may influence health service models of rehabilitation including recommendations for systemic change to the inpatient rehabilitation model of care to include self-management. Findings have the potential to improve patient function and quality of life, and the ability to participate in self-management. Potential health service benefits include reduced hospital length of stay, improved access to rehabilitation and reduced health service costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000313831; registered 22/03/2021, http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380828&isReview=true ).

Physical activity for children undergoing acute cancer treatment: A qualitative study of parental perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how to facilitate participation in physical activity among children receiving acute cancer treatment. OBJECTIVE: To understand the parental perspectives on physical activity for children during acute cancer treatment and explore strategies to overcome physical inactivity. METHODS: A qualitative study was completed. Data were collected via semistructured interviews with parents of children (aged 4-18 years) who were in their first nine months of cancer treatment. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Twenty parents were interviewed. A childhood cancer diagnosis and subsequent treatment were described as setting in motion a spiral of physical inactivity. Parents identified movement restrictions as a result of commencing treatment and the hospital environment as factors initiating this decline. Parents described the subsequent impact of movement restrictions on their child over time including loss of independence, isolation, and low motivation. These three consequences further contributed to an inability and unwillingness to be physically active. Parents responded in a variety of ways to their child's inactivity, and many were motivated to overcome the barriers to physical activity yet exhibited a reduced capacity to do so. Suggested intervention strategies highlighted the need for comprehensive support from the organization providing treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Reasons for reduced physical activity in children receiving acute treatment for cancer are complex and multifactorial. Inactivity cannot be addressed by children and parents alone but requires support from the oncology team through changes to the environment, services, and policies to promote physical activity. These findings may be used to inform targeted, effective, and feasible physical activity interventions.

Multiple short bouts of exercise are better than a single continuous bout for cardiometabolic health: a randomised crossover trial.

PURPOSE: To compare cardiometabolic responses to five consecutive days of daily postprandial exercise accumulated in three 10-min bouts or a single 30-min bout to a no-exercise control. METHODS: Ten insufficiently active adults completed three trials in a randomised order. Each trial comprised five consecutive days of 30 min of exercise either accumulated in three separate 10-min bouts (ACC) after main meals; a single 30-min bout after dinner (CONT); or a no-exercise control (NOEX). Glucose regulation was assessed from an oral glucose tolerance test. Applanation tonometry was used to assess pulse wave velocity approximately 12 h following completion of the final trial. RESULTS: Area under the 2-h glucose curve was similar for CONT (mean; 95% CI 917 mmol L-1 2 h-1; 815 to 1019) and ACC (931 mmol L-1 2 h-1; 794 to 1068, p = 0.671). Area under the 2-h insulin curve was greater following NOEX (70,328 pmol L-1 2 h-1; 30,962 to 109,693) than ACC (51,313 pmol L-1 2 h-1: 21,822 to 80,806, p = 0.007). Pulse wave velocity was lower for ACC (5.96 m s-1: 5.38 to 6.53) compared to CONT (6.93 m s-1: 5.92 to 7.94, p = 0.031) but not significantly lower for ACC compared to NOEX (6.52 m s-1: 5.70 to 7.34, p = 0.151). CONCLUSION: Accumulating 30 min of moderate-intensity walking in three bouts throughout the day is more effective at reducing markers of cardiometabolic health risk in insufficiently active, apparently healthy adults than a single daily bout. Both accumulated and single-bout walking were equally as effective at reducing postprandial glucose concentrations compared to a no-exercise control. Therefore, accumulating exercise in short bouts after each main meal might be more advantageous for overall cardiometabolic health.