Micro-computed Tomographic Assessment and Comparative Study of the Shaping Ability of 6 Nickel-Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study.

INTRODUCTION: This research studies and compares the shaping ability of WaveOne Gold (WG; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK), the Reciproc Blue (RB; VDW, Munich, Germany), TRUShape (TS, Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties), XP-endo Shaper (XP; FKG, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland), iRace (IR, FKG), and TruNatomy (TN; Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) in the preparation of moderately curved canals and using micro-computed tomographic technology. METHODS: Sixty lower molars with 2 mesial canals were randomly distributed into 6 groups of 10 molars and 20 canals per group (n = 20). Specimens were scanned before and after preparation using the SkyScan 1275 (Bruker microCT, Kontich, Belgium). Group 1 was treated with WG, group 2 with RB, group 3 with TS, group 4 with XP, group 5 with IR, and group 6 with TN. After instrumentation, researchers quantified the changes produced in the canal geometry in terms of surface, volume, structure thickness, surface convexity index, structure model index, percentage of surface touched, and centroids. Wilcoxon and analysis of variance tests were performed to compare the values before and after preparation and the differences between groups. The significance level was established at 5%. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between WG and RB (P > .05) and between TN and XP (P > .05). TN had significant differences with WG, RB, TS, and IR (P < .05). All the files produced similar apical transportation (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: WG and RB and TN and XP had similar shaping effectivity. TS and WG touched the highest percentages of canal surfaces (81% and 73%, respectively) but produced the biggest changes in the canal anatomy. TN and XP better kept the canal anatomy, but TN touched the lowest percentage of canal surface (50%). All the files used were able to clean and to shape moderately curved canals with minimal apical transportation.

TRUShape Versus XP-endo Shaper: A Micro-computed Tomographic Assessment and Comparative Study of the Shaping Ability-An In Vitro Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shaping ability of XP-endo Shaper (XP; FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) and TRUShape (TS; Dentsply/Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) during the preparation of moderated curved root canals using micro-computed tomographic imaging. METHODS: Twenty human maxillary premolars with 2 roots were randomly separated into 2 groups of 10 teeth, which were scanned before and after root canal preparation using the SkyScan 1275 X-ray microtomograph (Bruker micro-CT, Kontich, Belgium) at a nominal resolution of <4 µm. Premolars and irrigant were maintained at 37° before and during preparation; group 1 was treated using XP and group 2 with TS. After preparation, researchers measured the amount of dentin removed, untreated superficies of canal walls, root canal volume, degree of canal transportation, and centering ability. Values of central tendency and dispersion were calculated using Statgraphics Centurion XV software (StatPoint Technologies, Inc, Warrenton, VA); means and median were compared using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. The level of significance was set at 5% (P < .05). RESULTS: No significant statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups in shaping ability, untreated superficies of canal walls, degree of canal transportation, and centering ability (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Instrumentation of moderately curved root canals using the XP single file and the TS file system were equally effective. XP and TS maintained the original anatomy of the root canals and showed a similar percentage of untreated canal walls, centered ability, and minimal apical transportation.