Facilitating diversity of thought in learning environments for nursing students.

Human capital development is one of the goals of higher education and a decrease in open dialogue threatens these ideals and aspirations. A recent survey of undergraduate students showed that many students censor their point of view. There are many potential reasons for this, but it could be secondary to the current sociopolitical climate. Having educators who encourage and model open dialogue while supporting diversity of thought would provide alternative perspectives and innovation. Encouraging diversity of thought will enhance understanding of other's perspectives and unleash creative problem solving to address concerns in nursing practice and facilitate innovative research. The purpose of this article is to present strategies that can be employed to promote diversity of thought among nursing students in a learning environment. Exemplars are presented illustrating some of the strategies discussed.

E-Cigarettes: Background and Essential Information for Providers.

E-cigarettes are rapidly increasing in use across all populations, particularly in adolescents and young adults. Smoking cessation is important for patients with cancer; however, evidence supporting e-cigarettes as an effective cessation strategy is lacking and not currently recommended. Information on risks, safety, and recommendations regarding vaping will be discussed. Oncology nursing considerations for e-cigarettes include communicating known and potential risks while using smoking cessation strategies for people at risk for cancer or who have cancer and are currently vaping.

The impact of deliberate reflection with WISE-MD™ modules on surgical clerkship students' critical thinking: a prospective, randomized controlled pilot study.

PURPOSE: Critical thinking underlies several Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)-defined core entrustable professional activities (EPAs). Critical-thinking ability affects health care quality and safety. Tested tools to teach, assess, improve, and nurture good critical-thinking skills are needed. This prospective randomized controlled pilot study evaluated the addition of deliberate reflection (DR), guidance with Web Initiative in Surgical Education (WISE-MD™) modules, to promote surgical clerks' critical-thinking ability. The goal was to promote the application of reflective awareness principles to enhance learning outcomes and critical thinking about the module content. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Surgical clerkship (SC) students were recruited from two different blocks and randomly assigned to a control or intervention group. The intervention group was asked to record responses using a DR guide as they viewed two selected WISE-MD™ modules while the control group was asked to view two modules recording free thought. We hypothesized that the intervention group would show a significantly greater pre- to postintervention increase in critical-thinking ability than students in the control group. RESULTS: Neither group showed a difference in pre- and posttest free-thought critical-thinking outcomes; however, the intervention group verbalized more thoughtful clinical reasoning during the intervention. CONCLUSION: Despite an unsupported hypothesis, this study provides a forum for discussion in medical education. It took a sponsored tool in surgical education (WISE-MD™) and posed the toughest evaluation criteria of an educational intervention; does it affect the way we think? and not just what we learn, but how we learn it? The answer is significant and will require more resources before we arrive at a definitive answer.

A pilot study to explore next of kin's perspectives on end-of-life care in the nursing home.

OBJECTIVES: To explore next-of-kin's (NOK's) perceptions of end-of-life (EOL) care in the nursing home setting and to compare these perceptions for residents receiving hospice care plus usual care versus usual care only. DESIGN: Mailed survey. SETTING: Three nursing homes in central Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing home decedents' NOK MEASUREMENTS: Nursing home decedents' NOK were identified from nursing home records. Survey data were collected on NOK demographics and perceptions of decedents' EOL care. This care included nursing home care and services received by decedents, pain and symptom management, communication about decedents' care, and advance directives. RESULTS: Of 164 surveys mailed, 114 surveys were returned (70% response rate) with 100 completed (61% used for analysis). NOK reported that nursing home decedents had a high symptom burden, with at least 70% experiencing pain, agitation, and/or anxiety, and 60% having shortness of breath or depression. Most NOK reported good-to-excellent symptom control for decedents (88%), feeling well informed about the decedent's condition (91%), satisfaction with medical and nursing care (90%), and the decedent having advance directives in place (89%). Respondents' impressions of decedents' symptom control, communication about decedents' care, level of care, or advance directives did not differ significantly between the hospice plus usual care and usual care only groups. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, NOK perceived that decedents' EOL care in the nursing home was of similarly good quality under hospice care plus usual care and usual care only. Our study provides an approach to assessing quality of EOL care in the nursing home setting.