RESUMEN
Introduction: Structured and standardized follow-up care for preterm and high-risk infants enables an early detection of developmental deficits. The aim is to adapt the in-person follow-up to video consultation. Developmental delays can thus be identified at an early stage, independently of in-person contact. Methods: The adaptation of these follow-up to video consultation is presented descriptively, compared with the in-person consultation (similarities, differences, challenges, and limitations). Professionals's experiences with the adaption are described. Results: The experience of n = 267 video consultations for follow-up of children up to 6 years shows that an adaptation of the in-person consultation is necessary and possible. Prerequisite is a digital medium with a stable internet connection on both sides: the professional and the family, as well as a portal for video consultations with certified, encrypted data transmission. Among infants, testing is almost entirely parent guided. For older children, testing procedures have been adapted. A neurological examination is largely possible, while a general pediatric examination is omitted. A survey on professionals' (n = 7) experiences with video- and in-person consultations found that the rate of complete follow-up visits and the resources required for taking medical histories, personnel, and time remained constant for both approaches. All reported that the video consultation is generally suitable for identifying developmental delays in children up to an age of 6 years comparable with in-person consultations. One professional stated that the physical examination of children aged ≥1 year is impossible. Discussion: Video consultation is an alternative despite some limitations when an in-person consultation is impossible. Developmental delays can be identified, and therapies recommended.
Asunto(s)
Discapacidades del Desarrollo , Humanos , Lactante , Preescolar , Recién Nacido , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/diagnóstico , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Comunicación por Videoconferencia , Telemedicina , Consulta RemotaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, parents of infants born very preterm or at risk were exceptionally worried about being infected. The only means of protection during the onset of the pandemic was social distancing. Video consultations for neurodevelopmental follow-up care were offered as an alternative way to stay in contact with patients and their families, to provide expert support, and to monitor and assess children's development. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of and family satisfaction with video consultations, interviews were conducted after video and in-person consultations. METHODS: An interview with 28 questions was created to evaluate parental satisfaction with the consultations (eg, their confidentiality and the children's behavior). A total of 93 interviews with parents were conducted between March 2020 and February 2021 and compared (58 after video consultations and 35 after in-person consultations). The interviews were conducted at the end of the consultations by a trained professional. The video consultations were conducted using a certified platform created by Zava Sprechstunde Online, maintaining data protection with end-to-end encryption. Follow-up consultations (video or in-person) were performed at corrected ages of 3, 6, and 12 months as well as 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. The rate of total follow-up appointments attended during the survey period was evaluated and compared with the previous year. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the video and in-person consultation groups in satisfaction, attitudes on the confidentiality of the consultation, or discussion of private and sensitive information. Following video consultations, parents were significantly more likely to report that they were avoiding contact with medical professionals during the pandemic (P=.045; Shapiro-Wilk W=1094.5, Cohen d=-0.1782146) than the in-person consultation group. Parents in the video-consultation group stated that performing a guided examination on their child was comfortable and helped them understand their child's development. In fact, they agreed to take advantage of future video consultations. The rate of total follow-up appointments increased compared to the previous year. Between March 2019 and February 2020, 782 of 984 (79.5%) children born at Essen University Hospital attended a follow-up appointment. During the survey period, between March 2020 and February 2021, a total of 788 of 1086 children (73%) attended a follow-up appointment, of which 117 (14.9%) were video consultations. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of attending video consultations for follow-up care of very preterm or at-risk infants and parental satisfaction with these consultations were as high as for in-person consultations. Parents rated video consultations as being as confidential as in-person appointments. Telemedicine can be offered as an equivalent alternative to in-person consultations and is particularly useful under certain circumstances, such as for very sick children who require assistive devices or respiratory support and oxygen or for those living a long distance away.
RESUMEN
Very preterm infants (VPI) < 32 weeks are at increased risk of developmental disorders detectable using the Prechtl General Movements Assessment (GMA) and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition (BSID-III). The aim of this study was to investigate General Movements (GMs) trajectories from preterm to fidgety age including GMs tendencies and their association with cognitive and motor outcome. Retrospective analysis of VPI with GMA at preterm (35 ± 2 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), T1) and fidgety age (12 ± 3 weeks corrected age CA), T2), and BSID-III (12 ± 3 months CA, T3) is performed. Data are analysed using Pearson χ2-test, Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact test, and residual analyses. This study found significant associations between (a) GMs (T1) and (b) persistent pathological GMs (T1 + T2) with cognitive outcomes at 12 months (T3) considering the tendencies of GMs in addition to the global character (p = 0.007, p = 0.022, respectively), representing medium-sized effects. There were no significant associations between GMs or persistence of pathological GMs and gross and fine motor outcomes, regardless of GMs tendencies. Findings indicate that considering tendencies of GMs and the persistence of pathological GMs may be important in identifying children at risk of cognitive impairments early. This additional assessment parameter may have the potential for early identification of infants with milder motor and/or cognitive impairments. However, more research is needed using larger sample cohorts to generalise the results and to be able to recommend sequential GMA for clinical routine.