Real world experience with the TREO device in standard EVAR: Mid-term results of 150 cases from a German Multicenter study.

Background: The objective of the study was to analyze mid-term results of unselected patients treated with the TREO (Terumo Aortic, Florida, USA) device at six German hospital sites. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients treated within and outside instructions for use (IFU) from January 2017 to November 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality and endograft related complications according to IFU status. Secondary outcomes were aneurysm/procedure related re-interventions. Results: 150 patients (92% male, mean age 73 ±8 years) were treated (within IFU 84% vs. outside IFU 16%) with the TREO device for abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=127 intact, n=17 symptomatic and n=6 ruptured; p=0.30). Technical success was achieved in 147/150 (within IFU 99% vs. outside IFU 92%, p=0.08). 30-day mortality was 2%, one year and overall mortality was 3% and 5%. During a mean follow-up of 28.4 months (range: 1-67.4 months), 35 (25%; within IFU 23% vs. outside IFU 35%, p=0.23) patients suffered from endoleaks. The majority were endoleaks type II (n=33), the remaining type Ia (n=5) and type Ib (n=3). No endoleaks type III-V, migrations or aneurysm ruptures occurred. Overall, 19 patients (13%; within IFU 13% vs. 15% outside IFU, p=0.70) received a secondary intervention: nine endoleak related endovascular procedures, three open conversions, two endograft limb related interventions, four surgical revisions of the femoral access sites and two bowl ischemia related procedures, respectively. Conclusions: This non industry-sponsored, multicenter trial indicates that using the TREO device in a real-world setting (both within and outside IFU) seems feasible in the treatment of patients suffering from AAA. While the rate of complications and secondary interventions is in line with previously published data, the findings highlight the fact that standard EVAR is associated with serious adverse events.

[Atherectomy with a Novel Device Offering Wider Options]. / Atherektomie mit einem neuen System, das noch mehr kann.

Catheter-based atherectomy has been discussed for some years, although the conclusions have been controversial. Recent study data did show the feasibility of multifunctional atherectomy devices for complex lesion morphologies, with moderate material use. This is then thus an alternative to bypass surgery, although a direct comparison is lacking.The results of the ByCross approval study were compared to technical and clinical data from various atherectomy systems in terms of range of indication, limitations as defined by the manufacturer, the success and complication rate and the instructions for use. As in many recent studies, a residual stenosis ≤ 50% after atherectomy and ≤ 30% in the completion imaging was defined as the primary endpoint and proof of technical success.Lesions recruited for the ByCross study were more complex than in other studies, with respect to the lesion length (124.7 mm vs. 34 mm in the EASE study and 67.2 mm in the VISION study) and the degree of stenosis (99.4% vs. 88.5% in the EASE and 78,7% in the VISION study). Calcification was also more severe - as defined by the PACSS (Peripheral Artery Calcification Severity Score). ByCross allowed recanalisation of lesions without wire passage prior to atherectomy (26.82%), which is a must for all other systems. The variable tip diameter of the ByCross can achieve a lumen gain of 4.7 mm without tip or wire exchange or run time limits. The 0% rate of embolic events, which is unique for atherectomy device approval studies, can be explained by the working principle and the high aspiration rate. No vessel injuries occurred, and the 6-month follow-up results showed 0% revascularisation rate.New generation atherectomy systems offer safe and effective enlargement of the endovascular portfolio. The ByCross device is an atherectomy, thrombectomy and crossing device free from investment and has a wider range of indications for the iliac and the femorodistal segments, which supports ByCross atherectomy as an alternative for bypass surgery.

Stents With Torsional Strength for Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: The Prospective Q3-Registry.

PURPOSE: This postmarketing surveillance study aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of a peripheral self-expanding stent with high torsional strength (POLARIS stent) for the treatment of de novo superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions in the routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic de novo SFA occlusive disease who underwent POLARIS stent implantation were enrolled into the prospective, multicenter, observational postmarket surveillance study. Primary outcome measure was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR) at 12 months. Main secondary outcomes were procedural success, primary clinical improvement, and freedom from major adverse cardiovascular and limb events (MACLE) throughout 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 199 participants (70±11 years, 70.4% men) were included in the study at 9 German sites from December 2014 to August 2018. Half of them (52.6%) were current smokers, 37.6% had diabetes, and 25.0% were obese. Most participants suffered from intermittent claudication (88.4%). Mean lesion length was 98±83 mm, 43.5% of lesions were occluded, and 27.3% were severely calcified. Freedom from 12 months cdTLR was 94.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.6-98.2). At 24 months, freedom from cdTLR was 88.7% (95% CI, 83.0-94.4). Procedural success was achieved in 96.2% of participants. Primary clinical improvement occurred in 87.5% and 85.4% of participants at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Freedom from MACLE was 94.8% (95% CI, 91.4-98.1) and 93.8% (95% CI, 89.9-97.6) at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of SFA occlusive disease in a real-world setting using the POLARIS stent with high bidirectional torsional strength is efficacious and does not raise any safety concern in the medium term. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02307292).

ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions.

Purpose: To report the 12-month results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine if the ZILVER PTX paclitaxel-eluting stent was noninferior in terms of safety and efficacy compared with surgical bypass. Materials and Methods: This is a study in symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions comparing endovascular ZILVER PTX stenting vs surgical bypass surgery using a prosthetic graft (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01952457). Between October 2013 and July 2017, 220 patients (mean age 68.6±10.5 years; 159 men) were enrolled and randomized to the ZILVER PTX treatment group (113, 51.4%) or the bypass treatment group (107, 48.6%). Most of the lesions were occlusions (208, 94.5%); the mean lesion length was 247.1±69.3 mm. The primary outcome measure was primary patency at 12 months, defined as no evidence of binary restenosis or occlusion within the target lesion or bypass graft based on a duplex-derived peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4 and no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in endovascular cases or reintervention to restore flow in the bypass. Results: The estimated 12-month primary patency rate was 74.5% (95% CI 66.3% to 82.7%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs 72.5% (95% CI 63.7% to 81.3%) for the bypass arm (p=0.998). Freedom from TLR at 12 months was 80.9% (95% CI 73.3% to 88.5%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs 76.2% (95% CI 68.0% to 84.4%) for the bypass group (p=0.471). The 30-day complication rate was significantly lower in the ZILVER PTX group (4.4% vs 11.3%, p=0.004). Also, procedure time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the ZILVER PTX group (p<0.001 for both). Conclusion: With noninferior patency results, a lower complication rate, and shorter procedures and hospital stays, paclitaxel-eluting stenting might become a recommended treatment for long TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions.

[Treatment of Peripheral Aneurysms - Dual Supera for Popliteal Artery Aneurysms: Immediate and Long-Term Results]. / Therapie der Extremitätenarterienaneurysmen ­ Dual Supera bei Popliteaaneurysma: Sofort- und Langzeitergebnisse.

Popliteal aneurysms have the highest incidence of all peripheral aneurysms. The clinical symptoms are dominated by chronic embolism, resulting in irreversible ischemia with the associated risk of amputation and mortality, but rupture is less important. Acute aneurysm thrombosis bears a high risk of amputation and mortality. Endovascular exclusion with covered stents instead of open surgery has gained widespread acceptance and is based on reliable data. The principle of flow diversion for aneurysm treatment is well known for the cerebral vasculature, and is now emerging as a potential alternative with promising results and is challenging the concept of complete endovascular aneurysm exclusion or surgical bypassing. Since 2011, thirty-four out of 142 electively treated popliteal aneurysms and 8 thrombosed aneurysms were treated with a bare metal woven Nitinol stent. In this single centre series with continuous mid- to long-term follow-up, as described below, this option showed reliable results in terms of clinical outcome, material fatigue and preservation of outflow vasculature with the option for conversion. The limitation of the technique is determined by the available maximum outer stent diameter of 7.5 mm.

Research methodology and practical issues relating to the conduct of a medical device registry.

BACKGROUND: The postmarket research goal is to assess "generalizability" or "external validity" to see if the early results of clinical trials with investigational devices are reproducible in everyday practice in the real world and the longer term. Registries have an important but ambivalent role in achieving this goal. METHODS: Although registries are common, in practice they follow the regulatory processes that appear designed primarily for pharmaceutical clinical trials and confirmatory studies. We review the literature to assess different definitions and the role of registries in the hierarchy of scientific evidence. We analyze common characteristics affecting registry design, implementation, and governance as well as safety reporting and off-label use while describing the experience of setting up an international, prospective registry for an endovascular device used to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms. RESULTS: Key areas in which to distinguish registries from trials are as follows: eligibility, setting (patients and institutions), device configurations and iterations, the use of design and quality "spaces," a focus on systematic quality checks (rather than source data monitoring), open-ended follow-up, flexibility in the definition of end points and sample sizes, data sharing, and publishing commitments. CONCLUSION: Both clinical trials and registries are essential and complementary research methods and the strengths and weaknesses of each need to be recognized. The specific characteristics of registry research deserve to be acknowledged and safeguarded in the regulations governing clinical investigations with medical devices.

Effectiveness of the Pulsar-18 self-expanding stent with optional drug-coated balloon angioplasty in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions - the BIOFLEX PEACE All-Comers Registry.

Background: Previous studies showed favorable results after treatment of femoropopliteal lesions with the Pulsar-18 self-expanding (SE) nitinol stent. The objective of this registry was to evaluate whether these results will be confirmed in a real-world setting with varying stenting strategies. Patients and methods: In this prospective, observational trial, 160 patients with 186 femoropopliteal lesions were treated with the Pulsar-18 SE nitinol stent at 9 German sites. Mean lesion length was 116 ± 103 mm, and 41.9 % of the lesions were moderately or heavily calcified. Eighty lesions were concomitantly treated with drug-coated balloon (DCB). Main effectiveness outcome was primary patency at 12 months, and main safety outcome was freedom from the composite of device or procedure related death, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30 days and 6 months. Results: Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency was 89.1 %, 67.3 %, and 57.1 % at 6, 12, and 24 months. Freedom from TLR was 95.5 %, 91.4 %, and 85.2 % at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Lesions, which were additionally treated with DCB (plus DCB-group), were longer (150 versus 82 mm on average, p < 0.0001), and associated with lower primary patency estimates than those without DCB angioplasty (stent-only-group) (log-rank p = 0.006). However, there was no difference in freedom from TLR between groups (log-rank p = 0.542). Improvement by ≥ 1 Rutherford category was achieved in 84.8 %, 81.0 %, and 81.7 % of patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Walking distance and patient-reported pain improved persistently through 24 months (p < 0.001). Hemodynamic improvement was achieved in 68.2 %, 73.7 %, and 70.7 % of the patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions: The Pulsar-18 self-expanding nitinol stent with optional drug-coated balloon angioplasty can be considered an efficacious and safe therapy option for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease.

Global Post-Market Clinical Follow-up of the Treovance Stent-Graft for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: One-Year Results From the RATIONALE Registry.

PURPOSE:: To evaluate the safety and performance of the Treovance stent-graft. METHODS:: The global, multicenter RATIONALE registry ( ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT03449875) prospectively enrolled 202 patients (mean age 73.0±7.8 years; 187 men) with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) suitable for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Treovance. The composite primary safety endpoint was site-reported all-cause mortality and major morbidity. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical success. Further outcomes evaluated included technical success; stent-graft migration, patency, and integrity; endoleak; and aneurysm size changes. RESULTS:: Technical success was 96% (194/202); 8 patients had unresolved type I endoleaks at the end of the procedure. There was no 30-day mortality and 1% major morbidity (1 myocardial infarction and 1 bowel ischemia). Clinical success at 1 year was confirmed in 194 (96%) patients; 6 of 8 patients had new/persistent endoleaks and 2 had aneurysm expansion without identified endoleak. A total of 8 (4%) reinterventions were required during the mean 13.7±3.1 months of follow-up (median 12.8). At 1 year, the Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from reintervention was 95.6% (95% CI 91.4% to 97.8%). Other estimates were 95.5% (95% CI 91.7% to 97.6%) for freedom from endoleak type I/III and 97.4% (95% CI 94.2% to 98.9%) for freedom from aneurysm expansion. Thirteen (6.4%) patients died; no death was aneurysm related. CONCLUSION:: The RATIONALE registry showed favorable safety and clinical performance of the Treovance stent-graft for the treatment of infrarenal AAAs in a real-world setting.

Nonspecific Presentation of an Infected Aorto-Iliac Artery Stent Following Endovascular Revision and Stent Insertion.

Over the last few decades, the use of covered stent grafts became increasingly popular; as it plays a pivotal role in the management of various atherosclerotic diseases that are rising in both incidence and prevalence. Subsequently, vascular stent infections, although rare, are becoming a well-recognized complication with possibly devastating consequences, owing to the difficulties associated with its diagnosis and treatment. This has prompted significant interest in the condition regarding its pathophysiology, modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and the possible implementation of prophylactic measures. We herein present a case of a patient with an infected aortoiliac stent 4 weeks after endovascular revision with atherectomy and additional stent insertion. The patient initially developed nonspecific symptoms and later developed a life-threatening hemorrhage, which was urgently controlled using a percutaneously inserted covered stent at the infected site. Definitive treatment using extraanatomical bypass implantation and an explantation of the infected stents was performed with excellent clinical response.

Safety and effectiveness of bycross rotational atherectomy and aspiration device: a prospective, multi-center pre-market approval study.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the novel ByCross® atherectomy system for treatment of complex femorodistal > 80% arterial stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2018 until April 2019 39 patients with 41 femorodistal lesions including the femoropopliteal and distal popliteal segments were treated in a prospective, nonrandomized pre-market approval study with 6 months follow up using the ByCross® atherectomy device (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03724279). Adjunctive treatment with balloon dilatation or stenting was allowed by the protocol. Mean patient age was 72 years with 62% male. The average lesions length was 125 ± 118 mm (30 and 450 mm) with an average reference vessel diameter of 5.2 ± 0.85 mm and a mean stenosis of 96.4 ± 6.2% based on CT or MR angiography measurements. The primary performance endpoint was defined as acute procedural success with angiographically determined residual stenosis of ≤ 50% and of ≤ 30% after atherectomy or adjunctive treatment. The primary safety endpoint was the major adverse event (MAE) rate through 30 days. Secondary endpoints were stenosis of the target lesions measured by duplex ultrasound (DUS) and the ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) at discharge, 30 and 180 days as well as any major adverse event (MAE) through 6 months. RESULTS: The acute procedural success was achieved in 39/41 (95.12%) lesions, partially without wire guidance (11/41 (26.82%)). No embolic protection was used, and adjunctive angioplasty and stenting was performed in 40/41 (97.56%) and 12/41 (29.26%) lesions, respectively without device related MAE's at 30 days. Mean level of stenosis was 5.7% at discharge and 21.7% at 6 months FU measured by DUS. Mean ABPI was 0.8, 1.0 and 0.8 at baseline, discharge, and 6 months FU respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the high technical success rate and the low rates of MAE`s through six months, the BYCROSS® Atherectomy System has shown to be safe and effective for the crossing and atherectomy of complex lower-extremity arterial occlusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: October 17, 2018,retrospectively registered. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT03724279; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03724279.

ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent versus Prosthetic Above-the-Knee Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions, 5-year Results.

PURPOSE: To report the 60-month safety and effectiveness results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the ZILVER PTX paclitaxel-eluting stent to prosthetic above-the-knee bypass for the treatment of symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled between October 2013 and July 2017. One of the secondary outcomes was primary patency at 60 months, defined as no evidence of binary restenosis or occlusion within the target lesion or bypass graft based on a duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio < 2.4 and no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in endovascular cases or reintervention to restore flow in the bypass at 60 months. Survival rates after 5 years were also analyzed. RESULTS: 220 patients (mean age 68.6 ± 10.5 years; 159 men) were included and randomized to ZILVER PTX (n = 113, 51.40%) or BYPASS group (n = 107, 48.60%). The 60-month primary patency rate was 49.3% for the ZILVER PTX group versus 40.7% for the bypass group (p = 0.6915). Freedom from TLR was 63.8% for the ZILVER PTX group versus 52.8% for the bypass group (p = 0.2637). At 5 years, no significant difference in survival rate could be seen between the ZILVER PTX and the bypass group (69.1% vs. 71% respectively, p = 0.5503). CONCLUSION: Even at 5 years, non-inferior safety and effectiveness results of the ZILVER PTX could be seen. These findings confirmed that the use of ZILVER PTX stents can be considered as a valid alternative for bypass surgery when treating long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.

ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs. Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions, 3 year results and economic analysis.

BACKGROUND: To report the 3-year safety and effectiveness results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the ZILVER PTX paclitaxel-eluting stent to surgical bypass and to conduct a health economic analysis up to 3-year follow-up of the two treatment modalities. METHODS: This is a study in symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions comparing endovascular ZILVER PTX stenting vs. surgical bypass surgery using a prosthetic graft (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01952457). Between October 2013 and July 2017, 220 patients (mean age 68.6±10.5 years; 159 men) were enrolled and randomized to the ZILVER PTX treatment group (113, 51.40%) or the bypass treatment group (107, 48.60%). One of the secondary outcomes was primary patency at 3-year, defined as no evidence of binary restenosis or occlusion within the target lesion or bypass graft based on a duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4 and no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in endovascular cases or reintervention to restore flow in the bypass. An economic analysis was conducted to analyze the cost differences between ZILVER PTX and bypass, which shows the perspective of the public authority/organization that pays for healthcare in the two countries (payor), Germany and USA. RESULTS: The 3-year primary patency rate was 53.30% (95% CI 61.40% to 45.20%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs. 58.20% (95% CI 67.10% to 49.30%) for the bypass arm (P=0.9721). Freedom from TLR at 3-year was 62.80% (95% CI 72.60% to 53%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs. 65.30% (95% CI 75.40% to 55.20%) for the bypass group (P=0.635). There was also no significant difference (P=0.358) in survival rate at 3-year between the ZILVER PTX group 78.50%, (95% CI to 87.70% to 69.30%) and the bypass group 87.40% (95% CI 97.6% to 77.2%). None of the deaths was categorized as related to the procedure or device. The economic analysis, taking into account procedural-, hospitalization- and reintervention costs, showed a clear cost-benefit for Zilver PTX in both investigated countries up to 3-year follow-up: Germany (Bypass €9446 per patient versus ZILVER PTX €5755) and USA (Bypass $26,373 per patient versus ZILVER PTX $19,186). CONCLUSIONS: The non-inferior safety and effectiveness results of the ZILVER PTX stent were associated with lower costs for the payer and confirmed that ZILVER PTX stent treatment can be considered as a valid alternative for bypass surgery in long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.

Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in patients with critical limb ischemia and infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE: Critical limb ischemia, the most severe form of peripheral arterial disease, results in extremity amputation if left untreated. Endovascular recanalization of stenotic or occluded infrapopliteal arteries has recently emerged as an effective form of therapy, although the duration of patency is typically limited by restenosis. Recently, it has been suggested that drug-eluting stents originally developed for the coronary arteries might also be effective in preventing restenosis in the infrapopliteal arteries. This prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial tested the hypothesis that treatment of infrapopliteal arterial occlusive lesions with an everolimus-eluting stent (Xience V) would provide superior patency to treatment with a bare-metal stent (Multi-Link Vision). METHODS: A sample size of 140 patients was planned to be enrolled at five European investigative sites. The primary end point was arterial patency at 12 months, defined as the absence of ≥50% restenosis based on quantitative analysis of contrast angiography. RESULTS: Between March of 2008 and September of 2009, 74 patients were treated with Xience V and 66 patients were treated with Vision. After 12 months, the primary patency rate after treatment with Xience V was 85% compared with 54% after treatment with Vision (P = .0001). Treatment with Xience V significantly reduced mean in-stent diameter stenosis (21% ± 21% vs 47% ± 27%; P < .0001) and mean in-stent late lumen loss (0.78 ± 0.63 vs 1.41 ± 0.89 mm; P = .001). There were no differences in the percentage of patients receiving a designation of Rutherford class 0 or 1 at the 12-month follow-up visit (56% for Vision, vs 60% for Xience V; P = .68). Major extremity amputations were rare in both groups (two for Vision and one for Xience V). The use of the Xience V stent significantly reduced the need for repeat intervention: freedom from target lesion revascularization was 91% for Xience V vs 66% for Vision (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of the infrapopliteal occlusive lesions of critical limb ischemia with everolimus-eluting stents reduces restenosis and the need for reintervention compared with bare metal stents.

The Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Mid-Term Outcomes after Revascularisation of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to determine the relationship between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and major 12-month outcomes for patients with in-hospital treatment for symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). METHODS: An analysis of the prospective longitudinal multicentric cohort study with 12-month follow-up was conducted including patients who underwent endovascular or open surgery for symptomatic PAOD at 35 German vascular centres (initial study protocol: NCT03098290). Severity of CKD was grouped into four stages combining information about the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and dialysis dependency. Outcomes included overall mortality as well as the two composite endpoints of amputation or death, and of major cardiovascular events (MACE). 12-month incidences and adjusted hazard ratios were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier function and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 4354 patients (32% female, 69 years mean age, 68% intermittent claudication, 69% percutaneous endovascular revascularisation) were included and followed for 244 days in median. Thereof, 22% had any CKD and 5% had end stage kidney disease (ESKD) at baseline. The 12-month overall mortality rate was 3.6% (95% CI 2.3-4.9) with 96 events in the entire cohort: 147 were amputated or died (5.3%, 95% CI 5.2-5.3), and 277 had a MACE (9.5%, 95% CI 9.4-9.5). When compared with patients without kidney disease, ESKD was significantly associated with overall mortality (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.5), amputation or death (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.4-4.1), and MACE (HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.3-3.2). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study on mid-term outcomes after invasive revascularisation for symptomatic PAOD, one out of five patients suffered from any CKD while those few with ESKD had twice the odds of death, of amputation or death, and of major adverse cardiovascular events after twelve months. These results emphasise that concomitant CKD and its impact on outcomes should be considered by severity while mild and moderate grades should not lead to ineffectual treatment strategies.

Secondary procedures after aortic aneurysm repair with fenestrated and branched endografts.

PURPOSE: To investigate the secondary procedures in patients with previous endovascular aortic repair by fenestrated or branched stent-grafts for aneurysms involving the renal and visceral vessels. METHODS: Between January 2001 and May 2010, 107 consecutive high-risk patients (97 men; mean age 73 years, range 50-86) with aortic aneurysms involving the renal and visceral arteries were treated with endovascular techniques. A custom-made Zenith graft was used in all patients. All secondary graft-related procedures performed in the perioperative period and during follow-up were analyzed. Estimates of survival, freedom from migration/type I endoleak, and freedom from any device-related secondary procedures were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 1.9%. During follow-up (mean 25 months, range 1-94), 34 secondary procedures were performed in 28 (26.2%) patients for 6 (17.6%) limb graft stenoses/thromboses (5.6% of 107 cases), 8 (23.5%) in-stent visceral vessel stenoses/occlusions (7.5% of 107 cases), 8 (23.5%) migrations/type I endoleaks with/without visceral stent fractures (7.5% of 107 cases), and 12 (35.3%) type III endoleaks (9.3% of 107 cases). The mean interval between the primary and secondary procedures was 12.9 months (range 1-68). In 26 (76.5%) of 34 cases, a secondary endovascular procedure was performed; in the remaining 8 (23.5%) cases, the complication was treated surgically. The secondary procedure was unsuccessful in 9 cases of visceral vessel compromise (failure to cannulation, stent fracture/migration, in-stent stenosis/occlusion). Estimated 3-year survival was 77%, while the 3-year rate for freedom from any device-related secondary procedure was 75.5%. CONCLUSION: The incidence of early and late complications requiring a secondary procedure after treatment with fenestrated or branched devices was not negligible. Endoleak type III represented the most common cause for reintervention during follow-up. Secondary procedures performed for visceral vessel compromise had high rates of treatment failure. Accurate preoperative planning, the advent of new materials/techniques, and strict follow-up could be the key factors to improving the results of fenestrated or branched stent-graft interventions and to reduce the rate of secondary procedures.

Nitinol stents with polymer-free paclitaxel coating for lesions in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries above the knee: twelve-month safety and effectiveness results from the Zilver PTX single-arm clinical study.

PURPOSE: To report a prospective, single-arm, multicenter clinical study evaluating the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent for treating the above-the-knee femoropopliteal segment (NCT01094678; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ). METHODS: The Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent is a self-expanding nitinol stent with a polymer-free paclitaxel coating. Patients with symptomatic (Rutherford category 2-6) de novo or restenotic lesions (including in-stent stenosis) of the above-the-knee femoropopliteal segment were eligible for enrollment. Between April 2006 and June 2008, 787 patients (578 men; mean age 66.6±9.5 years) were enrolled at 30 international sites. RESULTS: Nine hundred lesions (24.3% restenotic lesions of which 59.4% were in-stent stenoses) were treated with 1722 Zilver PTX stents; the mean lesion length was 99.5±82.1 mm. The 12-month Kaplan-Meier estimates included an 89.0% event-free survival rate, an 86.2% primary patency rate, and a 90.5% rate of freedom from target lesion revascularization. There were no paclitaxel-related adverse events reported. The 12-month stent fracture rate was 1.5%. The ankle-brachial index, Rutherford score, and walking distance/speed scores significantly improved (p<0.001) from baseline to 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent is safe for treatment of patients with de novo and restenotic lesions of the above-the-knee femoropopliteal segment. At 1 year, the overall anatomical and clinical effectiveness results suggest that this stent is a promising endovascular therapy.

[Innovations in the endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease]. / Innovationen in der endovaskulären Therapie der peripheren arteriellen Verschlusskrankheit (pAVK).

The cooperation of physicians, engineers and other sciences results in a steady launching of effective tools for vascular treatment, which further support the dominating position of endovascular therapy in the field of PAD. Parallel to the treatment options, non-radiation based image guidance is another area, where innovation helps to reduce radiation burden for patient and staff members without losing procedural quality and despite a growing number of radiation based procedures. Meanwhile, the available portfolio of endovascular tools allows to treat every vessel segment with results comparable to or even better then open surgery. This survey presents new techniques, tools and recently published results from related trials, which will probably have further influence on PAD treatment in the coming years.

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with the Endurant stent-graft: early and 1-year results from a European multicenter experience.

PURPOSE: To assess preliminary results of the Endurant stent-graft, which was developed to treat patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and challenging aortoiliac anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2007 to October 2008, 45 patients with AAAs were treated with the Endurant stent-graft in three European vascular centers. Thirty-eight of the 45 patients (84%) had a hostile anatomy of the proximal neck. Early (30 days), early midterm (6 months), and late midterm (1 year) results were analyzed in terms of technical success, clinical success, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: Intraoperative immediate technical and clinical success was achieved in all cases. At completion angiography, a type II endoleak was detected in seven of the 45 patients (16%) and an iliac limb stenosis was diagnosed and successfully treated in five (11%). At discharge, computed tomography demonstrated a type I endoleak in one of the 45 patients (2.2%). At 30 days, a graft limb thrombosis was diagnosed (2.2%) and successfully treated. The 30-day overall technical and clinical success rates were 97.8% (44/45 cases) and 95.6% (43/45 cases), respectively. During follow-up (mean duration, 8 months; range, 5-16 months), the type I endoleak was successfully treated with an aortic extension. Estimated freedom from type I or III endoleak and repeat intervention at 1 year was 97.8% (44/45 cases) and 93.3% (42/45 cases), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The initial experience shows that the Endurant stent-graft appears to be effective in endovascular repair of AAAs in patients with hostile aortoiliac anatomy. This graft permits a broader group of patients to be treated with endovascular aneurysm repair; however, further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term results.

Vascular endostapling: new concept for endovascular fixation of aortic stent-grafts.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a new vascular endostapling system in treating infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms using commercially available endografts. METHODS: Eight patients (6 men; mean age 71 years, range 59-82) underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using Talent or Zenith stent-grafts and the Anson Refix clip, which provides transmural aortic fixation of the endoprosthesis with high pullout force proportional to the number of the clips deployed. RESULTS: Twenty (69%) of the 29 endostaples were successfully implanted and secured with the endostaple system; 9 clips that did not fully penetrate the graft and tissue due to severe calcification of the neck were retracted successfully into the delivery device. The delivery time from insertion of the Refix delivery catheter to its withdrawal was a mean 57 minutes (range 20-102) over and above the regular stent-graft procedure. Notably, the delivery time was reduced as the learning curve was passed: mean 89.75 minutes in the first 4 cases versus 27.5 minutes in the last 4. No endostaple migrated or was lost from the intended deployment site based on radiological imaging. No patients had evidence of perioperative endoleak based on computed tomography. No endograft-related complications have been documented during follow-up at 30 days. CONCLUSION: The initial experience established the safety and feasibility of EVAR using the Anson Refix endostapling system. However, further clinical evaluation is mandatory to draw robust conclusions about the utility of this new concept for fixation of aortic stent-grafts.