Evaluation of a First Responders Course in Rural North India.

BACKGROUND: Most mortality in trauma occurs in prehospital settings when the golden hour is spent accessing healthcare facilities rather than resuscitating and stabilizing. Assessments performed in the rural community of Nanakpur, India demonstrated a significant paucity of, and limited access to healthcare facilities. To address deficiencies in prehospital care, the All-India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) constructed the Basic Emergency Care Course (BECC). This study evaluated the BECCs efficacy in Nanakpur. METHODS: The first responder courses took place in 2017 in Nanakpur. Local community health workers, known as Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) were recruited as participants. Participants completed both a pre- and post-course evaluation to assess baseline knowledge and improvement. Participants then took a one-year post-course assessment to evaluate retention. RESULTS: The course included 204 individuals, and over half (109/204) were ASHAs. Pre- and post-course test results were available for 70 participants and demonstrated a significant improvement in knowledge (P < 0.0001). The one-year knowledge retention assessment was completed by 48.6% (n = 53/109) of the original ASHAs. Comparisons between both the pre- and post-course assessment tests with the 12-mo retention assessment revealed a significant decay in knowledge (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing BECC to train ASHAs in Nanakpur as first responders. Participants demonstrated a significant improvement in knowledge immediately after the course. After one year, there was a significant loss in knowledge, highlighting the need for refresher courses. These data suggest potential for the use of BECC for training ASHAs countrywide to strengthen India's prehospital care system.

Comparing commercial versus low-cost gelatinous phantoms for ultrasound-guided needle tracking: A randomized crossover trial, among emergency medicine residents.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to devise a low-cost indigenous gelatin-based vascular phantom and to compare this newly constructed phantom with a commercially available phantom. METHODS: This was a randomized crossover study conducted at a tertiary care hospital of India. The aim of the study was to develop a prototype low-cost gelatin-based vascular phantom and compare it with a commercially available phantom. Gelatin, psyllium husk, corn starch, antiseptic liquid, food-coloring agent, latex balloons, and metallic containers were used to prepare the gelatin phantom. The newly prepared gelatin model was labeled "Model A" and the commercially available gelatin model was labeled "Model B." Emergency medicine residents (n = 34) who routinely perform ultrasound (USG)-guided invasive procedures were asked to demonstrate USG-guided in-plane and out-of-plane approach of needle-tracking in both the models and fill out a questionnaire on a Likert scale (1-5). An independent supervisor assessed the image quality. RESULTS: The cost of our phantom was USD 6-8 (vs. USD 1000-1200 for commercial phantom). The participants rated the ease of performance and tissue resemblance as 4 (interquartile range [IQR]: 4-5) for both the models "A" and "B." The supervisor rated the overall performance as 4 (IQR: 3-4) for both the models. In all the parameters assessed, model A was noninferior to model B. CONCLUSION: The indigenously developed vascular phantom was noninferior to the commercially available phantom in terms of tissue resemblance and overall performance. The cost involved was a fraction of that incurred with the currently available commercial model. The authors feel that gelatin-based models can be easily prepared in resource-constraint settings which may be used for USG-guided training and medical education in low- and middle-income countries.

Hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for schoolchildren: A comparison study among different class groups.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Up to 70% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are witnessed by family members, friends, and other bystanders. These bystanders can play a vital role in delivering help, before professional help arrives. Mandatory nationwide training of schoolchildren has shown the highest impact in improving the bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rate. In our study, we compared the competency of different classes of schoolchildren from middle school onward in learning hands-only CPR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in four schools. Schoolchildren were divided into three groups as middle school (6th to 8th standard) (MS), secondary school (9th and 10th standard) (SC), and senior secondary school (11th and 12th standard) (SN). Training module consisted of slide presentation on "hands-only CPR" of 1 h, video demonstration of 30 min, and hands-on session of 2.5 h. Students were then individually assessed for the skills. RESULTS: A total of 810 children were enrolled and trained. Initial approach was performed correctly by 68% of MS, 79.3% of SC, and 82.4% of SN school children, whereas 49.4% of MS, 61.3% of SC, and 72.5% of SN correctly performed chest compression in terms of rate, depth, and duration. Median compression depth and maximum duration of CPR achieved were significantly different across class groups (P < 0.001) Compression depth and duration of chest compression were positively correlated with children's age, height, weight, and body mass index (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Theoretical training on hands-only CPR can be started at the middle school level, and practical training can be incorporated in school curricula from secondary school.

Does community emergency care initiative improve the knowledge and skill of healthcare workers and laypersons in basic emergency care in India?

BACKGROUND: Due to lack of training in emergency care, basic emergency care in India is still in its infancy. We designed All India Institute of Medical Sciences basic emergency care course (AIIMS BECC) to address the issue. AIM: To improve the knowledge and skill of healthcare workers and laypersons in basic emergency care and to identify impact of the course. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study conducted over a period of 4 years. The target groups were medical and nonmedical personnel. Provider AIIMS BECC is of 1 day duration including lectures on cardio-pulmonary resuscitation, choking, and special scenarios. Course was disseminated via lectures, audio-visual aids, and mannequin training. For analysis, the participants were categorized on the basis of their education and profession. A pre- and a post-course evaluation were done and individual scores were given out of 20 and compared among all the groups and P value was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 1283 subjects were trained. 99.81% became providers and 2.0% were trained as instructors. There was a significant improvement in knowledge among all the participants irrespective of their education level including medicos/nonmedicos. However, participants who had higher education (graduates and postgraduates) and/or belonged to medical field had better knowledge gain as compared to those who had low level of education (≤12(th) standard) and were nonmedicos. CONCLUSION: BECC is an excellent community initiative to improve knowledge and skill of healthcare and laypersons in providing basic emergency care.