RESUMEN
Recent reports in North America and Europe of Clostridium difficile being isolated from livestock and retail meats of bovine origin have raised concerns about the risk to public health. To assess the situation in Australia, we investigated the prevalence and genetic diversity of C. difficile in adult cattle and calves at slaughter. Carcass washings, gastrointestinal contents, and feces were collected from abattoirs across five Australian states. Selective culture, toxin profiling, and PCR ribotyping were performed. The prevalence of C. difficile was 56% (203/360 samples) in feces from <7-day-old calves, 3.8% (1/26) in 2- to 6-month-old calves, and 1.8% (5/280) in adult cattle. Three PCR ribotypes (RTs), RT127, RT033, and RT126, predominated in <7-day-old calves and comprised 77.8% (158/203 samples) of isolates. RT056, which has not been reported in cattle before, was found in 16 <7-day-old calves (7.7%). Surprisingly, RT078 strains, which dominate production animal carriage studies in the Northern Hemisphere, were not isolated.
Asunto(s)
Bovinos/microbiología , Clostridioides difficile/clasificación , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Productos de la Carne/microbiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/veterinaria , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Australia , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Estudios Transversales , Heces/microbiología , Contenido Digestivo/microbiología , Variación Genética , Prevalencia , RibotipificaciónRESUMEN
Clostridium difficile rose in prominence in the early 2000s with large-scale outbreaks of a particular binary toxin-positive strain, ribotype 027, in North America and Europe. In Australia outbreaks of the same scale had not and have not been seen. A survey of C. difficile across Australia was performed for 1 month in 2010. A collection of 330 C. difficile isolates from all States and Territories except Victoria and the Northern Territory was amassed. PCR ribotyping revealed a diverse array of strains. Ribotypes 014/020 (30.0%) and 002 (11.8%) were most common, followed by 054 (4.2%), 056 (3.9%), 070 (3.6%) and 005 (3.3%). The collection also contained few binary toxin positive strains, namely 027 (0.9%), 078 (0.3%), 244 (0.3%), 251 (0.3%) and 127 (0.3%). The survey highlights the need for vigilance for emerging strains in Australia, and gives an overview of the molecular epidemiology of C. difficile in Australia prior to an increase in incidence noted from mid-2011.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Australia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Humanos , Laboratorios de Hospital , Epidemiología Molecular , Tipificación Molecular , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Ribotipificación , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The culture of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from stool specimens is still seen as the gold standard for the laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI). bioMérieux have released ChromID Cdiff chromogenic agar (CDIF) for the isolation and identification of C. difficile in 24 h. In this study, we compared CDIF to pre-reduced cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar with sodium taurocholate (TCCFA) in the examination of glutamate dehydrogenase-positive faecal specimens that were either GeneOhm positive or negative, using direct culture or culture following alcohol shock. Direct culture on CDIF had a sensitivity of 100 % and recovery of 94 % while for TCCFA these were 87 % and 82 %, respectively. For GeneOhm-positive alcohol-shocked faecal samples, sensitivity and recovery on CDIF was similar to direct culture while on TCCFA they were about 10 % higher. For direct culture, there was a significant difference between growth on CDIF at 24 h and TCCFA at 48 h (P = 0.001) and between the two media at 48 h (P<0.001). A total of 142 strains of C. difficile were recovered in pure culture from all GeneOhm-positive samples used in this study and 11 (7.7 %) of these were A(-)B(-)CDT(-) and may represent mixed infections of toxigenic and non-toxigenic C. difficile. The most dominant ribotype was UK 014 (14.7 %) followed by 002 (11.9 %) and 020 (11.9 %), and 36 % of toxigenic isolates, including an A(-)B(+)CDT(-) strain, could not be assigned a UK ribotype. CDIF outperformed pre-reduced TCCFA by negating the need for alcohol shock treatment and by giving a time saving of 24 h in the isolation of C. difficile. CDIF plates were also more selective than TCCFA and C. difficile colonies were easy to identify and subculture prior to strain typing.
Asunto(s)
Agar/química , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Cefoxitina/química , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Cicloserina/química , Heces/microbiología , Alcoholes/química , Medios de Cultivo , Fructosa/química , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Ribotipificación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estrés Fisiológico , Ácido TaurocólicoRESUMEN
AIM: The rapidly changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection highlights the need for improved and continuing surveillance involving stool culturing to enable molecular tracking. Culture of C. difficile can be difficult and time consuming. In this report ChromID C. difficile agar (CDIF) was compared to cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose-egg-yolk agar which contained 0.1% sodium taurocholate (TCCFA) as a germinant. RESULTS: All ribotypes of C. difficile tested (n=90) grew well on CDIF within 24 h and most gave characteristic small irregular black colonies with a raised umbonate profile. Counts from standard suspensions of C. difficile at 24 h (p<0.005) and 48 h (p=0.01) were significantly higher on CDIF than on TCCFA. Similar results were achieved after alcohol shock. When temperature shock was used to differentiate vegetative cells and spores, the total number of culturable and vegetative cells on CDIF was significantly higher than on TCCFA (culturable cells, p=0.003 at 24 h and p=0.002 at 48 h; vegetative cells, p=0.0003 at 24 h and p=0.0002 at 48 h). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that CDIF is a better medium for the recovery of vegetative C. difficile than TCCFA and equal to TCCFA for spore recovery.
Asunto(s)
Agar/clasificación , Cefoxitina , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Cicloserina , Fructosa , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Agar/química , Cefoxitina/análisis , Clostridioides difficile/crecimiento & desarrollo , Cicloserina/análisis , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/diagnóstico , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/epidemiología , Etanol , Fructosa/análisis , Humanos , Ribotipificación , Temperatura , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
During a 24 month period from 2007 to 2009, 174 faecal specimens from horses in Australia (predominantly from Western Australia) were tested for Clostridium difficile. C. difficile was isolated from 14 (23â%) of 62 diarrhoeal animals (including 10 foals) and from none of 112 healthy adult horses. These isolates were toxin profiled by PCR for toxin A, toxin B and binary toxin, and ribotyped. Ten of the equine isolates were A(+)B(+)CDT(-). Other toxin profiles detected were A(-)B(-)CDT(+) (one isolate), A(+)B(+)CDT(+) (two isolates) and A(-)B(-)CDT(-) (three isolates). There were six different ribotypes detected in the horses, ribotype 012 being the most common with six isolates. Two horses (one adult and one foal) had two strains of C. difficile isolated on different days. These strains had the same toxin profile but different ribotypes. None of the equine isolates was ribotype 078, which is A(+)B(+)CDT(+) and a significant cause of animal disease overseas. All isolates were susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin. These results suggest that the epidemiology of C. difficile in horses in Australia is currently similar to that in other parts of the world, but requires further surveillance to monitor changes.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/microbiología , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Australia/epidemiología , Clostridioides difficile/clasificación , Clostridioides difficile/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Diarrea/epidemiología , Diarrea/microbiología , Diarrea/veterinaria , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Enfermedades de los Caballos/epidemiología , Caballos , Prevalencia , RibotipificaciónRESUMEN
A total of 817 human clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile from all Australian states were screened for A(-)B(+) strains by toxin gene PCR assays. Nine (1.1â%) strains were confirmed to be A(-)B(+) by enzyme immunoassay for toxin production. Of these, six (66.7â%) were binary toxin-positive by PCR. Using PCR ribotyping and toxinotyping, the A(-)B(+) strains could be grouped into seven ribotypes and three toxinotypes. Only one of the ribotypes had been reported previously (017). The prevalence of ribotype 017 was low in this study with only two strains detected. Two new A(-)B(+) toxinotypes were also defined (XXX, XXXI). Toxinotype XXX had a toxin B gene similar to that of toxinotype IV (A(+)B(+)) but with a novel cytopathic region. Toxinotype XXXI was similar to other A(-)B(+) types (X, XVII), but had a larger deletion to the toxin A gene than in either of those types. The types of A(-)B(+) strains identified in this study differed markedly from those described in other regions.