Soft drinks and premiums with children's meals marketed on the websites of the top restaurant chains worldwide.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency with which soft drinks and premiums are available with children's meals marketed on the top restaurant chains' websites worldwide. DESIGN: Cross-sectional structured observational assessment of secondary information about top international restaurant chain children's meals. SETTING: Websites of top restaurant chains for 193 countries and five regions of the United Nations. PARTICIPANTS: Top restaurant chains (including McDonald's, Subway, Burger King and KFC) across 193 countries. Children's meal images and descriptions were reviewed to determine if the meal was marketed with a soft drink as a beverage option and whether the meal offered a premium. RESULTS: Children's meals were marketed online on restaurant websites by at least one of the four chains in a total of seventy eight of the 193 countries (40·4 %). Overall, 56·3 % of countries with any online children's meal marketing by the four chains included at least one chain that marketed soft drinks and 92·3 % marketed premiums with the meal. CONCLUSIONS: Every region in the world includes marketing of children's meals on the websites of the top restaurant chains. The high prevalence of premiums marketed online with children's meals is of concern. Similarly, with over 50 % of countries with online children's meal marketing having at least one chain that offers soft drinks as part of the meals, additional regulation and education may be warranted.

The Quality of Menu Offerings in Independently Owned Restaurants in Baltimore, Maryland: Results from Mixed-Methods Formative Research for the FRESH Trial.

(1) Background: Independently owned restaurants (IORs) are prevalent in under-resourced racial and ethnic minority communities in the US and present a unique setting for public health nutrition interventions. (2) Methods: We conducted 14 in-depth interviews with IOR owners in Baltimore about their perceptions of healthy food, and customers' acceptance of healthier menus and cooking methods and concurrent observations of the availability of healthy options on their menus. Qualitative data were coded and analyzed using ATLAS.ti. Observations were analyzed with statistical analysis performed in R. (3) Results: Owners perceived non-fried options, lean proteins, and plant-based meals as healthy. While open to using healthier cooking fats, they had mixed feelings about reducing salt, adopting non-frying methods for cooking, and adding vegetables and whole grains to the menu, and were reluctant to reduce sugar in recipes and beverages. Only 17.5% of 1019 foods and 27.6% of 174 beverages in these IORs were healthy, with no significant differences in the healthfulness of restaurant offerings within low-healthy-food-access/low-income neighborhoods and those outside. (4) Conclusion: Healthy options are generally scarce in Baltimore's IORs. Insights from owners inform future interventions to tailor healthy menu offerings that are well-received by customers and feasible for implementation.