RESUMEN
Comorbid depression and anxiety disorders occur in up to 25% of general practice patients. About 85% of patients with depression have significant anxiety, and 90% of patients with anxiety disorder have depression. Symptomatology may initially seem vague and non-specific. A careful history and examination with relevant investigations should be used to make the diagnosis. Once the diagnosis is made, rating scales may identify illness severity and help in monitoring treatment progress. Both the depression disorder and the specific anxiety disorder require appropriate treatment. Psychological therapies, such as cognitive behaviour therapy, and antidepressants, occasionally augmented with antipsychotics, have proven benefit for treating both depression and anxiety. Benzodiazepines may help alleviate insomnia and anxiety but not depression. They have dependency and withdrawal issues for some people, and may increase the risk of falls in older people. Despite the availability of treatments, 40% of patients with depression or anxiety do not seek treatment, and of those who do, less than half are offered beneficial treatment.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Ansiedad/terapia , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Comorbilidad , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Depression is the predominant psychosocial and suicide burden in bipolar disorder, yet there is a paucity of evidence-based treatments for bipolar depression. METHODS: This post hoc subgroup analysis of data pooled from two 3-week, randomized, placebo- and olanzapine-controlled trials (December 2004-April 2006, N = 489 and November 2004-April 2006, N = 488) examined a subgroup of patients meeting criteria for moderate-to-severe mixed major depressive episodes, defined using DSM-IV-TR criteria for mixed episodes (mania and major depression simultaneously) with a baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥ 20. RESULTS: Decreases in MADRS scores (least squares mean [SE]), the a priori primary outcome, were significantly greater in the asenapine group than in the placebo group from baseline to day 7 (-11.02 [1.82] vs -4.78 [1.89]; P = .0195), day 21 (-14.03 [2.01] vs -7.43 [2.09]; P = .0264), and endpoint (-10.71 [1.76] vs -5.19 [1.98]; P = .039). Decreases in MADRS scores with asenapine were significantly greater than with olanzapine from baseline to day 7 (-6.26 [1.47]; P = .0436). Decreases in Young Mania Rating Scale mean total score were greater with asenapine than with placebo or olanzapine at all time points assessed. A significantly greater reduction from baseline to day 21 in the Short Form-36 mental component summary score was observed with asenapine, but not olanzapine, compared with placebo (16.57 vs 5.97; P = .0093). Asenapine was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide support for the potential efficacy of asenapine in mixed major depressive episodes; however, these data cannot be linearly extrapolated to nonmixed major depression.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/complicaciones , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/complicaciones , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Dibenzocicloheptenos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Olanzapina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Bipolar disorders are cyclical mood disorders with clinical features including distinct sustained periods of mood elevation. Briefer (4 days or more), mild episodes of mood elevation define bipolar II disorder; lengthier (7 days or more), more severe episodes (or those requiring hospitalisation), with or without psychotic features, define bipolar I disorder. Depressive periods are more common and lengthier than manic or hypomanic states, and are the main cause of disability. Bipolar depression may respond poorly to antidepressants and these medications may destabilise the illness. The diagnosis of bipolar disorder should be considered when a patient with depression is treatment resistant. Irritability is a common symptom in bipolar disorder, particularly during mixed states (during which patients have features of mood elevation and depression concurrently) or when there is rapid cycling of mood (more than four episodes of mood disorder per year). Alcohol misuse and use of illicit drugs may simulate mood changes in bipolar disorder. Accurate diagnosis and assessment of bipolar disorder is essential for clinical decision making and determining prognosis and treatments.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study compared electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) seizure threshold determined by stimulus dose titration with age-based estimations. METHOD: Patients with major depressive disorder had their initial seizure thresholds determined by stimulus dose titration and the results compared with age-based estimations. There are no significant differences in thresholds determined by these methods. RESULTS: Two hundred and three psychiatric patients (149 females, 54 males) had their seizure thresholds determined by stimulus dose titration. There was a significant positive correlation between seizure thresholds and age for males and females with male thresholds greater than female thresholds. Age determinations of seizure threshold would have resulted in excessive initial treatment stimuli for 30% of females and 8% of males. Ineffective stimulus doses would have been given to 2% of females and 7% of males on a full age basis and 64% using a half age strategy. CONCLUSIONS: For effective high-dose right unilateral ECT, initial seizure threshold should be determined by stimulus dose titration.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Terapia Electroconvulsiva/efectos adversos , Terapia Electroconvulsiva/métodos , Lateralidad Funcional/fisiología , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Convulsiones/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To review controlled studies of long-term treatment and their side-effects with newer dual action antidepressants following an acute episode of major depression. METHOD: A literature review (MedLine) was undertaken and references were selected for their relevance and methodology in describing their contribution to the examination of our objective. RESULT AND CONCLUSION: Three dual action antidepressants are identified: venlafaxine, mirtazapine and milnacipran. These are more effective and better tolerated than the older tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of an acute episode of depression and in the prevention of relapse. They also offer advantages in that they lack autonomic side-effects of the tricyclics. However, sedation, nausea and sexual side-effects may occur with venlafaxine, and weight gain with mirtazapine.