Renal insufficiency is the leading cause of double maintenance (bevacizumab and pemetrexed) discontinuation for toxicity to advanced non-small cell lung cancer in real world setting.

OBJECTIVES: In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), maintenance therapy has emerged as a novel therapeutic reference for patients with non-progressive disease after platinum-based induction chemotherapy. However, the use of double maintenance (DM) with pemetrexed and bevacizumab is still being evaluated in terms of its clinical benefits and safety profile. The objective of this retrospective study was to describe the reasons for DM discontinuation in a real-world setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC were eligible if they had received at least 4 cycles of induction chemotherapy, followed by at least 1 cycle of DM. They were identified by using the oncology pharmacy database of 17 French centers. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients who began a DM after induction chemotherapy were identified from September 2009 to April 2013. Among the 78 patients who had stopped DM at the time of the analysis, the main reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (42%), adverse events (33%), and personal preference (8%). The most frequent toxicity responsible for DM discontinuation was renal insufficiency (54%). CONCLUSION: For patients with advanced NSCLC eligible for DM therapy, a particular attention should be paid to potential renal failure. Kidney function should be monitored carefully before and during DM to detect and manage early this adverse event.

A randomized phase II trial assessing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with stable disease after two courses of cisplatin-gemcitabine an early modification of chemotherapy doublet with paclitaxel-gemcitabine versus continuation of cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy (GFPC 03-01 Study).

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and stable disease after cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The objective of the trial was to evaluate a switch to a different dual-agent chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer and stable disease after two cycles of cisplatin (P) and gemcitabine (G) (P day1 (d(1)): 75 mg/m(2), G: 1250 mg/m(2) d(1) and d(8) every 3 weeks) were randomized to receive either two further cycles of PG (arm A) or paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2) d(1), d(8), d(15)) plus gemcitabine (1250 mg/m(2) d(1) and d(8), every 4 weeks) (arm B). RESULTS: Two-hundred-twenty-eight patients were enrolled between October 2003 and August 2006. After two cycles of PG, 98 patients (43%) had stable disease; 87 were randomized: 45 to arm A and 42 to arm B. The objective response rates were 15.6% (6.5-29.4) and 21.4% (10.3-36.8) in arms A and B. Overall survival after randomization was 9.6 months (7.0-13.8) in arm A and 9.3 months (7.4-13.3) in arm B. Adverse events were similar in the two arms for hematological and non hematological toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential first-line chemotherapy in these patients is feasible with no difference in response rates. These results do not warrant a phase III trial.