Awareness of social care needs in people with epilepsy and intellectual disability.

BACKGROUND: Nearly a quarter of people with intellectual disability (ID) have epilepsy with large numbers experiencing drug-resistant epilepsy, and premature mortality. To mitigate epilepsy risks the environment and social care needs, particularly in professional care settings, need to be met. PURPOSE: To compare professional care groups as regards their subjective confidence and perceived responsibility when managing the need of people with ID and epilepsy. METHOD: A multi-agency expert panel developed a questionnaire with embedded case vignettes with quantitative and qualitative elements to understand training and confidence in the health and social determinants of people with ID and epilepsy. The cross-sectional survey was disseminated amongst health and social care professionals working with people with ID in the UK using an exponential non-discriminative snow-balling methodology. Group comparisons were undertaken using suitable statistical tests including Fisher's exact, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney. Bonferroni correction was applied to significant (p < 0.05) results. Content analysis was conducted and relevant categories and themes were identified. RESULTS: Social and health professionals (n = 54) rated their confidence to manage the needs of people with ID and epilepsy equally. Health professionals showed better awareness (p < 0.001) of the findings/recommendations of the latest evidence on premature deaths and identifying and managing epilepsy-related risks, including the relevance of nocturnal monitoring. The content analysis highlighted the need for clearer roles, improved care pathways, better epilepsy-specific knowledge, increased resources, and better multi-disciplinary work. CONCLUSIONS: A gap exists between health and social care professionals in awareness of epilepsy needs for people with ID, requiring essential training and national pathways.

National compliance with UK wide guidelines for usage of valproate in women of childbearing potential.

Valproate (VPA) is an effective treatment for epilepsy and also used in bipolar disorder. However, VPA is associated with a significant risk of birth defects and developmental disorders if used during pregnancy. This has led to the introduction of measures to reduce the use of valproate in women of childbearing potential such as the 'Prevent' pregnancy prevention program (PPP) and the completion of an annual risk acknowledgement form (ARAF). The aim of the current audit was to assess compliance with the guidance. An audit tool was made available to neurologists registered with the Association of British Neurologists (ABN) and to epilepsy nurse specialists via the Epilepsy Nurses Association (ESNA) in the UK. Data were collected between November 2020 and March 2021. The main indication for valproate was generalised epilepsy (55.8%), followed by focal (22.5%). For most, there was documentation that the woman had been informed about the risks associated with taking valproate during pregnancy (93.1%) and the need to be on highly effective contraception or that this was not deemed appropriate (92.2%). A signed ARAF was available in the notes for 81.2% although only 66% were <12 months old. Although information had been made available for most women, there were still individuals where this was not documented. Further work is needed to facilitate identification of women taking valproate and implementation of a digital ARAF. For clinicians, the audit highlights a need to carefully counsel women about the teratogenic risks of continuing to take valproate versus the risk of deteriorating seizure control if the drug is withdrawn. This is particularly true of women with focal epilepsy, where there may be safer, equally effective, alternative anti-seizure medication (ASM). The aim should be to create a partnership of trust between the patient and clinician in order to arrive at the best clinical decision for that individual.

Audit of healthcare provision for UK prisoners with suspected epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence and nature of epileptic seizure disorders in a typical UK prison and compare the care offered to prisoners to the recommendations of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). METHODS: Over a 14-month period, all prisoners identified as having epilepsy were registered by prison primary healthcare services at a category 'C' prison holding 640 male adults. Prison and National Health Service health records were reviewed, prisoners were re-assessed by members of a specialist secondary care service based in the local general hospital NHS. RESULTS: Twenty-six prisoners were thought to have epilepsy. 61.5% of diagnoses had not been made by epilepsy specialists, 73.1% had uncontrolled seizures, only 19.2% had had computed tomography, none magnetic resonance imaging. At review, 30.8% of prisoners were thought to require neuroimaging, 19.2% cardiac investigations. The diagnosis of epilepsy was confirmed in only 57.9% of those prisoners considered to have the condition by prison healthcare services. 53.8% of those prisoners confirmed as having epilepsy had not had a medical review in the past 12 months; 63.2% required a change in their antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). CONCLUSION: Although the prevalence of epilepsy in this prison population appeared high at first sight, a critical review of the diagnoses reduced the difference to the prevalence of epilepsy in the population at large. Fewer prisoners than expected achieved seizure control. Collaboration with specialist epilepsy services was poor. There were significant discrepancies between the healthcare provision in prison and the NICE epilepsy guidelines.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of hereditary spherocytosis.

Hereditary spherocytosis (HS) is a heterogeneous group of disorders with regard to clinical severity, protein defects and mode of inheritance. It is relatively common in Caucasian populations; most affected individuals have mild or only moderate haemolysis. There is usually a family history, and a typical clinical and laboratory picture so that the diagnosis is often easily made without additional laboratory tests. Atypical cases may require measurement of erythrocyte membrane proteins to clarify the nature of the membrane disorder and in the absence of a family history, occasionally molecular genetic analysis will help to determine whether inheritance is recessive or non-dominant. It is particularly important to rule out stomatocytosis where splenectomy is contraindicated because of the thrombotic risk. Mild HS can be managed without folate supplements and does not require splenectomy. Moderately and severely affected individuals are likely to benefit from splenectomy, which should be performed after the age of 6 years and with appropriate counselling about the infection risk. In all cases careful dialogue between doctor, patient and the family is essential. Laparoscopic surgery, when performed by experienced surgeons, can result in a shorter hospital stay and less pain.