Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 22(1): 211, 2022 Mar 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35296277

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In many countries, vaginal breech labor at term is an option in selected cases. However, the safety of vaginal breech labor in preterm is still unclear. Therefore our study aimed to evaluate the safety of vaginal breech labor in late preterm deliveries. DESIGN: A retrospective register-based study. SETTING: Maternity hospitals in Finland, 2004-2017. PARTICIPANTS: The study population included 762 preterm breech deliveries at 32 + 0-36 + 6 gestational weeks according to the mode of delivery, 535 (70.2%) of them were born vaginally in breech presentation, and 227 (29.8%) were delivered by non-urgent cesarean section. METHODS: The study compared short-term neonatal adverse outcomes of singleton vaginal breech deliveries with non-urgent cesarean deliveries at 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks of gestation. An odd ratio with 95% confidence intervals was calculated to estimate the relative risk of adverse outcomes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Neonatal death, an arterial umbilical pH below seven, a five-minute Apgar score below four and seven, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, neonatal intubation, neonatal antibiotic therapy, neonatal birth trauma, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal convulsions, cerebral ischemia, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, congenital hypotonia, and a composite of severe adverse outcomes. RESULTS: A five-minute Apgar scores below seven were increased in vaginal breech labor at 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks of gestation compared to non-urgent cesarean sections (aOR 2.48, 95% CI 1.08-5.59). Neonatal antibiotic therapy, the admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome were decreased after vaginal breech labor compared to the outcomes of non-urgent cesarean section (neonatal antibiotic therapy aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40-0.89; neonatal NICU admission aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.68; respiratory distress syndrome aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.48). CONCLUSION: Vaginal breech labor at 32 + 0-36 + 6 gestational weeks does not increase severe neonatal short-term morbidity or mortality compared to cesarean section.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas , Cesárea , Presentación de Nalgas/epidemiología , Presentación de Nalgas/terapia , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 306(1): 29-35, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34718843

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at the age of four after an attempted vaginal delivery according to the fetal presentation in birth. METHODS: This retrospective record linkage study evaluated the risks of cerebral palsy, epilepsy, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and speech, visual, and auditory disabilities among preterm children born after an attempted vaginal breech delivery. The control group comprised children born in a cephalic presentation at the same gestational age. This study included 23 803 singleton deliveries at gestational weeks 24 + 0-36 + 6 between 2004 and 2014. RESULTS: From 1629 women that underwent a trial of vaginal breech delivery, 1122 (66.3%) were converted to emergency cesarean sections. At extremely preterm and very preterm gestations (weeks 24 + 0-31 + 6), no association between a trial of vaginal breech delivery and neurodevelopmental delay occurred. At gestational weeks 32 + 0-36 + 6, the risks of visual disability (aOR 1.67, CI 1.07-2.60) and autism spectrum disorders (aOR 2.28, CI 1.14-4.56) were increased after an attempted vaginal breech delivery as compared to vaginal cephalic delivery. CONCLUSION: A trial of vaginal breech delivery at extremely preterm and very preterm gestations appears not to increase the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at the age of four. In moderate to late preterm births, a trial of vaginal breech delivery was associated with an increased risk of visual impairment and autism spectrum disorders compared to children born in cephalic presentation. A trial of vaginal preterm breech delivery requires distinctive consideration and careful patient selection.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Presentación de Nalgas , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/etiología , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Niño , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 42(1): 49-54, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33938353

RESUMEN

The objective of this retrospective, nationwide Finnish population-based cohort study was to determine whether there is an association between preterm caesarean breech delivery in the first pregnancy and maternal and neonatal morbidity in the subsequent pregnancy and delivery. We identified all singleton preterm breech birth in Finland from 2000 to 2017 (n = 1259) and constructed a data set of the first two deliveries for these women. We compared outcomes of the following pregnancy and delivery among women with a previous preterm caesarean breech section with the outcomes of women with one previous vaginal preterm breech birth. p Value, odds ratio, and adjusted odds ratio were calculated. Neonates of women with a previous caesarean preterm breech delivery had an increased risk for arterial umbilical cord pH below seven (1.2% versus 0%; p value .024) and a higher rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission [22.9% versus 15% adjusted OR 1.57 (1.13-2.18); p value <.001]. The women with a previous caesarean section had a higher rate of uterine rupture (2.3% versus 0%; p value .001). They were also more likely in the subsequent pregnancy to have a planned caesarean section [19.9% versus 4% adjusted OR 8.55 (4.58-15.95), an emergency caesarean section [21.5% versus 9.7% adjusted OR 2.16 (1.28-2.18)], or an instrumental vaginal delivery [9.3% versus 3.8% adjusted OR 2.38 (1.08-5.23)].IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Vaginal birth after caesarean section is generally known to be associated with a higher risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity.What do the results of this study add? The following birth after previous caesarean preterm breech section is associated with a higher rate of uterine rupture and with a higher rate neonatal admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and more often an arterial umbilical cord pH below seven regardless of the mode of the following delivery, compared to women with a subsequent delivery after a previous vaginal preterm breech birth.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our results must be considered when counselling patients regarding their first preterm breech delivery, as the selected method of delivery also affects the outcomes of subsequent pregnancies and deliveries.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas/cirugía , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Nacimiento Prematuro/cirugía , Historia Reproductiva , Adulto , Cesárea Repetida/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vagina
4.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 303(1): 93-101, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32767041

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the risk factors for adverse outcomes in attempted vaginal preterm breech deliveries. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study, including 2312 preterm breech deliveries (24 + 0 to 36 + 6 gestational weeks) from 2004 to 2018 in Finland. The preterm breech fetuses with adverse outcomes born vaginally or by emergency cesarean section were compared with the fetuses without adverse outcomes with the same gestational age. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the risk factors for adverse outcomes (umbilical arterial pH below 7, 5-min Apgar score below 4, intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death < 28 days of age). RESULTS: Adverse outcome in vaginal preterm breech delivery was associated with maternal obesity (aOR 32.19, CI 2.97-348.65), smoking (aOR 2.29, CI 1.12-4.72), congenital anomalies (aOR 4.50, 1.56-12.96), preterm premature rupture of membranes (aOR 1.87, CI 1.00-3.49), oligohydramnios (28-32 weeks of gestation: aOR 6.50, CI 2.00-21.11, 33-36 weeks of gestation: aOR 19.06, CI 7.15-50.85), epidural anesthesia in vaginal birth (aOR 2.44, CI 1.19-5.01), and fetal growth below the second standard deviation (28-32 weeks of gestation: aOR 5.89, CI 1.00-34.74, 33-36 weeks of gestation: aOR 12.27, CI 2.81-53.66). CONCLUSION: The study shows that for each subcategory of preterm birth, there are different risk factors for adverse neonatal outcomes in planned vaginal breech delivery. Due to the extraordinary increased risk of adverse outcomes, we would recommend a planned cesarean section in very preterm breech presentation (28 + 0 to 32 + 6 weeks) with severe maternal obesity, oligohydramnios, or fetal growth restriction and in moderate to late preterm breech presentation (33 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks) with oligohydramnios or fetal growth restriction.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas/epidemiología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto , Anestesia Epidural , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/etiología , Muerte Perinatal , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Mortinato/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 301(2): 393-403, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31741046

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine if the common risks for breech presentation at term labor are also eligible in preterm labor. METHODS: A Finnish cross-sectional study included 737,788 singleton births (24-42 gestational weeks) during 2004-2014. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the risks of breech presentation. RESULTS: The incidence of breech presentation at delivery decreased from 23.5% in pregnancy weeks 24-27 to 2.5% in term pregnancies. In gestational weeks 24-27, preterm premature rupture of membranes was associated with breech presentation. In 28-31 gestational weeks, breech presentation was associated with maternal pre-eclampsia/hypertension, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and fetal birth weight below the tenth percentile. In gestational weeks 32-36, the risks were advanced maternal age, nulliparity, previous cesarean section, preterm premature rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios, birth weight below the tenth percentile, female sex, and congenital anomaly. In term pregnancies, breech presentation was associated with advanced maternal age, nulliparity, maternal hypothyroidism, pre-gestational diabetes, placenta praevia, premature rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios, congenital anomaly, female sex, and birth weight below the tenth percentile. CONCLUSION: Breech presentation in preterm labor is associated with obstetric risk factors compared to cephalic presentation. These risks decrease linearly with the gestational age. In moderate to late preterm delivery, breech presentation is a high-risk state and some obstetric risk factors are yet visible in early preterm delivery. Breech presentation in extremely preterm deliveries has, with the exception of preterm premature rupture of membranes, similar clinical risk profiles as in cephalic presentation.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas/epidemiología , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto , Peso al Nacer , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Edad Materna , Paridad , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
6.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 302(1): 85-91, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32409926

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine whether there is an association between term cesarean breech delivery in the first pregnancy and maternal and neonatal morbidities in the subsequent pregnancy and delivery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, nationwide Finnish population-based cohort study, including all deliveries from January 2000 to December 2017. We included all women with the first two consecutive singleton deliveries of which the first one was a breech delivery regardless of mode of delivery (n = 11,953), and constructed a data set in which the first two deliveries for these women were connected. The outcomes of the second delivery of the women with a first pregnancy that resulted in cesarean breech delivery at term were compared with women whose first pregnancy resulted in a vaginal breech delivery at term. P-value, odds ratio, and adjusted odds ratio were calculated. RESULTS: Neonates of a subsequent delivery after cesarean breech delivery had an increased risk for arterial umbilical cord pH below seven, a higher rate of a 5 min APGAR score < 7 and a higher rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission. The women with a history of cesarean section with the fetus in breech presentation were more often in need of a blood transfusion and suffered more often a uterus rupture. In this group, the second delivery was more often a planned cesarean section, an emergency cesarean section, or an instrumental vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Primary cesarean breech section in the first pregnancy is associated with adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes in the subsequent delivery.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Nacimiento a Término , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Número de Embarazos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rotura Uterina/epidemiología
7.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 299(4): 969-974, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30734863

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a trial of planned vaginal labor is associated with adverse perinatal outcome in singleton, small for gestational agefetuses in breech presentation at term. METHODS: This is a Finnish nationwide, population-based record linkage study. The studied population included all small for gestational age breech labors from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2014. "Small for gestational age" was defined as birth weight below the 10th percentile according to gestational age. An odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals was used to estimate the relative risk for perinatal mortality and morbidity in a trial of vaginal labor. The reference group included all small for gestational age infants born in breech presentation by planned cesarean section. RESULTS: During the study period of eleven years, 1841 small for gestational age infants were delivered in breech position at term. A trial of vaginal breech labor is associated with a higher rate of neonates with an umbilical pH below seven [odds ratio 7.82 (1-61.21)], a lower 5-min Apgar score < 7 [adjusted odds ratio 6.39 (1.43-28.46)] and < 4 [adjusted odds ratio 6.39 (1.43-28.46)], a higher rate of postpartum neonatal intubations [adjusted odds ratio 6.52 (1.93-22)], an increased rate of neonatal antibiotic therapy [adjusted odds ratio 3.31 (1.85-5.93)], and with a higher rate of combined severe adverse perinatal outcome [adjusted odds ratio 4.24 (1.43-12.61)]. CONCLUSION: A trial of vaginal breech labor in SGA fetuses is associated with adverse perinatal outcome and should be avoided.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas/epidemiología , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Edad Gestacional , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Adulto Joven
8.
Congenit Anom (Kyoto) ; 61(4): 112-117, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33559256

RESUMEN

Our study aimed to determine if congenital anomalies are associated with breech presentation at delivery. We conducted a nationwide, retrospective population-based record linkage study and analyzed all singleton births in Finland from 1996 to 2016 using the mandatory health register data collected by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. We compared all major congenital anomalies detected during pregnancy, birth, or the first year of life according to the fetus's presentation at the time of delivery using X2 -square statistic and Student's t test. We adjusted the results for known risk factors for congenital anomalies to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Fetuses in breech presentation at delivery had an increased risk for congenital anomalies (6.5%) compared with fetuses in cephalic presentation (3.6%), P < .001. Breech presentation was associated with nearly all types of examined congenital anomalies. The strongest associations were observed with congenital deformities of the hip, the central nervous system, the respiratory system, and the musculoskeletal system. Our study supports the theory that breech presentation is, in many cases, a symptom of a fundamental problem in fetal morphogenesis or function. Neonates born in the breech presentation have a higher risk of congenital anomalies and should undergo a postnatal screening.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas/epidemiología , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Adulto , Presentación de Nalgas/etiología , Anomalías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Anomalías Congénitas/genética , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Vigilancia de la Población , Embarazo , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA