Antiproliferative effects of gefitinib are associated with suppression of E2F-1 expression and telomerase activity.

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839) is a selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. E2F-1 is a critical determinant in cell cycle. Growth signals up-regulate telomerase activity. The effects of gefitinib on E2F-1 and telomerase in A549, H23 and A431 cells were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cell proliferation and cell cycle progression were measured by the WST-1 assay and flow cytometry. The expression of E2F-1 and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors was evaluated, and hTERT mRNA expression and telomerase activity were analyzed. RESULTS: In the A431 and A549 cells, treatment with gefitinib inhibited cell proliferation and was associated with an increase in G1-phase. In both cell types, gefitinib decreased the expression of E2F-1 mRNA and protein, followed by the suppression of hTERT mRNA and telomerase activity. In the H23 cells, gefitinib did not affect cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: The antiproliferative effects of gefitinib may be, at least in part, due to the inhibition of E2F-1 expression and telomerase activity.

HTLV-I Tax protein inhibits apoptosis induction but not G1 arrest by pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate, an anti-oxidant, in adult T cell leukemia cells.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the anti-tumor effect of pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDTC) on HTLV-1-infected T clones and the mechanism of HTLV-1 Tax protein inhibition of PDTC-induced apoptosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tax-nonproducing clones S1T and Su9T01, Tax-producing clones K3T and F6T, and Tax cDNA stably transfected S1TcTax clones S1TcTax04 and S1TcTax05 were examined for PDTC inhibition of thymidine incorporation and apoptosis induction by ISEL method. In addition, S1TcTax clones were analyzed by DNA histography and DNA fragmentation and also examined for p53, p21, or Bax protein expression by Western blot. RESULTS: PDTC inhibited thymidine incorporation of all four HTLV-1-infected T cells in a similar dose-dependent manner, but K3T and F6T were more resistant than S1T and Su9T01 in apoptosis induction. S1TcTax clones also showed resistance to PDTC-induced apoptosis as compared to Tax-nonproducing S1T and S1Tneo. DNA histography demonstrated that PDTC induces G1 arrest and apoptosis in S1T and S1Tneo, and that S1TcTax clones are also sensitive to PDTC in G1 arrest but resistant in apoptosis induction. DNA fragmentation also demonstrated ladder formation only in S1Tneo but not in S1TcTax04. Western blots demonstrated higher expression of p53 and p21 proteins in S1Tneo than in S1TcTax04 during whole phase after PDTC stimulation with moderate enhancement in S1Tneo but small in S1TcTax04. Bax protein expression was detected only at early phase in S1Tneo but was not detected in S1TcTax04. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that PDTC-induced apoptosis is related with Bax, and that G1 arrest is possibly related with p21. Tax might inhibit apoptosis induction mainly via inhibition of Bax expression preceded at least in part by p53 inhibition.

Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I Tax activates lung resistance-related protein expression in leukemic clones established from an adult T-cell leukemia patient.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the significance of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) Tax protein-induced resistance to anticancer drugs and the relationship between Tax and multidrug resistance proteins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: S1T cell, a leukemic non-Tax-producing T-cell clone established from an adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) patient, S1TcTax05 and S1TcTax10 clones, transfected with Tax stably expressing cDNA, and S1Tneo, transfected with a neomycin-resistant gene, were examined for Tax-related anticancer drug resistance. Resistance of those cells to the anticancer drugs doxorubicin, etoposide, cisplatin, and vindesine was tested with the MTT method. Expression of multidrug resistance protein mRNAs (MDR1, MRP1, cMOAT/MRP2, and LRP) was analyzed with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Doxorubicin subcellular distribution in those cells was examined by fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: S1TcTax05 and S1TcTax10 showed resistance to doxorubicin, etoposide, and vindesine, but not to cisplatin as compared with S1T or S1Tneo. RT-PCR demonstrated that MRP1 mRNA was expressed, but MDR1, cMOAT, and LRP mRNAs were not in S1T or S1Tneo. Marked expression of LRP mRNA was detected, but no change of MDR1, MRP1, or cMOAT mRNA expression in Tax-expressing S1TcTax05 and S1TcTax10. Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that doxorubicin was distributed mainly in the cytoplasm of S1TcTax05 and S1TcTax10, and in the nucleus of S1T and S1Tneo. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that Tax-related drug resistance of ATL cells is due to LRP and not MDR1, as reported previously. These findings in cells derived from an ATL patient suggest a novel mechanism for drug resistance in Tax-expressing ATL cells.